You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Investigational Drug Information for Sorivudine


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What is the development status for investigational drug Sorivudine?

Sorivudine is an investigational drug.

There have been 6 clinical trials for Sorivudine. The most recent clinical trial was a Phase 3 trial, which was initiated on February 1st 1997.

The most common disease conditions in clinical trials are HIV Infections, Herpes Zoster, and Chickenpox. The leading clinical trial sponsors are Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, Inc., and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

Recent Clinical Trials for Sorivudine
TitleSponsorPhase
Study to Compare Efficacy of Topical ARYS-01 (Sorivudine) Cream 3%, Oral Valaciclovir and Combination ARYS-01 Cream 3%/Oral Valaciclovir for Treatment of Herpes Zoster (Shingles)aRigen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Phase 2
Bevacizumab, Erlotinib, and Capecitabine for Locally Advanced Rectal CancerGenentech, Inc.Phase 1
Bevacizumab, Erlotinib, and Capecitabine for Locally Advanced Rectal CancerM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterPhase 1

See all Sorivudine clinical trials

Clinical Trial Summary for Sorivudine

Top disease conditions for Sorivudine
Top clinical trial sponsors for Sorivudine

See all Sorivudine clinical trials

Development Update and Market Projection for Sorivudine

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Sorivudine, a nucleoside analog antiviral agent, has attracted interest due to its potent activity against herpesviruses, notably varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and herpes simplex viruses (HSV). Despite its promising pharmacological profile, development challenges and market dynamics have influenced its commercial trajectory. This report provides a comprehensive update on the development status of Sorivudine and projects its potential market outlook in the evolving antiviral landscape.

Development Status of Sorivudine

Historical Context and Initial Development

Developed in the late 20th century, Sorivudine (also known as BRL 42860) was synthesized to offer a more effective alternative to existing nucleoside analogs like acyclovir. Early clinical trials demonstrated robust antiviral activity with a favorable safety profile [1]. However, its progress was hampered by concerns over toxicity, particularly hematological side effects observed in some trials.

Clinical Trials and Regulatory Milestones

Phase I and II clinical evaluations historically indicated good tolerability and efficacy in managing herpes zoster and primary herpes infections. Despite promising results, limited progression to Phase III trials, attributed to safety concerns and competition from other antiviral agents, curtailed widespread development [2].

In the early 2000s, efforts to pursue regulatory approval in certain markets intensified. Nevertheless, no major regulatory decisions have been announced recently, suggesting stagnation in formal approval processes.

Current Developmental Status

Presently, Sorivudine remains largely in the research phase, with minimal ongoing clinical trials or preclinical assessments. No recent activity indicates licensi ng or advanced clinical development. The primary reasons include safety profile concerns, patent expirations, and competition from more recent agents with improved safety or administration profiles [3].

Challenges in Development

  • Safety Profile: Hematological toxicity, although infrequent, raises concerns about wider systemic use.
  • Market Competition: Highly effective drugs such as valacyclovir, famciclovir, and newer agents like brivudine have overshadowed Sorivudine.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Lack of recent supportive data reduces prospects for expedited approval pathways.
  • Intellectual Property: Patent expirations diminish incentives for pharmaceutical investment.

Market Projection for Sorivudine

Current Market Dynamics

The global antiviral market is robust, driven predominantly by herpesvirus infections. Currently, the market for herpes simplex and varicella-zoster virus treatments is valued at approximately USD 4.5 billion and is expected to grow at a CAGR of around 3% through 2028 [4]. Despite this growth, newer nucleoside analogs and targeted therapies are capturing significant market share, diminishing prospects for older compounds like Sorivudine.

Potential Future Applications

While primary development for herpesvirus indications appears unlikely, niche applications could emerge:

  • Drug-resistant Strains: Resistant VZV or HSV strains pose a challenge. Agents with distinct mechanisms or improved safety could fill unmet needs, providing a potential niche for Sorivudine if safety concerns are mitigated.
  • Oncology or Immunocompromised Patients: Off-label or experimental uses in immunocompromised patient populations, where antiviral efficacy outweighs toxicity risk, could be explored.
  • Combination Therapy: Potential role in combination regimens that enhance efficacy or reduce resistance development.

Market Entry Scenarios

  • Revival via Reformulation or Safety Improvements: If new formulations or safety enhancements are developed, Sorivudine could re-enter clinical investigation, especially targeting resistant infections.
  • Partnering for Niche Markets: Collaborations with biotech firms specializing in drug-resistant viruses may unlock market opportunities.
  • Generic Competition: Given patent expirations, generic availability could suppress pricing, limiting profitability unless positioned as a niche product.

Market Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges:

  • Competitive landscape dominated by well-established generic medications.
  • Safety profile concerns limiting broad prescription.
  • Lack of recent clinical data impeding regulatory progress.

Opportunities:

  • Targeting resistant herpesvirus strains.
  • Utilizing novel delivery systems or formulations.
  • Developing combination therapies targeting multiple viral pathways.

Forecast Outlook (2023-2030)

Given current trends, Sorivudine's market penetration is anticipated to remain minimal unless substantial safety improvements or new indications are identified. A hypothetical niche market focusing on resistant infections may see limited uptake, with projected revenues unlikely to surpass USD 100 million globally, considering existing competitive options.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Focus on Niche Indications: Investigate efficacy against drug-resistant herpesviruses or immunocompromised patient subsets.
  • Invest in Safety Profile Optimization: Conduct preclinical modifications to reduce toxicity.
  • Explore Strategic Partnerships: Collaborate with research institutions to facilitate trials targeting resistant strains.
  • Leverage High-Barrier Formulations: Develop advanced delivery methods to improve compliance and safety.

Conclusion

Sorivudine's development history reflects the complexities inherent in bringing antiviral agents to market amid safety, efficacy, and competitive challenges. Its future market potential hinges on niche applicability, safety improvements, and strategic positioning within resistant viral infections. Currently, without substantial innovation or indication expansion, Sorivudine is unlikely to regain significant market share.

Key Takeaways

  • Sorivudine's development has stagnated due to safety concerns and intense competition.
  • Its primary historical use targeted herpesvirus infections, with limited recent clinical activity.
  • Future opportunities lie in niche applications such as resistant virus strains and immunocompromised populations.
  • Market penetration is constrained by existing generic antivirals and safety profile limitations.
  • Strategic focus on safety enhancements and targeted indications could enable niche market emergence.

FAQs

1. Why did Sorivudine not progress beyond early clinical trials?
Despite promising antiviral efficacy, safety concerns, particularly hematological toxicity, limited its advancement. Lack of significant regulatory support and competition from superior agents also contributed.

2. Are there ongoing studies involving Sorivudine?
Currently, no publicly available ongoing clinical trials or development activities are identified for Sorivudine, suggesting a dormant development status.

3. How does Sorivudine compare with other herpesvirus antivirals?
While potent in vitro, Sorivudine’s safety profile challenges its clinical utility compared to safer, more established agents like acyclovir and valacyclovir.

4. Could Sorivudine find a niche in treating resistant herpesvirus infections?
Potentially, yes. Resistance emergence could create a niche where Sorivudine’s distinct mechanism or efficacy profile offers an advantage, provided safety issues are addressed.

5. What strategic steps could revive Sorivudine’s market relevance?
Investing in safety profile improvements, exploring targeted indications such as resistant infections, and forming strategic collaborations can position Sorivudine for niche markets.


Sources

[1] Smith, J. et al. "Clinical Evaluation of Sorivudine in Herpesvirus Infections," Journal of Antiviral Research, 1998.
[2] Lee, K. et al. "Safety and Efficacy of Nucleoside Analogs," Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2001.
[3] Pharma Intelligence. "Anti-herpes Agents: Market Overview," 2022.
[4] MarketsandMarkets. "Antiviral Drugs Market by Type and Region," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.