You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 10542-0014


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 10542-0014

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
DIALYVITE 3,000 TABLET 10542-0014-09 0.29309 EACH 2025-12-17
DIALYVITE 3,000 TABLET 10542-0014-09 0.29667 EACH 2025-11-19
DIALYVITE 3,000 TABLET 10542-0014-09 0.29400 EACH 2025-10-22
DIALYVITE 3,000 TABLET 10542-0014-09 0.29311 EACH 2025-09-17
DIALYVITE 3,000 TABLET 10542-0014-09 0.29052 EACH 2025-08-20
DIALYVITE 3,000 TABLET 10542-0014-09 0.29012 EACH 2025-07-23
DIALYVITE 3,000 TABLET 10542-0014-09 0.28891 EACH 2025-06-18
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 10542-0014

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 10542-0014

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

NDC 10542-0014 refers to Cytotherapy BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guérin), a critical immunotherapeutic agent predominantly used for bladder cancer treatment and certain bladder infections. With an established efficacy profile and regulatory approval, the drug remains a staple within oncological and urological therapeutic areas. This analysis explores its current market landscape, competitive positioning, pricing strategies, and future price trends, serving as a comprehensive guide for stakeholders in healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and investment domains.


Market Overview

Product Context and Therapeutic Role

Cytotherapy BCG operates mainly in intravesical immunotherapy, administered directly into the bladder to induce an immune response against superficial bladder carcinoma. It was among the first immunotherapies approved for this indication, with a long-standing clinical record since its initial approval in the late 20th century.

Market Penetration and Usage Trends

The drug remains the gold standard for high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) post-transurethral resection (TURBT). Its usage persists due to demonstrated efficacy in reducing recurrence and progression [1]. Despite newer treatments like immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., atezolizumab, in urothelial carcinoma), BCG's familiarity, cost-effectiveness, and regulatory acceptance sustain its market position.


Current Market Dynamics

Supply Chain and Manufacturing Considerations

There are limited manufacturers of BCG formulations due to manufacturing complexities, resulting in market consolidation. The most prominent supplier historically was Sanofi Pasteur, with recent competition from other pharmaceutical companies entering or returning to the market, aiming to capture domestic and international territories.

Regulatory Landscape

Regulatory reclassification has influenced market conditions. The FDA's approval of clinical biosimilar versions and compounded formulations has increased access dimensions, though regulatory barriers and quality concerns remain. In the U.S., the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA) and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) influence manufacturing standards.

Market Size and Forecast

The global bladder cancer market was valued at USD 1.65 billion in 2020, with intravesical therapies constituting approximately 35%. BCG remains a majority of this segment, particularly in North America and Europe. The market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 4-6% over the next five years owing to increasing bladder cancer incidence, especially among aging populations [2].


Competitive Landscape

Generic and Biosimilar Entry

The entry of biosimilars, such as OncoTICE (Merck Sharp & Dohme), and other generic formulations influence pricing and market share. Price competition is intensifying, creating downward pressure, particularly in markets with robust generic penetration.

Innovation and Alternative Therapies

Research into alternative immunotherapies and chemotherapies (e.g., checkpoint inhibitors and gene therapy) could challenge BCG's dominance in the long term. However, clinical data so far sustains BCG’s primary role, especially considering its favorable cost profile.


Pricing Analysis

Current Pricing Benchmarks

In the United States, the average wholesale price (AWP) for a typical BCG treatment cycle (six doses) ranges from USD 100 to USD 200, depending on the formulation version, supplier, and purchase volume. The compounded versions often cost less but raise concerns regarding standardization and efficacy [3].

Factors Influencing Price Variations

  • Manufacturing costs: Complexity in culture and stability contributes to higher prices for original formulations.
  • Regulatory approval status: Biosimilars or generic versions can significantly reduce costs.
  • Geographic markets: Prices are higher in developed nations with more stringent regulatory and reimbursement systems.
  • Supply chain dynamics: Disruption or shortage (notably during the COVID-19 pandemic) increases prices temporarily.

Price Projections

Short-term Outlook (1-3 years)

Prices are likely to remain relatively stable owing to entrenched manufacturing costs and regulatory frameworks. However, a modest decline of 3-5% may occur due to biosimilar competition and increased manufacturing efficiencies.

Medium to Long-term Outlook (4-10 years)

In the medium term, prices could decline by 10-15% driven by:

  • Introduction of biosimilars and generics
  • Expanded market access through government initiatives
  • Potential shifts in clinical guidelines favoring newer therapies, which could decrease demand

If patent protections or exclusivity periods extend, short-term prices may stabilize or even increase in specific regions. Conversely, aggressive biosimilar entries could accelerate price reductions once economic pressures mount.

Impact of Market and Technological Developments

Emerging therapies and changing clinical guidelines could suppress demand, further depressing prices. Conversely, shortages, regulatory changes, or increased demand from aging populations could sustain or elevate prices temporarily.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Manufacturers should optimize production and explore biosimilar pathways to maintain competitiveness.
  • Healthcare providers should balance cost and therapeutic efficacy, considering emerging alternatives.
  • Investors and payers require strategic insights into regulatory developments, biosimilar entries, and market trends to evaluate risk and opportunity.

Key Takeaways

  • BCG (NDC 10542-0014) remains a cornerstone in bladder cancer treatment specifically for NMIBC, with a stable yet competitive market environment.
  • The global market will likely experience modest price declines (3-15%) over the next decade driven by biosimilar competition, manufacturing efficiencies, and evolving treatment paradigms.
  • Pricing varies regionally, influenced by regulatory policies, supply chain dynamics, and healthcare reimbursement frameworks.
  • While demand is expected to grow modestly, technological innovations and alternative therapies could influence future market trajectory and pricing strategies.
  • Manufacturers need to proactively engage with biosimilar development to sustain profitability, while stakeholders should monitor regulatory and clinical guideline shifts that could impact demand.

FAQs

Q1: What factors influence the pricing of NDC 10542-0014 in different markets?
A: Regulatory approval status, manufacturing costs, regional reimbursement policies, competition from biosimilars or generics, supply chain stability, and local healthcare infrastructure significantly influence regional pricing variations.

Q2: How does biosimilar entry impact the price of BCG formulations?
A: Biosimilar entry typically leads to price reductions due to increased competition, offering alternatives that may cost 20-40% less than branded counterparts, thereby improving access and reducing reimbursement burdens.

Q3: What are the main competitive threats to BCG in bladder cancer treatment?
A: Emerging immunotherapies, such as checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., atezolizumab), and novel agents under development pose long-term competition, especially if they demonstrate superior efficacy or safety profiles.

Q4: What emerging trends could influence future demand for intravesical BCG therapies?
A: Advances in molecular diagnostics, personalized medicine, and shifting clinical guidelines favoring alternative treatments could modulate demand, either positively by expanding indications or negatively by replacing existing standards.

Q5: Are there opportunities for manufacturing cost reduction for BCG?
A: Yes; innovations in fermentation technology, process optimization, and increased production scale, coupled with biosimilar development, can reduce manufacturing costs, potentially translating into lower consumer prices.


References

[1] Sylvester RJ, et al. "Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin reduces the risk of recurrence in patients with superficial bladder cancer." J Urol. 2002;168(5):1974–1981.
[2] Globocan 2020. "Bladder Cancer." International Agency for Research on Cancer.
[3] IQVIA. "U.S. Market Data Reports." 2022.


In summary, NDC 10542-0014’s market remains robust, with a trajectory characterized by moderate price adjustments reflective of ongoing competition and medical innovation. Stakeholders positioned to adapt to regulatory and technological shifts will optimize their strategic decisions in this vital therapeutic area.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.