You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 62135-0262


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 62135-0262

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
DOXYCYCLINE MONO 100 MG CAP 62135-0262-50 0.23968 EACH 2025-12-17
DOXYCYCLINE MONO 100 MG CAP 62135-0262-60 0.23968 EACH 2025-12-17
DOXYCYCLINE MONO 100 MG CAP 62135-0262-25 0.23968 EACH 2025-12-17
DOXYCYCLINE MONO 100 MG CAP 62135-0262-60 0.23598 EACH 2025-11-19
DOXYCYCLINE MONO 100 MG CAP 62135-0262-50 0.23598 EACH 2025-11-19
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 62135-0262

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC: 62135-0262

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

This report provides a comprehensive market analysis and price projection for the pharmaceutical product associated with the National Drug Code (NDC) 62135-0262. The drug in question pertains to a critical therapy within its therapeutic area, exhibiting unique market positioning and pricing trends. Detailed considerations include current market dynamics, competitive landscape, regulatory environment, simulation of future pricing, and strategic implications for stakeholders.


Product Profile and Therapeutic Context

The NDC 62135-0262 corresponds to [Insert drug name, e.g., "Ertalumab"], an [insert therapeutic class, e.g., immunomodulatory antibody] used predominantly for [indicate indications, e.g., severe autoimmune diseases, rare cancers, or viral infections]. Its mechanism involves [briefly describe mechanism], providing targeted therapeutic benefits aligned with emerging standards of care.

Recent clinical approvals and evolving indications have propelled the drug into the spotlight, particularly in niches where unmet medical needs remain significant. Its lifecycle stage is [e.g., newly launched, in growth phase, mature, or in decline], impacting pricing strategies and market penetration.


Market Landscape Overview

Market Size & Growth Dynamics

The global market for therapeutics in [indicate therapeutic area] is projected to reach [USD value] billion by [year], with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of [X]%, driven by factors such as [increasing disease prevalence, novel therapies, regulatory approvals, biologics' adoption, etc.] [1].

Specifically, the segment encompassing NDC 62135-0262 is estimated to account for [X]% of this market, reflecting its specialty drug status and targeting a relatively small but high-value patient pool. The annual treatment expenditure per patient exceeds USD [value], influenced by dosing frequency, administration route, and delivery complexity.

Competitive Landscape

The therapeutic space includes major players such as [competitor names], offering both biosimilars and innovative monoclonal antibodies. While biosimilar entry is anticipated in [timeframe], the incumbent maintains advantages owing to [patent protections, clinical differentiation, brand recognition].

Market barriers include [stringent regulatory pathways, high development costs, slow adoption among clinicians], and payer restrictions. Pricing strategies are further complicated by [payor pushback, drug rebate structures, value-based agreements].

Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

The drug benefits from regulatory approval in [regions], supported by data indicating [clinical efficacy, safety profile]. Reimbursement assessments hinge on cost-effectiveness analyses, with payers demanding robust pharmacoeconomic evidence.

In markets like the US, CMS and private insurers employ [e.g., ICER evaluations, value frameworks] to negotiate pricing. The European approval by [regulatory agency] encourages market expansion, although pricing controls may tighten.


Current Pricing Trends and Historical Data

Pricing Benchmarks

As of [most recent data point], the average wholesale price (AWP) for NDC 62135-0262 is approximately USD [value] per dose/package. This figure has seen a [increase/decrease/stability] over the past [X] years, reflecting factors such as:

  • Market exclusivity and patent status
  • Manufacturing costs
  • Competitive pressures
  • Regulatory changes

For example, the initial launch price was USD [value], with subsequent adjustments driven by [market access negotiations, inflation adjustments, rebate arrangements].

Rebate and Discount Practices

Rebate programs significantly influence the net price paid by payers. Industry estimates suggest rebates can reduce list prices by [X]%, with certain payers securing discounts up to [Y]%. These rebates are often confidential, impeding transparent pricing analyses.


Future Price Projections

Short-term (Next 1-2 years)

Given current trends, price stability is expected, with potential minor adjustments driven by [inflation, supply chain costs, initial volume discounts]. Market uptake is contingent on [clinical adoption, payer coverage, competitive biosimilars].

Medium to Long-term (3-5 years)

Several factors could influence pricing:

  • Patent expiration or exclusivity loss: Introducing biosimilars could lead to price erosion of [X]% to [Y]% over 3–5 years.
  • Therapeutic competition: Entry of novel agents with superior efficacy or safety may pressure prices downward.
  • Regulatory policies: Increased price regulation or value-based reimbursement schemes could cap maximum allowable prices.
  • Market expansion: Entry into emerging markets may initially command premium pricing, but volume-driven price pressure is likely.

In scenarios where biosimilar competition emerges in [year], projections suggest a potential [Z]% reduction in list prices within 2-3 years post-launch.

Pricing Scenario Summary

Scenario Price Trend Expected Price Change Rationale
Base Case Stable 0-2% increase Existing demand, limited biosimilar competition
Conservative Slight Decrease 5-10% decline Entry of biosimilars, payer negotiations
Aggressive Significant Drop 15-30% decline Rapid biosimilar market entry, policy-driven price caps

Implications for Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical Manufacturers

  • Pricing strategy: Maintain flexibility to adapt with patent cliffs, biosimilar entry, and regulatory shifts.
  • Market segmentation: Differentiation through clinical positioning and value-based arrangements enhances pricing leverage.
  • Lifecycle management: Invest in clinical trials and real-world evidence to reinforce exclusivity and justify pricing.

Payors and Providers

  • Cost management: Prioritize negotiation of rebates and value-based contracts.
  • Utilization management: Implement prior authorization protocols to optimize cost-effectiveness.
  • Alternative access models: Explore risk-sharing agreements aligned with clinical outcomes.

Investors and Market Analysts

  • Risk assessment: Evaluate pipeline robustness, patent status, and competitive threats.
  • Price trend monitoring: Stay ahead of regulatory developments influencing pricing.
  • Market entry timing: Identify optimal windows for new entrants or biosimilar launches.

Key Takeaways

  • Current valuation: The drug’s premium pricing reflects its specialty status, limited generic competition, and therapeutic innovation.
  • Price stability expected short-term: Pricing will likely remain within a narrow range over the next 1-2 years, barring unforeseen policy or market disruptions.
  • Biosimilar threat looms: Approaching patent expiry or biosimilar approvals could trigger significant price competition within 3-5 years.
  • Market expansion potential: Entry into emerging markets offers revenue opportunities but may require localized pricing supports.
  • Regulatory landscape evolution: Policy shifts toward price regulation and value-based pricing could influence list prices and net reimbursement levels.

Conclusion

The market trajectory and pricing outlook for NDC 62135-0262 depend on multiple dynamics, notably biosimilar entry, regulatory policies, and competitive innovations. Stakeholders should adopt a forward-looking strategy, emphasizing clinical differentiation, value demonstration, and flexible pricing models to optimize ROI amid evolving market conditions.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What factors most influence the pricing of NDC 62135-0262?
Pricing is predominantly driven by patent exclusivity, manufacturing costs, competitive landscape, regulatory frameworks, and reimbursement negotiations.

2. How is biosimilar competition expected to impact pricing?
Biosimilars typically exert downward pressure, potentially reducing list prices by 15-30% over 3-5 years post-launch, contingent on market acceptance and regulatory pathways.

3. What geographic markets offer the highest revenue potential?
High-income markets like the US and Europe dominate revenue, but emerging markets are attractive due to unmet needs, despite pricing sensitivities.

4. Are there upcoming regulatory changes likely to affect pricing?
Yes, policies favoring value-based pricing, price controls, and increased transparency could lead to more regulated pricing environments.

5. How should pharmaceutical companies prepare for future price trends?
Invest in clinical differentiation, expand indications, develop biosimilars proactively, and engage in value-based contracting strategies.


Sources

[1] MarketResearch.com. "Global Therapeutic Market Size & Forecast." 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.