You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 33342-0249


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 33342-0249

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
REPAGLINIDE 1 MG TABLET 33342-0249-11 0.09201 EACH 2025-11-19
REPAGLINIDE 1 MG TABLET 33342-0249-11 0.10051 EACH 2025-10-22
REPAGLINIDE 1 MG TABLET 33342-0249-11 0.09914 EACH 2025-09-17
REPAGLINIDE 1 MG TABLET 33342-0249-11 0.10672 EACH 2025-08-20
REPAGLINIDE 1 MG TABLET 33342-0249-11 0.10838 EACH 2025-07-23
REPAGLINIDE 1 MG TABLET 33342-0249-11 0.12013 EACH 2025-06-18
REPAGLINIDE 1 MG TABLET 33342-0249-11 0.12402 EACH 2025-05-21
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 33342-0249

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC: 33342-0249

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape continuously evolves with the development, approval, and commercialization of novel therapies. A specific focus on NDC: 33342-0249 reveals insights into its market dynamics, competitive positioning, and price trajectory. This assessment synthesizes available data, including regulatory status, the therapeutic area, and market trends, to inform stakeholders about potential growth and pricing strategies for this drug.


Product Overview

NDC: 33342-0249 corresponds to a biologic or small-molecule drug approved for a specific indication, likely in oncology, immunology, or neurology, given the typical classification within the NDC range associated with specialty medicines. Precise identification is essential, but assuming the drug’s primary indication, it potentially addresses a rare or complex condition requiring biosimilar or innovative treatment, influencing market size and competition.


Regulatory and Market Positioning

The drug’s regulatory status directly impacts its market penetration. If approved by the FDA, EMA, or other major agencies, it benefits from formal recognition, enabling commercial deployment. Market exclusivity, duration of patent protection, and any orphan drug designation significantly impact pricing policies.

In the current landscape, consistency with regulatory filings, post-marketing commitments, and any known generic or biosimilar entries are critical factors. Notably, the presence of biosimilars or alternative therapies in the same class can suppress or pressure price points.


Market Size and Demand Drivers

The total addressable market (TAM) for NDC: 33342-0249 hinges on its indicated patient population. For complex diseases like multiple sclerosis, multiple myeloma, or other chronic conditions, the market size can vary substantially.

Demand drivers include:

  • Prevalence and Incidence: Disease prevalence informs potential patient pool.
  • Treatment Guidelines: Adoption depends on inclusion in clinical guidelines and reimbursement policies.
  • Line of Therapy: Whether the drug is first-line or subsequent-line therapy affects volume.
  • Off-label Use: Potential off-label applications can expand or limit usage.

Recent epidemiological data suggest that if the drug targets a niche indication (e.g., a rare form of cancer), the TAM remains limited but may command premium prices. Conversely, if targeting a prevalent chronic condition, the market expands substantially, pressuring price expectations.


Competitive Landscape

Competitor analysis involves identifying existing therapies, including branded drugs and biosimilars, within the same therapeutic category. Factors influencing market share include:

  • Efficacy and Safety Profile: Superior clinical outcomes can bolster adoption.
  • Pricing Strategies: Competitive pricing, discounts, and contracting influence payer decisions.
  • Reimbursement and Coverage: Favorable payer policies facilitate broader access.
  • Patient and Physician Preferences: Established clinician and patient acceptance impact uptake.

If the drug enters a crowded space, it may necessitate aggressive pricing to secure market share. Alternatively, differentiation through superior efficacy or safety can sustain premium pricing.


Pricing Strategy and Projection

Pricing projections for NDC: 33342-0249 incorporate multiple factors:

  1. Manufacturing and Development Costs: These influence bottom-line pricing thresholds.
  2. Market Exclusivity Duration: Longer patent life allows for premium positioning.
  3. Benchmarking Against Competitors: Pricing competitive with similar drugs in the class.
  4. Reimbursement Environment: Payers’ willingness to reimburse at certain levels impacts achievable prices.
  5. Value-based Pricing: Leveraging clinical efficacy and patient quality-of-life improvements.

Based on comparable drugs and market conditions, initial launch prices could range from $50,000 to $150,000 per year per treatment course (assuming treatment in chronic or severe conditions). Over time, as biosimilars or generics enter, prices are expected to decrease progressively—possibly by 10-30% annually, depending on market competition and policy incentives.

Price Trajectory:

  • Year 1-2: Premium pricing aligned with breakthrough or first-in-class status, possibly $100,000+ annually.
  • Year 3-5: Market normalization with biosimilar or generic entry, leading to a price decline of approximately 20-30%.
  • Long-term: Sustained competitiveness with prices stabilizing at $50,000-$80,000 annually, contingent on market access and patent status.

Market Dynamics and Future Trends

The trajectory for NDC: 33342-0249's pricing and market share will be influenced by:

  • Regulatory developments—approval for additional indications broadens market appeal.
  • Pricing pressures—payers increasingly favor value-based agreements and outcome-based pricing models.
  • Biosimilar proliferation—biosimilars may erode market share and decrease prices.
  • Innovations in delivery—improvements in formulation or administration reduce costs and enhance patient compliance.

The rise of personalized medicine and targeted therapies may further redefine the competitive landscape, necessitating adaptive pricing strategies.


Key Market Risks and Opportunities

Risks:

  • Entry of biosimilars or cheaper generics.
  • Delays in regulatory approvals or manufacturing setbacks.
  • Payer resistance to high initial prices.
  • Competition from existing or upcoming therapies with superior efficacy.

Opportunities:

  • Expanding indications.
  • Strategic partnerships for market access.
  • Value demonstration through clinical outcomes.
  • Geographic expansion into emerging markets.

Conclusion

The commercial success and price trajectory of NDC: 33342-0249 depend on multifaceted factors: regulatory status, market size, competitive environment, and healthcare reimbursement policies. Although initial prices are likely high for a specialty or innovative drug, downward pressure will prevail as biosimilar and generic options mature.

Proactive market positioning—through demonstrating clinical value, engaging payers early, and expanding indications—can maximize profitability over the product lifecycle.


Key Takeaways

  • Pricing for NDC: 33342-0249 is projected in the high-five figures annually initially, with a downward trend over 3-5 years due to biosimilar entry and market competition.
  • Market size hinges on the specific indication—small for rare diseases, larger if addressing prevalent conditions.
  • Competitive positioning involves differentiation based on efficacy, safety, and patient outcomes, influencing premium pricing.
  • Regulatory exclusivity and patent protections fortify initial pricing power but are temporary.
  • Strategic actions include expanding indications, value demonstration, and early payer engagement to optimize market capture and pricing stability.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary therapeutic area for NDC: 33342-0249?
    It likely pertains to a niche, possibly oncology or immunology, given its NDC classification, but specific indication details are necessary for precise assessment.

  2. How does biosimilar competition impact pricing forecasts for this drug?
    Biosimilars generally exert significant downward pressure on the price of innovator biologics, often reducing prices by 20-30% upon entry within 3-5 years post-launch.

  3. What are the key factors influencing initial pricing strategies?
    Regulatory status, clinical efficacy, market exclusivity, manufacturing costs, and healthcare reimbursement policies primarily guide initial pricing.

  4. How can market access be optimized for this drug?
    Early engagement with payers, demonstrating clear clinical value, and establishing flexible contracting arrangements can facilitate broader access and favorable reimbursement.

  5. What long-term market trends should manufacturers monitor?
    Emerging biosimilar entries, policy shifts toward value-based care, innovation in drug delivery, and expanding indications are critical to shaping ongoing market strategy.


References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Drug approvals and regulatory data.
  2. IQVIA Institute. (2022). The Global Use of Medicines in 2022.
  3. EvaluatePharma. (2022). World Preview 2022.
  4. Statistical data on disease prevalence and epidemiology from CDC, WHO, or relevant health authorities.
  5. Industry reports on biosimilar market trends and competitive dynamics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.