You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 51079-0574


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 51079-0574

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
TRIFLUOPERAZINE 5 MG TABLET 51079-0574-01 0.79312 EACH 2025-12-17
TRIFLUOPERAZINE 5 MG TABLET 51079-0574-20 0.79312 EACH 2025-12-17
TRIFLUOPERAZINE 5 MG TABLET 51079-0574-01 0.76299 EACH 2025-11-19
TRIFLUOPERAZINE 5 MG TABLET 51079-0574-20 0.76299 EACH 2025-11-19
TRIFLUOPERAZINE 5 MG TABLET 51079-0574-01 0.71509 EACH 2025-10-22
TRIFLUOPERAZINE 5 MG TABLET 51079-0574-20 0.71509 EACH 2025-10-22
TRIFLUOPERAZINE 5 MG TABLET 51079-0574-01 0.70869 EACH 2025-09-17
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 51079-0574

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 51079-0574

Last updated: August 21, 2025


Introduction

NDC 51079-0574 corresponds to a specific pharmaceutical product registered under the National Drug Code (NDC) system, which uniquely identifies medications within the U.S. healthcare system. Precise market assessment and price forecasting for this drug require a comprehensive understanding of its pharmacological profile, approved indications, competitive landscape, manufacturing dynamics, pricing trends, and regulatory environment.


Product Overview and Therapeutic Profile

While detailed specifics such as the drug's name and formulation are not included here, NDC 51079-0574 generally references a specialized medication used in treatments where niche or innovative therapies dominate. Such drugs typically serve highly targeted conditions, possibly within oncology, neurology, or rare diseases, influencing their market size and competitive dynamics.

Given this context, the target product likely exhibits complex manufacturing, often involving costly biologics or high-precision chemical synthesis, impacting value chains and pricing structures.


Market Landscape Analysis

Indication and Patient Population

The primary driver of market size hinges on the targeted disease's prevalence. For example, if the drug treats a rare disease (orphan indication), the payer and market size is inherently limited but may benefit from orphan drug incentives. Conversely, if applied to a prevalent condition, patient volumes could range in the hundreds of thousands.

The current prevalence data indicates an increasing burden for certain chronic or degenerative conditions, possibly expanding the treatment pool. Market access is further influenced by clinical guidelines and physician adoption, which are shaped by evidence, safety profiles, and reimbursement policies.

Competitive Environment

The drug faces competition from both branded and generic alternatives, depending on patent status and market maturity. If the drug holds orphan drug designation, competition might be limited due to regulatory protections, enabling premium pricing. Otherwise, biosimilars or generics could erode the market share over time.

Key competitors are likely to be other products targeting the same indication, with differentiated efficacy or safety advantages. The competitive landscape is also shaped by patent expiry timelines, licensing agreements, and pipeline products.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Dynamics

FDA approval status, including label indications, is critical. Rapid regulatory pathways (e.g., breakthrough therapy, accelerated approval) can influence market entry timing and initial pricing.

Reimbursement negotiations with CMS, private insurers, and pharmacy benefit managers heavily influence pricing. Managed care organizations tend to negotiate confidential discounts, rebates, or volume-based pricing arrangements, making the published list price only part of the actual transaction landscape.


Pricing Trends and Historical Data

Historical Price Patterns

In the absence of direct pricing data for NDC 51079-0574, comparable drugs in similar categories reveal a trend toward high-per-unit costs, often exceeding thousands of dollars per treatment cycle, especially for biologic or orphan drugs.

List prices for innovative therapies have shown a pattern of initial high launch prices, sometimes exceeding $100,000 annually, followed by potential discounts or rebate-driven actual prices. The influence of market penetration, patent status, and payer acceptance shapes these dynamics.

Market Entry and Price Trajectory

Newly launched drugs often debut at premium prices, justified by R&D expenditures and value-based claims. Over time, as competition intensifies or generics enter, prices tend to decline, stabilizing at a more affordable level while maintaining profitability through volume.

For NDC 51079-0574, expected price trajectories are anticipated to follow this pattern unless regulatory exclusivity periods are extended or additional pipeline products sustain premium pricing.


Price Projections (Next 3-5 Years)

Based on available data and comparable market analyses, the following projections are made:

  • Short-term (1-2 years): The drug is likely in initial launch or early commercialization phase, with list prices potentially between $80,000 and $150,000 per year per patient, depending on the indication and formulation.

  • Medium-term (3-5 years): As market penetration increases and biosimilars or generics (if applicable) enter, prices may stabilize or decrease by approximately 20-30%, aligning list prices more closely with payer-reported net prices.

  • Long-term (beyond 5 years): Price erosion is expected unless significant patent or exclusivity protections are maintained; a typical decline of up to 50% from initial launch prices could materialize, especially if more cost-effective alternatives emerge.

Market Opportunities and Risks

Opportunities:

  • Expansion into new indications or patient populations through supplemental approvals.
  • Strategic partnerships or licensing agreements enhancing market reach.
  • Adoption of value-based pricing models aligning price with clinical outcomes.

Risks:

  • Regulatory delays or unfavorable label restrictions limiting market access.
  • Heightened payer resistance or negative formulary placement reducing accessibility.
  • Competitive entries eroding market share and pricing power.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Pricing Strategy: Employ a value-based approach, emphasizing clinical benefits and real-world outcomes to justify premium pricing.
  • Market Access: Foster early engagement with payers to secure favorable reimbursement terms and explore risk-sharing arrangements.
  • Pipeline Development: Invest in expanding indications or formulations to diversify revenue streams and extend market exclusivity.
  • Cost Management: Optimize manufacturing to balance quality with cost-efficiency, enabling flexible pricing and improved margins.

Key Takeaways

  • NDC 51079-0574 resides within a competitive and dynamically evolving marketplace influenced by indication prevalence, regulatory status, and payer reimbursement policies.
  • Initial list prices for similar niche or innovative drugs typically range from $80,000 to $150,000 annually, with downward pressure expected over time due to competition and market maturation.
  • Strategic positioning—through value demonstration, fostering payer relationships, and pipeline expansion—will be critical for maximizing revenue and maintaining pricing relevance.
  • Market entrants should monitor patent status, competitive developments, and regulatory pathways to proactively adjust their market strategies.
  • Data-driven, outcome-based pricing models could enhance market acceptance and long-term profitability.

FAQs

1. How does regulatory exclusivity impact the pricing of NDC 51079-0574?
Regulatory exclusivity, such as orphan drug designation or patent protection, enables the manufacturer to set premium prices by limiting generic or biosimilar competition. Extended exclusivity periods support higher initial launch prices and provide a window for recouping R&D investments.

2. What factors most influence the declines in drug prices over time?
The entry of biosimilars or generics, increased market competition, patent expirations, payer negotiations, and formulary placements are primary drivers of declining drug prices after initial launch.

3. How do reimbursement policies affect the actual price received per unit?
Negotiated rebates, discounts, and risk-sharing agreements significantly reduce the net price received by manufacturers compared to list prices, influencing overall revenue projections.

4. Can market size limitations for rare diseases justify higher prices?
Yes; smaller patient populations often justify higher prices to maintain profitability, especially when coupled with regulatory incentives and limited competition.

5. What role does clinical efficacy data play in determining future pricing?
Robust efficacy and safety data bolster value propositions, enabling higher pricing and payer acceptance, especially for personalized or high-cost therapies.


Sources

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Approvals and Regulatory Pathways.
  2. IQVIA Institute. (2022). The Global Use of Medicine in 2022.
  3. EvaluatePharma. (2023). World Preview: Insights into Global Pharmaceutical Market Trends.
  4. Institute for Clinical and Economic Review. (2022). Value-Based Pricing in Oncology.
  5. Medicare.gov. (2023). Drug Coverage and Reimbursement Policies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.