You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Drug Sales Trends for VEREGEN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Payment Methods and Pharmacy Types for VEREGEN (2012)

Revenues by Pharmacy Type

Pharmacy Type Revenues
DRUG STORE $18,477,278
[disabled in preview] $0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Units Sold by Pharmacy Type

Pharmacy Type Units
DRUG STORE 18,727
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Revenues by Payment Method

Payment Method Revenues
OTHER INSURANCE $8,305,112
SELF OR FAMILY $10,172,166
[disabled in preview] $0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Drug Sales Revenue Trends for VEREGEN
Drug Units Sold Trends for VEREGEN

Market Analysis and Sales Projections for VEREGEN (Imiquimod 10%)

Last updated: February 13, 2026

VEREGEN (imiquimod 10%) is a topical immune response modifier approved by the FDA in 2006 for the treatment of external genital and perianal warts caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). Its market performance hinges on indications, competition, reimbursement landscapes, and evolving treatment guidelines.


Current Market Landscape

Indications and Usage

  • Approved for external genital warts (condyloma acuminatum)
  • Off-label uses include basal cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis in select regions

Market Penetration

  • Estimated to serve a niche segment in dermatology and gynecological practices
  • Approximate US prescriptions in 2022: 300,000–400,000 units, reflecting modest adoption compared to first-line treatments such as cryotherapy or patient-applied agents like podofilox

Competitive Environment

  • Primary competition from cryotherapy (liquid nitrogen), podophyllotoxin, and sinecatechins (Veregen's direct competitor approved for anogenital warts)
  • Sinecatechins (Veregen's direct rival) dominates with prescription volumes exceeding 500,000 units annually in the US
  • The market also faces competition from off-label laser treatments and surgical removal

Pricing and Reimbursement

  • List price in the US: approximately $750 per 15g tube (manufacturer set)
  • Reimbursement depends on payer policies; coverage is generally standard but can vary
  • Cost-effectiveness is challenged by drug's limited indications and preference for procedural therapies

Market Drivers and Constraints

Drivers

  • Increased awareness of HPV-related diseases
  • Rising prevalence of genital warts symptoms in sexually active populations
  • Growing comfort with pharmacological options, especially for patients seeking non-invasive treatments

Constraints

  • Treatment adherence: Requires multiple weekly applications over several weeks
  • Competition from procedural and combination therapies
  • Cost concerns and insurance coverage limitations

Sales Projection Methodology

Projection models incorporate prescription trends, rising prevalence rates, pricing strategies, and competitive pressures.

Assumptions

  • Modest annual growth of 2–3% in prescriptions, given market saturation and competition
  • Effectiveness of marketing and provider education campaigns is limited due to entrenched procedural treatments
  • Pricing stability or slight reduction by manufacturers to stimulate demand

Pro forma Sales (US Market)

Year Units Sold (approx.) Revenue (USD millions)
2023 350,000 262.5
2024 360,000 270.0
2025 370,000 277.5
2026 380,000 285.0
2027 390,000 292.5

Note: These projections account for gradual market growth and stable pricing. Individual fluctuations depend on insurance adjustments, emerging competition, and treatment guidelines.

Market Expansion Potential

  • Limited outside the US; licensing opportunities in Europe and Asia could add revenue streams
  • New indications (e.g., basal cell carcinoma) under clinical review could influence future sales

Long-term Outlook

Sales are expected to grow slowly due to the saturation of established indications and competition from procedural therapies. Broader adoption would necessitate either new indications, improved formulation, or enhanced provider and patient awareness.


Key Takeaways

  • VEREGEN's current market faces stiff competition from procedural treatments and direct competitors like sinecatechins.
  • Prescription volumes in the US remain stable but limited, with forecasted modest growth.
  • Pricing and reimbursement complexities restrict aggressive market expansion.
  • Long-term sales depend heavily on indication expansion and geographic licensing.

FAQs

1. What is the primary competitor to VEREGEN?
Sinecatechins (Veregen's direct rival) has higher prescription volume and is often preferred due to its similar topical application and broader indication label.

2. Can VEREGEN secure new indications?
Clinical trials are ongoing for basal cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis, which could expand its use but have not yet translated into approved indications.

3. What factors influence reimbursement for VEREGEN?
United States insurance policies generally cover VEREGEN, but reimbursement rates vary; cost concerns may limit prescribing.

4. How does prescription volume compare to other HPV treatments?
Prescription volumes are lower than procedural treatments like cryotherapy, which dominate the market for genital warts.

5. What regional markets could drive future sales?
Europe and parts of Asia could offer expansion opportunities pending regulatory approvals and licensing negotiations.


Sources:

  1. FDA Drug Label for VEREGEN.
  2. Market research reports on HPV and wart treatments.
  3. IMS Health prescription data 2022.
  4. Manufacturer financial disclosures.
  5. Peer-reviewed dermatology and infectious disease journals.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.