List of Excipients in Branded Drug YUSIMRY
YUSIMRY Excipient Strategy and Commercial Opportunities
YUSIMRY (adalimumab-aqvh) is Coherus BioSciences’ biosimilar to Humira (adalimumab). Its commercial position depends less on novel excipient intellectual property than on formulation reliability, supply economics, device usability, payer access and contracting. YUSIMRY is FDA-approved for multiple inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa. It was approved in October 2022 and launched in the United States in 2023. [1][2]
The formulation uses a conventional protein-stabilization system centered on mannitol and polysorbate 80 in water for injection. This profile supports a relatively simple excipient supply chain, but it limits opportunities to claim composition-of-matter protection. The stronger commercial opportunities are in high-concentration reformulation, citrate-free or low-volume delivery, autoinjectors, pediatric presentations, regional licensing and manufacturing-cost reduction.
What excipients are used in YUSIMRY?
YUSIMRY is supplied as a sterile, preservative-free solution of adalimumab-aqvh for subcutaneous injection. The FDA prescribing information identifies mannitol, polysorbate 80 and water for injection as inactive ingredients. [1]
| Component | Function in YUSIMRY | Commercial relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Mannitol | Tonicity adjustment and protein-stability support | Widely available, low-cost excipient with established parenteral use |
| Polysorbate 80 | Limits protein adsorption and aggregation at air-liquid and container surfaces | Critical quality attribute; oxidation and degradation must be controlled |
| Water for injection | Vehicle | Standard sterile injectable component |
| Adalimumab-aqvh | Active monoclonal antibody | Requires control of aggregation, particulates, potency and immunogenicity |
YUSIMRY is a 40 mg/0.8 mL presentation, corresponding to a 50 mg/mL concentration. The product is supplied in a single-dose prefilled syringe. [1] The lower concentration and larger injection volume distinguish it from the high-concentration 40 mg/0.4 mL Humira presentation.
Does YUSIMRY contain citrate?
The FDA label identifies mannitol and polysorbate 80 among YUSIMRY’s inactive ingredients and does not list citrate as an inactive ingredient. [1] This is commercially relevant because citrate-containing adalimumab formulations were associated with injection-site discomfort, while later Humira formulations were marketed as citrate-free. YUSIMRY’s excipient profile can therefore support a patient-comfort message, although the product is not automatically interchangeable with every citrate-free adalimumab presentation.
How does the YUSIMRY formulation compare with Humira?
YUSIMRY was developed to be highly similar to Humira, but biosimilarity does not require identical inactive ingredients. FDA approval was based on analytical, nonclinical and clinical evidence showing no clinically meaningful differences from the reference product. [1][3]
| Attribute | YUSIMRY | Humira high-concentration presentation |
|---|---|---|
| Active ingredient | Adalimumab-aqvh | Adalimumab |
| FDA pathway | Biosimilar | Reference biologic |
| Typical strength | 40 mg/0.8 mL, 50 mg/mL | 40 mg/0.4 mL, 100 mg/mL |
| Primary excipient strategy | Mannitol and polysorbate 80 in water for injection | Formulation varies by presentation and manufacturing version |
| Delivery | Single-dose prefilled syringe | Prefilled syringe, pen and other presentations |
| Interchangeability | Not designated interchangeable by FDA | Reference product |
| Patent status | No Orange Book listing | Humira patent estate and settlement history affected launch timing |
The practical difference is injection volume. YUSIMRY’s 0.8 mL dose is twice the volume of Humira’s 0.4 mL high-concentration dose. That can affect patient preference, device development and competitive positioning. A future YUSIMRY reformulation at 100 mg/mL could reduce this disadvantage, but it would require additional analytical, stability, device and regulatory work.
What formulation opportunities exist for YUSIMRY?
The most valuable formulation opportunities are not likely to arise from adding a novel excipient. They are more likely to come from improving the interaction between the antibody, excipient system and delivery device.
High-concentration adalimumab
A high-concentration YUSIMRY formulation could provide:
- A 40 mg dose in approximately 0.4 mL.
- Reduced injection burden.
- Better positioning against Humira citrate-free 100 mg/mL products.
- Greater suitability for autoinjector delivery.
- Potential differentiation in specialty-pharmacy formularies.
The technical challenge is maintaining protein stability at higher concentration. Increasing antibody concentration can raise viscosity, aggregation risk, opalescence and injection force. Changes in mannitol or surfactant levels may affect osmolality, subvisible particles and long-term stability. A new strength could also require a supplemental FDA submission and device-specific human-factors work.
Alternative surfactant systems
Polysorbate 80 is established and inexpensive, but it has known degradation pathways, including hydrolysis and oxidation. Degradation can generate fatty acids, increase particles and affect protein stability. [4] Commercial development could evaluate:
- Polysorbate 20.
- Poloxamers.
- Low-peroxide surfactant grades.
- Stabilized or tightly controlled polysorbate 80.
- Surfactant-free formulations where feasible.
The business value would depend on measurable gains in shelf life, shipping robustness, particulate control or compatibility with a high-concentration formulation. A surfactant substitution without a patient or manufacturing benefit would have limited commercial value.
Buffer and pH optimization
YUSIMRY’s current inactive-ingredient disclosure does not identify a conventional buffer as a principal excipient. A future formulation could evaluate histidine, phosphate, acetate or other buffering systems. Buffer changes can affect:
- Deamidation and oxidation.
- Aggregation.
- Injection-site tolerability.
- Container closure compatibility.
- Freeze-thaw and temperature-excursion stability.
The strongest patent strategy would claim a defined combination of adalimumab concentration, pH range, excipient concentration, container and stability performance. A broad claim to mannitol plus polysorbate 80 would face significant prior-art and obviousness exposure.
Lyophilized or alternative dosage forms
A lyophilized YUSIMRY presentation could improve storage stability but would add reconstitution steps, manufacturing cost and administration complexity. It would be less competitive with ready-to-use prefilled syringes and autoinjectors.
Other possibilities include:
- Wearable or on-body delivery for larger-volume doses.
- Dual-chamber systems.
- Prefilled cartridges.
- Room-temperature-stable products.
- Pediatric low-dose presentations.
The commercial priority is likely a ready-to-use, low-volume, high-concentration product rather than a lyophilized product.
What patents protect YUSIMRY’s excipient strategy?
YUSIMRY’s core commercial protection does not come from an Orange Book patent estate. Biologics are recorded in the FDA Purple Book rather than the Orange Book, and YUSIMRY is not an FDA-designated interchangeable biosimilar. [3][5]
The relevant intellectual-property categories are:
| IP category | Relevance to YUSIMRY | Likely strength |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab composition patents | Primarily held by the Humira reference-product owner; generally expired or commercially exhausted in the U.S. before YUSIMRY launch | Low for YUSIMRY |
| Biosimilar manufacturing patents | Cell line, culture, purification and process-control claims | Potentially moderate to strong if narrowly enabled |
| Formulation patents | Concentration, pH, surfactant, stabilizer and stability claims | Moderate if supported by unexpected performance |
| Device patents | Syringe, autoinjector, needle shield and delivery mechanics | Moderate to strong depending on ownership |
| Use patents | Indications and dosing regimens | Relevant to labeling and litigation |
| Trade secrets | Cell culture parameters, purification conditions and analytical controls | Potentially strong but not publicly visible |
A formulation patent covering standard mannitol and polysorbate 80 concentrations would face prior-art risk because those excipients are common in antibody formulations. A more defensible claim would combine specific concentration ranges with demonstrated technical effects, such as reduced aggregation after thermal stress, improved syringe stability or lower injection force.
What is the FDA regulatory status of YUSIMRY?
YUSIMRY received FDA approval under the biosimilar pathway in section 351(k) of the Public Health Service Act. [1] The approved product is indicated for:
- Rheumatoid arthritis.
- Juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
- Psoriatic arthritis.
- Ankylosing spondylitis.
- Crohn’s disease.
- Ulcerative colitis.
- Plaque psoriasis.
- Hidradenitis suppurativa.
- Uveitis.
The product was approved as biosimilar to Humira but not as interchangeable. Under U.S. law, non-interchangeable biosimilars may still be prescribed and dispensed according to state substitution rules, but they do not receive the same automatic-substitution designation as an interchangeable product.
Does YUSIMRY have an Orange Book listing?
No. YUSIMRY is a biologic and is tracked through FDA’s Purple Book rather than the Orange Book. The Orange Book is principally used for approved small-molecule drugs and related patent and exclusivity information. Biosimilar reference-product disputes are handled through the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act framework, including patent-information exchanges and litigation under the patent-dispute process. [3][5]
When did YUSIMRY lose exclusivity, and when can generics launch?
YUSIMRY does not have traditional small-molecule generic exclusivity. Its market entry was governed by the Humira patent settlement landscape and the statutory biosimilar framework.
| Milestone | Date or status |
|---|---|
| Humira U.S. approval | 2002 |
| YUSIMRY FDA approval | October 2022 |
| U.S. commercial launch | 2023 |
| Biosimilar designation | Yes |
| Interchangeable designation | No |
| Small-molecule generic exclusivity | Not applicable |
| Biosimilar substitution | Governed by FDA designation and state law |
| Humira patent litigation | Resolved through manufacturer-specific settlements and launch licenses |
YUSIMRY entered after the U.S. launch date permitted under Coherus’ settlement arrangements with AbbVie. AbbVie reached separate settlement agreements with multiple adalimumab biosimilar developers, producing staggered launch dates during 2023. [6][7]
Which companies compete with YUSIMRY?
YUSIMRY competes in a crowded U.S. adalimumab biosimilar market. Major competitors include:
- Amjevita, marketed by Amgen.
- Cyltezo, marketed by Boehringer Ingelheim.
- Hyrimoz, marketed by Sandoz.
- Hadlima, marketed by Organon and Samsung Bioepis.
- Abrilada, marketed by Pfizer.
- Simlandi, marketed by Teva and Alvotech.
- Idacio, marketed by Fresenius Kabi.
- Hulio, marketed by Biocon Biologics.
- Adalimumab-adbm and other approved products.
The competitive variable is not only price. Products compete on:
- WAC and net price.
- Interchangeability.
- High-concentration dosing.
- Autoinjector design.
- Payer formulary placement.
- Specialty-pharmacy distribution.
- Patient-support services.
- Manufacturing reliability.
- Indication breadth.
- Contracting with integrated delivery networks.
Cyltezo received FDA interchangeable designation, giving it a regulatory distinction that YUSIMRY does not currently have. [8] That distinction can affect pharmacy substitution and payer policy, particularly where formularies favor automatic substitution.
What commercial opportunities exist for YUSIMRY excipients?
Can excipient suppliers create value?
Yes, but the opportunity is primarily operational and formulation-driven. Potential supplier value includes:
- Low-peroxide polysorbate 80 grades with tighter oxidation controls.
- Pharmaceutical-grade mannitol with controlled particle and endotoxin profiles.
- Excipient packages qualified for high-concentration monoclonal antibodies.
- Single-use manufacturing components with lower leachable risk.
- Stabilizer systems that support longer room-temperature excursions.
- Analytical methods for surfactant degradation and particulate monitoring.
The supplier with the strongest position will not necessarily offer the lowest unit price. Qualification history, global regulatory documentation, lot consistency and supply continuity are important because switching excipients in a commercial biologic can require comparability work and regulatory review.
What licensing opportunities exist?
Potential licensing targets include:
- High-concentration adalimumab formulations.
- Autoinjector and wearable delivery systems.
- Interchangeable biosimilar development rights.
- Regional commercialization rights.
- Contract manufacturing in Europe, Asia or Latin America.
- Pediatric and low-dose presentations.
- Room-temperature-stable formulations.
- Formulation analytics and comparability platforms.
Coherus has used commercial partnerships and channel arrangements to expand access to its biosimilar portfolio. Its partnership with Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company placed YUSIMRY within a low-cost distribution model, demonstrating that distribution economics can be as important as excipient differentiation. [9]
What manufacturing and IP barriers affect YUSIMRY?
The main barriers are not the cost of mannitol or polysorbate 80. They are:
- Mammalian cell-culture productivity.
- Viral clearance validation.
- Aggregate and particle control.
- Batch-to-batch similarity.
- Cold-chain distribution.
- Device assembly.
- Fill-finish capacity.
- Biosimilarity analytics.
- Immunogenicity monitoring.
- Regulatory comparability for formulation changes.
A reformulation can create a new patent opportunity but also introduce regulatory risk. Changes to concentration, excipient grade, surfactant level, container closure or delivery device may require new comparability studies. The commercial case must show that the change improves price realization, adherence, substitution, shelf life or manufacturing cost.
How strong is the YUSIMRY patent estate?
YUSIMRY’s excipient patent estate is likely weaker than its manufacturing know-how and commercial contracting position. Standard excipients are difficult to protect broadly. The strongest defensible assets would be:
- A high-concentration formulation with demonstrated stability.
- A low-volume delivery system.
- A formulation-device combination.
- A process that improves yield or reduces aggregate formation.
- A manufacturing method with measurable cost or quality benefits.
- A stability package that supports less restrictive distribution.
The weakest strategy would be a narrow patent directed only to conventional mannitol and polysorbate 80 use without unexpected results.
What generic launch risks exist for YUSIMRY?
YUSIMRY faces biosimilar competition rather than traditional generic competition. Key risks include:
| Risk | Impact |
|---|---|
| Interchangeable competitors | May reduce prescribing friction and improve automatic substitution |
| High-concentration competitors | May make YUSIMRY’s 0.8 mL presentation less attractive |
| Payer consolidation | Can compress net price and favor a limited number of suppliers |
| Price erosion | Reduces return on formulation and manufacturing investment |
| Supply disruptions | Can cause formulary displacement |
| Device differentiation | Can shift prescriber and patient preference |
| New indications or label changes | Can alter contracting value across specialties |
| International price controls | Limit regional licensing returns |
Key Takeaways
- YUSIMRY is a 50 mg/mL adalimumab biosimilar supplied as 40 mg/0.8 mL.
- Its listed excipients are mannitol, polysorbate 80 and water for injection.
- The formulation is commercially practical but offers limited broad composition-of-matter patent potential.
- The largest formulation opportunity is a 100 mg/mL, low-volume, patient-friendly presentation.
- Polysorbate degradation, aggregation, viscosity and injection force are the main technical issues for reformulation.
- YUSIMRY is tracked in the Purple Book, not the Orange Book.
- It is FDA-approved as a biosimilar but not designated interchangeable.
- Commercial performance depends on payer contracts, price, supply continuity, device usability and distribution.
- Manufacturing know-how and device rights may be more valuable than conventional excipient patents.
- Formulation licensing, high-concentration development and low-cost regional manufacturing are the most credible commercial opportunities.
FAQs
Is YUSIMRY citrate-free?
The FDA label identifies mannitol and polysorbate 80 as inactive ingredients and does not list citrate. [1]
Can YUSIMRY be automatically substituted for Humira?
YUSIMRY is not FDA-designated interchangeable. Substitution depends on state law, payer policy and pharmacy practice.
Is YUSIMRY a generic drug?
No. YUSIMRY is a biologic biosimilar, not a traditional small-molecule generic.
Could YUSIMRY be reformulated at 100 mg/mL?
Yes, but the program would require formulation, stability, device, comparability and regulatory work. Higher concentration can increase viscosity, aggregation and injection force.
Which excipient is the largest technical risk in YUSIMRY?
Polysorbate 80 is the principal excipient risk because oxidation and hydrolysis can produce degradation products and contribute to particle formation. Mannitol is generally lower risk but still requires control of grade, purity and tonicity.
References
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022). YUSIMRY (adalimumab-aqvh) injection, prescribing information.
- Coherus BioSciences, Inc. (2023). Coherus announces U.S. launch of YUSIMRY, an interchangeable? [Commercial release concerning YUSIMRY launch].
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Purple Book: Lists of licensed biological products with reference product exclusivity and biosimilarity or interchangeability evaluations.
- Kerwin, B. A. (2008). Polysorbates 20 and 80 used in the formulation of protein biotherapeutics: Structure and degradation pathways. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 97(8), 2924-2935.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations, Orange Book.
- AbbVie Inc. (2023). Humira patent settlement and biosimilar launch agreements.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). FDA-approved adalimumab biosimilar products.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2019). Cyltezo (adalimumab-adbm) approval and interchangeability designation.
- Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company. (2023). YUSIMRY distribution and pricing announcement.
More… ↓
Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing
Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.
Alerts Available With Subscription
Alerts are available for users with active subscriptions.
Visit the Subscription Options page for details on plans and pricing.
ISSN: 2162-2639

Privacy and Cookies
Terms & Conditions
Site Map
DrugPatentWatch Alternatives
LOE / Major Patent Expirations 2026 - 2027
NCE-1 Patent Challenge Dates 2026 - 2027
Friedman, Yali. "DrugPatentWatch" DrugPatentWatch, thinkBiotech, 2026, www.DrugPatentWatch.com.
See Primary Research Papers Citing DrugPatentWatch
Access the Complete Database
Make Better Decisions
- Identify first generic entrants
- Uncover prior art in expired and abandoned patents
- Obtain formulation and manufacturing information