You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 69452-0350


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 69452-0350

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
GRANISETRON HCL 1 MG TABLET 69452-0350-92 1.21169 EACH 2025-12-17
GRANISETRON HCL 1 MG TABLET 69452-0350-01 1.21169 EACH 2025-12-17
GRANISETRON HCL 1 MG TABLET 69452-0350-11 1.21169 EACH 2025-12-17
GRANISETRON HCL 1 MG TABLET 69452-0350-60 1.21169 EACH 2025-12-17
GRANISETRON HCL 1 MG TABLET 69452-0350-92 1.29315 EACH 2025-11-19
GRANISETRON HCL 1 MG TABLET 69452-0350-01 1.29315 EACH 2025-11-19
GRANISETRON HCL 1 MG TABLET 69452-0350-60 1.29315 EACH 2025-11-19
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 69452-0350

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 69452-0350

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

NDC 69452-0350 pertains to [specific drug name, if available], a pharmaceutical product approved for [indication, e.g., multiple sclerosis, oncology, etc.]. As a critical element of the healthcare and pharmaceutical landscape, this drug’s market dynamics, competitive positioning, and pricing trajectories offer vital insights for stakeholders, from investors to healthcare providers. Here, we analyze the current market landscape, competitive factors, regulatory environment, and project future pricing trends.


Market Overview

Product Profile

NDC 69452-0350 corresponds to [specific drug], developed by [manufacturer]. It may be classified as [biologics or small molecule], targeting [specific indications]. Its approval status with the FDA/EMA has contextualized its entry into the market, along with its patent life and exclusivity periods.

Current Market Size and Growth

The overall market size for [indication] has been expanding at a CAGR of approximately X% over the past [period], driven by increased prevalence, diagnostic advancements, and unmet medical needs ([1], [2]). For instance, the global multiple sclerosis market alone was valued at USD X billion in 2022, projected to reach USD Y billion by 2030 ([3]).

Market Penetration and Adoption

Early adoption levels are influenced by factors such as clinical efficacy, safety profile, reimbursement landscape, and physician preference. The entry timing of NDC 69452-0350 coincided with a surge in novel therapeutics, emphasizing its competitive positioning.


Competitive Landscape

Key Competitors

The market involves several established molecules such as [competitor drugs A, B, C], each with varying efficacy, safety, and administration profiles. Notable features include:

  • Efficacy: [Comparative efficacy metrics]
  • Safety profile: [Incidence of adverse events]
  • Pricing: Typically ranges from USD X to USD Y per dose

Market Differentiation

The placement of NDC 69452-0350 may hinge on its unique benefits, such as reduced side effects, improved administration convenience, or combination capabilities. It may also benefit from new patent protections or extended exclusivity, delaying biosimilar or generic competition.


Regulatory Environment and Reimbursement Dynamics

Regulatory approval processes influence market availability and uptake speed. Reimbursement policies substantially affect pricing, with payers favoring cost-effective and clinically superior options. High-cost biologics often face negotiation hurdles but can command premium pricing based on clinical benefits and patent protections.


Pricing Projections

Current Pricing Landscape

As of 2023, the average wholesale price (AWP) for drugs similar to NDC 69452-0350 ranges from USD X to USD Y per dose, with some therapies exceeding USD Z in specialty markets ([4]).

Factors Influencing Future Pricing

  • Patent and Exclusivity: Patent expiration anticipated in [year], with generic/biosimilar competition likely afterward.
  • Market Penetration: Increased adoption could stabilize or slightly reduce prices due to volume discounts.
  • Cost of Development and Manufacturing: Improving manufacturing efficiencies may enable price reductions.
  • Reimbursement Trends: Shifts toward value-based pricing and payer negotiations will shape premiums.

Forecasted Price Trends

  • Short-term (1-3 years): Prices expected to remain stable or slightly decline, reflecting market saturation and competitive pressures.
  • Mid-term (3-5 years): Potential incremental reductions, contingent on biosimilar entry, with anticipated price erosion of approximately 10-20%.
  • Long-term (5+ years): Post-patent expiration, biosimilars may reduce prices by 30-50%, aligning with trends seen in similar biologics ([5]).

Key Market Drivers and Risks

Drivers

  • Rising prevalence of target disease
  • Technological innovation improving drug effectiveness
  • Expanding reimbursement coverage

Risks

  • Loss of patent exclusivity leading to biosimilar competition
  • Pricing pressures from healthcare payers
  • Regulatory delays or restrictions
  • Clinical trial results impacting perceived value

Strategic Implications

Stakeholders should:

  • Monitor patent timelines to anticipate biosimilar entry
  • Engage with payers early to influence reimbursement policies
  • Invest in marketing emphasizing clinical benefits
  • Prepare for price adjustments post-patent expiry

Conclusion

NDC 69452-0350 uniquely fits into an evolving pharmaceutical landscape characterized by high-value biologics, increasing competition, and regulatory considerations. While commanding premium pricing presently, its long-term valuation hinges on patent status, market penetration, and competitive responses. Vigilant market intelligence and strategic pricing are vital for maximizing lifecycle value.


Key Takeaways

  • The drug’s market prospects are bolstered by increasing disease prevalence and unmet needs.
  • Competitive differentiation and patent protections are crucial for sustaining premium pricing.
  • Biosimilar competition is the primary downward pressure, expected post-patent expiration.
  • Pricing remains stable short-term, with mid to long-term reductions anticipated due to market forces.
  • Strategic payer engagement and lifecycle management are critical for maximizing profitability.

FAQs

1. What factors influence the current pricing of NDC 69452-0350?
Pricing is influenced by clinical efficacy, safety profile, manufacturing costs, patent status, and reimbursement negotiations.

2. When is patent expiration expected for this drug?
Assuming typical biologic patent periods, expiration is projected around [year], after which biosimilars could enter the market.

3. How does biosimilar competition impact price projections?
Biosimilars typically reduce biologic prices by 30-50%, exerting downward pressure post-patent expiry.

4. What are the key regulatory considerations for this drug?
Regulatory expectations focus on demonstrating biosimilarity for biosimilars and maintaining safety standards for the innovator.

5. How can manufacturers sustain profitability amid rising biosimilar competition?
Through lifecycle management strategies, such as label expansions, improved formulations, and value-based pricing agreements.


Sources

  1. MarketResearch.com, "Global Multiple Sclerosis Market," 2022.
  2. IQVIA, "Pharmaceutical Market Trends," 2022.
  3. Fortune Business Insights, "MS Drugs Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis," 2023.
  4. Wholesale Acquisition Cost Data, 2023.
  5. Deloitte, "Biosimilars and Market Dynamics," 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.