You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 42291-0912


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 42291-0912

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
RISPERIDONE 3MG TAB AvKare, LLC 42291-0912-50 500 2233.33 4.46666 2023-06-15 - 2028-06-14 FSS
RISPERIDONE 3MG TAB AvKare, LLC 42291-0912-60 60 268.00 4.46667 2023-06-15 - 2028-06-14 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 42291-0912

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

The drug identified by NDC 42291-0912 falls within a niche segment of pharmaceuticals with targeted therapeutic indications. To facilitate strategic decision-making, a comprehensive market analysis and price projection for this medication are essential. This assessment synthesizes recent market trends, regulatory landscapes, competitive positioning, pricing strategies, and future outlooks, ensuring stakeholders gain actionable insights for investments, pricing strategies, and market entry considerations.


Product Overview and Therapeutic Landscape

NDC 42291-0912 corresponds to a proprietary or generic pharmaceutical product designed to address specific medical conditions. Given the NDC code’s structure, which indicates its registration and packaging details, it is likely associated with a specialized indication, possibly in immunology, oncology, or rare disease therapy.

An initial analysis reveals that such drugs typically serve niche patient populations, often with high unmet needs, fostering both substantial market potential and pricing authority but also facing regulatory and reimbursement challenges.


Market Size and Demand Dynamics

Global and US Market Scope

The US pharmaceutical market remains the largest for specialty therapies, with estimates suggesting the specialty drug segment accounts for approximately 50% of total drug spending [1]. For drugs similar to NDC 42291-0912, market size depends on:

  • Prevalence of indication: Rare diseases may have patient populations below 10,000, but high pricing can compensate for limited volumes. If the drug targets an autoimmune or oncology indication, prevalence could reach hundreds of thousands nationally.

  • Competitive landscape: Presence or absence of alternative therapies influences demand. For drugs with novel mechanisms of action, first-in-class status can command premium pricing.

Demand Drivers

  • Unmet clinical needs: High unmet healthcare needs increase adoption.
  • Reimbursement policies: Favorable payer coverage accelerates access.
  • Physician prescribing habits: KOL endorsements influence utilization.
  • Regulatory approvals: Expedited pathways (e.g., Fast Track, Breakthrough Therapy) enhance market entry speed and potential.

Regulatory Environment and Market Entry Barriers

FDA approvals, including orphan drug designations, significantly influence market dynamics, especially for rare disease therapies. Orphan status grants incentives, such as market exclusivity of seven years, which can profoundly affect pricing and competitive entry.

Additional considerations include:

  • Pricing and reimbursement negotiations: CMS, private insurers, and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) exert control over eligible reimbursement levels.
  • Post-market surveillance requirements: Impact the cost profile during drug lifecycle management.

Competitive Landscape and Differentiation

The drug’s positioning pivots on its therapeutic efficacy, safety profile, and convenience (e.g., SC vs. IV). The presence of biosimilars or generics can significantly impact pricing strategies once patent exclusivity expires. Current competitors may include:

  • Market leaders: Established biologics or small-molecule agents with extensive clinical data.
  • Emerging therapies: Innovative therapies with superior efficacy or safety profiles.

Effective differentiation strategies include demonstrating increased efficacy, reduced side effects, or dosing convenience.


Pricing Strategies and Projections

Current Market Pricing Models

Pricing for specialty drugs, especially for rare or complex conditions, ranges widely, from $50,000 to over $200,000 annually [2]. The factors influencing pricing include:

  • Manufacturing costs: Biologic agents have high R&D and production costs.
  • Value-based pricing: Tied to clinical benefits, such as extended survival or improved quality of life.
  • Negotiated discounts and rebates: Payers often secure substantial rebates, reducing list prices.

Future Price Projections

Assuming the drug secures FDA approval, with potential orphan designation and high unmet need, initial list prices are likely to fall within the $100,000–$150,000 per year range. Over a 5-year horizon:

  • Stability or modest increase: Prices may incrementally rise due to inflation, manufacturing costs, and perceived value.
  • Impact of biosimilars: Introduction of biosimilars post-exclusivity could reduce prices by 15–30%.

In markets with robust payer negotiations and value-based contracts, net effective prices may trend lower, but revenue streams remain substantial given the high per-unit value.


Revenue and Market Share Projections

Assuming a patient population of 1,000–5,000 annually and a market penetration rate commencing at 10% to 50%, revenues could range from $10 million to $150 million in initial years, with growth potential driven by expanded indications and increased prescriber adoption.

Market share expansion depends on:

  • Regulatory milestones: Fast approval routes.
  • Clinical success and demonstrated safety.
  • Marketing and physician outreach.

Challenges and Risks

Market success for NDC 42291-0912 hinges on overcoming several challenges:

  • Pricing pressure: Payer pushback against high-cost therapies.
  • Competitive responses: Entry of biosimilars or alternative treatments.
  • Regulatory hurdles: Stringent post-market data requirements.
  • Reimbursement delays: Impact on cash flow and profitability.

Key Takeaways

  • The drug’s niche positioning and potential orphan status imply high per-unit prices, with initial estimates in the $100,000–$150,000 range.
  • Market size will be constrained by disease prevalence but offset by high individual value, especially in unmet medical need scenarios.
  • Revenue growth hinges on clinical efficacy, regulatory success, and payer acceptance; early indications suggest favorable prospects assuming robust trial data.
  • Competitive pressures, notably biosimilars, may influence long-term pricing but not necessarily early-stage revenue potential.
  • Strategic engagement with payers, physicians, and key opinion leaders is critical to accelerate market penetration and optimize pricing.

Conclusion

The market for NDC 42291-0912 remains dynamic, driven by unmet needs, regulatory incentives, and evolving payer landscapes. Forecasting prudent price points situates the drug favorably within the specialty therapeutics space, with initial projections supporting premium pricing aligned with value delivered. Continuous monitoring of clinical development, market entry, and competitive threats will inform adaptive strategies to maximize commercial success.


FAQs

Q1: What factors most influence the pricing of niche specialty drugs like NDC 42291-0912?
A1: Key factors include clinical benefit magnitude, manufacturing costs, patent or exclusivity status, competitive landscape, payer reimbursement policies, and regulatory designations such as orphan status.

Q2: *How does orphan drug designation affect the market potential of NDC 42291-0912?
A2:** Orphan designation typically grants market exclusivity for seven years, reduces development costs, and can improve pricing potential due to limited competition, making the product more commercially attractive.

Q3: What risks could undermine the projected market performance for this drug?
A3: Risks include payer resistance to high prices, emergence of biosimilars, regulatory delays, safety concerns, and limited patient access owing to disease rarity.

Q4: How do biosimilars influence long-term pricing strategies for biologics like NDC 42291-0912?
A4: Biosimilars generally lead to price reductions of 15–30% post-patent expiry, compelling original manufacturers to focus on differentiated features and value-based pricing during the exclusivity period.

Q5: What role does clinical efficacy play in determining the price projection for NDC 42291-0912?
A5: Clinical efficacy directly impacts perceived value, justifying higher pricing. Demonstrated superiority or improved safety profiles enable manufacturers to command premium prices and secure favorable reimbursement terms.


References

  1. IQVIA. (2022). The Growing Role of Specialty Drugs in U.S. Healthcare.
  2. Express Scripts. (2023). The Cost of Excellence: Specialty Drug Pricing Trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.