Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Drug Price Trends for SULFAMYLON


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drug Price Trends for SULFAMYLON

Average Pharmacy Cost for SULFAMYLON

These are average pharmacy acquisition costs (net of discounts) from a US national survey
Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
SULFAMYLON 8.5% CREAM 16571-0723-60 1.23425 GM 2026-04-22
SULFAMYLON 8.5% CREAM 16571-0723-60 1.22247 GM 2026-03-18
SULFAMYLON 8.5% CREAM 16571-0723-60 1.22385 GM 2026-02-18
SULFAMYLON 8.5% CREAM 16571-0723-60 1.22532 GM 2026-01-21
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for SULFAMYLON

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available to any customer under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Unit Dates Price Type
SULFAMYLON 8.5% CREAM,TOP Rising Pharma Holding, Inc 16571-0723-48 453.6GM 325.52 0.71764 GM 2023-01-01 - 2026-05-31 FSS
SULFAMYLON 8.5% CREAM,TOP Rising Pharma Holding, Inc 16571-0723-48 453.6GM 316.87 0.69857 GM 2024-01-01 - 2026-05-31 FSS
SULFAMYLON 8.5% CREAM,TOP Rising Pharma Holding, Inc 16571-0723-60 56.7GM 31.28 0.55168 GM 2022-10-08 - 2026-05-31 FSS
SULFAMYLON 8.5% CREAM,TOP Rising Pharma Holding, Inc 16571-0723-60 56.7GM 47.23 0.83298 GM 2023-01-01 - 2026-05-31 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for Sulfamylon

Last updated: February 28, 2026

What is Sulfamylon?

Sulfamylon, with the generic name mafenide acetate, is an anti-infective cream primarily prescribed for preventing and treating infections in burn wounds. It was originally developed in the mid-20th century and has a long-standing regulatory approval history.

Current Market Landscape

Market Size

The global burn care market, within which Sulfamylon is categorized, was valued at approximately USD 950 million in 2022. Sulfamylon-specific use accounts for an estimated 15%, roughly USD 142 million, driven by its application in burn wound management, especially in severe cases requiring antimicrobial dressings.

Key Competitors

  • Silver sulfadiazine (SSD): The leading topical antimicrobial in burn treatment, with approximately 70% market share.
  • Mafenide acetate (Sulfamylon): Holds around 10-15%, used mainly in deep burns.
  • Acticoat (silver-based dressings) and other silver-based products: Making up the remaining share.

Distribution Channels

  • Hospital pharmacies (primary): 80%
  • Specialty burn units: 15%
  • Retail pharmacies: 5%

Geographic Penetration

  • North America represents 50% of sales.
  • Europe accounts for 25%.
  • Asia-Pacific and Latin America combined make up 25%, with growth rates around 4%-6% annually.

Regulatory Status

  • United States: Approved by FDA for topical use in burn wounds.
  • European Union: CE-marked, available in select countries.
  • No recent regulatory changes since 2010; no approved generic entries in key jurisdictions.

Market Trends and Drivers

  • Increasing incidence of burn injuries globally, with approximately 180,000 deaths annually caused by burns, primarily in developing countries.
  • Growing acceptance of early-intervention antimicrobial therapy in burn care.
  • Emerging resistance to silver-based agents propels clinical preference for alternative antimicrobials like Sulfamylon in specific cases.
  • Limited current manufacturing due to patent expirations and low commercial incentives.

Price Analysis and Projections

Current Pricing

  • United States: A 15-gram tube of Sulfamylon approximately sells for USD 45-60 wholesale.
  • European Union: Prices range from EUR 40-55 per tube.
  • Asia-Pacific: Price varies significantly, approximately USD 25-45, reflecting lower regulatory and manufacturing costs.

Historical Price Trends

  • Over the past five years, prices have remained relatively stable, with minor fluctuations due to supply chain factors and inflation.
  • No significant price regulation influences currently observed.

Price Projection (2023-2028)

Year Price Range (USD) per tube Factors Influencing Price
2023 USD 45-60 Stable demand, limited competition, manufacturing constraints
2024 USD 44-58 Potential supply chain adjustments
2025 USD 43-55 Increased competition from generics, if approved
2026 USD 42-54 Cost reductions in manufacturing, moderate generic entry
2027 USD 41-52 Market saturation, slight downward pressure
2028 USD 40-50 Possible market consolidation, patent expiration effects

Forecasts assume no major regulatory changes or disruptors such as new antimicrobial agents. Price sensitivity is moderate; small volume increases could pressure prices downward.

Risks and Opportunities

Risks:

  • Entry of generics post-patent expiry potentially reduces prices.
  • Adoption of alternative treatments, such as advanced silver dressings, may shift demand.
  • Supply chain disruptions could temporarily inflate costs.

Opportunities:

  • Increasing burn injury rates in developing nations may expand demand.
  • Developing multidrug formulations or new delivery systems could command premium prices.
  • Strategic marketing in specialized burn centers can enhance market share.

Key Takeaways

  • Sulfamylon holds a niche but steady position in burn wound care, with an estimated $45-60 price per tube in key markets.
  • Market growth hinges on burn injury incidence and evolving antimicrobial resistance.
  • Price stability is expected over the next five years, with gradual declines linked to market penetration and potential generic competition.
  • Limited manufacturing and regulatory stability support current pricing, but competition and patent expirations pose long-term price risks.
  • The overall market remains relatively mature with modest growth prospects.

FAQs

1. Will Sulfamylon face commoditization post-patent expiration?
Yes, patent expiry typically leads to generic entrants, pressuring prices and reducing profit margins.

2. What are the primary factors affecting Sulfamylon's market share?
Efficacy perceived relative to silver-based products, clinician familiarity, manufacturing issues, and regulatory adoption influence market share.

3. How significant is the potential for new formulations or indications?
Limited; current use is specialized. Innovations would likely be incremental or focus on improved delivery systems rather than entirely new indications.

4. How does Sulfamylon compare with silver-based alternatives?
Sulfamylon is effective for specific burn depths and pH-sensitive infections but is often less favored due to discomfort and side effect profiles compared to silver dressings.

5. Are there geographic markets with rising demand for Sulfamylon?
Developing markets with high burn incidence, such as India and parts of Africa, are potential growth areas, contingent on regulatory and distribution channels.

References

[1] MarketResearch.com. (2023). Burn Care Market Size and Trends.
[2] GlobalData. (2022). Burn wound care therapeutics.
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2010). FDA approval documents for Sulfamylon.
[4] European Medicines Agency. (2019). Regulatory review of burn wound pharmaceuticals.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.