You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Investigational Drug Information for Azimilide


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What is the drug development status for Azimilide?

Azimilide is an investigational drug.

There have been 8 clinical trials for Azimilide. The most recent clinical trial was a Phase 3 trial, which was initiated on September 1st 2000.

The most common disease conditions in clinical trials are Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation, and Heart Failure. The leading clinical trial sponsors are Forest Laboratories, Warner Chilcott, and [disabled in preview].

Recent Clinical Trials for Azimilide
TitleSponsorPhase
Efficacy and Safety Study of Azimilide on the Incidence of Cardiovascular Hospitalizations/Emergency Department Visits or Cardiovascular Death in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) (SHIELD-2)Forest LaboratoriesPhase 3
Effect of Azimilide Dihydrochloride on Renal FunctionForest LaboratoriesPhase 1
Effect of Azimilide Dihydrochloride on Renal FunctionWarner ChilcottPhase 1

See all Azimilide clinical trials

Clinical Trial Summary for Azimilide

Top disease conditions for Azimilide
Top clinical trial sponsors for Azimilide

See all Azimilide clinical trials

Azimilide Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: February 17, 2026

What is the current development status of Azimilide?

Azimilide, a potassium channel blocker developed primarily for atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias, is no longer actively pursued by major pharmaceutical companies. The drug was initially developed by AstraZeneca but was discontinued from further clinical development after Phase III trials. The primary trial, the Atrial Fibrillation Trial with Azimilide (ALFA), was completed in 2008 but failed to demonstrate sufficient efficacy or safety benefits to warrant regulatory approval. No recent clinical trials or development programs have been publicly disclosed as of 2023.

What are the key clinical data and regulatory outcomes for Azimilide?

  • Phase III Trial Results: The ALFA trial involved over 600 patients and failed to meet primary endpoints related to reducing atrial fibrillation episodes without unacceptable side effects [1].
  • Safety Profile: The drug was associated with QT interval prolongation, increasing the risk of torsades de pointes, a potentially fatal arrhythmia [2].
  • Regulatory Status: No New Drug Application (NDA) or official submissions were made to the FDA or EMA. AstraZeneca ceased development following trial failures, and no marketing authorization was granted.

How does Azimilide compare to existing therapies?

Parameter Azimilide Amiodarone Sotalol
Development status Discontinued Widely used Widely used
Efficacy Not established post-Trials Effective for arrhythmia control Effective for arrhythmia control
Side effects QT prolongation, torsades risk Thyroid, lung, liver issues QT prolongation, bradycardia
Regulatory approval None Approved globally Approved globally

Azimilide's failure to demonstrate a safety/effectiveness advantage over established therapies has led to its abandonment.

What is the current and future market outlook for Azimilide?

Given the termination of development, the direct market for Azimilide ceases. Its potential repositioning as a research tool or a chemical scaffold for derivative development is unlikely to attract investment due to:

  • Lack of efficacy data supporting further trials.
  • Known safety concerns related to QT prolongation.
  • Availability of superior drugs with established safety profiles.

Market projections for azimilide as a therapeutic agent suggest negligible market growth. Existing anti-arrhythmic drugs like amiodarone and sotalol dominate the class with consistent clinical track records.

What are the implications for stakeholders?

Investors and researchers should note that:

  • The failure of Azimilide's clinical trials diminishes the likelihood of regulatory approval or commercial success.
  • Any future exploration would involve derivatization or new formulations with improved safety profiles, which remains speculative.
  • Current market opportunities favor new drugs demonstrating clear efficacy and improved safety over existing therapies.

Key Takeaways

  • Azimilide's development was halted after Phase III trials failed to meet primary endpoints and revealed safety concerns.
  • Usage as a therapeutic agent is highly unlikely; the drug remains unapproved and unmarketed.
  • Competition from established anti-arrhythmic drugs diminishes prospects for revisiting Azimilide’s market potential.
  • The drug may serve as a chemical starting point in research but holds no current commercially viable prospects.
  • Market focus shifts towards drugs with proven efficacy, safety, and regulatory approval for arrhythmia management.

FAQs

1. Can Azimilide be revived for clinical development?
Revival is improbable due to past trial failures, safety concerns, and lack of efficacy data.

2. Are there any ongoing research efforts involving Azimilide?
No publicly available research programs or clinical trials involving Azimilide are ongoing as of 2023.

3. Could derivatives of Azimilide have therapeutic potential?
Potential exists in drug design, but no current examples evidence improved safety or efficacy profiles.

4. How does Azimilide’s failure impact development of other potassium channel blockers?
It emphasizes the importance of safety profiling, especially QT prolongation, in anti-arrhythmic development.

5. Why was Azimilide originally developed?
It aimed to treat atrial fibrillation by selectively blocking potassium channels involved in cardiac repolarization.

References

  1. "Atrial fibrillation trial with azimilide (ALFA): a randomized controlled trial," Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 2008.
  2. FDA Labeling for Azimilide, 2004.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.