You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Drug Price Trends for KERYDIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drug Price Trends for KERYDIN

Best Wholesale Price for KERYDIN

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available to any customer under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Unit Dates Price Type
KERYDIN 43.5MG/ML Sandoz, Inc. 10337-0905-44 1X4ML 388.23 2023-08-15 - 2028-08-14 FSS
KERYDIN 43.5MG/ML Sandoz, Inc. 10337-0905-44 1X4ML 402.59 2024-01-01 - 2028-08-14 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for KERYDIN

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

KERYDIN (tavinebant), developed by Pfizer, is a prescription medication approved by the FDA in 2020 for the treatment of onychomycosis, a common fungal nail infection. As a once-daily topical agent, KERYDIN offers a novel approach to fungal nail treatment, traditionally dominated by systemic antifungals. This analysis evaluates its market landscape, potential growth trajectories, pricing strategies, and factors influencing future price trends.


Market Overview

Disease Epidemiology and Patient Demographics

Onychomycosis affects approximately 10-15% of the global adult population, with higher prevalence among those aged 40-60, diabetics, and immunocompromised individuals. In the United States alone, an estimated 35 million people suffer from this condition, presenting a significant market (~$1.5 billion in 2021 valuations, [1]).

Current Treatment Landscape

Standard-of-care options include oral antifungals such as terbinafine and itraconazole, with topical therapies like ciclopirox and efinaconazole. Despite efficacy, systemic treatments pose risks like hepatotoxicity, and topical agents often suffer from limited efficacy and patient adherence issues. KERYDIN aims to fill these gaps with its targeted mechanism and improved safety profile.

Market Penetration and Competition

Since its approval, KERYDIN operates in a competitive IP landscape with brands like Jublia (efinaconazole) and Penlac (ciclopirox). While clinical trials demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy profiles, market penetration hinges on prescriber acceptance, insurance coverage, and patient adherence.


Market Dynamics

Forecasting Market Growth

Projections suggest the onychomycosis drug market could grow at a CAGR of 4-6% over the next five years, driven by increased awareness, demographic shifts, and demographic aging. KERYDIN’s unique topical profile positions it favorably for expanding its share, especially among patients contraindicated for systemic agents.

Key Drivers

  • Innovative Efficacy and Safety Profile: Improved tolerability compared to systemic options.
  • Patient Preference: Ease of application, minimized systemic exposure.
  • Expansion into New Markets: Potential approval in Europe, Asia, and emerging markets can significantly broaden sales.

Barriers and Challenges

  • Pricing and Reimbursement: The cost to patients and insurance coverage levels are crucial for uptake.
  • Competitive Fragmentation: Multiple topical and systemic options dilute market share.
  • Physician Adoption: Prescriber familiarity and clinical evidence shape real-world utilization.

Price Strategy and Projections

Initial Pricing Context

Upon launch, KERYDIN was priced approximately at $585 for a 4 mL bottle (weekly regimen), translating to roughly $14.63 per mL. This aligns with other topical antifungals like Jublia, which was priced around $650–$700 per bottle initially ([2]).

Market Positioning and Pricing Trends

Pfizer’s strategy likely balances premium positioning with competitive pricing. Considering the drug's differentiated safety profile, Pfizer could maintain or slightly increase pricing to reinforce its premium image. A realistic scenario entails:

  • Year 1-2: Stable pricing at ~$585–$610 per bottle.
  • Year 3-5: Potential price escalation of 3-5%, driven by inflation, value-based pricing considerations, or differentiation efforts.

Price Impact of Volume and Patent Exclusivity

Patent exclusivity extends roughly 10-12 years from launch, providing Pfizer with pricing leverage during early years. As biosimilars or generics emerge post-expiry, competition will induce downward pricing pressure.


Future Market and Price Projections

Year Estimated Market Share Average Price per Bottle Projected Revenue Notes
2023 10-15% $585 ~$100M - $150M Launch phase, early adoption
2024 20-25% $600 ~$200M - $250M Growing prescriber base
2025 30-35% $615 ~$275M - $330M Market penetration accelerates
2026+ Stabilization or slight decline $620-$635 Potential plateau or decline amid competition

Note: These estimates assume steady uptake, insurance coverage expansion, and minimal price erosion.


Factors Influencing Future Price Trajectories

  • Insurance and Reimbursement Policies: If reimbursement aligns favorably, pricing can sustain or increase.
  • Market Penetration and Patient Access: Broader access can sustain higher revenue.
  • Post-Patent Generic Entry: Expected around 2032-2033, leading to significant price erosion.
  • Development of Competitors and Generics: Entry of biosimilars or alternatives will pressure pricing downward.
  • Therapeutic Advances: New formulations or combination therapies could influence demand and prices.

Economic and Regulatory Considerations

Regulators favor value-based pricing, especially with therapies demonstrating superior safety and efficacy. Pfizer’s approach may include tiered pricing in international markets and Patient Assistance Programs to optimize access.

Moreover, evolving healthcare policies emphasizing cost-effectiveness could pressure KERYDIN’s pricing structure. Market exclusivity beyond patents, such as orphan drug designation or formulation patents, could temporarily buffer pricing.


Key Takeaways

  • Market Penetration is Critical: Early adoption rates, physician preference, and insurance coverage will significantly shape revenue trajectories.
  • Pricing Strategy Should Balance Profitability and Accessibility: Maintaining a premium price consistent with comparable therapies while fostering broader insurance coverage is essential.
  • Competitive Landscape Will Erode Prices Post-Patent: Expect price erosion after patent expiry (~2032–2033), emphasizing the importance of maximizing current market share.
  • International Expansion Offers Revenue Growth: Entering markets with less price sensitivity or different reimbursement structures can bolster revenues.
  • Innovative Formulations and Indications Are Opportunities: Expanding approved uses or developing combination therapies could justify sustained or increased pricing.

FAQs

1. What factors influence KERYDIN’s pricing compared to competitors?
Pricing is influenced by clinical efficacy, safety profiles, manufacturing costs, market exclusivity, and brand positioning. Pfizer’s reputation and the drug’s safety data support premium pricing strategies.

2. How will patent expiry impact KERYDIN’s market and price?
Post-patent expiration (~2032–2033), competition from generics or biosimilars is expected, leading to significant price reductions and market share redistribution.

3. Could insurance reimbursements affect KERYDIN’s market penetration?
Yes. Favorable reimbursement policies can enhance access, increase prescriptions, and stabilize or elevate pricing. Conversely, restrictive coverage may limit uptake.

4. What is the potential for international expansion to influence pricing?
International markets, especially those with less price sensitivity, can contribute substantially to revenues. Tailored pricing strategies can optimize profits across regions.

5. What are the key risks to KERYDIN’s pricing trajectory?
Competitive erosion, regulatory changes, payer resistance, and the emergence of alternative therapies pose risks to sustaining premium pricing.


References

  1. Patel, R., et al. (2021). "Onychomycosis: Epidemiology and Management." Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research.
  2. IQVIA, (2021). "Pharmaceutical Pricing and Market Trends."
  3. Pfizer Inc. (2020). KERYDIN Prescribing Information.
  4. Grand View Research. (2021). "Onychomycosis Market Size, Share & Trends."
  5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2020). KERYDIN FDA Approval Statement.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.