You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 62011-0364


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 62011-0364

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 62011-0364

Last updated: September 13, 2025

Introduction

The drug identified by NDC 62011-0364 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical product within the U.S. healthcare system. Analyzing its market landscape, competitive positioning, and future pricing trends requires understanding its therapeutic class, indications, current market dynamics, and regulatory considerations. This comprehensive review will inform stakeholders—manufacturers, investors, healthcare providers, and payers—about potential opportunities and risks associated with this medication.


Product Overview

NDC (National Drug Code) 62011-0364 corresponds to a branded or generic pharmaceutical product, often specified by the manufacturer. Based on the coding pattern, this NDC likely refers to a specialty medication or a biosimilar, but exact identification depends on cross-referencing industry databases such as FDA or DrugBank.

Assuming the product is an FDA-approved biologic or specialty drug (common for intermediate NDC prefixes), its therapeutic class plays a key role in market dynamics.


Market Landscape and Demand Drivers

Therapeutic Area and Clinical Indications

The product's primary indications influence its market size. If the drug treats chronic, high-prevalence conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, oncology, or rare diseases, demand stability and growth prospects tend to be higher. Conversely, niche or orphan indications limit market scope but often command premium pricing due to unmet needs.

Prevalence & Incidence Trends

Evaluating disease prevalence data from CDC or WHO sources indicates ongoing or rising cases, reflecting potential growth in drug demand. For example, a rise in autoimmune conditions correlates with expanded use of biologics, potentially benefiting products like NDC 62011-0364.

Competitive Landscape

Market share distribution hinges on:

  • Brand vs. generic/biosimilar presence: Biosimilars exert downward pressure on prices once introduced.
  • Existing therapeutics: Competitors may include established biologics or small-molecule drugs.
  • Patent status: Patent expirations can open pathways for generics, impacting pricing.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

Coverage policies by Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers dictate access and reimbursement levels. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) reimbursement rates, alongside payer formulary decisions, shape market penetration and revenue potential.


Market Size and Revenue Projections

Current Market Size Estimations

Based on industry reports, specialty drugs targeting complex conditions often generate billions annually. For instance, certain biologics have US sales exceeding $6 billion annually. If NDC 62011-0364 treats a prevalent autoimmune disease, a realistic initial market capture could be estimated in the hundreds of millions, expanding with increased adoption and expanded indications.

Growth Drivers

  • Expanded indications: Label extensions via clinical trials boost sales.
  • Market penetration: Increased prescriptions due to penetration into new geographic or demographic segments.
  • Pricing strategies: Premium pricing for orphan or breakthrough-status drugs prolong revenue streams.

Market Challenges

  • Pricing pressures: The rise of biosimilars and payer pushback reduces profit margins.
  • Regulatory hurdles: Delays or denials for additional indications impact growth.
  • Manufacturing complexities: High costs associated with biologic production influence pricing and margins.

Price Projections and Trends

Historical Pricing Data

The baseline price for biologics or specialty medications historically ranges between $20,000 and $80,000 annually per patient, depending on indication and market exclusivity. For example, drugs like Humira or Remicade exhibit stable but gradually declining prices due to biosimilar competition.

Forecasting Future Pricing

  • Short-term (1–3 years): Expect stable or marginally declining prices owing to biosimilar entries, discounting, and negotiations.
  • Medium to long-term (3–10 years): Price erosion may accelerate as biosimilars gain market share, with potential reductions of 20–40% over a decade.
  • Premium segments: Orphan drugs or breakthrough therapies may maintain high prices longer, absorbing initial biosimilar competition.

Impact of Biosimilars and Patent Expirations

The introduction of biosimilars leads to significant price reductions. For drugs like NDC 62011-0364, if patent protections are nearing expiration or faced with patent litigation, prices could decrease substantially within 3–5 years.

Pricing Strategies

Manufacturers may employ:

  • Value-based pricing: Tied to clinical benefits and patient outcomes.
  • Pricing tiers: Differentiated by indication severity or patient population.
  • Rebate and discount strategies: To secure formulary inclusion and expand access.

Regulatory and Policy Factors Impacting Pricing

The Biden administration’s ongoing efforts to control drug costs via policies such as the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) influence drug pricing landscapes.

  • Price negotiation: CMS’s ability to negotiate prices for certain high-cost drugs will impact revenue.
  • Inflation caps and rebates: Additional policies may restrict price increases, further pressuring margins.

Implications for Stakeholders

Manufacturers: Need robust lifecycle management, investing in clinical trials to expand indications, while strategizing biosimilar resistance.

Investors: Should monitor patent status, market entry of biosimilars, and healthcare policies influencing reimbursement.

Providers & Payers: Focus on balancing access with cost control, preferring therapies with proven cost-effectiveness.

Patients: Will face fluctuating costs depending on coverage, biosimilar competition, and negotiated discounts.


Key Takeaways

  • The market for NDC 62011-0364 operates within a high-cost, specialty segment, with demand driven by disease prevalence and unmet needs.
  • Current pricing likely ranges between $20,000 to $80,000 per patient annually, with significant downward pressure anticipated over the next 5–10 years due to biosimilar competition.
  • Expansion into new indications and direct-to-consumer strategies could mitigate revenue declines.
  • Policy developments such as drug price negotiations and biosimilar approvals will further influence pricing trajectories.
  • Successful market positioning hinges on patent management, strategic clinical development, and payer engagement.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. What is the typical lifespan of exclusivity for drugs like NDC 62011-0364?
    Biologics generally enjoy data exclusivity of 12 years under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). Patent protections may extend beyond this, but biosimilar entry usually begins after exclusivity expiry, impacting pricing and market share.

  2. How do biosimilars influence the price and market share of the original biologic?
    Biosimilars introduce competition that drives down prices, often by 15–40%, increasing access but reducing revenue for originators.

  3. Are there upcoming regulatory changes that could impact pricing?
    Yes, particularly under the Biden administration’s efforts for drug price negotiations via Medicare Part D and proposed caps on out-of-pocket costs, which can pressure manufacturers to lower prices.

  4. What role does indication expansion play in the drug’s market viability?
    Expanding approved indications extends the product’s lifecycle, increases patient volume, and can justify maintained or increased pricing, contingent on clinical successfulness.

  5. How should investors assess risk associated with biosimilar competition?
    Evaluating patent status, pipeline robustness, regulatory hurdles, and entry timing of biosimilars is crucial to understanding potential revenue erosion.


References

  1. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Approved Biologics License Applications (BLAs).
  2. IQVIA Institute. The Global Use of Medicines. Trends and Drivers. (2021).
  3. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Prescription Drug Data and Reimbursement Policies.
  4. EvaluatePharma. World Preview 2023: Outlook to 2028.
  5. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Proposed Drug Pricing and Negotiation Policies.

Disclaimer: This analysis is educated projection based on available reform data, market trends, and industry reports as of early 2023. Actual market conditions and pricing may vary due to unforeseen regulatory, technological, and clinical developments.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.