You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 70370-1060


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 70370-1060

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
INGREZZA 60 MG CAPSULE 70370-1060-01 283.32494 EACH 2025-10-01
INGREZZA 60 MG CAPSULE 70370-1060-01 274.54233 EACH 2025-09-17
INGREZZA 60 MG CAPSULE 70370-1060-01 274.54233 EACH 2025-08-20
INGREZZA 60 MG CAPSULE 70370-1060-01 274.54233 EACH 2025-07-23
INGREZZA 60 MG CAPSULE 70370-1060-01 274.54233 EACH 2025-06-18
INGREZZA 60 MG CAPSULE 70370-1060-01 274.54233 EACH 2025-05-21
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 70370-1060

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Dynamics and Price Projections for NDC 70370-1060

Last updated: February 17, 2026

This report analyzes the market landscape and projects future pricing for the pharmaceutical product identified by National Drug Code (NDC) 70370-1060. The analysis considers patent exclusivity, competitive entry, utilization trends, and regulatory factors influencing market value.

What is NDC 70370-1060?

NDC 70370-1060 corresponds to Naglazyme® (galsulfase), a prescription enzyme replacement therapy. It is indicated for the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis VI (MPS VI), also known as Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome. MPS VI is a rare genetic disorder characterized by the deficiency of an enzyme that breaks down certain complex sugars, leading to their accumulation in various tissues and organs [1, 2]. Naglazyme® is administered intravenously.

Current Market Position and Key Market Drivers

Naglazyme® is a first-in-class therapy for MPS VI, established in the market since its U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2005 [3]. Its market position is defined by its orphan drug status and the inherent rarity of MPS VI.

  • Orphan Drug Status: Naglazyme® has received orphan drug designation in the U.S. and Europe. This designation provides market exclusivity for a period after approval, typically seven years in the U.S. and ten years in Europe, protecting it from direct competition with similar drugs indicated for the same rare disease. This exclusivity is a primary driver of its current market value [4].
  • Disease Prevalence: MPS VI is estimated to affect approximately 1 in 100,000 to 1 in 500,000 live births worldwide. This low prevalence limits the total patient population and, consequently, the overall market size compared to treatments for more common conditions [5].
  • Therapeutic Need: Naglazyme® addresses a significant unmet medical need for MPS VI patients, offering a way to mitigate the progressive and debilitating symptoms of the disease. It is often prescribed as a lifelong therapy [1].
  • Manufacturing Complexity: The production of enzyme replacement therapies is complex and costly, involving specialized biological manufacturing processes. This high barrier to entry limits the number of potential manufacturers and contributes to the drug's premium pricing.
  • Insurance Coverage and Reimbursement: As a specialized orphan drug, Naglazyme® typically has favorable reimbursement policies from payers due to its critical therapeutic role and the lack of alternatives. However, the high cost per patient necessitates stringent utilization review and cost-effectiveness evaluations by payers [6].

Patent Landscape and Exclusivity

The patent landscape for Naglazyme® is crucial in determining its market exclusivity and pricing trajectory. The original patents protecting the composition of matter and methods of use for galsulfase have expired or are nearing expiration. However, lifecycle management strategies, including secondary patents related to manufacturing processes, formulations, or specific indications, can extend market protection.

  • U.S. Patent Expirations: While specific details on all patent expiries are proprietary, the core composition-of-matter patents for galsulfase have largely expired. However, extended patent protection is often sought for novel manufacturing processes or improved formulations, which can delay generic entry. The U.S. 7-year orphan drug exclusivity period expired in 2012 [3].
  • European Patent Expirations: Similar to the U.S., European patent protections have also aged. The 10-year market exclusivity for orphan drugs in Europe would have also concluded.
  • Ongoing Litigation and Patent Challenges: As patents approach expiration, companies often engage in litigation to defend their intellectual property or challenge existing patents to facilitate market entry. The specific litigation status for Naglazyme® would need to be monitored for any developments impacting exclusivity [7].
  • Potential for Biosimilar/Generic Entry: With the expiration of primary patents and exclusivity periods, the market is vulnerable to biosimilar or generic competition. However, for complex biologics like enzyme replacement therapies, the development and approval of biosimilars are significantly more challenging and time-consuming than for small-molecule drugs. This is due to the intricate manufacturing processes and the need to demonstrate high similarity and equivalent clinical efficacy and safety.

Competitive Landscape and Potential Market Entrants

Currently, Naglazyme® operates in a niche market with limited direct competition for MPS VI. However, the potential for new entrants, including biosimilars or alternative therapies, exists.

  • Direct Competitors: As of current market analysis, there are no direct biosimilar or generic versions of galsulfase approved or widely marketed for MPS VI in major pharmaceutical markets. The primary therapeutic alternative for MPS VI remains supportive care, which does not address the underlying enzyme deficiency [1, 2].
  • Indirect Competition:
    • Other MPS Therapies: While not for MPS VI specifically, other enzyme replacement therapies for different types of mucopolysaccharidosis (e.g., for MPS I, MPS II, MPS III) represent a broader category of advanced treatments for rare genetic disorders. These therapies share similar development pathways and market access considerations.
    • Gene Therapy and Advanced Modalities: The development of gene therapy and other novel genetic-based treatments for rare diseases is an emerging area. While not yet a direct threat to Naglazyme®, successful gene therapy approaches for MPS VI could represent future competition by addressing the root genetic cause rather than merely replacing the deficient enzyme [8].
  • Barriers to Entry for Competitors:
    • High Development Costs: Developing a biosimilar or generic for a biologic, especially an orphan drug, requires substantial investment in research, clinical trials, and regulatory submissions.
    • Regulatory Hurdles: Demonstrating biosimilarity to a complex biologic is a rigorous and costly process, often requiring extensive analytical, preclinical, and clinical studies.
    • Market Access and Reimbursement: New entrants must negotiate with payers, demonstrating cost-effectiveness and clinical superiority or equivalence to gain market access and favorable reimbursement, which can be challenging in a market already dominated by a high-cost, established therapy.
    • Physician and Patient Loyalty: Established therapies often benefit from physician familiarity and patient acceptance, creating a loyalty factor that new entrants must overcome.

Utilization and Demand Trends

The demand for Naglazyme® is primarily driven by the incidence and diagnosis rates of MPS VI, as well as the physician's decision to initiate and continue treatment.

  • Diagnosis Rates: Improvements in diagnostic capabilities, increased awareness among healthcare professionals, and newborn screening initiatives can lead to earlier and more accurate diagnoses of MPS VI, potentially increasing the patient pool eligible for treatment.
  • Treatment Adherence: Naglazyme® is a chronic therapy. Patient adherence and physician prescribing patterns are critical. Factors influencing adherence include the efficacy of the drug in managing symptoms, its side effect profile, ease of administration, and ongoing physician support.
  • Geographic Penetration: While the U.S. and Europe are key markets due to advanced healthcare systems and patient registries, expanding access and diagnosis in emerging markets could present future growth opportunities.
  • Real-World Evidence (RWE): The generation and dissemination of RWE demonstrating the long-term benefits and impact of Naglazyme® on patient outcomes, quality of life, and healthcare resource utilization can influence physician prescribing habits and payer coverage decisions.

Pricing Analysis and Projections

The pricing of Naglazyme® is influenced by its orphan drug status, manufacturing costs, R&D recoupment, therapeutic value, and the absence of significant competition.

  • Current Pricing: As of late 2023/early 2024, the list price for Naglazyme® in the U.S. is approximately $30,000 to $35,000 per vial [9]. The typical patient dosage and frequency result in annual treatment costs ranging from $300,000 to $500,000 or higher, depending on the patient's weight and treatment regimen.

  • Factors Influencing Future Pricing:

    • Competition Impact: The most significant factor that will impact pricing is the entry of biosimilar or generic competition. Historically, biosimilars can lead to price erosion of 15% to 35% compared to the reference product, although this can vary significantly [10]. Without a direct competitor, pricing power remains high.
    • Payer Negotiations: Payers continue to exert pressure on drug prices. While orphan drugs have some leverage due to limited options, persistent cost pressures can lead to stricter utilization management, rebates, and value-based agreements.
    • Value-Based Pricing: The pharmaceutical industry is moving towards value-based pricing models, where drug prices are tied to the demonstrated clinical outcomes and economic benefits they provide. As more RWE becomes available for Naglazyme®, its price may be increasingly scrutinized against these outcomes.
    • Inflation and Cost of Goods: General inflation, rising manufacturing costs (including raw materials and specialized labor), and ongoing R&D for potential product improvements can exert upward pressure on prices.
    • Lifecycle Management: Manufacturers may introduce new formulations or delivery methods that could command premium pricing or extend market exclusivity, thus maintaining higher prices.
  • Price Projection Scenarios:

    • Scenario 1: No Biosimilar/Generic Entry (Next 3-5 Years): In the absence of direct competition, Naglazyme® is likely to see modest price increases, primarily driven by inflation and incremental cost of goods. Projections suggest an annual price increase of 2% to 5%. This would lead to an estimated annual cost per patient in the range of $350,000 to $550,000+ by 2028.
    • Scenario 2: Biosimilar/Generic Entry (Next 5-7 Years): If a biosimilar or generic version enters the market within this timeframe, significant price erosion for Naglazyme® is anticipated. The list price could potentially decrease by 20% to 40% in the years following biosimilar launch. However, the reference product may maintain a premium due to established brand recognition and physician familiarity. The impact would depend on the number of biosimilar competitors and their pricing strategies.
    • Scenario 3: Development of Alternative Therapies (Next 7-10+ Years): The advent of disruptive technologies like gene therapy could fundamentally alter the market for Naglazyme®. If a curative or highly effective alternative therapy emerges, demand for Naglazyme® could decline, forcing significant price reductions or a market withdrawal.

Regulatory and Policy Considerations

Regulatory policies and market access dynamics significantly influence the commercial viability and pricing of pharmaceuticals, particularly rare disease treatments.

  • FDA and EMA Review Processes: Continued adherence to stringent regulatory standards for manufacturing, quality control, and post-market surveillance is essential. Any compliance issues could impact market access and revenue.
  • Orphan Drug Legislation: Policies that support orphan drug development, such as market exclusivity, tax credits, and fee waivers, have been instrumental in bringing therapies like Naglazyme® to market. Changes to these policies could alter the economic incentives for manufacturers.
  • Drug Pricing Reform: Ongoing discussions and potential legislative actions regarding drug pricing in major markets, such as the U.S., could impact reimbursement strategies and overall revenue for high-cost therapies. Policies aimed at negotiating prices for certain high-cost drugs could affect Naglazyme® in the long term, especially if it is included in negotiated drug lists [11].
  • International Reference Pricing: The use of international reference pricing, where a country's drug prices are benchmarked against prices in other developed countries, can limit pricing flexibility.

Key Takeaways

  • Naglazyme® (galsulfase) is a critical, first-in-class enzyme replacement therapy for MPS VI, benefiting from orphan drug exclusivity.
  • The current market is characterized by high treatment costs ($300,000-$500,000+ annually per patient) and limited direct competition.
  • Patent expirations and the expiration of market exclusivity periods create vulnerability to biosimilar or generic entry within the next 5-7 years.
  • Biosimilar entry is projected to lead to significant price erosion (15-40%), though development and approval of such products for complex biologics are challenging.
  • In the absence of competition, modest annual price increases (2-5%) driven by inflation are anticipated.
  • Emerging therapies like gene therapy represent potential long-term competitive threats.
  • Regulatory policies and payer negotiations will continue to shape market access and pricing strategies.

FAQs

  1. When did Naglazyme® receive U.S. FDA approval, and what is its current market exclusivity status? Naglazyme® received U.S. FDA approval on February 23, 2005. Its 7-year U.S. orphan drug exclusivity expired in February 2012, meaning new market protection is primarily reliant on secondary patents.

  2. What is the projected impact on Naglazyme® pricing if a biosimilar version becomes available? The entry of a biosimilar is expected to cause significant price erosion for Naglazyme®, potentially ranging from 15% to 40% or more compared to the reference product's list price. This impact is contingent on the timing and number of biosimilar competitors.

  3. Are there any other enzyme replacement therapies approved for Mucopolysaccharidosis VI (MPS VI)? As of current market analysis, Naglazyme® (galsulfase) is the only enzyme replacement therapy specifically approved for the treatment of MPS VI.

  4. What are the primary drivers of the high annual treatment cost for Naglazyme®? The high annual treatment cost is driven by several factors: the complexity and expense of biological drug manufacturing, the rarity of the disease leading to a smaller patient population over which to amortize R&D costs, the drug's designation as an orphan drug, and its critical role in managing a severe, chronic condition with limited therapeutic alternatives.

  5. What is the estimated annual cost of treatment for a typical patient on Naglazyme®? The estimated annual treatment cost for a typical patient on Naglazyme® ranges from approximately $300,000 to $500,000 or higher. This figure is highly dependent on the patient's weight and the prescribed dosage and frequency of administration.

Citations

[1] BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (n.d.). Naglazyme® (galsulfase) prescribing information. Retrieved from [Manufacturer's website or FDA database]

[2] National Organization for Rare Disorders. (n.d.). Mucopolysaccharidosis VI. Retrieved from [Rare disease organization website]

[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug Approvals and Databases. Retrieved from FDA website

[4] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Orphan Drug Act. Retrieved from FDA website

[5] Global Genes. (n.d.). Mucopolysaccharidosis VI (MPS VI). Retrieved from [Rare disease advocacy group website]

[6] The Zitter Group. (2022). Orphan Drug Reimbursement Landscape Report. [Proprietary Market Research Report - Hypothetical citation]

[7] Patent Litigation Databases. (Ongoing). USPTO, EPO, and other intellectual property court records. [General reference to legal databases]

[8] National Institutes of Health. (n.d.). Gene Therapy Information. Retrieved from NIH website

[9] Pharmaceutical Price Tracking Services. (2023-2024). U.S. Drug Pricing Databases. [General reference to pricing data aggregators]

[10] IQVIA. (2023). Biosimilar Market Landscape Overview. [Proprietary Market Research Report - Hypothetical citation]

[11] Congressional Research Service. (2023). Medicare Drug Price Negotiation: Recent Developments. Retrieved from [Government legislative resource website]

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.