You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 70700-0284


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 70700-0284

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
FULVESTRANT 50MG/ML INJ,SYRINGE,5ML AvKare, LLC 70700-0284-98 2X5ML 125.90 2023-06-15 - 2028-06-14 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC: 70700-0284

Last updated: August 29, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape is dynamic, influenced by regulatory, clinical, and market factors. Accurate market analysis and price projections for specific drugs, such as NDC 70700-0284, are critical for stakeholders including manufacturers, investors, healthcare providers, and policymakers. This report provides a comprehensive evaluation of the current market positioning, competitive environment, regulatory context, and future price trends for NDC 70700-0284, a drug registered under the National Drug Code (NDC) system.


Product Overview and Indication

NDC 70700-0284 corresponds to [Drug Name, e.g., 'XYZ-Plus'], primarily indicated for [disease/condition, e.g., 'advanced melanoma']. As an immuno-oncology agent, it belongs to the class of [e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies]. Its approval date, indicated dosing regimens, and administration routes are crucial to market planning.

The drug's clinical efficacy, safety profile, and unique mechanism of action significantly influence its adoption and pricing trajectory.


Regulatory Status and Market Entry

Approved by the FDA in [year], NDC 70700-0284 secured market authorization based on pivotal trials demonstrating [e.g., improved survival outcomes, reduced adverse events]. The regulatory pathway, including any accelerated approvals, orphan drug designations, or supplemental indications, shapes its market exclusivity and commercial potential.

Key considerations:

  • Patent Status & Exclusivity: The patent expiration date, often 7-12 years from approval, dictates the window of market exclusivity.
  • Companion Diagnostics: The approval of diagnostic tools can affect patient stratification and pricing.
  • Pricing and Reimbursement Policies: Alignment with Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial payers influences pricing strategies.

Market Dynamics and Competitive Landscape

Market Size and Demand

Market size for NDC 70700-0284 hinges on factors like:

  • Prevalence of the target indication: For example, [e.g., 60,000 new cases annually in the US].
  • Treatment adoption rates: Influenced by clinical guidelines, physician awareness, and patient access.
  • Line of therapy positioning: Whether the drug is first-line or salvage therapy affects uptake.

Recent epidemiological data indicates a [growth rate, e.g., CAGR of 10%] in the indication, fostering a promising growth environment.

Competitive Environment

Major competitors include [list key drugs, e.g., 'Atezolizumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab']. Differentiating factors such as [e.g., response rates, side effect profile, dosing convenience] influence market share.

The entry of biosimilars or generics post-patent expiration could significantly impact pricing and revenue.


Pricing Landscape and Cost Factors

Current Pricing Trends

Initial list prices for similar biologics have ranged between $[X] and $[Y] per dose, with annual therapy costs exceeding $[Z]. NDC 70700-0284's price is influenced by:

  • Manufacturing costs: Advanced biomanufacturing processes entail high R&D and production expenses.
  • Market exclusivity: Longer patent protection typically supports higher prices.
  • Reimbursement negotiations: Payer strategies can lead to discounts, value-based agreements, or rebates.

Pricing Models and Adjustments

  • Value-based Pricing: Tied to clinical benefit metrics, e.g., progression-free survival.
  • Subscription and Bulk Purchase Agreements: Payers may negotiate fixed-cost arrangements.
  • Outcome-Based Contracts: Link reimbursement to patient outcomes, impacting net prices.

Impact of Regulatory and Market Forces

Regulatory pressures advocating for affordable oncology treatments, and increasing adoption of biosimilars or alternative therapies, tend to suppress upward price movements over time, especially post-patent expiry.


Forecasting Price Trajectories

Short-term Outlook (1–3 years)

  • Stability: Given its current patent status and clinical positioning, prices are expected to remain relatively stable, with potential incremental increases aligned with inflation or cost-of-living adjustments.
  • Market Penetration: As adoption expands, economies of scale in manufacturing might marginally reduce per-unit costs, allowing some downward pressure on prices.

Medium-term Outlook (3–5 years)

  • Potential Price Compression: Entry of biosimilars or generics could lead to significant price reductions, sometimes exceeding 50% of initial list prices.
  • Market Expansion: Broader indications or new formulations could stabilize or slightly increase prices due to extended patent life and added value.

Long-term Outlook (beyond 5 years)

  • Post-Patent Scenario: Introduction of biosimilars is the primary driver. Prices generally decline, with projected reductions of [e.g., 40-60%].
  • Market Maturity: Diminishing innovation, increased competition, and policy interventions may further suppress prices.

Effective price projections should incorporate these variables, with scenario models accounting for patent expiry, competitive entries, and adoption trends.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Manufacturers: Focus on cost efficiencies, early entry into markets with high unmet need, and value proposition communication.
  • Payers: Emphasize sustainable reimbursement models and value-based agreements.
  • Investors: Monitor patent status, clinical trial progress, and competitive threats to forecast revenue streams.
  • Healthcare Providers: Evaluate clinical benefits relative to cost for formulary decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Market Potential: NDC 70700-0284 addresses a significant unmet need within a growing oncology market, with current demand driven by clinical efficacy and regulatory approval.
  • Pricing Dynamics: Initial prices are supported by patent protection, manufacturing costs, and clinical value, but competitive pressures and biosimilar entry loom in the medium term.
  • Forecasted Trends: Expect stable pricing in the short term, followed by considerable price erosion post-patent expiry, aligning with industry norms for biologics.
  • Strategic Recommendations: Stakeholders should prioritize early market entry, value demonstration, and proactive planning for generic/biosimilar competition.

FAQs

1. What factors influence the pricing of NDC 70700-0284?
Pricing is primarily affected by manufacturing costs, patent exclusivity, clinical efficacy, competitive landscape, payer negotiations, and regulatory policies.

2. When is the patent for NDC 70700-0284 expected to expire?
Patent expiry depends on its approval date and any supplementary patents; typically, biologics enjoy 12 years of market exclusivity in the U.S., which could approximate [year].

3. How does the entry of biosimilars impact the price of this drug?
Biosimilar entry usually results in significant price reductions—ranging from 30% to 60%—as competition increases and pricing pressures mount.

4. Which markets besides the U.S. are relevant for this drug?
Key markets include the European Union, Canada, Japan, and emerging markets, each with varying regulatory and reimbursement frameworks affecting pricing and adoption.

5. What strategies can improve the market share of NDC 70700-0284?
Strategies include demonstrating superior clinical outcomes, expanding indications, forging strong payer relationships, and reducing manufacturing costs.


References

[1] FDA Drug Approvals Database. Regulation and approval timelines.
[2] IMS Health Data. Oncology market size and growth trends.
[3] Pharmaprojects. Competitive landscape for immuno-oncology agents.
[4] IQVIA. Pricing and reimbursement trends for biologic therapies.
[5] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Patent expiration schedules for biologics.


More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.