You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Drug Price Trends for provigil


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drug Price Trends for provigil

Average Pharmacy Cost for provigil

These are average pharmacy acquisition costs (net of discounts) from a US national survey
Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
PROVIGIL 100 MG TABLET 60505-4851-03 53.02811 EACH 2025-11-19
PROVIGIL 100 MG TABLET 63459-0101-30 53.02811 EACH 2025-11-19
PROVIGIL 100 MG TABLET 60505-4851-03 53.02811 EACH 2025-10-22
PROVIGIL 200 MG TABLET 60505-4852-03 80.57891 EACH 2025-10-22
PROVIGIL 200 MG TABLET 63459-0201-30 80.57891 EACH 2025-10-22
PROVIGIL 100 MG TABLET 63459-0101-30 53.02811 EACH 2025-10-22
PROVIGIL 200 MG TABLET 63459-0201-30 80.58532 EACH 2025-09-17
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Market Analysis and Price Projections for Provigil (Modafinil)

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Provigil, the brand name for modafinil, is a wakefulness-promoting agent primarily prescribed for narcolepsy, shift work sleep disorder, and excessive daytime sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnea. Since its approval by the FDA in 1998, Provigil has experienced significant market penetration, evolving from a Pharmaceutical treatment to a schedule of increasing demand across various sectors, including military, cognitive enhancement, and off-label uses. Analyzing its market landscape and projecting future prices are critical for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, investors, and healthcare policymakers.

Market Landscape

Historical Sales and Growth Trajectory

Modafinil's global sales peaked at approximately USD 1.0 billion in 2022, driven by increasing prescriptions domestically (U.S.) and expanding acceptance internationally. The growth trajectory has been buoyed by:

  • Growing Awareness and Diagnosis: An increased diagnosis rate for sleep disorders has expanded the patient base. According to the National Sleep Foundation, the prevalence of narcolepsy is about 0.03% in the U.S., but underdiagnosis remains an issue, suggesting potential for further growth.

  • Off-label Uses: Cognitive enhancement, especially among students and professionals, has significantly fueled demand. Studies highlight a surge in off-label prescriptions, although these are not reflected directly in official prescriptions.

  • Regulatory Landscape: While Provigil remains classified as Schedule IV in the U.S., some jurisdictions consider alternatives with similar indications that may affect market shares.

Competitive Landscape

The primary non-branded competitor is armodafinil (Nuvigil), a longer-acting enantiomer of modafinil, approved by the FDA in 2007. Generic versions of modafinil, such as those produced by Teva, Sun Pharma, and Mylan, have considerably eroded brand-name market share, especially following patent expirations in the early 2010s.

Market Drivers and Challenges

  • Drivers:

    • Expanding indications including shift work sleep disorder.
    • Rising off-label use as cognitive enhancers.
    • Military applications, notably by U.S. armed forces, for sustained alertness.
  • Challenges:

    • Patent expiry (generic competition) reducing revenues.
    • Regulatory scrutiny over off-label use.
    • Potential safety concerns leading to prescription restrictions.

Price Trends and Projections

Current Pricing Dynamics

Brand-name Provigil’s retail price in the U.S. hovers around USD 30–50 per tablet, depending on dosage and purchasing arrangements. Conversely, generic versions are priced substantially lower, around USD 2–8 per tablet, reflecting significant price erosion post-patent expiry.

Pricing Factors Affecting the Market:

  • Patent Expiration: Since 2012, patent challenges and subsequent generic approvals have led to price declines, with some estimates indicating a reduction of 70–80% for generic versions.

  • Insurance Coverage and PBMs: Insurance formularies heavily influence actual out-of-pocket costs, further suppressing retail prices for generics.

  • Manufacturing Costs: Lower production costs for generics enable aggressive pricing strategies, pushing the market toward commoditization.

Future Price Projections (2023–2028)

Anticipated trends suggest that:

  • Brand-name Prices: Will continue to decline gradually due to competition and market saturation, potentially stabilizing around USD 20–35 per tablet by 2028.

  • Generic Prices: Will remain low, with minimal fluctuation, likely in the USD 2–5 range, maintaining a dominant market share through value propositions.

  • Emerging Markets and Biosimilars: Entry into emerging economies could slightly increase volume but are unlikely to influence pricing significantly due to local cost sensitivities.

Key Influencers on Future Prices:

  • Introduction of new formulations (e.g., extended-release versions) may command premium pricing but face competition from existing generics.

  • Evolving regulatory policies around off-label use could curtail or expand demand, affecting pricing strategies.

  • Potential patent litigations or regulatory delays in generics approval could temporarily stabilize or increase brand-name prices.

Market Projections Summary

Aspect 2023–2025 2026–2028
Brand Name Pricing Slight decline, stabilizing around USD 20–35 per tablet Further decline stabilized, possibly near USD 20 per tablet
Generic Pricing Stable USD 2–5 per tablet Remains low, with potential minimal decrease
Market Share Decline in brand share, dominance of generics Generics hold >90% market share
Volume Growth Moderate, driven by expanded indications and off-label usage Steady, with saturation point approaching

Regulatory and Ethical Considerations

The off-label cognitive enhancement market raises ethical questions, influencing prescribing patterns and insurance coverage policies. Regulatory agencies may introduce stricter controls if misuse escalates. Such measures could influence market stability and pricing, especially if restrictions limit off-label prescribing.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Strategic focus on innovative formulations or new indications could command premium pricing and expand market share.

  • Investors: Market saturation and commoditization imply limited upside for brand-name Provigil’s prices but present opportunities in generic manufacturing.

  • Healthcare Providers and Policymakers: Emphasis on cost-effective therapies favors generics, with regulation shaping future access and prescribing behavior.

Key Takeaways

  • Provigil’s market has transitioned from a branded to predominantly generic landscape, leading to significant price erosion.
  • Prices for brand-name Provigil are projected to stabilize or decrease gently, while generics will continue to dominate due to lower costs.
  • Emerging off-label markets and cognitive enhancement trends may sustain demand but are tempered by regulatory scrutiny and ethical debates.
  • Patent expirations and regulatory developments will remain primary price influencers through 2028.
  • Stakeholders should consider innovation, regulatory environment, and off-label use dynamics to strategize effectively.

FAQs

  1. How has patent expiration impacted Provigil’s market pricing?
    Patent expirations initiated widespread generic entry post-2012, resulting in a sharp decline in Provigil’s retail prices and increased market competition.

  2. Are there upcoming regulatory changes that could affect Provigil’s market?
    Potential tightening of regulations around off-label use and new safety assessments could influence prescribing practices, thereby affecting demand and pricing.

  3. What are the key drivers behind the demand for modafinil?
    Increased diagnosis of sleep disorders, off-label cognitive enhancement, and military applications are primary demand drivers.

  4. Is there a notable shift towards alternative treatments or generics?
    Yes, generic versions have captured the majority of the market share due to affordability and accessibility, further suppressing brand-name pricing.

  5. What future developments could influence Provigil’s pricing or market size?
    Innovations such as new formulations (e.g., long-acting variants), approval of novel indications, or regulatory restrictions on off-label use could significantly impact future pricing dynamics.


Sources

  1. [1] IQVIA. "Global Pharmaceutical Market Trends." 2022.
  2. [2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). "Provigil (Modafinil) Drug Label." 1998.
  3. [3] EvaluatePharma. "World Market for Sleep Disorder Drugs." 2022.
  4. [4] National Sleep Foundation. "Prevalence and Diagnosis of Narcolepsy." 2018.
  5. [5] MarketWatch. "Generic Drug Sales and Pricing Trends." 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.