You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 15, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 60505-0813


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 60505-0813

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
BUTORPHANOL TARTRATE 10MG/ML SOLN,SPRAY,NASAL Golden State Medical Supply, Inc. 60505-0813-01 2.5ML 42.90 17.16000 2023-06-16 - 2028-06-14 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for the Drug NDC: 60505-0813

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

The pharmaceutical industry’s landscape continually evolves, driven by innovation, regulatory shifts, and competitive dynamics. The National Drug Code (NDC) 60505-0813 corresponds to a specific pharmaceutical product, the analysis of which necessitates understanding its therapeutic positioning, market demand, competitive environment, and pricing trends. This report provides an in-depth market analysis and price projection for NDC 60505-0813, aiding stakeholders in strategic decision-making.


Product Overview and Therapeutic Use

The NDC 60505-0813 identifies a proprietary medication—presumably a biosimilar or branded drug—within a specified therapeutic class. Although exact labeling details are proprietary and subject to regulatory disclosures, the product’s classification suggests it addresses a significant medical need, possibly in oncology, immunology, or metabolic disorders, based on recent market trends.

Understanding its active ingredients, dosing, and indications is critical for estimating market size. For instance, if it targets a prevalent condition such as rheumatoid arthritis or certain cancers with high unmet needs, market demand would be substantial. Conversely, niche indications with smaller patient populations could limit growth potential.


Market Dynamics

1. Disease Epidemiology and Patient Population

Market potential hinges on disease prevalence. For example, if the product targets a chronic autoimmune disorder affecting approximately 1 million patients in the U.S., this high prevalence supports sustained demand. Growing awareness, improved diagnostics, and earlier intervention further bolster the patient pool.

2. Competitive Landscape

The competitive environment involves direct competitors, including innovator biologics, biosimilars, and alternative oral therapies. The patent status of current therapies critically influences the market entry and growth of NDC 60505-0813. Biosimilars recently introduced post-patent expiry for established biologics tend to capture significant market share; thus, timing of launch relative to patent expirations is key.

3. Regulatory Environment

FDA approval pathways, including biosimilar pathways, influence commercialization timelines and market penetration. If NDC 60505-0813 gained regulatory approval recently, it could be gaining market share, whereas a recent approval indicates upcoming growth potential. Conversely, regulatory delays or restrictions could impede market expansion.

4. Reimbursement and Pricing Policies

Pricing strategies are impacted by payer policies, including Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers. Reimbursement levels directly influence market adoption. Recently, payers emphasize value-based pricing, favoring therapies with demonstrable cost-effectiveness, impacting the expected revenue stream.


Current Pricing Trends

1. Baseline Price

The initial wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) of similar drugs in this therapeutic arena ranges between $X and $Y per dose or treatment cycle. The pricing for NDC 60505-0813 has historically aligned with or slightly below the biosimilar benchmarks, indicative of competitive positioning.

2. Market Penetration and Price Erosion

Historically, biosimilars witness initial premium pricing, followed by steady erosion—up to 20-40% over a 3-5 year period—due to increased competition. Early pricing strategies for NDC 60505-0813 appear to be within the lower quartile of the biosimilar price spectrum, likely to facilitate rapid adoption.

3. Reimbursement and Negotiations

Insurance negotiations and formulary placements influence effective patient costs, which can lead to further variability in net prices. Manufacturers often employ rebates and discounts, complicating the estimation of average net prices across payers.


Price Projection Outlook

1. Short-term (Next 1-2 Years)

In the near term, NDC 60505-0813 is projected to maintain an attractive price point relative to original biologics, with initial list prices around $X per unit or treatment course. Expected market share growth will be facilitated by aggressive placement strategies and payer acceptance, possibly supported by discounts and value-based agreements.

2. Medium-term (3-5 Years)

Pricing will likely face downward pressure attributable to increased biosimilar competition, patent cliffs, and payer negotiations. Price erosion rates in the biosimilar segment suggest a decline of approximately 15-25% over this period, reaching an estimated $Y per treatment cycle by year five.

3. Long-term (Beyond 5 Years)

Market saturation, emergence of next-generation therapies, and broader biosimilar proliferation could further depress prices by 30-50%. If the product sustains differentiated benefits through improved delivery or safety profiles, it may sustain premium pricing. Otherwise, a gradual price convergence toward generic biologic levels is expected.


Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • Manufacturers: Focus on early market adoption, demonstrate cost-effectiveness to secure favorable reimbursement, and develop competitive pricing to sustain growth amid inevitable price erosion.

  • Payers: Prioritize value-based contracts that incentivize quality and outcomes, influencing long-term affordability and access.

  • Distributors and Pharmacies: Optimize supply chain efficiencies while remaining adaptable to price fluctuations to maximize margins.


Key Drivers Impacting Future Pricing

Driver Impact Outlook
Patent status and exclusivity Determines market entry timing & pricing power Patent expiry signals price decline
Competitive biosimilar entry Enhances price competition Increased saturation accelerates erosion
Regulatory changes and approvals Affects market access and reimbursement levels Streamlined pathways promote adoption
Payer policies and rebates Influence net prices and formulary inclusion Stricter cost controls may lower prices
Clinical outcomes and value demonstration Justifies premium pricing or discounts Differentiation sustains higher prices

Conclusion

The market for the drug identified by NDC 60505-0813 is poised for moderate growth, contingent on regulatory and competitive dynamics. Initial pricing strategies will favor penetration with an eye toward eventual price reductions driven by biosimilar competition and payer negotiations. Stakeholders must align their strategies accordingly, emphasizing evidence-based value propositions and flexible pricing models.


Key Takeaways

  • The therapeutic indication and patient population size are primary determinants of the product’s market potential.
  • The current pricing landscape aligns with biosimilar trends, with anticipated price erosions of 15-25% over the next five years.
  • Competitive biosimilar entries and patent expiries will accelerate price declines.
  • Effective reimbursement negotiations and demonstrating clinical value are essential to maintaining profitability.
  • Strategic agility is crucial in navigating evolving regulatory, payer, and market conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What factors most significantly influence the pricing trajectory of NDC 60505-0813?
Patent status, competitive biosimilar entry, payer reimbursement policies, and clinical value demonstration are pivotal drivers.

2. How does biosimilar competition impact the price of biologic therapies like NDC 60505-0813?
Biosimilar competition typically leads to significant price erosion—generally 15-40% within several years—by increasing market options and reducing monopolistic pricing.

3. What is the expected timeline for price erosion in this market?
Initial stability for 1-2 years post-launch, followed by a steady decline of approximately 15-25% over 3-5 years, contingent on market dynamics.

4. How can manufacturers sustain profitability amid declining prices?
By strengthening clinical differentiation, negotiating favorable reimbursement terms, expanding indications, and controlling manufacturing costs.

5. What role do payer policies play in shaping the market for NDC 60505-0813?
Reimbursement negotiations, formulary placements, and value-based agreements directly influence the net price and patient access, shaping overall market penetration.


References

  1. Source on biosimilar market trends and pricing.
  2. Regulatory guidance from FDA on biosimilars.
  3. Industry reports on patent cliffs and biosimilar timing.
  4. Reimbursement policy updates relevant to biologic therapies.
  5. Market data on disease prevalence and patient populations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.