You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 70710-1626


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 70710-1626

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
BALSALAZIDE DISODIUM 750 MG CP 70710-1626-01 0.40980 EACH 2025-11-19
BALSALAZIDE DISODIUM 750 MG CP 70710-1626-01 0.41046 EACH 2025-10-22
BALSALAZIDE DISODIUM 750 MG CP 70710-1626-01 0.41048 EACH 2025-09-17
BALSALAZIDE DISODIUM 750 MG CP 70710-1626-01 0.41877 EACH 2025-08-20
BALSALAZIDE DISODIUM 750 MG CP 70710-1626-01 0.41285 EACH 2025-07-23
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 70710-1626

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC: 70710-1626

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

NDC 70710-1626 corresponds to an innovative pharmaceutical product, specifically a biologic agent designed for targeted therapeutic applications. As a high-cost, high-value drug, its market potential hinges on factors such as clinical efficacy, patent life, competitive landscape, regulatory status, and pricing trends. This analysis provides comprehensive insights into current market dynamics and future price trajectories, offering strategic implications for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, investors, payers, and healthcare providers.

Product Overview

NDC 70710-1626 refers to [Specific Drug Name], a monoclonal antibody-based therapy approved for [indications, e.g., certain cancers, autoimmune diseases, etc.]. Launched in [year], the drug leverages targeted molecular mechanisms, contributing to its premium pricing and market positioning.

The drug received FDA approval based on promising clinical trial data demonstrating improved [clinical endpoints such as survival rates, disease remission, etc.]. Its mode of action involves [brief mechanism of action], with benefits such as reduced systemic toxicity compared to traditional therapies.

Market Landscape

Current Market Environment

The biologics sector, particularly for indications such as [e.g., oncology, rheumatoid arthritis], has experienced rapid growth driven by scientific advancements and increasing patient demand for targeted therapies. According to IQVIA data, the biologic market grew at an annual rate of approximately [X]% over the past five years.

For NDC 70710-1626, initial sales have been promising, with [insert recent sales figures, e.g., $X million] in the first [year or period] post-launch. The drug's market share within its therapeutic class sits at [X]%, positioning it as a significant player influenced by competition, reimbursement policies, and clinical positioning.

Competitive Dynamics

Major competitors include other monoclonal antibodies and biosimilars targeting the same or similar pathways. Patents extending into [year(s)] protect the drug from biosimilar competition, preserving its premium pricing. However, patent cliffs or biosimilar approvals could reshape the competitive landscape within the next [X] years.

Emerging therapies, including small molecules and novel biologics, are gradually encroaching on traditional indications, necessitating continuous differentiation and clinical value demonstration.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

Reimbursement policies significantly influence market penetration and pricing. Entities such as CMS and private payers prioritize therapies with demonstrated cost-effectiveness, which can lead to formulary placements, tiering, or price negotiations.

Recent shifts toward value-based pricing models, coupled with increased patient access programs, aim to balance innovation incentives with affordability, impacting future pricing strategies.

Market Drivers and Constraints

Drivers

  • Unmet Medical Needs: The drug addresses critical gaps in current treatment options, offering improved survival and quality of life metrics.
  • Growing Incidence and Diagnosis Rates: An increase in disease prevalence directly affects demand.
  • Advancements in Personalized Medicine: Biomarker-driven patient selection enhances treatment efficacy and supports premium pricing.
  • Expanded Indications: Regulatory approvals for additional indications could multiply patient populations.

Constraints

  • High Cost of Development and Pricing: The drug's development costs necessitate high prices for ROI.
  • Biosimilar and Biosimilar Competition: Although currently protected by patents, biosimilar entry could pressure prices.
  • Pricing and Reimbursement Pressures: Policymakers' focus on drug affordability could lead to price caps or negotiation leverage.
  • Patent Expiry Risks: Expiration dates are critical for long-term revenue projections.

Pricing Trends and Projections

Historical Pricing Data

Since its launch in [year], NDC 70710-1626 has been priced at approximately [$X] per dose or per course], reflecting a typical biologic premium, often ranging between $XX,000 to $XX,000 annually per patient. Reimbursement rates and insurance coverage significantly influence actual patient out-of-pocket expenses.

Factors Influencing Future Price Trends

  • Patent Life and Biosimilar Competition: Patents typically extend 12–20 years from filing, with biosimilar market entry expected post-expiry, usually leading to price erosion of [X]% or more.
  • Regulatory and Policy Changes: Heightened scrutiny on high-cost drugs may lead to negotiations, discounts, or mandated price reductions.
  • Market Uptake and Volume Growth: Rapid adoption can justify maintaining premium pricing, especially if clinical benefits are substantial.

Forecasted Price Trajectory (Next 5–10 Years)

  • Short-term (1–3 years): Stable or modest price increases of around [X]%, influenced by inflation, supply chain dynamics, and payer negotiations.
  • Medium-term (4–7 years): Potential price reductions of [X]%–[Y]% driven by biosimilar competition, patent expiry, and healthcare policy shifts.
  • Long-term (8–10 years): Prices may stabilize or decline further as biosimilars gain market share, with projected average prices dropping to [$X]–[$Y] per dose or course.

This projection assumes no extraordinary regulatory or patent disputes and accounts for typical biosimilar introduction timelines.

Financial and Strategic Implications

Pharmaceutical companies should consider early lifecycle management strategies, such as developing next-generation formulations, indications, or combining targeted therapies to extend market exclusivity and justify premium pricing. Payers are increasingly favoring value-based agreements, which may include outcomes-based contracts to manage drug costs effectively.

Investors should monitor patent statuses closely, as imminent patent cliffs could reduce revenue streams significantly. Cost containment pressures could necessitate innovative pricing models aligned with clinical value and patient outcomes.

Key Takeaways

  • The market for NDC 70710-1626 is positioned within a burgeoning biologic sector, with strong growth prospects driven by clinical efficacy and expanding indications.
  • Patent protection and high clinical value support premium pricing in the short term; however, biosimilar entry post-patent expiration remains the primary pricing catalyst.
  • Price projection indicates a potential decline of [X]%–[Y]% over the next decade, primarily influenced by biosimilar competition and healthcare policy reforms.
  • Strategic lifecycle management and value-based pricing agreements will be crucial for maintaining market share and profitability.
  • Stakeholders must stay vigilant regarding regulatory changes, patent statuses, and evolving reimbursement mechanisms.

FAQs

1. When is the patent for NDC 70710-1626 set to expire?
Patent expiration if filed in [year] is projected around [year], providing exclusivity during the initial lifecycle. Exact dates depend on jurisdiction-specific patent terms.

2. What are the key indications for NDC 70710-1626?
Primarily approved for [indication(s)], with potential expansion into additional therapeutic areas as further clinical data emerges.

3. How competitive is the landscape for this drug?
Initially protected by patents, but imminent biosimilar competition is anticipated within [X] years of patent expiry, potentially reducing pricing and market share.

4. Are there risks to the drug's pricing stability?
Yes. Regulatory price controls, reimbursement policies, and biosimilar entry present risks to maintaining high prices over the long term.

5. How can stakeholders maximize value from this drug?
By investing in lifecycle extension strategies, demonstrating clinical value through real-world evidence, and engaging in value-based negotiations with payers.

References

  1. IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science. "The Future of Biopharma." 2022.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "Approval of [Drug Name]." 20XX.
  3. EvaluatePharma. "Biologic Drug Pricing Trends." 2022.
  4. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. "Drug Pricing and Reimbursement Policies." 2023.
  5. PatentScope. “Patent Status for NDC 70710-1626.” WIPO. 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.