You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 68382-0848


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 68382-0848

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
ESOMEPRAZOLE DR 20 MG PACKET 68382-0848-94 5.89619 EACH 2025-12-17
ESOMEPRAZOLE DR 20 MG PACKET 68382-0848-94 6.13250 EACH 2025-11-19
ESOMEPRAZOLE DR 20 MG PACKET 68382-0848-94 6.08026 EACH 2025-10-22
ESOMEPRAZOLE DR 20 MG PACKET 68382-0848-94 6.21174 EACH 2025-09-17
ESOMEPRAZOLE DR 20 MG PACKET 68382-0848-94 6.29847 EACH 2025-08-20
ESOMEPRAZOLE DR 20 MG PACKET 68382-0848-94 6.38663 EACH 2025-07-23
ESOMEPRAZOLE DR 20 MG PACKET 68382-0848-94 6.47928 EACH 2025-06-18
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 68382-0848

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 68382-0848

Last updated: August 10, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape is dynamic, driven by factors such as regulatory changes, competitive activity, technological advancements, and shifts in healthcare policies. Analyzing the market environment for the drug identified by NDC 68382-0848 necessitates a comprehensive understanding of its therapeutic application, manufacturing details, patent status, competitive positioning, and potential pricing trajectories. This report provides an in-depth market analysis and price projections for this specific drug to inform stakeholders' strategic decisions.


Product Overview and Therapeutic Applications

The National Drug Code (NDC) 68382-0848 refers to a proprietary pharmaceutical product registered within the United States, typically reflecting specifics on manufacturer, dosage form, and strength. Based on current databases and public registries, NDC 68382-0848 corresponds to [Insert current drug name, e.g., "XYZ Therapeutics' XYZ-123"], a [specific class, e.g., novel biologic, small molecule, biosimilar] indicated for [indication, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, diabetes].

The drug's mechanism of action, its targeted patient population, and unique clinical benefits position it within a niche or generic expansion within its therapeutic class. Published clinical trial data demonstrates [key efficacy/safety data, e.g., superior patient outcomes, reduced adverse events] which bolsters its market appeal.


Regulatory Status and Patent Landscape

The regulatory status significantly shapes market entry strategies. As of [latest date], the drug has received [FDA approval, pending approval, or accelerated approval status]. Its patent life extends until [year], providing a window for market exclusivity, with potential patents covering [composition of matter, method of use, formulation].

Patent expirations projected within the next [X years] could enable generic or biosimilar competition, affecting pricing and market share. Additionally, regulatory shifts—such as formulary inclusions, competitive tenders, or reimbursement changes—affect uptake and pricing strategies.


Market Dynamics and Competitive Landscape

The market for drugs in [therapeutic class] is characterized by [high/low] competition. Key competitors include [list the main existing brand-name drugs and biosimilars], with prominent players holding significant market shares.

Industry analyses suggest that the drug's differentiation lies in [unique efficacy, delivery method, side effect profile], which could grant a competitive advantage. Nonetheless, price competition is inevitable once patent protections lapse.

Emerging therapies and pipeline candidates are influences that could challenge the market share or accelerate the adoption of alternative treatments, impacting long-term revenue potential for [drug name].


Current Pricing Environment

Pharmaceutical pricing strategies for new entrants often balance recouping R&D investments and ensuring market penetration. Based on publicly available data, the average wholesale price (AWP) for comparable drugs in the [therapeutic class] ranges from $[X] to $[Y] per [dose/unit].

For [NDC 68382-0848], the initial launch has seen a price point around $[D] per [unit/dose], positioning it as [premium, mid-range, accessible] relative to existing therapies.

Reimbursement models, including insurer negotiations and Medicare/Medicaid policies, influence net price and access. High-cost drugs often leverage value-based pricing strategies, especially if real-world evidence demonstrates [improved outcomes, reduced long-term costs].


Pricing Trends and Projections

Short-term (1-3 years):

Given the current patent life and regulatory status, projected prices will likely stabilize around $[X] to $[Y] per [dose/unit]. During this period, manufacturers typically pursue early market share growth via promotional incentives and payer negotiations.

Initial uptake is expected to be robust owing to [clinical advantages, lack of direct competition, or formulary placements]. Price adjustments may occur in response to [rebate agreements, market penetration, or adverse event reports].

Medium-term (3-5 years):

Anticipating patent expiration around [year], generic competition could emerge, exerting pressure to reduce prices by [X]% to [Y]%. Historically, similar drugs have experienced a [specific percentage] decline post-patent expiry.

Innovative pricing models, such as outcomes-based contracts, may influence net pricing. The entry of biosimilars or generics could lead to a price reduction of up to 40-70%, depending on regulatory acceptance and market demand.

Long-term (beyond 5 years):

If biosimilar or generic versions dominate, prices could stabilize at [lower price point], driven by competitive dynamics. However, continued innovation, new indications, or expanded patents can prolong exclusivity, maintaining higher prices.

Additionally, the integration of the drug within personalized medicine paradigms could justify premium pricing if clinical benefits are demonstrable and differentiated.


Factors Influencing Price Dynamics

  • Regulatory Approvals and Patent Litigation: Extended patent protections support higher prices; legal challenges may shorten exclusivity or endorse biosimilar market entries.

  • Market Penetration and Access: Adoption rates influence revenue; partnerships with payers bolster formulary inclusion, enabling higher reimbursement rates.

  • Clinical Data and Real-World Evidence: Demonstrated superior efficacy or safety profile justifies premium pricing.

  • Manufacturing and Supply Chain: Production costs, especially for biologics, impact baseline pricing and margin considerations.

  • Healthcare Policy Trends: Policy movements favoring biosimilars, pricing transparency, and value-based reimbursement can exert downward price pressures.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

For manufacturers, securing extended patent protection and demonstrating clinical superiority are pivotal to maintain high pricing. Early engagement with payers and formulary committees is essential for market share capture.

For payers and providers, cost containment strategies, including formulary management and negotiated rebates, are integral as more competitors enter the market.

For investors, understanding patent life, R&D pipeline, and regulatory environment will inform valuation models and investment timing.


Key Takeaways

  • The initial price of [drug name] is positioned competitively within its therapeutic niche, supported by its clinical profile and regulatory approval status.
  • Patent protection provides a competitive moat for approximately [X] years, with subsequent biosimilar or generic entry expected to significantly reduce prices.
  • Price projections indicate a potential decline of [X]% to [Y]% post-patent expiry, depending on market dynamics and technological developments.
  • Market access strategies, including payer negotiations and demonstrating value, are critical for maximizing revenue.
  • Emerging therapeutic competitors and healthcare policy trends will be key determinants of product pricing longevity and profitability.

FAQs

1. What factors most influence the pricing of NDC 68382-0848?
Pricing is driven primarily by patent status, clinical efficacy, manufacturing costs, competitive landscape, payer negotiations, and healthcare policies.

2. How soon could biosimilars or generics affect the market for this drug?
Typically, biosimilar or generic versions may enter the market approximately [X] years after patent expiry, which is projected around [year] for this drug.

3. What is the typical price range for drugs in this therapeutic class?
Prices vary widely; biologics in this class often range from $[X] to $[Y] per dose, depending on formulation and brand versus generic status.

4. How can manufacturers extend the market life of their drug?
By securing new indications, optimizing formulations, engaging in value-based pricing, and enhancing clinical outcomes data.

5. What role does healthcare policy play in the future pricing of this drug?
Policies promoting biosimilars, price transparency, and value-based reimbursement can lead to potential downward price adjustments.


References

  1. [Insert publication or database references related to drug data, price analyses, regulatory insights]
  2. [Industry reports analyzing biosimilar entry and patent cliffs]
  3. [Peer-reviewed articles on drug pricing strategies and market dynamics]

This analysis is intended for informational purposes and should be supplemented with ongoing market intelligence and regulatory updates.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.