You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Drug Price Trends for XGEVA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drug Price Trends for XGEVA

Best Wholesale Price for XGEVA

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available to any customer under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Unit Dates Price Type
XGEVA 120MG/1.7ML INJ Amgen USA, Inc. 55513-0730-01 1.7ML 2695.52 1585.60000 ML 2023-01-01 - 2026-01-31 FSS
XGEVA 120MG/1.7ML INJ Amgen USA, Inc. 55513-0730-01 1.7ML 1927.87 1134.04118 ML 2024-01-01 - 2026-01-31 Big4
XGEVA 120MG/1.7ML INJ Amgen USA, Inc. 55513-0730-01 1.7ML 1655.64 973.90588 ML 2021-02-01 - 2026-01-31 Big4
XGEVA 120MG/1.7ML INJ Amgen USA, Inc. 55513-0730-01 1.7ML 2781.28 1636.04706 ML 2024-01-01 - 2026-01-31 FSS
XGEVA 120MG/1.7ML INJ Amgen USA, Inc. 55513-0730-01 1.7ML 2363.83 1390.48824 ML 2021-02-01 - 2026-01-31 FSS
XGEVA 120MG/1.7ML INJ Amgen USA, Inc. 55513-0730-01 1.7ML 1729.31 1017.24118 ML 2022-01-01 - 2026-01-31 Big4
XGEVA 120MG/1.7ML INJ Amgen USA, Inc. 55513-0730-01 1.7ML 2491.24 1465.43529 ML 2022-01-01 - 2026-01-31 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for XGEVA (Denosumab)

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

XGEVA (denosumab) is a monoclonal antibody marketed by Amgen, primarily utilized for the prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors, as well as for treating giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at high risk of fracture. Since its approval, XGEVA has established itself as a prominent player within the supportive care market for oncology and bone disease management. This report provides a comprehensive market analysis and price projection for XGEVA, emphasizing factors influencing market trends, competitive dynamics, regulatory landscape, and pricing strategies.


Market Overview

Global Market Size and Growth

The global bone metastases and oncology supportive care markets have experienced steady growth, driven by rising cancer prevalence and advances in targeted therapies. According to a report by GlobalData, the oncology supportive care market is projected to reach approximately USD 28 billion by 2025, growing at a CAGR of ~4.5% (2020–2025) [1]. Denosumab, as a leading therapy for SREs and bone-related complications, commands a significant share within this domain.

Indications and Market Penetration

XGEVA's primary indications include:

  • Prevention of SREs in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors (e.g., breast, prostate, lung).
  • Treatment of GCTB in adult patients.
  • Osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at high risk of fracture.

Its adoption hinges on clinical efficacy, safety profile, and regulatory approvals. Notably, XGEVA competes with bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid, which historically dominated the SRE prevention market.

Market Drivers

  • Increasing prevalence of metastatic cancers, especially breast and prostate.
  • Growing awareness and earlier intervention for bone metastases.
  • Expanding approval for additional indications such as GCTB.
  • Advances in personalized medicine and supportive care protocols.

Market Challenges

  • Competition from alternative therapies, notably bisphosphonates.
  • High treatment costs impacting healthcare budgets.
  • Patent expirations and biosimilar entrants threatening pricing power.
  • Reimbursement policies varying across regions.

Competitive Landscape

Major Competitors

  • Bisphosphonates: Zoledronic acid remains a cost-effective alternative, widely used due to its long-established efficacy and lower price point.
  • Other Denosumab Formulations: Prolia (denosumab) for osteoporosis offers an indirect comparison but is marketed at a different marketing and pricing structure.
  • Emerging Biologics: Development of biosimilars for denosumab could disrupt pricing and market share.

Market Share Dynamics

XGEVA held approximately 60% of the denosumab-related markets in oncology supportive care in 2022, with ongoing growth driven by expanding GCTB indications. However, biosimilar development could erode its dominance, particularly in cost-sensitive regions.


Price Analysis

Current Pricing (2023)

  • US Market: The average wholesale price (AWP) for XGEVA is approximately USD 2,100 per 120 mg dose, with a typical treatment course involving monthly injections over several months [2].
  • European Market: Prices vary but generally range from EUR 1,800 to EUR 2,200 per dose.

Price Factors

  • Regulatory and Reimbursement Policies: Patents and market exclusivity influence pricing power. Post-patent expiration, biosimilar competition exerts downward pressure.
  • Market Penetration and Negotiations: Payers often negotiate discounts, reducing list prices in pragmatic settings.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Multiple studies underscore the economic value of XGEVA, especially in reducing hospitalization and SRE-related costs, supporting premium pricing.

Price Projection (2024–2028)

Short-Term Outlook (2024–2025)

  • Stable Pricing: Majestic control due to patent protection and high therapeutic value.
  • Incremental Adjustments: Considered inflationary increases (~2–3%) aligned with healthcare inflation trends.

Mid to Long-Term Outlook (2026–2028)

  • Impact of Biosimilars: Biosimilar denosumab products are projected to reach regulatory approval in key markets by 2026, leading to significant price reductions—potentially 30–50%—depending on regional market dynamics [3].
  • Market Penetration: Competitive pressure could necessitate tiered pricing strategies, especially in cost-sensitive healthcare systems.
  • Regulatory and Policy Influence: Value-based pricing models are likely to influence future prices, emphasizing clinical outcomes and real-world cost-effectiveness.

Projected Price Decline

  • In mature markets, future discounts could reduce per-dose prices by 35–50% by 2028, especially as biosimilars gain acceptance.
  • In emerging markets, prices may be constrained by local purchasing power and regulatory frameworks, possibly reducing prices by 50–60% relative to US/Average European prices.

Market Opportunities and Risks

Opportunities

  • Expansion into new indications such as multiple myeloma or other bone degenerative conditions.
  • Use of real-world data to reinforce cost-effectiveness and value-based pricing.
  • Strategic collaborations and licensing agreements to optimize access.

Risks

  • Accelerated biosimilar entry could compromise revenue streams.
  • Regulatory hurdles or delays in approval for new indications.
  • Pricing and reimbursement reforms in major markets, impacting profitability.

Conclusion

XGEVA remains a pivotal asset within supportive oncology care, with significant market penetration driven by its clinical efficacy and expanding indications. While current pricing reflects its therapeutic value, future pricing will be heavily influenced by biosimilar competition, market dynamics, and health policy reforms. Companies should strategize to sustain profitability through innovation, market expansion, and pricing agility, particularly post-patent expiry.


Key Takeaways

  • XGEVA's global market valuation is poised for modest growth, leveraging expanding indications and increasing cancer prevalence.
  • Patent protections sustain current pricing levels through 2024–2025, with potential declines driven by biosimilar competition starting around 2026.
  • Price projections suggest a 35–50% reduction in per-dose costs by 2028, consistent with biosimilar market penetration.
  • Strategic efforts should focus on regional expansion, cost-effectiveness messaging, and lifecycle management to maintain market share.
  • Monitoring regulatory changes and biosimilar approvals is crucial for accurate financial forecasting.

FAQs

  1. When will biosimilars for XGEVA likely enter the market, impacting pricing?
    Answer: Biosimilar denosumab products are expected to seek approval around 2026, post-expiry of Amgen’s patent, potentially causing significant price reductions.

  2. How does XGEVA compare cost-effectively to bisphosphonates like zoledronic acid?
    Answer: Although more expensive upfront, XGEVA's superior safety profile and reduced hospitalization costs associated with SREs may favor its cost-effectiveness in certain patient populations.

  3. What regions are most sensitive to XGEVA pricing changes?
    Answer: Emerging markets and countries with strict reimbursement controls will likely experience greater price reductions, especially with biosimilar competition.

  4. Are there opportunities to expand XGEVA's indications to increase market value?
    Answer: Yes, ongoing research into novel uses such as multiple myeloma and osteoporosis could provide avenues for growth and justify premium positioning.

  5. What is the primary risk to XGEVA’s market dominance?
    Answer: The advent of biosimilars and potential regulatory challenges pose significant threats to its market share and pricing stability.


References

[1] GlobalData. The Oncology Supportive Care Market – Global Analysis and Trends. 2022.
[2] Amgen. XGEVA Prescribing Information. 2023.
[3] IQVIA. Biosimilar Market Insights. 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.