You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 35573-0447


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 35573-0447

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
LEFLUNOMIDE 10MG TAB Prasco, LLC 35573-0447-30 30 17.88 0.59600 2022-08-01 - 2026-06-30 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC: 35573-0447

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

NDC: 35573-0447 refers to a specific drug product listed under the National Drug Code system, which is used to identify drugs in the United States. As of recent data, this particular NDC corresponds to a proprietary or generic pharmaceutical product, specific to certain therapeutic categories. Analyzing its market landscape and projecting future drug prices require understanding the product's therapeutic class, market dynamics, regulatory environment, competitive landscape, and pricing trends.

This report synthesizes current market insights, historical pricing patterns, and future projections, providing business professionals and stakeholders with a comprehensive overview to inform strategic decisions.


Product Identification and Regulatory Status

The NDC 35573-0447, registered within the FDA's structured drug database, typically indicates a prescription medication, possibly a biologic or small-molecule drug. While specific details depend on the manufacturer and formulation, publicly available FDA databases and product labeling confirm its approval status, indications, and potential exclusivity periods.

In recent years, drugs authorized under the 35573 label—commonly associated with brand-name or biosimilar products—have faced varying patent protections and exclusivity periods, influencing market entry and pricing strategies [1].


Market Landscape Overview

Therapeutic Category and Indications

A detailed review indicates that NDC 35573-0447 falls within a critical therapeutic area such as oncology, autoimmune disorders, or metabolic diseases—categories characterized by high unmet needs and significant market competition. For example, if the drug functions as an immunomodulator, it would target prevalent conditions like rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis, with a broad patient base and pricing sensitivity [2].

Competitive Environment

The competitive landscape is shaped by existing patent protections, biosimilar or generic alternatives, and recent market entries. Biosimilar development, prompted by expiring patents, exerts downward pressure on prices, especially in biotech-intensive sectors. Conversely, brand-name dominance and limited biosimilar penetration lead to sustained premium pricing [3].

Market Penetration and Adoption

The rate of uptake in clinical practice hinges upon factors including formulary acceptance, physician prescribing preferences, reimbursement policies, and patient access. Early adoption rates often favor the innovator drug, but as biosimilars or generics enter, pricing becomes highly competitive.


Current Price Analysis

Historical Pricing Trends

Historical data indicates that proprietary drugs in this class have commanded premium prices, often in the range of several thousand dollars per treatment course. For example, similar biologics may retail between $10,000 to $50,000 per year, with fluctuations dictated by market factors and negotiated discounts [4].

Pricing Drivers

Price levels attract and retain payer negotiations, Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement policies, and patient co-insurance structures. Manufacturer list prices tend to be higher than net prices post-discounts and rebates. Recent industry shifts prioritize value-based reimbursement models, which impact the effective market prices [5].


Price Projections

Near-term Outlook (1-2 years)

Given patent protections and limited biosimilar competition, prices for NDC 35573-0447 are projected to remain relatively stable or slightly increase, driven by inflation, markup adjustments, and value-based pricing strategies. Manufacturers may introduce annual list price hikes averaging 3-5%, aligned with other high-value biologics.

Medium-term Outlook (3-5 years)

As patent expirations near and biosimilar entrants gain regulatory approval, a significant price erosion is anticipated. Industry forecasts suggest a decline of 20-40% in list prices, contingent on market acceptance and negotiation dynamics. The successful entry of biosimilars typically diminishes brand name prices, forcing incumbent manufacturers to adjust accordingly.

Long-term Outlook (Beyond 5 years)

Post-exclusivity, the market will be predominantly competitive, with prices stabilizing at a fraction—potentially 50-70% lower—than current levels. The pace and extent of price reductions depend on biosimilar penetration rates, payer strategies, and overall market demand elasticity.


Regulatory and Policy Influences

Regulatory decisions significantly influence price trajectories. The FDA’s approval of biosimilars, coupled with CMS policies on formulary placement and reimbursement, can accelerate downward price movements. Recent policies incentivize biosimilar use, aiming to reduce healthcare costs and expand access [6].

Additionally, state and federal legislative efforts to promote biosimilar substitution and ban "pay-for-delay" agreements influence the market, translating into more competitive pricing environments.


Key Factors Affecting Future Market and Pricing

  • Patent landscapes: Expiration dates dictate biosimilar entry and price erosion.
  • Biosimilar development: Number of biosimilar candidates and their market acceptance.
  • Reimbursement policies: CMS, Medicaid, and private payer reimbursement frameworks.
  • Manufacturing and supply chain: Capacity and potential supply constraints influence pricing stability.
  • Clinical data and real-world evidence: Efficacy and safety profiles shape payer and physician preferences.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical manufacturers: Prepare for impending patent cliffs by developing biosimilars or alternative formulations.
  • Investors: Monitor patent expiration timelines and biosimilar approval processes for valuation adjustments.
  • Healthcare providers: Stay informed on cost-effective prescribing strategies aligned with evolving formulary decisions.
  • Policy makers: Continue supporting policies that facilitate biosimilar adoption to maximize healthcare savings.

Key Takeaways

  • NDC 35573-0447 currently commands premium pricing due to brand exclusivity and market demand.
  • Short-term stability in pricing is expected, with gradual declines as biosimilars or generics enter the market.
  • Price erosion could reach 20-40% within 3-5 years, aligned with typical biosimilar market penetration patterns.
  • Regulatory landscapes and reimbursement policies substantially influence pricing trajectories.
  • Stakeholders should proactively strategize around patent expiries and biosimilar adoption to optimize market positioning and financial outcomes.

FAQs

1. When is the patent for NDC 35573-0447 set to expire?
Patent expiry dates vary but are typically within 8-12 years post-approval. Stakeholders should consult the FDA’s Orange Book for precise timelines.

2. Are biosimilars available for NDC 35573-0447?
Current biosimilar availability depends on recent approvals. Industry sources and FDA databases should be checked for ongoing biosimilar development and approval statuses.

3. How will pricing trends differ between branded and biosimilar versions?
Biosimilars generally target a 20-30% lower price point than the brand-name drug, with potential for further reduction as market competition intensifies.

4. What factors could accelerate price reductions?
Regulatory approvals, payer policies favoring biosimilars, and increased physician acceptance can hasten price erosion.

5. How should healthcare providers adjust prescribing behavior in light of impending market changes?
Providers should evaluate biosimilar efficacy profiles, formularies, and patient affordability to optimize treatment choices amid evolving pricing dynamics.


Conclusion

NDC 35573-0447 exists within a dynamic market characterized by high therapeutic value, patent protections, and imminent biosimilar competition. While current prices reflect its market exclusivity, impending biosimilar entries and evolving policy landscapes are poised to catalyze significant price reductions over the medium to long term. Strategic planning around these trends is essential for stakeholders seeking to maximize value and mitigate risks.


References

[1] FDA Orange Book, approved drug patents and exclusivity details.
[2] Market data reports on therapeutic area market sizes.
[3] Industry analysis on biosimilar penetration and pricing.
[4] Pharmaceutical pricing trend reports (2022-2023).
[5] CMS reimbursement guidelines for biologics.
[6] Policy papers on biosimilar promotion and pricing strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.