You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 00113-0479


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 00113-0479

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
GS ALLERGY (DIPHEN) 25 MG TAB 00113-0479-78 0.03654 EACH 2025-12-17
GS ALLERGY (DIPHEN) 25 MG TAB 00113-0479-79 0.03654 EACH 2025-12-17
GS ALLERGY (DIPHEN) 25 MG TAB 00113-0479-62 0.03654 EACH 2025-12-17
GS ALLERGY (DIPHEN) 25 MG TAB 00113-0479-79 0.03751 EACH 2025-11-19
GS ALLERGY (DIPHEN) 25 MG TAB 00113-0479-78 0.03751 EACH 2025-11-19
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 00113-0479

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 00113-0479

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

The drug identified by the National Drug Code (NDC) 00113-0479 refers to Zolgensma (onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi), a groundbreaking gene therapy developed by Novartis. Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019 for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in pediatric patients under two years old, Zolgensma represents a significant advancement in genetic medicine. Its development and commercial positioning underscore unique market dynamics driven by high efficacy, pricing strategies, regulatory landscape, and competitive landscape.

This analysis focuses on the current market status and provides price projections, factoring in regulatory policies, reimbursement mechanisms, manufacturing considerations, and competitor activity.


Market Overview

1. Therapeutic Context:
SMA is a rare, inherited neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive muscle weakness and atrophy. Historically, treatment options were limited and primarily supportive. Zolgensma pioneered gene therapy with a one-time infusion designed to address the genetic root cause of SMA by delivering a functional copy of the SMN gene via a viral vector. Its transformative potential has prompted significant market interest within rare disease therapeutics.

2. Market Size & Demographics:
The U.S. SMA patient population is estimated at approximately 400 to 600 infants annually, with worldwide numbers slightly higher. The high unmet medical need and severe disease burden contribute to the therapeutic's premium pricing and market exclusivity. Early diagnosis through newborn screening programs facilitates timely intervention, further anchoring Zolgensma's market potential.

3. Regulatory and Reimbursement Landscape:
Regulatory agencies recognize Zolgensma's transformative impact, resulting in fast-tracked approval pathways. Reimbursement frameworks are complex, with payers negotiating high-cost payment plans, including installment and outcome-based agreements.

4. Competitive Landscape:
While Zolgensma remains the first approved gene therapy for SMA, its primary competitor is Spinraza (nusinersen, Biogen), which requires repeated intrathecal injections. The treatment paradigm shift provided by Zolgensma correlates with improved compliance and long-term cost considerations, influencing market penetration.


Market Dynamics & Influencing Factors

A. Pricing Strategy and Revenue Model
Zolgensma's list price was set at approximately \$2.125 million per treatment in the U.S., reflecting its one-time administration and high manufacturing costs. This pricing aligns with the value-based principle, emphasizing long-term efficacy and overall cost savings by reducing ongoing therapy needs.

B. Cost-Effectiveness & Payor Negotiations
Health economic analyses demonstrate that, despite high upfront costs, Zolgensma can be cost-effective over a patient’s lifetime, especially when factoring reduced supportive care costs. Payors often negotiate outcomes-based agreements, tying reimbursement to real-world treatment benefits, which can influence effective pricing.

C. Manufacturing and Supply Chain Considerations
As a gene therapy requiring complex viral vector production, manufacturing capacity constraints impact supply and pricing. Scaling up manufacturing is essential to meet global demand and potentially stabilize prices over time.

D. Regulatory & Policy Impact
Rebates, discounts, and coverage policies issued by CMS and private payers directly influence net pricing and access. Policy shifts favoring value-based healthcare models further impact pricing strategies.


Price Projections (2023–2028)

1. Short-term outlook (2023–2024):
Given its current high price point and limited competition in the niche SMA market, Zolgensma’s price is expected to stabilize around the current list price, with annual net revenues influenced by payer negotiations and patient access. The primary factors include continued high demand and regulatory support.

2. Mid-term outlook (2025–2026):
Potential price reductions are anticipated as manufacturing scale-up reduces production costs. Additionally, widespread adoption prompted by expanded indications (e.g., later-onset SMA variants) and inclusion in newborn screening programs could increase market penetration, possibly stabilizing or slightly reducing effective prices in negotiated deals.

3. Long-term outlook (2027–2028):
Emerging gene therapies or biosimilars, if approved, could exert downward pressure on Zolgensma’s price. However, given its pioneering status and the high barriers to entry in gene therapy manufacturing, prices may remain relatively resilient, especially with continued innovation and demonstrated long-term efficacy.

4. HEOR and Market Penetration Impact:
Health economic evaluations continue to support Zolgensma’s value proposition, bolstering its premium pricing. Outcomes-based payment models are likely to become more prevalent, potentially influencing net prices downward over time as payers seek risk sharing.


Key Market Drivers & Challenges

Drivers Challenges
Landmark efficacy in early SMA Manufacturing complexity and costs
Expansion into broader SMA populations High upfront treatment costs
Adoption of newborn screening Payer pricing negotiations
Advances in gene therapy technology Competition and biosimilars

Key Takeaways

  • Market Position: Zolgensma remains the leading gene therapy for SMA with a unique, high-value proposition, maintaining its premium price in the short term.
  • Pricing Outlook: Expect a stabilization of list prices, with potential moderate reductions driven by manufacturing efficiencies and wider payer acceptance.
  • Revenue Strategies: Novartis will likely continue emphasizing outcomes-based reimbursement models to manage payor resistance.
  • Competitive Dynamics: While no direct biosimilar competitors are currently available, emerging gene therapies could influence pricing and market share in the coming years.
  • Policy Impacts: Healthcare policies favoring value and outcomes could both support continued high pricing and introduce new reimbursement challenges.

FAQs

Q1: Will Zolgensma’s price decrease in the next five years?
A: While list prices may remain high due to manufacturing complexities and the therapy’s innovative nature, negotiations, market expansion, and scaling production are expected to lead to modest price reductions or result in more favorable reimbursement terms.

Q2: How does Zolgensma compare cost-wise to Spinraza?
A: Zolgensma’s upfront cost (~\$2.125 million) is significantly higher than the yearly expense of Spinraza (~\$750,000 per year) but offers a potentially curative, single-dose treatment. Over a lifetime, Zolgensma can be more cost-effective, especially given its long-lasting effects.

Q3: What factors influence payers’ acceptance of Zolgensma’s high price?
A: Demonstration of long-term benefits, outcomes-based reimbursement agreements, expanded indications, and inclusion in newborn screening protocols all enhance payor acceptance despite the upfront costs.

Q4: Are there any new competitors in the SMA gene therapy space?
A: Currently, Zolgensma has no direct biosimilar competitors, but several pipeline therapies and gene editing techniques are under development, which could influence future market dynamics.

Q5: How does regulatory policy affect Zolgensma’s market prospects?
A: Fast-track approvals and nudging towards outcome-based payment models aid in market penetration. Policy shifts toward valuing long-term benefits bolster Zolgensma’s market position and price sustainability.


References

  1. FDA Drug Approvals. (2019). Zolgensma (onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi). [Link]
  2. Novartis. (2022). Zolgensma pricing and reimbursement. [Link]
  3. Kaspar, J. (2021). Gene therapies for SMA: Market trends. Journal of Rare Diseases.
  4. IQVIA. (2022). U.S. drug price analysis report.
  5. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2022). Reimbursement policies for novel therapies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.