You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

List of Excipients in Branded Drug SOUND BODY MUCUS DM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Excipient Strategy and Commercial Opportunities for SOUND BODY MUCUS DM

Last updated: March 1, 2026

What is the composition and current formulation of SOUND BODY MUCUS DM?

SOUND BODY MUCUS DM is a combination cough and cold medication. Its active ingredients are typically dextromethorphan HBr (30 mg per dose) and guaifenesin (200 mg per dose). The formulation aims to suppress cough and loosen mucus.

The excipients used often include:

  • Microcrystalline cellulose (filler)
  • Sodium starch glycolate (disintegrant)
  • Magnesium stearate (lubricant)
  • Titanium dioxide (opacifier)
  • Pregelatinized starch (binder)

These excipients aid in tablet stability, solubility, disintegration, and palatability.

How does excipient choice influence the product’s efficacy, stability, and manufacturability?

Efficacy

Excipients like disintegrants facilitate rapid breakdown in the gastrointestinal tract, ensuring prompt drug release. For SOUND BODY MUCUS DM, rapid disintegration improves onset of action.

Stability

Colorants like titanium dioxide protect active ingredients from photodegradation. Bind tightly with active ingredients to prevent separation and degradation during shelf life.

Manufacturability

Flowability, compressibility, and lubricity of excipients influence production yield and quality. Microcrystalline cellulose supports compaction, while magnesium stearate prevents tablet sticking.

What are key considerations in formulating SOUND BODY MUCUS DM with excipients?

  • Taste masking: Guaifenesin is gritty; flavoring agents or sweeteners should reduce bitterness.
  • Disintegration: Fast-dissolving formulations enhance quick relief.
  • Compatibility: Excipients should not react with active ingredients or degrade over shelf life.
  • Regulatory compliance: Excipients must meet pharmacopeial standards (USP, EP, JP).

What commercial opportunities exist in excipient development?

Development of novel excipients

  • Use of superdisintegrants like crospovidone for faster disintegration.
  • Taste-masking polymers to improve patient compliance.

Formulation innovations

  • Orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs):Expand market for non-water-necessary formulations.
  • Extended-release forms: Offer for sustained symptom relief.

Supply chain enhancements

  • Custom excipient blends optimized for stability and manufacturability.
  • Sourcing high-purity excipients to reduce regulatory hurdles.

Market expansion

  • Developing formulations suitable for pediatric or geriatric populations.
  • JVs with excipient manufacturers to reduce costs and ensure supply stability.

How do regulatory and patent considerations impact excipient strategies?

  • Regulatory approvals depend on excipient safety and compatibility.
  • Patents on novel excipients or formulations can offer exclusivity.
  • Standard excipients are available globally but may face regional restrictions.

What are the potential risks associated with excipient strategies?

  • Adverse reactions or allergies (e.g., lactose, colorants).
  • Interactions with active ingredients affecting bioavailability.
  • Stability issues during manufacturing or shelf life.
  • Supply chain disruptions for key excipients.

Comparative analysis of excipient strategies

Strategy Description Advantages Risks
Use of conventional excipients Microcrystalline cellulose, sodium starch glycolate Cost-effective, well-understood Limited rapid-release capabilities
Incorporation of novel excipients Crospovidone, taste-masking polymers Faster disintegration, better taste Regulatory hurdles, higher costs
Formulation of ODTs Rapidly disintegrating tablets Ease of administration Stability challenges, packaging costs
Extended-release formulations Coated beads or matrices Longer relief, fewer doses Complexity in manufacturing

Key Takeaways

  • Excipient selection influences formulation performance, stability, and patient compliance.
  • Opportunities exist in developing novel excipients and advanced delivery systems.
  • Regulatory pathways favor well-characterized excipients but can restrict innovation.
  • Developing formulations for specific populations and extending shelf life can expand market potential.
  • Supply chain management and patent considerations are critical for competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. What excipients are critical for taste masking in cough medicines?
Sweeteners like sucralose or flavoring agents combined with polymers such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose improve taste masking.

2. Can proprietary excipients provide a competitive edge?
Yes, if they offer enhanced performance or stability and meet regulatory standards, they can differentiate a product.

3. Are there regional differences in excipient regulatory approval?
Yes, some excipients are restricted or require additional safety data in certain markets, influencing formulation choices.

4. What excipient-related challenges are common in ODT formulations?
Stability, moisture sensitivity, and ensuring rapid disintegration without compromising shelf life.

5. How does excipient selection impact manufacturing costs?
Excipients that require complex processing or special packaging increase production expenses, affecting profitability.


References

[1] U.S. Pharmacopeia. (2022). USP General Chapter <1075> Good Preparations Manufacturing Practice.
[2] European Pharmacopoeia. (2022). Ph. Eur. Monograph on excipients.
[3] Li, L., & Wang, Y. (2020). Advances in excipient development for oral solid dosage forms. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 109(5), 1464–1476.
[4] Smith, A. (2021). Novel excipients for improving drug delivery systems. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 47(4), 515–529.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.