You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 30, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 00025-1421


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 00025-1421

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 00025-1421

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

The National Drug Code (NDC) 00025-1421 refers to a specific pharmaceutical product, which, based on available data, corresponds to the Repatha (evolocumab) injection. Repatha is a monoclonal antibody developed by Amgen, used primarily for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease.

This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the market landscape, competitive dynamics, regulatory environment, pricing trends, and future projections for Repatha (NDC: 00025-1421). It aims to guide stakeholders—including healthcare providers, payers, and investors—in understanding the product’s current positioning and future valuation potential.


Market Overview

Therapeutic and Market Context

Repatha belongs to a class of PCSK9 inhibitors, which emerged in the last decade as alternatives to statins for high-risk hypercholesterolemia patients. The global hyperlipidemia treatment market is forecasted to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 6-8% over the next five years, driven by increasing awareness, aging populations, and unmet needs among familial hypercholesterolemia patients.

Market Size and Penetration

In 2022, the US market for PCSK9 inhibitors, including Repatha and rival drugs like Praluent (by Regeneron/Sanofi), was valued at approximately $2.5 billion, with Repatha accounting for over 60% of sales (per IQVIA data). Repatha’s market penetration is influenced by physician prescribing behaviors, patient adherence, reimbursement policies, and competition.

Key Competitive Landscape

  • Amgen's Repatha: Established leader with extensive clinical data and broad formulary coverage.
  • Sanofi-Regeneron’s Praluent: Competitor with similar efficacy but slightly lower market share.
  • Emerging Agents: Inclisiran (by Novartis), a novel siRNA therapy, introduces new competition expected to impact PCSK9 market growth.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Dynamics

Repatha is FDA-approved for primary hyperlipidemia and certain familial hypercholesterolemia cases. Reimbursement remains a critical factor; insurance coverage, prior authorization hurdles, and high out-of-pocket costs limit access, suppressing potential market expansion.


Pricing Trends and Revenue Drivers

Historical Pricing Data

  • List Price: The wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) for Repatha in 2022 was approximately $5,850 per 420 mg monthly injection ($14,700 annually) [1].
  • Net Price: After rebates and discounts, real-world net prices are often 20-30% lower, depending on negotiations and payer arrangements.

Price Evolution

Amgen has employed strategic price reductions via copay assistance programs and formulary negotiations to enhance market access, particularly amid increasing competition. Since market entry in 2015, list prices have remained relatively stable, with minor adjustments linked to inflation and market conditions.

Profitability and Cost Considerations

  • Manufacturing Costs: Monoclonal antibody production costs are high but have decreased with process optimization.
  • Reimbursement Challenges: High treatment costs have constrained utilization and placed pressure on margins, especially with increasing payer scrutiny and formulary tier placements.

Future Price Projections

Market Drivers

  • Patent Status: Repatha’s patent is projected to expire in North America by 2030, opening room for biosimilar entry.
  • Biosimilar Competition: Entry of biosimilars typically drives prices downward, reducing average selling prices (ASPs) by 20-40% within the first few years post-launch.
  • Market Expansion: Growing adoption among high-risk populations and potential off-label uses could sustain revenue levels initially, but pricing will likely decline in the face of competition.

Projecting Price Trajectory (2023-2028)

  • Short-term (1-2 years): Stabilization of list prices with only minor reductions (~2-5%) due to inflation adjustments and negotiated discounts.
  • Mid-term (3-5 years): Introduction of biosimilars post-2030 patent expiration may decrease prices by an estimated 25-30%.
  • Long-term (beyond 2028): Significant price erosion anticipated, with net prices potentially dropping below $4,500 per injection (~$10,000 annually), depending on biosimilar uptake and reimbursement policies.

Revenue Outlook

Given the current market share and pricing strategies, Amgen’s revenue from Repatha could decline by 20-40% over the next five years if biosimilar competition advances as expected. However, market expansion through increased indication approvals and formulary placement may offset some losses.


Regulatory and Policy Impact

  • The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and private payers are increasingly focused on value-based reimbursement models, pressuring pharmaceutical pricing strategies.
  • Adoption incentives for biosimilars via policy reforms could accelerate price declines.
  • Ongoing clinical trials assessing expanded indications could alter the landscape, influencing pricing strategies.

Key Market Risks

  • Biosimilar Entry: The primary risk to pricing due to imminent biosimilar competition.
  • Reimbursement and Access: High costs and prior authorization practices may limit market penetration.
  • Emerging Therapies: Novel agents like inclisiran may shift market shares or render current treatments less attractive.

Conclusion

Repatha (NDC 00025-1421) remains a key player in the hyperlipidemia treatment space, supported by strong clinical data and established market presence. Short-term pricing is likely to remain stable, but the landscape faces significant downward pressure due to biosimilar competition, evolving policies, and emerging therapies. Stakeholders must strategically navigate pricing adjustments, formulary negotiations, and market expansion efforts to sustain revenue streams over the next five years.


Key Takeaways

  • The current list price of Repatha stands around $14,700 annually, with net prices reduced through negotiated discounts.
  • Market growth is driven by increased awareness, expanding indications, and clinical guidelines favoring PCSK9 inhibitors.
  • Biosimilar entrants projected to significantly reduce prices post-patent expiry, with a potential 25-30% decrease within five years.
  • Reimbursement landscapes and value-based care policies influence actual market uptake and pricing.
  • Strategic investments in clinical development and market access are crucial to mitigate downward pricing pressures.

FAQs

1. How will biosimilar entry affect Repatha’s pricing in the next five years?
Biosimilar competition is expected to initiate significant price reductions, potentially decreasing prices by 25-30%, leading to substantial revenue erosion but also expanding overall market volume.

2. What legal measures exist to extend Repatha’s patent protection?
Patent extensions and data exclusivity regulations may delay biosimilar entry. However, biosimilars face complex approval pathways, and patent litigation often influences their market launch timing.

3. Are there emerging therapies that could replace Repatha?
Inclisiran and other novel lipid-lowering agents are entering the market, offering alternative mechanisms of action that could impact Repatha’s market share over the next decade.

4. How do reimbursement policies influence Repatha’s market access?
Reimbursement constraints, prior authorization, and high out-of-pocket costs hinder widespread adoption. Favorable formulary placement and value-based agreements can improve access and sales.

5. What strategies can stakeholders adopt to optimize value from Repatha?
Engaging in early formulary negotiations, supporting clinical evidence for expanded indications, and implementing patient adherence programs can maximize utilization and value realization.


References

[1] IQVIA. "Pharmaceutical Market Data". 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.