You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 00955-1052


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 00955-1052

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
SEVELAMER CARBONATE 0.8GM/PKT PWDR Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC 00955-1052-90 90 47.80 0.53111 2023-06-01 - 2028-05-31 Big4
SEVELAMER CARBONATE 0.8GM/PKT PWDR Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC 00955-1052-90 90 86.83 0.96478 2023-06-01 - 2028-05-31 FSS
SEVELAMER CARBONATE 0.8GM/PKT PWDR Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC 00955-1052-90 90 49.57 0.55078 2024-01-01 - 2028-05-31 Big4
SEVELAMER CARBONATE 0.8GM/PKT PWDR Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC 00955-1052-90 90 86.83 0.96478 2024-01-01 - 2028-05-31 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 00955-1052

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

The National Drug Code (NDC) 00955-1052 refers to a specific pharmaceutical product, which requires comprehensive market analysis and price projections to inform stakeholders, including healthcare providers, payers, investors, and policy-makers. This analysis synthesizes data related to the drug’s therapeutic class, competitors, manufacturing landscape, regulatory environment, and market dynamics to project its pricing trajectory over the next several years.


Product Overview and Therapeutic Landscape

NDC 00955-1052 corresponds to [Insert drug name], marketed primarily for [Indication: e.g., oncology, cardiovascular, central nervous system disorder]. Its approval by the FDA was granted in [Year], with the indication approved for [specific patient population or disease severity]. As a [drug type: biologic, small molecule, biosimilar, etc.], its clinical efficacy, safety profile, and pharmacokinetic properties position it distinctly within its therapeutic area.

Current treatment paradigms in this segment favor [monotherapy/combinatorial regimens], influencing the demand dynamics for this drug. The evolving standard of care, especially as novel therapies enter the market, directly impacts its market penetration and pricing strategies.


Market Size and Demand Drivers

The global market for [therapeutic class] is estimated to reach $X billion by [Year], with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of X% ([Source]). The demand for [product] is primarily driven by:

  • Prevalence of target condition: For example, if treating [disease], approximately [X million] patients are affected globally, with [X]% eligible for treatment.
  • Line of therapy: As a first-line or late-line agent, its market share is limited or expanding accordingly.
  • Pricing policies: Reimbursement levels and formulary positioning influence market expansion.
  • Regulatory and reimbursement environments: Changes in coverage or new approvals in emerging markets amplify demand.
  • Manufacturing capacity: Supply constraints or expansions affect available market volume.

In the U.S., it is estimated that [X]% of the target population receives treatment, translating into approximately [number] patients, with growth driven by increased diagnosis and expanding indications.


Competitive Landscape

The competitive environment encompasses:

  • Brand-name equivalents and biosimilars: Notably, if the drug is a biologic, biosimilar competition is a significant factor, typically exerting downward pricing pressure.
  • Alternative therapies: Small-molecule competitors or non-pharmacologic interventions influence overall market share.
  • Pricing benchmarks: Similar drugs in the same class are priced between $X - $Y per unit/dose, with distinctions based on delivery method and indication.

The market positioning of NDC 00955-1052 hinges on its clinical advantages, such as improved efficacy, safety profile, or dosing convenience, which can sustain premium pricing.


Regulatory and Reimbursement Considerations

Regulatory approvals in international markets can dramatically alter its revenue potential. As of [latest update], the drug has [status: e.g., full approval, orphan designation, orphan drug exclusivity], influencing its market exclusivity period and pricing flexibility.

Reimbursement policies influence net price realization. In the U.S., private insurers and Medicare Part D negotiate discounts and rebates, often reducing the list price by [X]%. Countries with national health systems tend to negotiate lower prices, constraining overall revenue.


Price Trends and Projections

Historical Pricing Dynamics

Since market entry, the drug's list price has evolved from $X to $Y per dose, reflecting negotiations, inflation, and value-based pricing strategies. For biologics, an annual price increase averaging X% is typical, driven by R&D recoupment, manufacturing costs, and clinical value.

Future Price Trends (Next 5–10 Years)

  • Price stabilization or decline: As biosimilars enter the market, competition could drive down prices by X–Y% annually.
  • Value-based pricing models: Payer-driven value assessments may restrict list-price growth, particularly if the drug’s incremental benefit over existing therapies is marginal.
  • Market expansion: Entry into emerging markets may lead to tiered pricing, with lower prices compared to the U.S. and EU.

Projected Price Range

  • Short-term (1-3 years): List prices are expected to remain stable at $X–$Y per dose, with rebates reducing actual net prices.
  • Medium-term (4-7 years): With biosimilar competition, prices could decrease by X–Y%, stabilizing around $A–$B.
  • Long-term (8-10 years): Price reductions of up to Z% are plausible, aligning with patent expiry and increased biosimilar availability.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Manufacturers should strategize around patent protections, specialty pharmacy channels, and value demonstration to sustain premium pricing.
  • Payers and policymakers will continue emphasizing value-based negotiations, influencing future price ceilings.
  • Investors should monitor biosimilar pipeline progress, which generally exerts downward pressure on prices and margins.

Key Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges

  • Market saturation by biosimilars and generics.
  • Price pressure from healthcare cost containment efforts.
  • Rapid innovation potentially rendering current therapies obsolete.

Opportunities

  • Potential for expanding indications, increasing market size.
  • Differentiation through improved delivery methods or combination therapies.
  • International expansion in emerging markets with less price regulation.

Conclusion

NDC 00955-1052 operates within a dynamic market environment characterized by increasing competition, regulatory scrutiny, and evolving reimbursement policies. Current pricing strategies reflect patent protections and clinical value, but prospective biosimilar entries and healthcare cost pressures are poised to exert downward influence on pricing over the next decade. Stakeholders must adopt adaptive approaches, emphasizing value demonstration and market expansion to enhance profitability.


Key Takeaways

  • The drug markets within its therapeutic class are growing steadily, but price competition is intensifying due to biosimilars and generics.
  • Current list prices are approximately $X–$Y per dose, with actual net prices significantly lower after rebates and discounts.
  • Patents and exclusivity periods provide temporary pricing power; after expiration, expect substantial price declines.
  • International market penetration may present opportunities for growth at differentiated pricing levels.
  • Value-based negotiations will increasingly influence future pricing, favoring drugs with demonstrated superior efficacy and safety profiles.

FAQs

1. How will biosimilar competition impact the price of NDC 00955-1052?
Biosimilar entrants typically drive down biologic prices by 15–30% within a few years of market entry, depending on market acceptance, regulatory barriers, and manufacturing costs.

2. What is the expected timeline for patent expiry for this drug?
Patent expiry generally occurs 12–14 years post-approval, though data exclusivity can extend market monopoly by additional years.

3. How do reimbursement policies influence the drug’s net price?
Reimbursement negotiations, rebates, and value assessments can reduce the list price by 10–40%, impacting net revenue.

4. Which markets present the highest growth opportunities for this drug?
Emerging markets such as China, India, and Brazil offer substantial growth potential due to expanding healthcare infrastructure and lower price sensitivities, albeit with pricing constraints.

5. What strategies can manufacturers implement to sustain profitability amid price pressures?
Investing in demonstrating clinical and economic value, expanding indications, optimizing manufacturing efficiency, and exploring combination therapies are key strategies.


References

  1. [Insert relevant industry reports, databases, or sources used]
  2. [Citations of regulatory filings, pricing studies, or market research]
  3. [Additional authoritative publications]

[Note: As the actual therapeutic nature of NDC 00955-1052 is unspecified, placeholders such as "[Insert drug name]" and "[Indication]" should be updated with precise data upon further review.]

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.