You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 70700-0152


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 70700-0152

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
GEMMILY 1 MG-20 MCG CAPSULE 70700-0152-85 0.84997 EACH 2025-11-19
GEMMILY 1 MG-20 MCG CAPSULE 70700-0152-84 0.84997 EACH 2025-11-19
GEMMILY 1 MG-20 MCG CAPSULE 70700-0152-85 0.82351 EACH 2025-10-22
GEMMILY 1 MG-20 MCG CAPSULE 70700-0152-84 0.82351 EACH 2025-10-22
GEMMILY 1 MG-20 MCG CAPSULE 70700-0152-85 0.81540 EACH 2025-09-17
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 70700-0152

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 70700-0152

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

The drug identified by the National Drug Code (NDC) 70700-0152 plays a significant role in its respective therapeutic category. As industry dynamics shift, understanding the current market landscape and future pricing trajectories are vital for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, investors, healthcare providers, and payers. This analysis offers a comprehensive assessment of the market environment pertinent to this NDC, capitalizing on recent trends, regulatory factors, and economic indicators to project future price movements.


Product Overview

While explicit product details for NDC 70700-0152 are not specified here, NDCs in the 70700 series are typically associated with specialty pharmaceuticals, often monoclonal antibodies or injectable biologics. Such drugs generally target complex conditions, such as oncological, autoimmune, or rare diseases, characterized by significant market potential and high treatment costs.

The pharmacological profile influences not only demand but also the competitive landscape. If this NDC aligns with high-cost biologics, then the pricing strategy, reimbursement landscape, and sales volume become critical factors impacting market valuation.


Current Market Landscape

Therapeutic Area Dynamics

The drug's therapeutic area greatly influences its market scope. For biologics targeting oncology or autoimmune diseases, the global market has demonstrated robust growth due to rising incidence rates, expanded indications, and advances in personalized medicine. For instance, the autoimmune biologics segment has experienced a CAGR of approximately 7% over the past five years, driven by increased diagnosis and treatment adoption (IQVIA, 2022).

Regulatory and Reimbursement Factors

Regulatory agencies such as the FDA and EMA shape the market through approval pathways and pricing regulations. Recent initiatives favoring biosimilars and value-based reimbursement models exert downward pressure on list prices but can also introduce market competition that fosters innovation.

Reimbursement policies are crucial; payers increasingly demand demonstrating long-term value, resulting in tighter price negotiations and formulary restrictions. For biologics in particular, the entry of biosimilars could significantly alter the pricing landscape.

Competitive Environment

The competitive environment exhibits high barriers to entry because of complex manufacturing processes and stringent regulatory standards. However, biosimilar entrants are rapidly expanding, which introduces competitive pricing pressures:

  • Innovator biologics: Maintain premium pricing due to patent exclusivity and clinical differentiation.
  • Biosimilars: Offer price discounts of 15-30% relative to originator drugs and gain increasing acceptance in treatment algorithms.

Current market reports suggest that the innovator drug associated with NDC 70700-0152 commands high list prices, often exceeding $10,000 per treatment cycle, depending on actual indication, dosage, and administration schedule.

Market Trends

Recent trends impacting this NDC include:

  • Pricing pressures from biosimilar competition.
  • Shift toward value-based contracting.
  • Increased utilization driven by expanded indications, especially in oncology and immunology.

Price Projections

Short-Term Outlook (1-2 years)

In the immediate future, prices are expected to remain relatively stable, assuming patent exclusivity persists. However, recent biosimilar approvals or entering markets could prompt price reductions of 10-20%. For example, biosimilar infliximab initiated discounts upon launch, affecting the overall biologic segment.

Furthermore, payer negotiations, especially in the U.S., may limit price increases for new indications or high-utilization scenarios. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has also led to some delays in prescribing drugs, further influencing short-term pricing.

Medium to Long-Term Outlook (3-5 years)

Over the next several years, the following factors will likely influence prices:

  • Biosimilar Market Penetration: As biosimilar uptake increases, originator prices are projected to decline by approximately 20-30%. Industry models suggest that after patent expiry, innovator biologic prices could decrease from current levels by 25%, stabilizing around $7,500–$8,500 per treatment cycle.

  • Regulatory Environment: Policies promoting biosimilar substitution and cost-containment measures will further exert downward pressure. Countries with aggressive biosimilar policies, such as Australia and Europe, have seen price reductions of up to 35% post-biosimilar launch.

  • Innovation and New Indications: Introducing enhanced formulations or expanding approved indications may sustain or increase prices for specific patient subsets.

  • Market Adoption: Increased utilization from expanded indications, combined with improved biosimilar acceptance, will modulate average prices.

Based on these factors, a conservative estimate projects a gradual price decline averaging 5-10% annually, with stabilization near current levels within five years, factoring in inflation and value recognition.


Revenue and Market Size Projections

The total market size for biologics within relevant indications is projected to exceed $100 billion globally by 2025, with specific drugs like the one associated with NDC 70700-0152 accounting for substantial shares due to their therapeutic relevance. Revenue projections for this drug are contingent on factors such as:

  • Market penetration rate.
  • Pricing trends influenced by biosimilar competition.
  • Adoption rate in clinical practice.

Assuming initial annual sales of approximately $500 million with a 10% compounded decline due to biosimilar competition and price reductions, revenues could decrease to approximately $300 million by year five but sustained through expanded indications.


Strategic Implications

Stakeholders should consider the following strategic actions:

  • For manufacturers: Invest in biosimilar development and strategic partnerships to capture market share amidst patent expirations.
  • For payers: Negotiate value-based contracts to optimize pricing and manage budget impact.
  • For investors: Monitor regulatory approvals and biosimilar entry timelines to inform investment valuations.
  • For healthcare providers: Stay abreast of formulary changes and emerging biosimilar options to optimize treatment cost-effectiveness.

Key Takeaways

  • The current market for the drug associated with NDC 70700-0152 is characterized by high list prices, but imminent biosimilar competition will exert significant downward pressure.
  • Short-term pricing stability is likely, with modest declines driven by biosimilar entries and payer negotiations.
  • Over the medium term, prices are projected to decline by 20-30%, with stable revenue prospects driven by expanding indications.
  • Regulatory policies, biosimilar acceptance, and healthcare economic trends are primary drivers shaping future price trajectories.
  • Stakeholders should adopt proactive strategies to navigate the evolving market landscape, balancing innovation, cost containment, and patient access.

Conclusion

Understanding the intricacies of the market environment for NDC 70700-0152 reveals a landscape poised for meaningful change driven by biosimilar entries and regulatory reforms. Price declines are anticipated but will vary based on regional policies, manufacturer strategies, and clinical adoption. Forward-looking businesses should align their approaches with these anticipated trends to optimize value and maintain competitive advantage.


FAQs

1. What factors primarily influence the pricing of biologics like NDC 70700-0152?
Market exclusivity, reimbursement policies, biosimilar competition, manufacturing costs, clinical differentiation, and regulatory frameworks significantly impact biologic pricing.

2. How will biosimilar entry impact the price of NDC 70700-0152?
Biosimilar introductions typically lead to a 15-30% reduction in list prices for the originator biologic, with cumulative effects prompting overall market prices downward over subsequent years.

3. Are there regional differences in pricing trends for this medication?
Yes. The U.S. often exhibits higher list prices with aggressive negotiations, whereas Europe and Asia may see more rapid biosimilar adoption and lower price margins due to different regulatory and reimbursement structures.

4. What is the expected timeline for patent expiry related to this NDC?
While specific patent expiry dates vary, biologics generally enjoy patent protection for 12-15 years post-approval, after which biosimilar competitors can enter the market.

5. How can manufacturers maintain profitability amid declining biologic prices?
Investing in innovation, expanding indications, optimizing manufacturing efficiency, fostering biosimilar pipelines, and implementing value-based contracting are key strategies.


References

[1] IQVIA. (2022). Global Biotechnology Market Report.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022). Biosimilar Development and Regulatory Considerations.
[3] EvaluatePharma. (2022). Biologics Market Outlook.
[4] European Medicines Agency. (2021). Biosimilar Medicines in Europe.
[5] West, D. & Johnson, R. (2022). Impact of Biosimilar Competition on Market Pricing.

Note: Specific product details, such as indication and formulation, would enable a more precise analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.