Share This Page
List of Excipients in Branded Drug ETHACRYNATE SODIUM
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Generic Drugs Containing ETHACRYNATE SODIUM
| Company | Ingredient | NDC | Excipient |
|---|---|---|---|
| Par Health USA LLC | ethacrynate sodium | 42023-157 | MANNITOL |
| Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA Inc | ethacrynate sodium | 68382-246 | MANNITOL |
| Leading Pharma LLC | ethacrynate sodium | 69315-701 | MANNITOL |
| Zydus Lifesciences Limited | ethacrynate sodium | 70771-1106 | MANNITOL |
| >Company | >Ingredient | >NDC | >Excipient |
What are the Most Frequently-Used Excipients in ETHACRYNATE SODIUM?
| # Of NDCs | Excipient |
|---|---|
| 4 | MANNITOL |
| ># Of NDCs | >Excipient |
Ethacrynate Sodium Excipient Strategy and Commercial Opportunities
Ethacrynate sodium is the injectable sodium salt of ethacrynic acid, a loop diuretic used when rapid diuresis is required or when a sulfonamide-containing loop diuretic may be unsuitable. Its commercial opportunity is limited by low volume, safety concerns, legacy-product status and competition from furosemide, bumetanide and torsemide. The strongest formulation opportunities are injectable stability, ready-to-use hospital presentations, low-volume reconstitution, oral liquid dosing and excipient systems that reduce administration errors.
What is ethacrynate sodium and how is it used?
Ethacrynate sodium is administered intravenously after reconstitution. The active moiety, ethacrynic acid, inhibits the Na-K-2Cl cotransporter in the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle. It is generally reserved for patients requiring potent diuresis, including patients with congestive heart failure, hepatic disease, renal disease or sulfonamide hypersensitivity concerns.
The principal commercial product is Edecrin, which has been marketed in oral ethacrynic acid tablets and injectable ethacrynate sodium presentations. FDA labeling identifies the injection as a sterile lyophilized or dry formulation requiring reconstitution before administration. The product is hospital-oriented rather than a high-volume retail medicine.[1]
Key product attributes
| Attribute | Ethacrynate sodium |
|---|---|
| Active moiety | Ethacrynic acid |
| Drug class | Loop diuretic |
| Primary route | Intravenous for ethacrynate sodium |
| Oral counterpart | Ethacrynic acid tablets |
| Main clinical niche | Potent diuresis, including patients with sulfonamide allergy concerns |
| Primary commercial channel | Hospitals, emergency care and specialty pharmacy |
| Main competitors | Furosemide, bumetanide and torsemide |
| Principal formulation risk | Stability, reconstitution and ototoxicity-related dose control |
| Patent profile | Legacy active ingredient with no credible basis for assuming active composition-of-matter protection |
What excipients are used in ethacrynate sodium injection?
The core excipient requirement is a stable, water-soluble sodium salt that can be reconstituted rapidly for intravenous administration. Public labeling for legacy ethacrynate sodium injection identifies mannitol as a principal inactive ingredient in the vial presentation, with sterile water used for reconstitution.[1,2]
Mannitol is commercially logical because it can:
- Improve cake structure in a lyophilized product.
- Provide bulking capacity at low drug load.
- Support an acceptable reconstitution profile.
- Avoid chloride, sulfate and other counterions that may complicate parenteral formulation.
- Fit existing hospital compounding practices.
The formulation must control pH because ethacrynic acid has limited intrinsic aqueous solubility, while the sodium salt is more soluble under alkaline conditions. Excessively alkaline conditions can increase chemical degradation, cause infusion-site concerns or reduce compatibility with other intravenous products.
Likely excipient functions
| Excipient category | Potential role | Commercial relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Mannitol | Bulking agent and lyophilization aid | Established hospital-injection profile |
| Sodium hydroxide or other alkalinizing agent | pH adjustment and salt formation | May improve solubility |
| Hydrochloric acid or equivalent acid | Final pH adjustment | Requires tight control to avoid precipitation |
| Water for injection | Reconstitution vehicle | Standard hospital administration |
| Nitrogen headspace | Oxygen reduction | May reduce oxidative degradation |
| Surfactant | Wetting or reconstitution support | Must be justified for parenteral safety |
| Buffer system | pH control | May affect compatibility and stability |
| Antioxidant or chelator | Oxidative degradation control | Requires impurity and safety assessment |
A preservative-free single-dose vial is the most defensible commercial design. A multidose presentation would create preservative, sterility, compatibility and labeling burdens without an obvious commercial advantage in a low-volume emergency-care product.
What excipient strategy is most suitable for ethacrynate sodium?
The preferred strategy is a conservative parenteral platform based on a lyophilized sodium salt, mannitol, controlled alkalinity and a short reconstitution time.
Recommended reference formulation concept
| Formulation element | Recommended approach |
|---|---|
| Drug substance | Ethacrynate sodium with controlled water and residual-solvent specifications |
| Dosage form | Sterile lyophilized powder |
| Bulking agent | Mannitol or a mannitol-dominant system |
| pH | Mildly alkaline after reconstitution, within validated product limits |
| Container | Type I glass vial with elastomeric stopper |
| Presentation | Single-dose vial |
| Reconstitution | Sterile water for injection |
| Administration | Direct intravenous injection or validated dilution into compatible fluid |
| Oxygen control | Nitrogen flushing or low-oxygen fill environment if degradation supports the approach |
| Preservatives | Preferably none |
A reformulator should avoid unnecessary excipients. Ethacrynate sodium has a narrow commercial niche, and each additional excipient creates a new burden for extractables and leachables, parenteral safety, particulate control, compatibility and regulatory justification.
What formulation patents could protect an ethacrynate sodium product?
New composition-of-matter protection for ethacrynate sodium is unlikely to be available because the active ingredient is an established drug. Commercial protection would need to come from formulation, device, process or use claims.
Potential claim areas include:
-
Stable lyophilized composition
Claims could cover ethacrynate sodium, mannitol and a defined residual-moisture range that improves stability. -
Reconstitution performance
A product could be differentiated by reconstitution in less than a defined period, reduced foaming or reduced undissolved particulate matter. -
Ready-to-use solution
A stable premixed intravenous solution in a specific container, concentration and pH range could support a formulation patent if the stability data show an unexpected result. -
Container-closure system
Claims could cover a vial, syringe or cartridge that limits adsorption, oxidation or moisture ingress. -
Administration device
A prefilled syringe, dose-confirming system or closed-transfer device could create device claims, although the commercial value would depend on hospital workflow. -
Stability-indicating manufacturing process
Claims could address oxygen control, lyophilization cycle parameters, moisture limits or impurity reduction. -
Patient-selection or method-of-use claims
Use claims for patients with sulfonamide hypersensitivity or specific renal and hepatic conditions may be possible, but their practical exclusivity is often weaker than formulation claims.
The main patent risk is that broad claims may be vulnerable to prior art involving legacy ethacrynic acid formulations, generic lyophilized injections and standard parenteral excipient systems. A robust filing would need comparative stability data, not only routine formulation screening.
What is the FDA regulatory status of ethacrynate sodium?
Ethacrynate sodium has an established FDA regulatory history through Edecrin and related ethacrynic acid products. The product is not a new molecular entity. A new sponsor would likely evaluate one of three pathways:
| Regulatory pathway | Potential use |
|---|---|
| ANDA under section 505(j) | Generic equivalent to a listed reference product if a suitable reference and dosage-form pathway are available |
| 505(b)(2) NDA | Reformulated, ready-to-use, new-concentration or otherwise differentiated product relying partly on FDA findings for the established drug |
| Full 505(b)(1) NDA | Unlikely commercial choice unless the sponsor cannot rely on existing findings |
The regulatory pathway depends on the current reference-listed drug, dosage form, route, labeling, product availability and FDA determinations. A sterile injectable product must address sterility assurance, particulate matter, endotoxins, container-closure integrity, extractables and leachables, assay, impurities, pH, osmolality and reconstitution performance.
FDA development priorities
A development program should generate:
- Accelerated and long-term stability data.
- Photostability data.
- Reconstitution-time and solution-clarity data.
- Compatibility data with common intravenous fluids.
- In-use stability after reconstitution.
- Particulate and subvisible-particle data.
- Container-closure integrity.
- Forced-degradation profiles.
- Leachables and extractables data.
- Comparative impurity profiling against the reference product.
When does ethacrynate sodium lose exclusivity?
Ethacrynate sodium’s original active-ingredient exclusivity is historical and has expired. The main commercial barriers are therefore regulatory and technical rather than basic compound patent rights.
Exclusivity profile
| Protection type | Current commercial assessment |
|---|---|
| Composition-of-matter patent | Expected to be expired |
| Original product patent | Expected to be expired |
| New chemical entity exclusivity | Expired |
| Pediatric exclusivity | No current basis for assuming active protection |
| Orphan exclusivity | Not the principal historical protection |
| Formulation exclusivity | Product-specific; requires current Orange Book and FDA review |
| Method-of-use exclusivity | Must be verified against current FDA listings |
| Generic exclusivity | Depends on approved ANDAs and Paragraph IV events |
| Biosimilar exclusivity | Not applicable |
A precise current Orange Book conclusion requires review of the live FDA Orange Book entry for the relevant Edecrin and ethacrynate sodium products. Historical patent expiration does not by itself establish whether a later formulation patent remains listed or enforceable.
What is the Orange Book status of ethacrynate sodium?
Ethacrynate sodium is a small-molecule drug and is evaluated under the Orange Book framework rather than the Purple Book biosimilar framework. Orange Book analysis should distinguish between:
- Ethacrynic acid tablets.
- Ethacrynate sodium injection.
- The specific reference-listed drug.
- Any listed patents or exclusivity codes.
- Product availability and discontinuation status.
- Whether the relevant product is eligible for ANDA referencing.
The practical diligence question is whether a sponsor can file an ANDA against a currently referenceable product or must pursue a 505(b)(2) route because the desired presentation differs from the listed product.
What Paragraph IV challenges and litigation affect ethacrynate sodium?
Ethacrynate sodium has a low-profile litigation history compared with major branded medicines. No significant current Paragraph IV campaign should be assumed without a live review of FDA ANDA records, Orange Book patent listings and federal court dockets.
For a new entrant, the likely litigation exposure is limited to:
- A Paragraph IV certification against any listed formulation patent.
- Patent infringement claims involving a newly approved formulation.
- Trade-secret or contract disputes involving manufacturing processes.
- Product liability claims linked to dosing errors, ototoxicity or infusion complications.
- Regulatory exclusivity disputes tied to reference-product status.
The absence of prominent litigation does not establish freedom to operate. Legacy patents can expire while newer patents covering a specific ready-to-use concentration, container or stability system remain relevant.
How strong is the patent estate for ethacrynate sodium?
The underlying patent estate is weak by branded-pharmaceutical standards because the active ingredient is old and generic substitution is technically feasible. A reformulated product could create a moderate patent position only if it delivers a measurable technical improvement.
Patent-strength assessment
| Asset type | Expected strength |
|---|---|
| Active ingredient | Low |
| Basic sodium salt formulation | Low |
| Mannitol-containing lyophilized vial | Low to moderate |
| Narrow stability range supported by comparative data | Moderate |
| Ready-to-use formulation with unexpected stability | Moderate to strong if enabled |
| Prefilled syringe or delivery device | Moderate, depending on integration |
| Broad method-of-use claims | Low to moderate |
| Manufacturing process claims | Moderate if difficult to design around |
The best protection would combine a formulation patent with trade secrets covering drug-substance controls, lyophilization parameters, moisture limits and container selection.
What commercial opportunities exist for ethacrynate sodium?
The commercial opportunity is a focused hospital product, not a mass-market generic. Potential opportunities include:
1. Ready-to-use injectable
A premixed or prefilled presentation could eliminate vial reconstitution and reduce medication-preparation time. The commercial case depends on demonstrating acceptable stability and pricing the product against pharmacy labor, waste and medication-error costs.
2. Improved lyophilized vial
A smaller vial, faster reconstitution time or clearer labeling could compete with legacy presentations. This is the lowest-risk development option if the reference formulation is available for comparison.
3. Hospital shortage product
Ethacrynate sodium can occupy a shortage-resilience niche because it is clinically differentiated from sulfonamide-containing loop diuretics. A manufacturer with sterile-injectable capacity could target hospital contracts and group purchasing organizations.
4. Pediatric or dose-flexible presentation
A lower-strength vial or a validated oral liquid could improve dose flexibility. Pediatric development would require careful attention to taste masking, preservative selection, dosing accuracy and excipient exposure.
5. International licensing
A regional license can be attractive where hospitals lack reliable access to ethacrynic acid products. The opportunity is strongest in markets with high demand for loop diuretics and limited access to non-sulfonamide alternatives.
6. Contract manufacturing
A manufacturer with lyophilization capacity, Type I glass filling and low-volume injectable experience could offer ethacrynate sodium as a portfolio product alongside other hospital injectables.
How does ethacrynate sodium compare with competing loop diuretics?
| Product | Sulfonamide-related concern | Typical commercial position | Formulation opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethacrynate sodium | No sulfonamide group | Specialty or rescue use | Ready-to-use injectable and shortage supply |
| Furosemide | Contains sulfonamide structure | Dominant high-volume loop diuretic | Cost and supply efficiency |
| Bumetanide | Contains sulfonamide structure | Potent, lower-dose alternative | Concentrated injectable and oral products |
| Torsemide | Contains sulfonamide structure | Chronic oral heart-failure use | Long-acting oral products |
Ethacrynate sodium cannot compete primarily on price. Its value proposition is clinical differentiation, injectable availability, non-sulfonamide positioning and reliable hospital supply.
What manufacturing and IP barriers exist?
The most important barriers are sterile manufacturing and product quality rather than active-ingredient synthesis. Key manufacturing risks include:
- Low-dose uniformity.
- Control of sodium-salt formation.
- Moisture sensitivity.
- Oxidative degradation.
- Reconstitution variability.
- Particulate generation.
- Stopper interaction.
- Vial adsorption.
- Batch-to-batch impurity control.
- Limited commercial scale.
The active ingredient may be sourced from a small number of qualified manufacturers. A dual-source strategy is important because a single-source drug substance can create supply risk even when the product has no meaningful patent barrier.
What licensing deals are relevant?
No major, widely disclosed current licensing transaction should be treated as a benchmark for ethacrynate sodium. Commercial deals would more likely involve:
- Regional marketing rights.
- Transfer of an approved injectable product.
- Contract manufacturing and supply.
- Acquisition of a legacy hospital product.
- Co-development of a ready-to-use formulation.
- Licensing of a sterile-fill or lyophilization platform.
The most valuable licensable asset would be an approved product with demonstrated hospital demand, not a broad ethacrynate sodium patent. A deal should prioritize regulatory status, supply continuity, manufacturing redundancy and any listed formulation patents.
Key Takeaways
- Ethacrynate sodium is a legacy loop diuretic with a narrow but defensible hospital niche.
- The strongest excipient platform is a preservative-free, single-dose lyophilized vial using mannitol and controlled pH.
- Ready-to-use and prefilled presentations offer the clearest commercial differentiation.
- Active-ingredient patent protection is expected to be expired; formulation and process claims are the principal remaining IP tools.
- An ANDA may be appropriate for a direct generic, while a differentiated ready-to-use product may require a 505(b)(2) strategy.
- Biosimilar risk does not apply because ethacrynate sodium is a small-molecule drug.
- The key barriers are sterile manufacturing, stability, reconstitution performance and hospital economics.
- Commercial success depends on supply reliability and workflow advantages rather than premium pricing based solely on the active ingredient.
FAQs
Is ethacrynate sodium the same as ethacrynic acid?
No. Ethacrynate sodium is the sodium salt used for injectable administration, while ethacrynic acid is the active drug commonly associated with oral tablets. Both deliver the same active moiety after administration.
Can mannitol be replaced in an ethacrynate sodium injection?
Potentially. Trehalose, sucrose or other lyophilization excipients could be evaluated, but replacement would require new stability, reconstitution, sterility and compatibility data. Mannitol remains the most commercially conservative starting point.
Is ethacrynate sodium eligible for biosimilar development?
No. Biosimilar pathways apply to biological products. Ethacrynate sodium is a chemically synthesized small-molecule drug and is addressed through ANDA or NDA pathways.
What is the most valuable improvement for an ethacrynate sodium product?
A stable ready-to-use or prefilled intravenous presentation is likely the most valuable improvement because it can reduce reconstitution steps, pharmacy workload and medication-preparation risk.
Does ethacrynate sodium have strong generic-entry potential?
Yes, if a current reference product and viable sterile manufacturing pathway are available. The market is small, but the absence of meaningful active-ingredient exclusivity lowers the primary IP barrier.
References
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Edecrin (ethacrynic acid) and Edecrin sodium prescribing information. FDA/DailyMed.
- National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). Ethacrynate sodium injection product labeling. DailyMed.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations. FDA.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA: FDA-approved drugs database. FDA.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Orange Book: Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations. FDA.
More… ↓
Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing
Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.
Alerts Available With Subscription
Alerts are available for users with active subscriptions.
Visit the Subscription Options page for details on plans and pricing.
ISSN: 2162-2639

Privacy and Cookies
Terms & Conditions
Site Map
DrugPatentWatch Alternatives
LOE / Major Patent Expirations 2026 - 2027
NCE-1 Patent Challenge Dates 2026 - 2027
Friedman, Yali. "DrugPatentWatch" DrugPatentWatch, thinkBiotech, 2026, www.DrugPatentWatch.com.
See Primary Research Papers Citing DrugPatentWatch
Access the Complete Database
Deeper Knowledge, Faster
- Analyze global market entry opportunities
- Uncover prior art in expired and abandoned patents
- Obtain formulation and manufacturing information