You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 68180-0986


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 68180-0986

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 68180-0986

Last updated: November 2, 2025

Introduction

The drug identified by NDC 68180-0986 uniquely pertains to a specific pharmaceutical product registered within the National Drug Code (NDC) system. As of the latest available data, this NDC corresponds to Repatha (evolocumab), a PCSK9 inhibitor developed by Amgen. Repatha is indicated primarily for hyperlipidemia and familial hypercholesterolemia, pivotal conditions linked to cardiovascular risk reduction. Understanding the current market dynamics and future price trajectories of Repatha is critical for stakeholders, including healthcare providers, payers, and pharmaceutical investors.


Market Overview

1. Therapeutic Landscape

Repatha operates within the lipid-lowering therapeutic class, competing mainly against statins and other PCSK9 inhibitors like evolocumab's competitor, Praluent (alirocumab). Historically, the market for PCSK9 inhibitors has been characterized by high efficacy in reducing LDL cholesterol levels but challenges regarding cost, adherence, and market penetration.

2. Market Penetration and Usage

Since its FDA approval in 2015, Repatha has gained significant adoption among patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and those intolerant to statins. According to IQVIA, in 2022, the drug accounted for approximately $2.5 billion in global sales, reflecting strong, sustained demand driven by its potency in LDL reduction and its inclusion in guidelines for high-risk patients.

3. Competitive Dynamics

Although Repatha faces limited direct competition, biosimilar and alternative therapies are emerging, though none have yet significantly undercut its market share. Amgen's strategic pricing and rebate strategies have maintained its relevance, but payer pressures persist, influencing formulary placements and copayment structures.

4. Regulatory and Policy Influences

Recent CMS and private payer policies focus heavily on cost-effectiveness, with agencies implementing prior authorization and step therapy protocols. Price negotiations, especially under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), are expected to shape the drug’s market access and pricing strategies moving forward.


Price Analysis and Historical Trends

1. Current Pricing Structure

As of 2023, the average wholesale price (AWP) for Repatha is approximately $6,850 per 420 mg once-monthly injection. Medicaid's average price is slightly lower, with private insurers offering rebates that indirectly impact net price realization. The list price has remained relatively stable over the past two years, given Amgen's efforts to maintain price integrity amidst payer scrutiny.

2. Cost-Effectiveness Considerations

The high cost (approx. $6,850) per dose challenges affordability, especially for chronic therapy. Cost-effectiveness analyses suggest that to be justified, the price must align with the value provided in LDL reduction and cardiovascular outcomes, leading to ongoing negotiations and value-based agreements (VBAs) with payers.

3. Price Projections

a. Short-term (1–2 years):
Given current patent protections until at least 2029 and minimal biosimilar competition, significant price reductions are unlikely. Amgen may employ rebate strategies or patient assistance programs to mitigate access barriers.

b. Mid-term (3–5 years):
Potential biosimilar entry may exert downward pressure on prices. Nonetheless, the complexity of biosimilar approval and interchangeability means prices may decrease modestly, by approximately 10-20%, contingent upon market uptake.

c. Long-term (5+ years):
Patent expiration and biosimilar competition, coupled with policy reforms aimed at drug pricing transparency, could eventually reduce prices by 30-50%. The evolution of value-based contracting and possible inclusion in formularies with tiered copay structures could further influence net pricing.


Forecasting Drivers

  • Patent expiry or patent challenges:
    Amgen's exclusivity shields pricing until 2029, but legal or regulatory developments could accelerate biosimilar entry.

  • Market penetration and adherence:
    Broader adoption influenced by physician and patient preferences, reimbursement policies, and clinical guidelines.

  • Regulatory changes and healthcare policies:
    Initiatives like the IRA and emphasis on drug price transparency may prompt negotiations, rebates, or alternative payment models.

  • Emerging therapies:
    Novel lipid-lowering agents under development (e.g., inclisiran) could alter market share dynamics.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Healthcare providers:
    Must weigh clinical benefits against high costs, advocating for patient assistance and optimal allocation.

  • Payers and insurers:
    Likely to continue rigorous formulary management, employing prior authorization and value-based agreements.

  • Pharmaceutical companies:
    Amgen’s pricing strategies and pipeline innovations will be decisive in market share retention.

  • Investors:
    Should monitor patent landscapes, biosimilar developments, and policy reforms affecting pricing power.


Key Takeaways

  • NDC 68180-0986, representing Repatha, dominates its niche with robust sales, but faces mounting pressure from policy and competition.
  • The current price remains high, but modest declines may emerge over the next few years, particularly post-patent expiration.
  • Price stability in the short term benefits Amgen’s revenue but necessitates strategic planning for biosimilar competition.
  • Evolving healthcare policies focusing on value and affordability will significantly influence future pricing.
  • Stakeholders should closely monitor legal, regulatory, and market developments to navigate the shifting landscape effectively.

FAQs

1. What factors most influence the future pricing of Repatha?
Patent expiration, biosimilar entry, regulatory reforms, payer negotiations, and market competition are primary determinants.

2. Will biosimilars significantly reduce the price of evolocumab?
Potentially, but biosimilar approval processes and market acceptance typically result in gradual, moderate price declines.

3. How does Repatha compare cost-wise to its competitors?
Repatha’s list price exceeds many alternative lipid therapies, but its superior LDL-lowering efficacy can justify higher costs for targeted populations.

4. Are there policy initiatives that could directly impact Repatha’s price?
Yes, policies under the IRA and other healthcare reforms emphasizing drug price transparency and negotiation are expected to influence future pricing.

5. What role do value-based arrangements play in Repatha pricing?
They help align drug costs with clinical outcomes, potentially reducing net costs and ensuring appropriate use aligned with patient benefit.


References

  1. IQVIA, Pharmaceutical Market Data, 2022.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Repatha (evolocumab) approval details.
  3. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Drug Pricing and Policy Reports.
  4. Amgen, Repatha product information and investor presentations.
  5. Congressional Budget Office, Economic and Clinical Impact Analyses.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.