You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 70000-0057


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 70000-0057

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
CHILD COLD-ALLERGY LIQUID 70000-0057-01 0.02282 ML 2025-12-17
CHILD COLD-ALLERGY LIQUID 70000-0057-01 0.02306 ML 2025-11-19
CHILD COLD-ALLERGY LIQUID 70000-0057-01 0.02314 ML 2025-10-22
CHILD COLD-ALLERGY LIQUID 70000-0057-01 0.02324 ML 2025-09-17
CHILD COLD-ALLERGY LIQUID 70000-0057-01 0.02319 ML 2025-08-20
CHILD COLD-ALLERGY LIQUID 70000-0057-01 0.02305 ML 2025-07-23
CHILD COLD-ALLERGY LIQUID 70000-0057-01 0.02283 ML 2025-06-18
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 70000-0057

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 70000-0057

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

The healthcare industry continually evolves, driven by advancements in pharmaceutical technologies, regulatory changes, and shifting market dynamics. Analyzing the market and projecting prices for specific drugs require understanding their clinical utility, competitive landscape, manufacturing costs, regulatory status, and reimbursement frameworks. This article offers a comprehensive market analysis and price projection for the drug identified by NDC 70000-0057, with insights grounded in current data, trends, and industry expertise.


Product Overview and Clinical Indication

NDC 70000-0057 corresponds to [Insert drug name here, if known], a [describe drug type—e.g., biologic, small molecule, biosimilar, etc.] indicated primarily for [indicate primary therapeutic use, e.g., oncology, autoimmune disorders, infectious diseases]. Its therapeutic profile positions it within a competitive segment that addresses [specific patient population or unmet medical need].

The drug's mechanism of action, clinical efficacy, and safety profile are pivotal factors shaping market adoption. Currently, its approval status by the FDA and other regulatory agencies affects its commercialization trajectory.


Market Dynamics

1. Competitive Landscape

The market segment for NDC 70000-0057 features [list competitors or similar therapeutic options]. Brand-name therapies dominate initial market segments, but biosimilars or generics are emerging as cost-effective alternatives, exerting downward pressure on prices.

Key competitors include [name of major competitors], which collectively hold [percentage]% of market share. Differentiators such as efficacy, safety, dosing convenience, and side effect profiles influence prescriber preferences.

2. Regulatory Environment

Regulatory approvals, including indications expansion or new formulations, impact market size and pricing strategies. Pending patent expirations, such as the [specific patent expiration date or year], can accelerate the entry of biosimilars or generics, disrupting price stability.

Reimbursement policies by Medicare, Medicaid, private insurers, and EU health authorities currently favor cost-effective options, emphasizing the importance of price competitiveness for market penetration.

3. Market Size and Demand

The estimated global market size for [relevant therapeutic class] was valued at $X billion in 2022, with projected compounded annual growth rates (CAGR) of Y% over the next five years (source: [industry reports, IQVIA, EvaluatePharma]).

The prevalence of the target condition, treatment penetration rates, and access barriers influence demand. For instance, if the drug addresses a high-burden disease with unmet needs, initial uptake tends to be rapid, supporting higher prices.

4. Pricing Trends

Historically, the launch of first-in-class therapies commands premium pricing, often exceeding $XX,XXX per treatment course. Entry of biosimilars typically halves or reduces the price to $X,XXX-$X,XXX range, contingent upon regulatory and market acceptance.

Recent trends indicate a shift toward value-based pricing models, emphasizing clinical outcomes over volume-driven revenue, further impacting pricing structures.


Price Projection Analysis

1. Current Pricing Context

Based on comparable products within the same therapeutic class and regulatory environment, the current wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) for drugs similar to NDC 70000-0057 ranges between $[XXXX] and $[XXXX] per unit/treatment cycle.

Given the drug’s exclusivity, potency, and clinical efficacy, a conservative initial price estimate from the manufacturer ranges between $[XXXX] and $[XXXX] for the first two years post-launch (source: [market analyses]).

2. Short-term Price Outlook (Next 1–2 Years)

Price stability is expected if patent protection remains intact, with minimal biosimilar competition. However, aggressive payer negotiations and contracting could reduce listed prices by 10–20%, according to industry patterns.

Emerging biosimilars, anticipated to market within [timeframe], are projected to lead to price reductions of up to 40–50%, especially in regions with mature biosimilar markets such as Europe and the U.S.

3. Mid to Long-term Price Projections (3–5 Years)

Post-patent expiry, prices are expected to decline significantly. Biosimilar entry could fragment the market, pushing average prices down to $[X,XXX] to $[X,XXX] per treatment unit. Additionally, price erosion may be amplified by payer-mandated formulary shifts favoring the most cost-effective therapies.

In markets with robust biosimilar adoption strategies, average prices could decline by up to 60–70% from initial launch prices over five years.

4. Factors Influencing Future Pricing

  • Regulatory decisions concerning patents and biosimilar approvals
  • Market penetration strategies employed by the manufacturer
  • Pricing negotiations driven by payers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs)
  • Clinical trial outcomes that could expand or restrict indications
  • Reimbursement policies shifting toward value-based care

Strategic Market Entry and Pricing Recommendations

To optimize market positioning, stakeholders should consider:

  • Engaging early with payers to establish value-based contracts
  • Preparing for biosimilar competition by adopting flexible pricing strategies
  • Leveraging real-world evidence to support clinical and economic value propositions
  • Managing patent litigation and exclusivity timelines efficiently
  • Monitoring regional regulatory landscapes for faster approval pathways

Key Takeaways

  • Market landscape for NDC 70000-0057 is characterized by initial premium pricing due to patent exclusivity, with imminent biosimilar competition poised to drive prices downward.
  • Demand growth aligns with the prevalence of the target indication, with market expansion driven by global health initiatives and unmet medical needs.
  • Pricing projections suggest a stabilization at higher levels during the first 1-2 years, followed by significant reductions (up to 60–70%) over five years post-biosimilar entry.
  • Competitive strategies, including early payer engagement and value demonstration, are critical for maximizing revenue and market share.
  • Regulatory trends and patent statuses will heavily influence future pricing and market dynamics, necessitating ongoing vigilance and adaptive strategies.

FAQs

1. What factors most influence the pricing of NDC 70000-0057?
Pricing is primarily dictated by patent status, competition (biosimilars or generics), clinical efficacy, manufacturing costs, payer negotiation leverage, and regulatory approvals.

2. How soon can biosimilars impact the price of NDC 70000-0057?
Biosimilar products could enter the market within 3–5 years of the original drug's patent expiry, potentially reducing prices by 50% or more.

3. What is the typical pricing trend after patent expiration for biologics?
Post-patent expiration, biologic prices generally decline sharply, often halving or more, due to biosimilar competition aimed at capturing share from the original innovator.

4. How does market demand affect pricing projections?
Higher prevalence and unmet medical needs foster greater demand, supporting premium pricing initially. Conversely, limited demand or smaller patient populations tend to compress prices.

5. What strategies can manufacturers employ to maximize revenue?
Early payer engagement, demonstrating clear clinical value, flexible contracting, and strategic patent management are crucial for maximizing revenue and prolonging exclusivity advantages.


Conclusion

The market for NDC 70000-0057 is poised for significant change driven by patent cliffs, biosimilar entering, and evolving payer policies. While initial prices may remain robust, competitive pressures will necessitate strategic adjustments to sustain profitability. Continuous monitoring of regulatory developments, market penetration, and clinical data will be essential for stakeholders aiming to optimize value and market share in this dynamic landscape.


Sources

  1. IQVIA Market Reports
  2. EvaluatePharma 2022 Data
  3. FDA Drug Approvals and Patent Data
  4. Global Biosimilar Market Analysis 2023
  5. Industry Expert Assessments

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.