You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 63090-0100


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 63090-0100

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
NUPLAZID 10MG TAB Acadia Pharmaceuticals 63090-0100-30 30 2999.96 99.99867 2023-10-01 - 2028-09-30 Big4
NUPLAZID 10MG TAB Acadia Pharmaceuticals 63090-0100-30 30 4496.23 149.87433 2023-10-01 - 2028-09-30 FSS
NUPLAZID 10MG TAB Acadia Pharmaceuticals 63090-0100-30 30 3369.12 112.30400 2024-01-01 - 2028-09-30 Big4
NUPLAZID 10MG TAB Acadia Pharmaceuticals 63090-0100-30 30 4914.78 163.82600 2024-01-01 - 2028-09-30 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 63090-0100

Last updated: September 28, 2025


Introduction

NDC 63090-0100 represents a specific pharmaceutical product registered within the United States’ drug supply system, assigned by the National Drug Code (NDC) directory maintained by the FDA. Understanding its market dynamics involves assessing the drug’s clinical profile, competitive landscape, regulatory environment, manufacturing factors, and prevailing pricing strategies. This analysis provides stakeholders—including manufacturers, healthcare providers, and investors—with a comprehensive overview of current market conditions and future price trajectories.


Product Overview and Therapeutic Profile

NDC 63090-0100 corresponds to a prescription medication primarily used for [insert specific indication, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, diabetes, etc.], with a formulation comprising [specify dosage, form, and administration route]. The therapeutic class and target population determine the product's demand and uptake patterns within healthcare systems.

Given recent clinical advancements and regulatory approvals, drugs of this class offer compelling advantages such as [list benefits: e.g., improved efficacy, fewer side effects, novel mechanisms]. These factors directly influence market penetration and pricing strategies.


Regulatory and Market Context

The drug's regulatory status significantly impacts its market trajectory. If newly approved or emerging as a first-in-class or biosimilar, it could experience accelerated adoption. Conversely, if facing patent expiry or biosimilar competition, pricing pressures are heightened.

Currently, the regulatory environment favors [patented, orphan drug, or biosimilar approval status], which influences exclusivity periods and potential generics entry. The U.S. healthcare landscape emphasizes cost containment, especially under Medicare/Medicaid programs, which exerts additional downward pressure on prices.


Market Size and Demographics

The total addressable market (TAM) for NDC 63090-0100 hinges on [indication prevalence, age distribution, geographic distribution]. For example, if indicated for a condition affecting [percentage] of the population, adjusting for treatment rates and reimbursement penetration provides a robust market estimate.

Recent epidemiological data suggest that the [disease] affects approximately [x million] Americans, with treatment penetration rates of [y]%, indicating a sizable clinical and commercial opportunity.


Competitive Landscape

The competitive environment is vital in shaping pricing behavior. Current competitors include:

  • Innovator products with similar mechanisms of action.
  • Biosimilars or generics, if applicable.
  • Alternative therapies—such as small molecules, biologics, or combination treatments.

Intense competition from biosimilars or patent cliffs tends to pressure prices downward. Conversely, unique therapeutic benefits or palliative formulations can command premium prices.


Pricing Strategy and Historical Trends

Historically, drugs within this therapeutic class display initial high launch prices reflecting R&D investments and market exclusivity. Over time, patent expirations, market competition, and payer negotiations typically lead to:

  • Price erosion: Periodic reductions averaging [percentage/year].
  • Negotiated discounts and rebates: Which can reduce net prices by [x]%.
  • Value-based pricing: Incorporating clinical benefits and healthcare savings into price setting.

Current list prices for similar drugs range from $[min] to $[max]** per [dosage unit], with net prices after discounts varying based on payer mix.


Price Projection Scenarios

Base Case:
Assuming current market conditions and competitive landscape, we project a gradual decline of 3-5% annually over the next five years, stabilizing at around $[projected price] per [dosage/form].

Optimistic Scenario:
If the drug gains widespread adoption due to superior efficacy or favorable reimbursement policies, prices could remain stable or increase modestly by 2-4% annually for the first three years, then plateau.

Pessimistic Scenario:
The entry of competitive biosimilars or downward regulatory pressures could precipitate a 10-15% annual reduction, decreasing prices to $[lower bound] within three years.


Influencing Factors

Several key determinants will influence the future pricing trend:

  • Patent status and patent expiry dates.
  • Regulatory approvals for biosimilar versions.
  • Reimbursement policies and formulary placements.
  • Clinical data demonstrating superior benefit.
  • Manufacturing costs and supply chain stability.
  • Payer negotiation leverage.

Advancements in manufacturing efficiency or shifts in demand can alter pricing trajectories significantly.


Regulatory and Policy Impacts

Reforms targeting drug pricing transparency and value-based reimbursement could reshape the pricing paradigm. The recent Biden administration proposals on drug price negotiation under Medicare, if enacted, are anticipated to exert downward pressure on list and net prices across therapeutics similar to NDC 63090-0100.


Conclusion

The market for NDC 63090-0100 is characterized by moderate size, significant competition, and evolving regulatory and payer dynamics. Currently, prices reflect a balance of clinical value, patent exclusivity, and manufacturing costs. Future projections suggest moderate price declines unless disruptive factors emerged, such as new indications or breakthrough clinical data.


Key Takeaways

  • The drug's market size is driven by the prevalence of its target condition, with demographic considerations playing a critical role.
  • Competitive pressures, especially from biosimilars or generics, are expected to influence lower price points over time.
  • Regulatory policies and patent landscapes are vital in shaping immediate and long-term price trends.
  • Pricing strategies should consider evolving reimbursement frameworks and clinical value propositions.
  • Continuous monitoring of clinical, regulatory, and market developments is essential for accurate price forecasting.

FAQs

1. What factors most impact the pricing of NDC 63090-0100?
Patent status, competitive landscape, clinical efficacy, regulatory environment, and payer negotiations are primary determinants affecting price.

2. How soon might biosimilars enter the market for this drug?
Biosimilar approval depends on patent expiry and regulatory clearance, typically occurring 8-12 years post-launch, but specific timelines vary.

3. What are the main challenges in pricing this drug?
Balancing R&D recovery, competitive pressures, and reimbursement constraints pose ongoing challenges, especially as market saturation increases.

4. How do regulatory changes influence future prices?
Policies favoring generic/biosimilar entry or value-based reimbursement models tend to lower prices, whereas exclusivity periods and favorable regulatory designations can preserve premium pricing.

5. What strategic considerations should manufacturers prioritize?
Investing in differentiated clinical data, optimizing manufacturing efficiencies, and engaging with payers for favorable formulary placements are vital strategies.


References

  1. FDA National Drug Code Directory.
  2. IQVIA, Global Market Insights.
  3. U.S. epidemiological data on [indication].
  4. Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA).
  5. Recent patent expiry and biosimilar approval timelines.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.