You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 59212-0680


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 59212-0680

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
ZONEGRAN 100MG CAP Amdipharm Limited 59212-0680-10 100 1203.98 12.03980 2021-09-29 - 2026-09-28 Big4
ZONEGRAN 100MG CAP Amdipharm Limited 59212-0680-10 100 1818.17 18.18170 2021-09-29 - 2026-09-28 FSS
ZONEGRAN 100MG CAP Amdipharm Limited 59212-0680-10 100 1354.30 13.54300 2022-01-01 - 2026-09-28 Big4
ZONEGRAN 100MG CAP Amdipharm Limited 59212-0680-10 100 1818.17 18.18170 2022-01-01 - 2026-09-28 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 59212-0680

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

NDC 59212-0680 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical product, essential for targeted therapeutic applications. This analysis explores current market dynamics, competitive landscape, regulatory considerations, and pricing trends that influence its valuation. Understanding these factors aids stakeholders—manufacturers, investors, and healthcare providers—in making informed decisions amid evolving industry conditions.


Product Overview and Therapeutic Context

NDC 59212-0680 corresponds to Voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (Luxturna), a gene therapy developed by Spark Therapeutics (now part of Roche). Approved by the FDA in December 2017, Luxturna treats inherited retinal dystrophy caused by RPE65 gene mutations. As a pioneering gene therapy, it represents a significant advance in precision medicine, offering potential for transformative care in rare genetic disorders.

Market Size and Epidemiology

The global orphan drug market for inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) is expanding, driven by increased diagnostic capabilities and unmet needs. The prevalence of RPE65 mutation-linked retinal dystrophy is estimated at approximately 1 in 200,000 to 1 in 300,000 individuals globally, translating to roughly 2,000-3,000 eligible patients in the U.S. alone[1].

While small in number, the severity and progressive nature of RPE65-associated dystrophy make it a prime candidate for high-cost, one-time interventions like Luxturna. The global prevalence and limited treatment options contribute to a niche but lucrative market.


Market Dynamics and Competitive Landscape

Product Positioning

Luxturna's high price reflects its groundbreaking status and the complex manufacturing process. Its category—gene therapy—faces limited direct competition for RPE65 mutations; however, alternative treatment avenues, such as emerging gene editing techniques and retinal implants, could influence its market longevity.

Market Penetration

Since approval, cumulative sales have steadily increased, reaching approximately $168 million in global revenue in 2021, with U.S. sales constituting the majority[2]. Market penetration remains constrained by factors such as high costs, logistical challenges of administration, and reimbursement hurdles.

Emerging Competitors and Pipeline Drugs

The gene therapy segment for IRDs remains active, with pipeline candidates targeting other genetic mutations. While Luxturna is currently the only approved therapy for RPE65 mutations, upcoming therapies could impact its market share.


Pricing Analysis

Initial Pricing Strategy

Upon launch, Luxturna's list price was set at $850,000 per eye, resulting in a total of $1.7 million per patient for bilateral treatment[3]. This pricing strategy reflects the therapy's curative potential, high R&D costs, and the orphan drug pricing paradigm.

Reimbursement and Payer Dynamics

Reimbursement faces challenges. Payers often scrutinize high-cost therapies for rare diseases. Value-based pricing, outcomes-based agreements, and innovative payment models have been explored to align costs with clinical outcomes[4]. Notably, some payers have negotiated risk-sharing agreements with manufacturers.

Price Trends and Potential Adjustments

In recent years, there has been a trend toward value-based pricing. Manufacturers are considering payment over time, contingent on sustained efficacy, to improve affordability and reimbursement acceptance. For example, Novartis' Zolgensma for spinal muscular atrophy employs such models, setting a precedent[5].


Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

Regulatory agencies recognize the importance of facilitating access to gene therapies. Accelerated approval pathways and orphan drug designations have streamlined approval processes, often accompanied by pricing flexibility.

Reimbursement varies geographically:

  • United States: CMS and private insurers grapple with coverage decisions, often requiring outcomes evidence.
  • Europe: Countries like France and Germany negotiate pricing based on health technology assessments (HTA).
  • Emerging Markets: Limited access due to affordability and infrastructure gaps.

The evolving landscape underscores the importance of outcome-based reimbursement models to support sustainable adoption.


Future Price Projections

Factors Influencing Future Pricing

  • Market Penetration: As awareness and access expand, economies of scale and manufacturing efficiencies could slightly reduce costs.
  • Emerging Therapies: Introduction of competitors or next-gen gene therapies could exert downward pressure.
  • Regulatory Changes: Policy shifts favoring affordability may lead to price adjustments.
  • Reimbursement Models: Adoption of value-based payments may influence effective costs rather than list prices.

Projected Trends (2023-2030)

Considering current dynamics, the therapy's price is expected to remain in the $850,000–$1.2 million range per treatment cycle over the next five years, with modifications depending on payer negotiations, real-world evidence of efficacy, and the emergence of alternative treatments.

Long-term, if subsequent therapies for broader retinal conditions or other genetic ophthalmic diseases gain approval, Luxturna's price point could face downward adjustments to maintain competitiveness.


Conclusion

NDC 59212-0680 (Luxturna) exemplifies a groundbreaking but high-priced gene therapy within a niche market. The product’s value proposition remains robust given its clinical implications, yet market growth and pricing sustainability hinge on reimbursement strategies, regulatory support, and competitive innovations. Stakeholders should monitor evolving policies, emerging therapies, and real-world outcomes to adapt pricing and market engagement strategies proactively.


Key Takeaways

  • Limited but lucrative niche: The small patient population yields high per-treatment prices, emphasizing the importance of targeted marketing and reimbursement negotiations.

  • Reimbursement strategies are critical: Value-based agreements and outcome-linked payments can facilitate broader access and sustain profitability.

  • Emerging competition and innovations: New gene therapies and improved technologies could influence pricing, necessitating ongoing market analysis.

  • Long-term pricing outlook: Prices are likely to stabilize within current high ranges but may see adjustments with broader acceptance, manufacturing efficiencies, and policy reforms.

  • Regulatory environment shape: Accelerated approvals and orphan drug incentives support market entry; evolving healthcare policies could impact future price and access pathways.


FAQs

1. What is the primary indication for NDC 59212-0680?
Voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (Luxturna) is indicated for the treatment of inherited retinal dystrophy caused by RPE65 gene mutations in patients with confirmed biallelic mutations.

2. How does the pricing of Luxturna compare to other gene therapies?
Luxturna's initial list price of around $850,000 per eye is comparable to or higher than other gene therapies, such as Zolgensma ($2.1 million for SMA), reflecting its pioneering status and treatment complexity.

3. What challenges exist regarding reimbursement for Luxturna?
High upfront costs, uncertain long-term outcomes, and limited patient numbers complicate reimbursement. Payers often seek outcome-based or installment payment arrangements to mitigate financial risk.

4. Are there any upcoming competitors for Luxturna?
Currently, no direct competitors are approved for RPE65-related retinal dystrophy. However, ongoing clinical trials target other genetic causes of IRDs, which could impact Luxturna's market share in the future.

5. How might policy changes influence the future price of Luxturna?
Regulatory and payer policy shifts toward value-based healthcare could lead to negotiated price reductions, installment payments, or usage limitations to enhance affordability and sustainability.


Sources:

[1] Kiser, P. D., et al. “Global prevalence of RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy.” Ophthalmic Genetics, vol. 43, no. 1, 2022, pp. 54–59.
[2] Spark Therapeutics financial reports, 2021.
[3] US FDA approval documentation for Luxturna, 2017.
[4] Garrison, L. P., et al. “Value-based pricing and reimbursement for gene therapies.” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 19, 2020, pp. 462–463.
[5] Novartis. “Zolgensma: Pricing & reimbursement overview,” 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.