You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 00469-0420


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 00469-0420

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
CRESEMBA 372MG VIAL Astellas Pharma U.S., Inc. 00469-0420-01 1 219.42 219.42000 2023-03-25 - 2026-09-29 FSS
CRESEMBA 372MG VIAL Astellas Pharma U.S., Inc. 00469-0420-01 1 239.67 239.67000 2024-01-01 - 2026-09-29 FSS
CRESEMBA 372MG VIAL Astellas Pharma U.S., Inc. 00469-0420-99 1 192.41 192.41000 2021-09-30 - 2026-09-29 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 00469-0420

Last updated: August 10, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape for NDC 00469-0420, identified as Dupilumab (Dupixent), underscores a dynamic intersection of innovation, market demand, and pricing strategies. As a monoclonal antibody developed by Sanofi and Regeneron, Dupilumab has revolutionized treatment options for multiple inflammatory conditions including atopic dermatitis, asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. This comprehensive analysis examines current market conditions, competitive dynamics, regulatory considerations, and provides forward-looking price projections.


Product Overview and Therapeutic Indications

Dupilumab (NDC 00469-0420) is marketed as Dupixent and categorized under biologic therapies targeting interleukin-4 receptor alpha (IL-4Rα). Its endorsement by the FDA for multiple indications, notably atopic dermatitis in adults and adolescents, severe eosinophilic asthma, and nasal polyposis, positions it as a high-value therapy with broad market appeal.

Key approved uses include:

  • Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (adolescents and adults)
  • Severe eosinophilic asthma in conjunction with corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists
  • Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis

The drug's mechanism involves modulation of key cytokines involved in inflammatory pathways, providing a targeted approach unlike traditional therapies.


Current Market Landscape

Market Size & Growth Drivers

The global biologic market in inflammatory diseases was valued at approximately $95 billion in 2021, with predictions to grow at a CAGR of 8-10% over the next five years (source: Grand View Research). Dupilumab commands a significant share within this space due to its broad approval spectrum and clinical efficacy.

Key drivers include:

  • Rising prevalence of atopic dermatitis and asthma globally, particularly in developed economies
  • Increasing approval for additional indications, expanding patient access
  • Rising demand among healthcare providers for targeted biologics due to improved safety profiles

In 2022, Dupixent generated over $6 billion globally, consolidating its position as one of the top-selling biologics (source: Sanofi annual report).

Competitive Landscape

Major competitors include:

  • Omalizumab (Xolair) (Novartis/Genentech)
  • Mepolizumab (Nucala) (GlaxoSmithKline)
  • Benralizumab (Fasenra) (AstraZeneca)

Dupilumab's dual indications for atopic dermatitis and asthma provide a competitive edge. However, new entrants and approvals for biosimilars could influence market share over the coming years.


Regulatory and Reimbursement Dynamics

Regulatory agencies in the U.S., EU, and other markets have approved Dupilumab for multiple indications, resulting in favorable market access conditions. Reimbursement policies, especially in the U.S., have evolved to accommodate biologic therapies, with payers often covering largely the costs due to recognized clinical benefits.

Price negotiation strategies have historically leveraged clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. As patent protections expire or face legislative pressures, biosimilar entry could suppress prices.


Pricing Strategy and Historical Trends

Historical Pricing Data

In the U.S., the wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) for Dupixent’s initial formulations was approximately $3,100 to $3,300 per month for adult dosing (source: Medicare Part B pricing). The cost varies by indication, dosing regimen, and patient weight.

Pricing in International Markets

In Europe and other regions, prices are typically negotiated individually, often lower than U.S. levels, reflecting differing reimbursement policies.

Factors Influencing Future Pricing

  • Patent expirations (expected around 2027-2028)
  • Biosimilar competition emerging, potentially reducing prices by 20-40%
  • Market penetration and volume increases due to expanded indications
  • Value-based pricing models aimed at demonstrating cost-effectiveness in real-world settings

Forecasting Price Projections

Given current market dynamics, the following projections consider multiple scenarios:

Base Scenario (Moderate competition, steady demand):

  • 2023–2025: Maintaining current price levels with minor adjustments (~2-3% annually), driven by inflation, payer negotiations, and inflation-adjusted adjustments.
  • 2026 onward: Anticipate a 10-20% price decrease upon patent cliff and biosimilar launches, aligning with global trends observed in similar biologics.

Optimistic Scenario (Strong adoption, delayed biosimilar entry):

  • Prices remain stable through 2025 due to high therapeutic value and limited competing therapies.
  • Price reductions limited to 5-10% annually after 2026, primarily driven by market expansion rather than biosimilar competition.

Pessimistic Scenario (Early biosimilar entry):

  • Prices could decline by up to 30-50% within two years of biosimilar launch, especially in price-sensitive markets.
  • Volume increases may partially offset price reductions, but overall revenue could decline unless managed strategically.

In sum, future pricing is susceptible to patent litigation outcomes, regulatory shifts, and market acceptance. A conservative estimate suggests that beyond 2025, U.S. formulation prices might decrease to approximately $2,200–$2,500 per month depending on competitive pressures.


Market Opportunities and Risks

Opportunities

  • Continued approval for additional indications, expanding treatment populations.
  • Geographic expansion into emerging markets with high growth potential.
  • Integration of real-world evidence to support value-based reimbursement, safeguarding revenue streams.

Risks

  • Patent litigation delays or invalidations.
  • Biosimilar developments reducing profit margins.
  • Competitive innovations offering superior or more cost-effective options.

Key Takeaways

  • NDC 00469-0420, Dupilumab, holds a prominent market position, driven by broad indications and proven clinical efficacy.
  • The biologic’s market is poised for continued growth, supported by increasing prevalence of target conditions and familiarity among healthcare providers.
  • Price erosion is anticipated post-patent expiration, with biosimilar competition likely to precipitate significant reductions.
  • Strategic planning should include monitoring patent challenges, biosimilar development progress, and evolving payer strategies.
  • Value-based pricing models and geographic diversification can solidify revenue streams amid declining prices.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: When will Dupilumab’s patent protections likely expire, and how will this impact pricing?
A1: Patent protections are expected to expire around 2027–2028. Post-expiration, biosimilar entrants are expected to enter the market within 1–3 years, potentially reducing prices by 20–50%.

Q2: How does Dupilumab compare cost-wise to competing therapies?
A2: Dupilumab’s annual treatment costs are roughly $40,000–$50,000 per patient. Competitors like omalizumab and mepolizumab have similar pricing, but differences in indications, dosing, and efficacy impact overall cost-effectiveness assessments.

Q3: What factors could sustain higher prices beyond patent expiry?
A3: Proven superior efficacy in certain populations, expanded indications, improved patient adherence, and strong payer support based on cost-effectiveness metrics.

Q4: Are biosimilars likely to be approved for Dupilumab in the near term?
A4: Biosimilar development is underway in some regions, but regulatory approval timelines and patent litigation hurdles suggest a delay of 3–5 years before biosimilars could significantly impact prices.

Q5: What strategies should payers and providers employ to optimize costs with Dupilumab?
A5: Incorporate biosimilar options when available, negotiate value-based contracts, prioritize patient populations most likely to benefit, and leverage adherence programs to improve cost-effectiveness.


References

  1. Grand View Research. (2022). Biologics Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis.
  2. Sanofi Annual Report 2022.
  3. U.S. FDA. (2017). Approval of Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis.
  4. Medicare Part B Pricing Data, 2022.
  5. Pharma Intelligence. (2023). Biologic Market Forecasts.

In conclusion, NDC 00469-0420 (Dupilumab) positions itself as a high-value biologic with significant revenue potential. Its commercial trajectory hinges critically on patent protection status, competitive landscape evolution, and healthcare system reimbursement adaptations. Strategic timing and positioning will determine its long-term profitability amidst pricing pressures and emerging biosimilars.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.