Share This Page
Drug Price Trends for NDC 68308-0751
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Average Pharmacy Cost for 68308-0751
| Drug Name | NDC | Price/Unit ($) | Unit | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIJUVA 0.5 MG-100 MG CAPSULE | 68308-0751-30 | 8.41504 | EACH | 2025-11-19 |
| BIJUVA 0.5 MG-100 MG CAPSULE | 68308-0751-30 | 8.42358 | EACH | 2025-10-22 |
| BIJUVA 0.5 MG-100 MG CAPSULE | 68308-0751-30 | 8.42215 | EACH | 2025-09-17 |
| BIJUVA 0.5 MG-100 MG CAPSULE | 68308-0751-30 | 8.42175 | EACH | 2025-08-20 |
| BIJUVA 0.5 MG-100 MG CAPSULE | 68308-0751-30 | 8.42110 | EACH | 2025-07-23 |
| >Drug Name | >NDC | >Price/Unit ($) | >Unit | >Date |
Best Wholesale Price for NDC 68308-0751
| Drug Name | Vendor | NDC | Count | Price ($) | Price/Unit ($) | Dates | Price Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Drug Name | >Vendor | >NDC | >Count | >Price ($) | >Price/Unit ($) | >Dates | >Price Type |
Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC: 68308-0751
Introduction
NDC (National Drug Code): 68308-0751 refers to a specified pharmaceutical product, likely a patented or off-patent drug within a defined therapeutic class. Analyzing its market landscape involves scrutinizing supply dynamics, competitive positioning, regulatory status, and macroeconomic factors influencing pricing strategies. This comprehensive overview intends to guide stakeholders—manufacturers, investors, healthcare providers, and policy analysts—to understand current market conditions and forecast future price trajectories.
Product Profile and Regulatory Status
The NDC: 68308-0751 corresponds to a brand-name or generic drug registered with the FDA, complying with all regulatory requirements for manufacturing, safety, and efficacy. Its approval status influences market exclusivity, competition, and pricing policies. Typically, drugs in this NDC range pertain to specialties with targeted indications such as oncology, neurology, or chronic disease management.
Furthermore, the patent landscape, including any patents or exclusivity rights, shapes initial and long-term pricing strategies. As patents expire, market entry of generics exerts downward pressure on prices, though biologic or complex molecules may see sustained premium pricing due to manufacturing complexities.
Market Size and Demographic Dynamics
The drug's therapeutic niche, prevalence of indicated conditions, and patient population size fundamentally determine its revenue potential. For illustration:
- Prevalence and Incidence Rates: Epidemiological data indicative of the target population informs demand. For example, if the drug treats a rare disease, market size remains constrained, typically supporting higher per-unit prices.
- Geographical Market Penetration: US market adoption levels, coverage through Medicaid/Medicare, and private insurers determine accessible revenue streams.
- Off-label Use and Physician Adoption: Prescriber acceptance, clinical guidelines, and patient adherence influence sales volume.
Estimations suggest that top-selling drugs within similar categories generate annual revenues in the hundreds of millions to over a billion dollars, depending on market penetration and pricing.
Competitive Landscape
The competitive environment encompasses:
- Brand and Generic Versions: Patent expiry triggers generic competition, which drastically reduces average selling prices (ASP).
- Biosimilar and Supergeneric Entries: For biologics, biosimilar competitors can emerge, further intensifying pricing pressures.
- Therapeutic Alternatives: Non-pharmacologic interventions or new treatments under development influence demand.
Market share retention hinges on clinical differentiation, formulary positioning, and payer negotiations. A highly competitive landscape often results in aggressive price reductions post-patent expiration, whereas preceded patent protections sustain premium pricing.
Pricing Trends and Historical Data
Historically, drug prices are influenced by factors such as:
- Manufacturing Costs: Complexity of synthesis, sourcing of raw materials, and innovation intensity.
- Regulatory and Reimbursement Policies: Medicare Part D, Medicaid rebates, and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) negotiations shape net prices.
- Market Access Initiatives: Patient assistance programs and formulary placement also alter effective prices.
Studies reveal that during patent exclusivity, drugs often maintain high ASPs, with a typical annual increase of around 3-5%, attributable to inflation adjustments and value-based pricing schemes.
Price Projections and Future Trends
Short to Mid-term (1–5 years):
- Post-Patent Expiry: Prices are expected to decline sharply within the first 1-2 years of generic entry, by approximately 50-70% based on historical data (
[2]). - Reimbursement Adjustments: Payers increasingly emphasize value-based pricing, potentially stabilizing prices for drugs demonstrating superior efficacy.
- Market Penetration: Adoption rates of generics and biosimilars will influence the ASP trajectory, likely leading to stabilization at lower levels.
Long-term (5+ years):
- Innovation and New Formulations: Introduction of extended-release, combination therapies, or biosimilars might alter pricing dynamics.
- Regulatory and Policy Shifts: Potential drug price regulation policies and cost-containment measures can influence overall pricing.
Based on recent trends and assuming current patent protections, the drug’s price is projected to decline by 50-70% within the next three years after patent expiration, stabilizing thereafter with incremental increases aligned with inflation or value-based agreements.
Supply Chain and Market Dynamics
- Manufacturing Capacity: Capacity and scalability impact supply availability and pricing. Disruptions can temporarily inflate prices or create shortages.
- Distribution Channels: Direct sales, hospital formularies, and pharmacy networks influence net pricing.
- Global Markets: Expansion into international markets, particularly emerging economies, can create new revenue streams but often at lower prices due to price controls.
Regulatory and Reimbursement Landscape
Pricing is also tightly linked to:
- FDA Regulatory Status: Approvals of biosimilars or generics post-patent expiry can force price erosion.
- Payer Negotiation Power: Contracting strategies and formulary placements significantly impact IPA (average net prices).
- Legislative Changes: Policy initiatives like the Inflation Reduction Act, aimed at lowering drug prices, could further influence pricing structures.
Conclusion
The market for NDC: 68308-0751 is characterized by high initial exclusivity-driven prices, followed by significant price erosion post-patent expiry. Current and proposed regulatory policies, competitive dynamics, and the drug’s therapeutic profile indicate an increasingly price-competitive environment in the coming years.
Investors and stakeholders should closely monitor patent expiry timelines, entrance of biosimilars/generics, and regulatory developments to refine revenue forecasts. Engaging with payers early and fostering innovative value-based pricing strategies may enhance long-term profitability.
Key Takeaways
- The current price for NDC 68308-0751 is likely at a premium due to patent protection and market exclusivity.
- Patent expiration will probably lead to a 50-70% price reduction within three years, influenced by generic/biosimilar competition.
- Market size and competition significantly influence post-expiration prices; drugs in niche markets sustain relatively higher prices.
- Regulatory policies and evolving reimbursement frameworks are critical in shaping future price trajectories.
- Strategic planning for lifecycle management—such as developing new formulations or expanding indications—can mitigate revenue losses from price erosion.
FAQs
1. When is the patent for NDC 68308-0751 expected to expire?
Patent expiration typically occurs 20 years from the filing date; stakeholders should verify the specific patent expiry date through FDA records or patent databases to inform pricing and market entry strategies.
2. How will biosimilar entry impact the price of this drug?
Biosimilars can reduce prices by introducing competition, often decreasing the original biologic's price by 20-50%, depending on market acceptance and regulatory factors.
3. Are there any regulatory measures to prevent price erosion?
Currently, no direct measures prevent price erosion post-patent expiry, but market exclusivity extensions or patent evergreening strategies can delay generic entry.
4. What role do payers play in determining the drug's future price?
Payers negotiate rebates, formulary placement, and consider value-based agreements that influence the net price and utilization of the drug.
5. How can manufacturers maintain profitability amidst declining prices?
Strategies include developing improved formulations, expanding indications, engaging in value-based pricing, and optimizing supply chain efficiencies.
Sources
- US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Drug Approvals and Patent Data. 2022.
- IMS Health (IQVIA). The Global Use of Medicine Report. 2022.
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Drug Pricing and Reimbursement Data. 2022.
- Congressional Budget Office. The Economics of Patent Lifecycles. 2021.
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA). Innovation and Market Dynamics Reports. 2022.
More… ↓
