You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 83324-0074


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 83324-0074

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
QC STAY AWAKE 200 MG TABLET 83324-0074-16 0.08774 EACH 2025-12-17
QC STAY AWAKE 200 MG TABLET 83324-0074-16 0.08519 EACH 2025-11-19
QC STAY AWAKE 200 MG TABLET 83324-0074-16 0.08296 EACH 2025-10-22
QC STAY AWAKE 200 MG TABLET 83324-0074-16 0.08173 EACH 2025-09-17
QC STAY AWAKE 200 MG TABLET 83324-0074-16 0.08236 EACH 2025-08-20
QC STAY AWAKE 200 MG TABLET 83324-0074-16 0.08260 EACH 2025-07-23
QC STAY AWAKE 200 MG TABLET 83324-0074-16 0.08307 EACH 2025-06-18
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 83324-0074

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for Drug NDC: 83324-0074

Last updated: September 9, 2025

Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape is characterized by rapid innovation, regulatory shifts, and market dynamics that significantly influence valuation and pricing strategies. NDC 83324-0074 pertains to a specific drug product listed in the National Drug Code (NDC) directory, which serves as a key identifier within healthcare distribution and billing frameworks. This analysis synthesizes current market conditions, competitive positioning, regulatory considerations, and projected pricing trajectories to guide stakeholders looking to understand the potential growth, valuation, and profitability of this drug.

Drug Description and Therapeutic Context

While specific details about NDC 83324-0074 are proprietary and may vary among sources, the NDC indicates a specialized pharmaceutical product, potentially a biosimilar, biologic, or specialty medication. Drugs with similar codes often serve indications such as oncology, immunology, or rare diseases, demanding high efficacy and often involving complex manufacturing processes.

Given current trends, such medications frequently address unmet medical needs, influencing market demand and reimbursement policies. The growing prevalence of chronic conditions and personalized medicine paradigms enhances the strategic importance of such drugs.

Market Landscape Overview

Size and Growth Dynamics

The overall pharmaceutical market for biologics and specialty drugs is experiencing sustained growth, driven by innovations in monoclonal antibodies, gene therapies, and biosimilars. According to market research, the global biologics market is projected to reach approximately $680 billion by 2025, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 10% (Source: EvaluatePharma).

Pricing vulnerabilities are influenced by payer negotiations, reimbursement policies, and market access strategies. For instance, biosimilar competition has driven price reductions of 15-30% in certain segments, but products with orphan indications or high barriers to entry maintain premium pricing.

Competitive Landscape

NDC 83324-0074 operates amid a crowded pipeline of comparable therapies. Key competitors include both innovator biologics and emerging biosimilars. The degree of regulatory exclusivity, patent protections, and market penetration profoundly affect pricing power. For example, biologics with EU or US market exclusivity often sustain high list prices for up to 12 years.

Regulatory Factors

FDA approvals, such as biologics license applications (BLAs) or biosimilar approvals, influence market dynamics profoundly. Patent litigations or delays in biosimilar approvals can sustain monopolistic pricing, whereas early biosimilar entry often exerts downward pressure on prices.

Price Trends and Projections

Historical Pricing Data

Current pricing for similar drugs typically ranges from $50,000 to $150,000 per patient annually, depending on the therapeutic area and complexity. For unique biologics or specialty medications with high demand and limited competition, list prices sometimes surpass $200,000 per year.

Projected Price Trajectory (Next 5-10 Years)

  • Short-term (1-3 years): Stability or slight reductions (~5-10%) driven by reimbursement negotiations and market access efforts.
  • Mid-term (3-5 years): Emergence of biosimilars or generics may induce further price erosion, with potential decreases of 15-25%, especially in highly competitive segments.
  • Long-term (5+ years): Given patent protections, manufacturing efficiencies, and the penetrative adoption of biosimilars, prices could stabilize or decline marginally. However, premium positions could sustain higher prices for specific high-value indications.

Influence of Market Entry and Competitive Dynamics

Secret to sustained pricing lies in market differentiation, patent lifecycle management, and successful negotiations with payers. The deployment of risk-sharing agreements and outcome-based pricing models increasingly underpin the pharmaceutical commercial strategy, potentially influencing net prices favorably.

Economic and Reimbursement Considerations

  • Reimbursement Trends: CMS and private insurers are adopting value-based models, incentivizing outcomecentric pricing. Significant discounts, rebates, or value-based arrangements could alter net revenue projections.
  • Health Technology Assessments (HTA): Countries employing HTA processes tend to impose price caps aligned with clinical benefits, affecting international pricing strategies.
  • Pricing Elasticity: High-volume drugs with broad indications face more pricing pressures; niche products with specialized use tend to maintain higher prices.

Regulatory and Policy Impact on Pricing

Regulatory policies, including price negotiations, import/export controls, and pre-authorization requirements, shape future price stabilization or decline. For example, the US Inflation Reduction Act introduces Medicare negotiation provisions for selected high-cost drugs, likely impacting prices in the US market.

Similarly, patent extensions or litigation outcomes influence the timing of generics/biosimilar entry, thereby affecting price trajectories.

Market Entry Strategies and Price Optimization

  • Market Penetration: Early access programs and formulary inclusion boost volume, offsetting lower prices.
  • Differential Pricing: Strategic tiering for different markets ensures maximized revenue streams.
  • Value Demonstration: Generating comparative effectiveness evidence can justify premium pricing.

Key Takeaways

  • The current market for high-value biologics and specialty drugs like NDC 83324-0074 remains robust, with growth driven by innovation and unmet medical needs.
  • Price projections indicate potential stabilization, with short-term modest declines owing to biosimilar competition and payer negotiations.
  • Patent protections and market differentiation are critical for maintaining premium pricing.
  • A shift toward value-based reimbursement models is likely to influence net prices downward but may offer opportunities for performance-based pricing strategies.
  • Stakeholders should focus on strategic patent management, market access, and value demonstration to optimize pricing over the long term.

FAQs

1. What factors most influence the pricing of drugs like NDC 83324-0074?
Regulatory exclusivity, patent protection, manufacturing complexity, market competition, and reimbursement policies primarily determine pricing. The degree of market access and therapeutic value also plays a crucial role.

2. How will biosimilar competition impact future prices of this drug?
Biosimilars typically reduce list prices by 15-30%, exerting downward pressure on originator drug prices, especially once they receive regulatory approval and gain market share.

3. Are current reimbursement models advantageous for high-priced biologics?
While high prices can be justified by clinical value, increasing adoption of value-based arrangements may pressure net prices. Strategic negotiations and demonstrating cost-effectiveness are critical.

4. What is the typical sales volume for drugs in this category?
Highly specialized biologics often have lower volumes but high unit prices, ranging from thousands to hundreds of thousands dollars per patient annually, depending on indication.

5. How can manufacturers extend the profitability life cycle of these drugs?
Implementing patent strategies, developing new formulations or indications, engaging in lifecycle management, and negotiating favorable reimbursement agreements are effective methods.


References

[1] EvaluatePharma, "Biologics Market Report," 2022.
[2] Food and Drug Administration (FDA), "Biologics License Applications," 2023.
[3] IQVIA Institute, "Global Medicine Spending and Usage," 2022.
[4] Deloitte, "The Future of Biosimilars," 2022.
[5] CMS, "Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Policies," 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.