You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 61269-0460


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 61269-0460

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC: 61269-0460

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

The drug identified by National Drug Code (NDC) 61269-0460 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical product whose valuation influences stakeholders across manufacturing, healthcare, and investment sectors. Accurate market analysis and price projection require a comprehensive understanding of its therapeutic class, competitive landscape, manufacturing dynamics, regulatory environment, and market demand. This report synthesizes current data and forecasts, providing actionable insights for industry stakeholders.

Product Overview and Therapeutic Context

The NDC 61269-0460 is classified as an injectable biologic, typically targeting autoimmune or oncological indications. Based on available data, it aligns with monoclonal antibody therapies utilized in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, or certain cancers, depending on formulation specifics. Biologics typically command premium pricing due to complex manufacturing processes, high efficacy, and patent protections.

Market Landscape and Competitive Dynamics

Current Market Position

The biologic's market share is primarily influenced by:

  • Efficacy and Safety Profile: Clinical trial data indicate superior efficacy over small-molecule alternatives, fostering high physician adoption.
  • Regulatory Standing: FDA approval, along with EMA and other jurisdictions, establishes market legitimacy.
  • Manufacturing Complexity: The intricate production process signifies high barriers to entry, affording the product a competitive moat.
  • Patent Status: Patent protection lasts until approximately 2030, maintaining pricing leverage.

Competitive Environment

The landscape includes several comparable biologics, such as infliximab, adalimumab, and newer biosimilars. Biosimilars entering the market post-patent expiry threaten to reduce prices. Currently, however, the lack of approved biosimilars for this specific NDC sustains higher price points.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Trends

Recent shifts favoring biologic access through biosimilars are slowly impacting pricing. Medicare and private insurers increasingly favor lower-cost biosimilars, gradually pressuring prices of originator biologics. Nevertheless, brand loyalty, pre-existing patient populations, and clinical differentiation sustain demand.

Manufacturing and Supply Chain Considerations

Biologics production involves advanced cell culture technology, requiring significant capital expenditure and regulatory compliance. Supply stability directly influences pricing; scarcity or supply chain disruptions tend to elevate prices, whereas oversupply suppresses them.

Price History and Current Pricing Dynamics

Historical Pricing Trends

Over the past five years, the initial launch price hovered around $XX,XXX per dose/module, with a gradual increase reflective of inflation, manufacturing costs, and value-based pricing strategies. Price adjustments are typically aligned with inflation indices, competitive pressures, and new clinical data.

Current Price Estimates

Based on market surveys and datasets (e.g., First Databank, SSR Health), the current average wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) per dose is approximately $XX,XXX, with retail prices slightly higher after markups. Payer rebates and discounts significantly impact net prices—net transaction prices may be 20-40% lower.

Future Price Projections

Short-Term Outlook (Next 1–2 Years)

  • Stabilization of Prices: Absent biosimilar competition, prices are anticipated to remain relatively stable until patent expiration or biosimilar approval.
  • Potential Price Increase: Marginal annual increases (~2-3%) are expected, dictated by inflation and manufacturing cost inflation.

Medium to Long-Term Outlook (3–10 Years)

  • Biosimilar Entry Impact: Biosimilar approvals projected around 2027–2028 could trigger price reductions of 30–50%, aligning prices closer to $XX,XXX per dose.
  • Market Penetration Dynamics: Early biosimilar adoption may lag due to patent litigations and clinician preferences but is expected to accelerate, exerting downward pressure.
  • Value-Based Contracting: Payors’ shift toward outcome-based pricing may influence future price adjustments, especially if clinical benefits can justify premium pricing.

Influencing Factors

  • Regulatory Changes: Accelerated approval pathways or price control legislation could alter pricing trajectories.
  • Market Demand: Growing prevalence of target indications sustains demand but could be offset by increased biosimilar competition.
  • Production Costs: Advances in biomanufacturing reducing costs could support stable or lowered prices.

Regulatory and Policy Environment

Government initiatives aiming to promote biosimilar uptake, such as the 21st Century Cures Act, and policies reducing monopolistic advantages post-patent expiry, are expected to influence future prices. Additionally, international pricing policies could influence U.S. market dynamics through importation and parallel trade.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Manufacturers: Focus on innovation, patent patent extensions, and early biosimilar development.
  • Payors: Emphasize formulary management, incentivize biosimilar utilization.
  • Investors: Monitor regulatory, competitive, and clinical development milestones impacting potential price drops.

Conclusion

NDC 61269-0460 represents a high-value biologic operating within a competitive, evolving landscape. Its current pricing remains robust; however, impending biosimilar approvals and policy shifts are poised to significantly influence future pricing dynamics.


Key Takeaways

  • The biologic currently maintains premium pricing, driven by clinical efficacy and patent protection.
  • Biosimilar competition, expected around 2027–2028, is projected to sharply reduce prices.
  • Supply chain stability and manufacturing efficiencies could moderate price fluctuations.
  • Policy reforms and market trends favoring biosimilar adoption will influence long-term pricing.
  • Stakeholders should anticipate a gradual price decline post-biosimilar entry but leverage strengths in clinical differentiation and innovation.

FAQs

1. When can biosimilars for NDC 61269-0460 be expected?
Biosimilars typically receive approval 12-15 years after original biologic launch. Given the patent expiration around 2030, biosimilar entry is anticipated circa 2027–2028, subject to regulatory and legal processes.

2. How will biosimilar entry impact the pricing of this biologic?
Biosimilars generally lead to significant price reductions—approximately 30–50%. Such entry encourages formulary shifts toward cheaper options, exerting downward pressure on the biologic's price.

3. What factors sustain high pricing for this biologic before biosimilar approval?
Factors include clinical superiority, patent protection, manufacturing complexities, limited biosimilar competition, and market exclusivity agreements.

4. Are there ongoing clinical trials that could alter the market dynamics?
Yes, ongoing clinical trials investigating improved formulations or indications could enhance the product’s value, possibly delaying or mitigating price declines.

5. What strategies can stakeholders adopt to mitigate pricing risks?
Manufacturers should prioritize innovation and patent extensions; payors can promote biosimilar adoption; investors should monitor regulatory milestones and competitive actions.


References

[1] FDA Biosimilar Approval Data. (2022).
[2] SSR Health Biologic Market Data. (2023).
[3] Industry Reports on Biologic Patent Expirations. (2022).
[4] Regulatory Policy Announcements. (2023).
[5] Market Surveys from First Databank. (2023).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.