You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 50222-0203


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 50222-0203

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
PROTOPIC 0.03% OINT,TOP LEO Pharma, Inc. 50222-0203-30 30GM 217.66 7.25533 2023-05-15 - 2028-05-14 Big4
PROTOPIC 0.03% OINT,TOP LEO Pharma, Inc. 50222-0203-30 30GM 285.47 9.51567 2023-05-15 - 2028-05-14 FSS
PROTOPIC 0.03% OINT,TOP LEO Pharma, Inc. 50222-0203-30 30GM 225.71 7.52367 2024-01-01 - 2028-05-14 Big4
PROTOPIC 0.03% OINT,TOP LEO Pharma, Inc. 50222-0203-30 30GM 285.47 9.51567 2024-01-01 - 2028-05-14 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 50222-0203

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

NDC 50222-0203 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical product governed by the United States' National Drug Code (NDC) system. To assess the market standing and price trajectory of this drug, a thorough analysis considering current supply-demand dynamics, competitive landscape, regulatory environment, and pricing trends is essential. This report synthesizes these elements to deliver actionable insights for stakeholders, including manufacturers, healthcare providers, payers, and investors.

Product Profile and Market Context

While the exact name and therapeutic class of NDC 50222-0203 are not provided, NDCs typically represent either a brand-name drug, generic, or biosimilar formulation. Based on coding patterns, the first segment "50222" indicates the labeler, often associated with a specific manufacturer or distributor, and the subsequent segments specify the product and packaging details.

Assumption: Given the absence of explicit data, we assume NDC 50222-0203 pertains to a high-volume, specialty or primary care pharmaceutical with significant market exposure. The strategic implications for such drugs often hinge on patent statuses, exclusivity periods, and competitive generics entries.

Market Size and Demand Dynamics

Historical Trends:
The U.S. pharmaceutical market is characterized by rapid innovation, patent protection periods, and an evolving landscape driven by advances in therapeutics and biosimilars. Drugs with NDCs similar to 50222-0203 have experienced fluctuating demand based on clinical guideline updates, alternative therapies, and pricing strategies.

Therapeutic Area Demand:
A key driver for market size is the therapeutic class. Suppose the drug addresses a chronic condition like rheumatoid arthritis or oncology; demand remains robust owing to patient population size and treatment adherence. Conversely, if it targets rare diseases, the market is niche but often commands premium pricing due to limited treatment options.

Payer Coverage and Access:
Insurance coverage, formulary positioning, and reimbursement policies significantly influence market penetration. Drugs with favorable formulary access benefit from higher utilization, impacting overall revenue streams.

Competitive Landscape

Patent and Exclusivity Status:
Eigen market share depends on patent strength and expiration timelines. A drug still under patent protection enjoys market exclusivity, enabling premium pricing, whereas generic entries typically exert downward pressure on prices.

Generic and Biosimilar Competition:
The prevalence of generic medicines following patent expiration can erode price points by 60-80%, often leading to an overall decline in revenue unless differentiated by formulation, delivery method, or clinical benefits.

Alternative Therapies:
Emergence of new therapies, including biologics, small molecules, or digital health adjuncts, can capture market share and influence pricing strategies adversely or favorably, particularly if they demonstrate superior efficacy or safety profiles.

Pricing Landscape

Historical Pricing Trends:
Pricing for similar pharmaceuticals has traditionally seen gradual increases, driven by inflation, manufacturing costs, and value-based pricing models. However, recent pressures from payers and policy reforms have catalyzed a flattening or even reduction in list prices.

Current Price Range:
Assuming NDC 50222-0203 is a branded drug with a nominal annual cost of $30,000-$50,000, its average wholesale price (AWP) likely fluctuates based on negotiated discounts, rebates, and evolving market dynamics.

Reimbursement and Discounting Factors:
Net prices are significantly lower than list prices, with discounts and rebates negotiated through pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and payers. The real-world transaction prices often lag behind published MSRP figures, complicating precise projections.

Price Projection Analysis

Short-term Outlook (1–2 years):
Given current patent protections and stable demand, we anticipate modest price inflation aligned with healthcare inflation metrics, averaging 2-3% annually. Rebate-driven net prices are likely to remain steady unless significant policy changes occur.

Medium-term Outlook (3–5 years):
Expiration of patents or new biosimilar entries could trigger substantial price reductions, with potential declines up to 50% or more. Manufacturers might respond with value-added services, expanded indications, or formulation innovations to preserve value.

Long-term Projections (5+ years):
If generic or biosimilar competition intensifies, prices could stabilize at significantly lower levels, possibly around 30-40% of current list prices. Conversely, if the drug secures new indications or gains regulatory approval for orphan or rare disease status, prices could remain elevated or even increase.

Impact of Policy and Market Forces:
Regulatory reforms emphasizing drug affordability, importation, and transparency could accelerate price erosion. Market consolidations and payer strategies may also influence negotiations and final pricing.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Monitor Patent Expiry and Regulatory Milestones: Early detection of patent lapses allows for proactive planning regarding generic entry.
  • Engage with Payers: Building favorable formulary and patient access strategies mitigates downward pricing pressures.
  • Invest in Value Demonstration: Conducting real-world evidence studies to highlight clinical and economic benefits supports premium pricing.
  • Explore Lifecycle Extensions: Developing new formulations or indications can extend market exclusivity and stabilize prices.
  • Align Pricing with Market Trends: Regularly update pricing strategies in response to competitive movements and policy shifts.

Key Takeaways

  • Market size and demand for NDC 50222-0203 are closely tied to the therapeutic area and patent status.
  • The competitive landscape is shifting with potential generic and biosimilar entries, exerting downward pressure on prices.
  • Current prices are expected to grow modestly in the short term but face significant decline post patent expiration.
  • Price stabilization strategies include value demonstration, lifecycle management, and payer engagement.
  • Continuous market monitoring and adaptive strategies are crucial to sustain product profitability.

FAQs

1. How do patent expirations affect the price of drugs like NDC 50222-0203?
Patent expirations typically lead to rapid price reductions due to the entry of generics or biosimilars. The loss of exclusivity diminishes market power, resulting in competitive pricing that can reduce original drug prices by up to 50-80%.

2. What role do biosimilars play in the pricing landscape concerning biologic drugs?
Biosimilars introduce cost-effective alternatives, increasing competition and generally driving biosimilar prices 20-40% lower than reference biologics. Their emergence often leads to overall price reductions in the therapeutic area.

3. Can innovative formulations or new indications sustain higher prices?
Yes, expanding indications or developing novel formulations or delivery systems can retain or elevate market value, allowing manufacturers to command premium prices and extend market exclusivity.

4. How do payer negotiations influence net drug prices?
Negotiated rebates, discounts, and formulary placement directly affect net prices. Payers leverage formulary incentives and risk-sharing agreements to lower costs, influencing the final price paid by the healthcare system.

5. What are the key factors influencing long-term price projections?
Long-term pricing is shaped by patent exclusivity timelines, competitive entry, regulatory changes, healthcare policy reforms, and the therapeutic landscape's evolution. Shifts in these areas necessitate continuous reassessment of price strategies.


Sources

  1. U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). Drug Approvals and Market Data.
  2. IQVIA. Pharmaceutical Market Trends and Pricing Analytics.
  3. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Payer Rebate and Pricing Data.
  4. EvaluatePharma. Global Biotechnology and Industry Outlook.
  5. FDA Orange Book. Patent and Exclusivity Status Reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.