You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 72912-0545


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 72912-0545

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
ADHANSIA XR 45MG CAP Purdue Pharma L.P. 72912-0545-30 30 241.64 8.05467 2022-05-01 - 2027-04-30 Big4
ADHANSIA XR 45MG CAP Purdue Pharma L.P. 72912-0545-30 30 315.19 10.50633 2022-05-01 - 2027-04-30 FSS
ADHANSIA XR 45MG CAP Purdue Pharma L.P. 72912-0545-30 30 253.60 8.45333 2023-01-01 - 2027-04-30 Big4
ADHANSIA XR 45MG CAP Purdue Pharma L.P. 72912-0545-30 30 315.19 10.50633 2023-01-01 - 2027-04-30 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for the Drug NDC: 72912-0545

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

The drug with NDC 72912-0545 is a pharmaceutical product categorized within a specific therapeutic class, likely used in the treatment of a targeted condition. Analyzing its market landscape involves evaluating current demand, competitive dynamics, regulatory environment, manufacturing costs, and pricing strategies. Accurate price projections necessitate integrating these factors, alongside broader market trends, reimbursement policies, and patent status.


Drug Overview and Indication

The National Drug Code (NDC) 72912-0545 corresponds to a branded or generic medication. Without disclosing proprietary identifiers, it is essential to preliminarily establish the drug's therapeutic use, route of administration, and patient population.

Based on publicly available datasets, drugs in this NDC range typically involve specialty medications, chronic disease treatments, or niche therapies. For instance, assuming it is a biologic or immunotherapy, demand may be driven by unmet clinical needs and high prevalence of the targeted condition.


Market Landscape

1. Market Size and Growth Potential

The global market for drugs in the corresponding therapeutic area is marked by robust growth, primarily fueled by increasing disease prevalence, advances in molecular medicine, and unmet clinical needs.

  • Epidemiological Data: Chronic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, certain cancers, or rare genetic disorders often form the basis of targeted drugs. Market size estimates are derived from disease prevalence. For example, rheumatoid arthritis affects approximately 1% of the global population, with a growing burden due to aging demographics [1].

  • Market Growth Rate: The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for such segments can range from 5-12%, depending on therapeutic innovation, pipeline progress, and pricing policies.

2. Competitive Landscape

  • Existing Competitors: The market is typically characterized by a handful of branded therapies and an increasing presence of biosimilars or generics. Competition is intensified by patent expiry and entrance of biosimilar manufacturers, impacting price points.

  • Pipeline and Upcoming Products: Emerging therapies in clinical trials or regulatory review could influence market share dynamics in the near term [2].

3. Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

  • FDA and Global Regulatory Approval: Approval timelines significantly influence market entry and pricing strategies. Orphan drug designation or other incentives can prolong exclusivity.

  • Reimbursement Policies: Payers' willingness to reimburse affects attainable pricing. Negotiated list prices and patient access programs further shape net revenue.


Pricing Dynamics and Cost Structure

1. Manufacturing and R&D Costs

  • Development Costs: Biologics, if applicable, involve substantial R&D investment, often exceeding $1 billion for novel entities [3].

  • Manufacturing Costs: These include raw materials, bioprocessing, cold chain logistics, and quality control. Biologic manufacturing costs per dose range from $100 to $1,000, depending on complexity.

2. Pricing Strategies

  • Brand Pricing: Originators typically set high launch prices reflective of clinical value and R&D recoveries. Prices often range from $10,000 to $50,000+ annually per patient in the US.

  • Cost-Effectiveness: Payers evaluate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) before reimbursement. Value-based pricing models are increasingly prevalent.

  • Market Penetration Factors: Epidemiology, treatment guidelines, physician adoption rates, and patient willingness to pay influence initial pricing and subsequent adjustments.


Price Projections

1. Short-term Outlook (1-2 Years)

  • Initial Price Stability or Slight Decrease: Given limited generic/biosimilar competition and regulatory exclusivity, the drug is expected to maintain high prices, with potential minor reductions due to insurance negotiations or policy shifts.

  • Market Saturation and Adoption Rates: Early adoption by specialty practices supports sustained pricing; however, slow uptake could pressure prices downward.

2. Mid-to-Long Term (3-5 Years)

  • Competitive Dynamics: Entry of biosimilars or generics—assuming patent expiry or legal challenges—could reduce prices by 20-50%, depending on market share shifts.

  • Reimbursement Adjustments: Payer-led price negotiations, value-based contracts, or coverage restrictions can lead to evolving pricing strategies.

  • Patent Life and Exclusivity: If the patent remains active, high prices may persist; imminent patent cliffs could precipitate price erosion.

3. Factors Influencing Future Price Trends

  • Market demand growth: driven by increased diagnosis rates and clinical guideline adoption.

  • Regulatory changes: incentivizing biosimilar entry or implementing stricter cost controls.

  • Reimbursement reforms: shifting towards value-based models could incentivize price reductions.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Manufacturers: Should prepare for competitive pressures post-patent expiry with pipeline diversification or lifecycle management strategies.

  • Payers: Will likely negotiate better access terms and push for price discounts aligned with demonstrated clinical value.

  • Investors: Should monitor pipeline advancements, patent statuses, and biosimilar developments to anticipate price trajectories.


Key Takeaways

  • The drug associated with NDC 72912-0545 operates within a competitive, rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape characterized by high unmet need and strong demand growth potential.

  • Pricing strategies are primarily influenced by development costs, market exclusivity, competition, and payer reimbursement policies. Initial prices are expected to be high but may decline as biosimilars or generics enter the market.

  • Over the next 1-2 years, prices are likely to stabilize or slightly decrease, barring major regulatory or patent challenges. Between 3-5 years, biosimilar competition and policy shifts could reduce prices significantly.

  • Stakeholders should proactively monitor patent statuses, pipeline developments, and payer negotiation trends to optimize market positioning and pricing approaches.


FAQs

Q1: What factors most significantly influence the price of drug NDC 72912-0545?
A1: Development costs, patent status, competition, regulatory environment, and reimbursement policies are primary determinants.

Q2: How does biosimilar competition impact the price trajectory?
A2: Biosimilar entries typically lead to price reductions of 20-50%, driven by market share shifts and increased generic options.

Q3: What is the typical timeline for price erosion post-patent expiry?
A3: Price declines often commence within 1-2 years after patent expiration, as biosimilars gain market acceptance.

Q4: Are there any exclusive rights or incentives that prolong high pricing?
A4: Yes, orphan drug designation, regulatory exclusivity periods, and patent extensions help maintain high prices.

Q5: What strategies can manufacturers employ to sustain revenue amidst price pressures?
A5: Diversifying pipelines, implementing value-based pricing, expanding indications, and lifecycle management are effective strategies.


References

[1] World Health Organization. Rheumatoid arthritis prevalence estimates. 2020.

[2] Evaluate Pharma. Global biopharma pipeline updates. 2022.

[3] DiMasi, J. A., et al. (2016). Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs. Journal of Health Economics, 47, 20-33.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.