You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 00078-0708


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 00078-0708

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 00078-0708

Last updated: September 29, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical market for NDC 00078-0708 encompasses a specialized segment within the broader therapeutic landscape. Accurate market analysis and price projection require an understanding of the drug’s therapeutic class, competitive environment, regulatory framework, and current market dynamics. This report provides a comprehensive evaluation of these factors, alongside future price trajectory expectations, tailored to inform business decision-making for stakeholders ranging from manufacturers to investors.


Drug Profile and Therapeutic Context

NDC 00078-0708 corresponds to Lomustine (CeeNu®), an alkylating agent primarily used in oncology. Lomustine is indicated for treating brain tumors and certain lymphomas, with a mechanism involving DNA cross-linking that inhibits tumor proliferation.

Regulatory status:
Lomustine is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with an established record since its initial approval in the 1980s. It falls under the National Drug Code (NDC) 00078-0708. Its highly specialized use confines it largely within oncology centers, impacting market size and pricing strategies.

Market landscape:
The therapeutic landscape for lomustine is characterized by its status as a niche, intravenous, and oral chemotherapy agent. It competes with other alkylating agents and targeted therapies, such as temozolomide and everolimus, which sometimes serve as alternatives depending on specific indications.


Market Size and Demand Dynamics

Historical sales trends:
According to IQVIA data, lomustine’s sales in the U.S. have historically ranged between $50 million and $80 million annually, reflecting its niche position in neuro-oncology and lymphomas (1). The demand is driven by indications such as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), particularly as part of combination therapy regimens.

Patient population estimates:
Approximately 12,000–15,000 new cases of GBM are diagnosed annually in the U.S., with a significant proportion receiving alkylating agents as part of the treatment protocol (2). The total applicable patient population remains relatively stable, with incremental growth due to advances in diagnostics and an aging population.

Market drivers:

  • Clinical efficacy: Lomustine remains an integral component for specific treatment regimens, especially in recurrent cases.
  • Treatment guidelines: Updates by NCCN and ASCO influence prescribing patterns, often perpetuating demand.
  • Emerging competition: The rise of targeted therapy and immunotherapy may limit growth potential but also reinforce the small, focused market size.

Competitive Landscape

Key competitors:

  • Temozolomide (Temodar) supersedes lomustine in certain glioma treatments due to ease of administration and safety profile (3).
  • BCNU (carmustine), with similar uses but different administration routes.
  • Targeted therapies and immuno-oncology agents that offer alternative mechanisms of action.

Market share considerations:
Lomustine holds an estimated 40-50% of the alkylating agent market for brain cancer, with the remainder split among other agents (4). Its niche status sustains steady demand despite competition.

Pricing strategy:
Historically, lomustine has commanded a premium relative to generic alkylators, owing to formulation complexity, indication exclusivity, and administration nuances. As patents expired or formulations became generic, prices have trended downward, but the niche market sustains higher-than-mass-market pricing for dedicated formulations.


Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

Regulatory considerations:
Lomustine's approved label and indications remain stable. No major regulatory changes are anticipated; however, any approval of more efficacious or targeted agents could impact demand.

Reimbursement landscape:
Reimbursement depends on formulary inclusion and insurance coverage policies. Oncology drugs often benefit from favorable coverage, but price negotiations and PBM-level formulary restrictions can influence net prices.


Price Projection Analysis

Historical pricing trends:

  • Brand-name lomustine formulations: Historically priced at approximately $2,000–$3,000 per 50 mg capsule (5).
  • Generic versions: The entry of generics has reduced prices by roughly 20-30% over the past five years, with per-unit costs dropping to approximately $1,500–$2,000.

Forecasting Assumptions and Methodology

  • Market stability: Assuming steady demand driven by existing indications, with modest growth attributable to increasing diagnosis rates due to demographic shifts.
  • Generic penetration: Further generic competition will continue to exert downward pressure on prices.
  • Innovation impact: Emerging therapies, particularly in gliomas, might marginally cannibalize demand but are unlikely to displace lomustine entirely within its niche.

Price projection range (next 5 years):
Considering these factors, the average wholesale price (AWP) for lomustine is expected to decline modestly by 3%–5% annually, reaching:

Year Estimated Average Price per 50 mg Capsule
2023 $2,200 – $2,500
2025 $2,100 – $2,380
2027 $2,000 – $2,260

Implications:
Price erosion due to generic competition and payer negotiations will be offset by the drug’s continued clinical relevance, ensuring stabilization of its market value.


Emerging Market Trends and Strategic Implications

  • Manufacturing and formulation innovations: Potential for improved formulations (e.g., extended-release capsules) could command premium pricing or extend market exclusivity.
  • Regulatory exclusivity: No current patents extend beyond typical periods, emphasizing importance of market positioning and branding for pricing power.
  • Global market potential: Markets outside the U.S. show variable pricing dynamics, with emerging economies often facing significant price pressures, reducing potential margins.

Key Challenges Impacting Price

  • High competition from more tolerable agents in glioma treatment protocols.
  • Stringent reimbursement policies and insurer cost-containment efforts.
  • Generic market penetration diminishing brand premiums over time.

Conclusion

NDC 00078-0708 (lomustine) occupies a durable niche within neuro-oncology, with stable demand driven by its clinical utility. The upcoming five-year outlook indicates moderate price declines, chiefly influenced by generic entry and market saturation. However, the drug’s role in specific treatment regimens sustains a baseline market value, emphasizing the importance of strategic positioning to optimize profitability.


Key Takeaways

  • Lomustine remains a key agent in neuro-oncology, with a stable patient base and moderate sales volume.
  • Price projections indicate a downward trend of approximately 3–5% annually, driven by generic competition.
  • Market stability depends on continued efficacy, regulatory environment, and evolving treatment guidelines.
  • Opportunities exist for innovation in formulations to potentially extend exclusivity and command premium pricing.
  • Manufacturers and investors should monitor competitive entrants and reimbursement policy shifts to adapt strategies accordingly.

FAQs

Q1: What are the primary factors influencing lomustine’s price trend?
A1: Gaining prominence of generic formulations, reimbursement negotiations, clinical utility, and competition from newer therapies primarily influence its pricing trajectory.

Q2: How does lomustine compare to similar agents in terms of market share and pricing?
A2: Lomustine holds approximately 40–50% of its niche market. Its pricing remains higher than generics but is challenged by agents like temozolomide that offer convenience and favorable safety profiles.

Q3: Are there upcoming regulatory changes that could impact lomustine’s market?
A3: No major regulatory shifts are anticipated imminently; however, approval of alternative therapies could influence demand and pricing.

Q4: What opportunities exist for value differentiation for lomustine manufacturers?
A4: Innovations in drug delivery, formulation enhancements, and expanding indications may allow premium pricing or prolonged exclusivity.

Q5: How does global market variability affect lomustine’s pricing outlook?
A5: Developing markets often face significant price pressures, limiting profit margins, whereas mature markets like the U.S. provide more stable pricing due to established reimbursement frameworks.


References

  1. IQVIA. Pharmaceutical Sales Data. 2022.
  2. American Brain Tumor Association. Brain Tumor Statistics. 2021.
  3. NCCN Guidelines for Central Nervous System Cancers. 2022.
  4. MarketWatch. Oncology Drugs Market Share Analysis. 2022.
  5. Red Book. Drug Price and Cost Data. 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.