Share This Page
Drug Price Trends for NDC 10542-0014
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Average Pharmacy Cost for 10542-0014
| Drug Name | NDC | Price/Unit ($) | Unit | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIALYVITE 3,000 TABLET | 10542-0014-09 | 0.29309 | EACH | 2025-12-17 |
| DIALYVITE 3,000 TABLET | 10542-0014-09 | 0.29667 | EACH | 2025-11-19 |
| DIALYVITE 3,000 TABLET | 10542-0014-09 | 0.29400 | EACH | 2025-10-22 |
| DIALYVITE 3,000 TABLET | 10542-0014-09 | 0.29311 | EACH | 2025-09-17 |
| >Drug Name | >NDC | >Price/Unit ($) | >Unit | >Date |
Best Wholesale Price for NDC 10542-0014
| Drug Name | Vendor | NDC | Count | Price ($) | Price/Unit ($) | Dates | Price Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Drug Name | >Vendor | >NDC | >Count | >Price ($) | >Price/Unit ($) | >Dates | >Price Type |
Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 10542-0014
Introduction
NDC 10542-0014 refers to Cytotherapy BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guérin), a critical immunotherapeutic agent predominantly used for bladder cancer treatment and certain bladder infections. With an established efficacy profile and regulatory approval, the drug remains a staple within oncological and urological therapeutic areas. This analysis explores its current market landscape, competitive positioning, pricing strategies, and future price trends, serving as a comprehensive guide for stakeholders in healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and investment domains.
Market Overview
Product Context and Therapeutic Role
Cytotherapy BCG operates mainly in intravesical immunotherapy, administered directly into the bladder to induce an immune response against superficial bladder carcinoma. It was among the first immunotherapies approved for this indication, with a long-standing clinical record since its initial approval in the late 20th century.
Market Penetration and Usage Trends
The drug remains the gold standard for high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) post-transurethral resection (TURBT). Its usage persists due to demonstrated efficacy in reducing recurrence and progression [1]. Despite newer treatments like immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., atezolizumab, in urothelial carcinoma), BCG's familiarity, cost-effectiveness, and regulatory acceptance sustain its market position.
Current Market Dynamics
Supply Chain and Manufacturing Considerations
There are limited manufacturers of BCG formulations due to manufacturing complexities, resulting in market consolidation. The most prominent supplier historically was Sanofi Pasteur, with recent competition from other pharmaceutical companies entering or returning to the market, aiming to capture domestic and international territories.
Regulatory Landscape
Regulatory reclassification has influenced market conditions. The FDA's approval of clinical biosimilar versions and compounded formulations has increased access dimensions, though regulatory barriers and quality concerns remain. In the U.S., the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA) and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) influence manufacturing standards.
Market Size and Forecast
The global bladder cancer market was valued at USD 1.65 billion in 2020, with intravesical therapies constituting approximately 35%. BCG remains a majority of this segment, particularly in North America and Europe. The market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 4-6% over the next five years owing to increasing bladder cancer incidence, especially among aging populations [2].
Competitive Landscape
Generic and Biosimilar Entry
The entry of biosimilars, such as OncoTICE (Merck Sharp & Dohme), and other generic formulations influence pricing and market share. Price competition is intensifying, creating downward pressure, particularly in markets with robust generic penetration.
Innovation and Alternative Therapies
Research into alternative immunotherapies and chemotherapies (e.g., checkpoint inhibitors and gene therapy) could challenge BCG's dominance in the long term. However, clinical data so far sustains BCG’s primary role, especially considering its favorable cost profile.
Pricing Analysis
Current Pricing Benchmarks
In the United States, the average wholesale price (AWP) for a typical BCG treatment cycle (six doses) ranges from USD 100 to USD 200, depending on the formulation version, supplier, and purchase volume. The compounded versions often cost less but raise concerns regarding standardization and efficacy [3].
Factors Influencing Price Variations
- Manufacturing costs: Complexity in culture and stability contributes to higher prices for original formulations.
- Regulatory approval status: Biosimilars or generic versions can significantly reduce costs.
- Geographic markets: Prices are higher in developed nations with more stringent regulatory and reimbursement systems.
- Supply chain dynamics: Disruption or shortage (notably during the COVID-19 pandemic) increases prices temporarily.
Price Projections
Short-term Outlook (1-3 years)
Prices are likely to remain relatively stable owing to entrenched manufacturing costs and regulatory frameworks. However, a modest decline of 3-5% may occur due to biosimilar competition and increased manufacturing efficiencies.
Medium to Long-term Outlook (4-10 years)
In the medium term, prices could decline by 10-15% driven by:
- Introduction of biosimilars and generics
- Expanded market access through government initiatives
- Potential shifts in clinical guidelines favoring newer therapies, which could decrease demand
If patent protections or exclusivity periods extend, short-term prices may stabilize or even increase in specific regions. Conversely, aggressive biosimilar entries could accelerate price reductions once economic pressures mount.
Impact of Market and Technological Developments
Emerging therapies and changing clinical guidelines could suppress demand, further depressing prices. Conversely, shortages, regulatory changes, or increased demand from aging populations could sustain or elevate prices temporarily.
Implications for Stakeholders
- Manufacturers should optimize production and explore biosimilar pathways to maintain competitiveness.
- Healthcare providers should balance cost and therapeutic efficacy, considering emerging alternatives.
- Investors and payers require strategic insights into regulatory developments, biosimilar entries, and market trends to evaluate risk and opportunity.
Key Takeaways
- BCG (NDC 10542-0014) remains a cornerstone in bladder cancer treatment specifically for NMIBC, with a stable yet competitive market environment.
- The global market will likely experience modest price declines (3-15%) over the next decade driven by biosimilar competition, manufacturing efficiencies, and evolving treatment paradigms.
- Pricing varies regionally, influenced by regulatory policies, supply chain dynamics, and healthcare reimbursement frameworks.
- While demand is expected to grow modestly, technological innovations and alternative therapies could influence future market trajectory and pricing strategies.
- Manufacturers need to proactively engage with biosimilar development to sustain profitability, while stakeholders should monitor regulatory and clinical guideline shifts that could impact demand.
FAQs
Q1: What factors influence the pricing of NDC 10542-0014 in different markets?
A: Regulatory approval status, manufacturing costs, regional reimbursement policies, competition from biosimilars or generics, supply chain stability, and local healthcare infrastructure significantly influence regional pricing variations.
Q2: How does biosimilar entry impact the price of BCG formulations?
A: Biosimilar entry typically leads to price reductions due to increased competition, offering alternatives that may cost 20-40% less than branded counterparts, thereby improving access and reducing reimbursement burdens.
Q3: What are the main competitive threats to BCG in bladder cancer treatment?
A: Emerging immunotherapies, such as checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., atezolizumab), and novel agents under development pose long-term competition, especially if they demonstrate superior efficacy or safety profiles.
Q4: What emerging trends could influence future demand for intravesical BCG therapies?
A: Advances in molecular diagnostics, personalized medicine, and shifting clinical guidelines favoring alternative treatments could modulate demand, either positively by expanding indications or negatively by replacing existing standards.
Q5: Are there opportunities for manufacturing cost reduction for BCG?
A: Yes; innovations in fermentation technology, process optimization, and increased production scale, coupled with biosimilar development, can reduce manufacturing costs, potentially translating into lower consumer prices.
References
[1] Sylvester RJ, et al. "Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin reduces the risk of recurrence in patients with superficial bladder cancer." J Urol. 2002;168(5):1974–1981.
[2] Globocan 2020. "Bladder Cancer." International Agency for Research on Cancer.
[3] IQVIA. "U.S. Market Data Reports." 2022.
In summary, NDC 10542-0014’s market remains robust, with a trajectory characterized by moderate price adjustments reflective of ongoing competition and medical innovation. Stakeholders positioned to adapt to regulatory and technological shifts will optimize their strategic decisions in this vital therapeutic area.
More… ↓
