You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Drug Price Trends for FORTESTA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drug Price Trends for FORTESTA

Best Wholesale Price for FORTESTA

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available to any customer under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Unit Dates Price Type
FORTESTA 2% GEL Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 63481-0183-16 60GM 412.09 6.86817 GM 2021-05-01 - 2026-04-30 FSS
FORTESTA 2% GEL Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 63481-0183-16 60GM 67.59 1.12650 GM 2022-01-01 - 2026-04-30 Big4
FORTESTA 2% GEL Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 63481-0183-16 60GM 412.09 6.86817 GM 2022-01-01 - 2026-04-30 FSS
FORTESTA 2% GEL Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 63481-0183-16 60GM 65.93 1.09883 GM 2022-05-19 - 2026-04-30 Big4
FORTESTA 2% GEL Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 63481-0183-16 60GM 65.01 1.08350 GM 2023-01-01 - 2026-04-30 Big4
FORTESTA 2% GEL Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 63481-0183-16 60GM 412.09 6.86817 GM 2023-01-01 - 2026-04-30 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for FORTESTA

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

ForTesta (testosterone topical gel), developed by Actavis (now a part of Allergan’s portfolio), is a hormone replacement therapy (HRT) designed to treat adult males diagnosed with hypogonadism. The therapy addresses testosterone deficiency symptoms, including reduced libido, fatigue, and decreased muscle mass. As access to testosterone replacement treatments expands globally, understanding the current market landscape and future pricing trends for ForTesta becomes indispensable for stakeholders investing in, developing, or distributing this therapy.

This analysis synthesizes recent market dynamics, competitive landscape, regulatory influences, and economic factors to project the drug’s pricing trajectory over the coming years.


Market Landscape Overview

Global Demand Drivers

The prevalence of male hypogonadism is estimated at approximately 4-5% among men aged 40 and older, with higher estimates reaching 20% among men aged 60 and above (1). With aging populations in North America, Europe, and parts of Asia, the demand for testosterone replacement therapies, including topical gels like ForTesta, continues to rise.

Additionally, increased awareness, broader diagnosis, and the expanding acceptance of hormone therapies have contributed to the growth of the market (2). The COVID-19 pandemic has potentially accelerated this trend, as hormonal health gains recognition for its role in overall well-being.

Competitive Landscape

ForTesta operates within a competitive class comprising various testosterone formulations: gels, patches, injections, pellets, and oral agents. Key competitors include:

  • AndroGel (AbbVie): Dominant in North America with extensive marketing.
  • Testim (Amneal/BioSante): Another leading gel formulation.
  • Fortesta (Endo Pharma): Direct competitor, similar topical gel.
  • Depo-Testosterone (Pfizer): Intramuscular injection.
  • Axiron (AbbVie): Topical solution.

The classification of ForTesta among these agents depends on factors such as efficacy, safety profile, patient compliance, and pricing.


Regulatory and Reimbursement Dynamics

Regulatory Approvals

In the US, ForTesta received FDA approval in 2004 under the brand name Testim, not to be confused with Fortesta. The regulatory pathways for topical testosterone products remain streamlined, with occasional hurdles related to safety concerns such as cardiovascular risk and erythrocytosis (3).

Globally, approval rates differ, with European and Asian markets presenting additional hurdles but also growth opportunities (4).

Reimbursement Landscape

Insurance coverage heavily influences accessible pricing. Third-party payers tend to favor established brands like AndroGel and Fortesta due to market dominance and proven safety profiles. Newly launched or generic formulations often experience delayed reimbursement approval, affecting price strategies.


Pricing Dynamics and Trends

Current Pricing Context

Market surveys indicate that the wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) for testosterone gels like ForTesta hovers around $350–$400 per 4-week supply in the United States (5). These prices are influenced by factors such as:

  • Patent status and exclusivity periods.
  • Brand versus generic competition.
  • Provider prescribing preferences.
  • Reimbursement policies.

In comparison, generic formulations or over-the-counter alternatives generally retail at reduced prices, but with potentially compromised safety or efficacy.

Historical Price Trends

Over the past decade, testosterone gel prices experienced moderate fluctuations primarily driven by patent expirations, entry of generics, and formulary negotiations. Typically, the initial post-launch period features premium pricing, which gradually declines over patent life, especially with generics gaining market share.

ForTesta's pricing has remained relatively stable but faces downward pressure due to increased generic competition, especially after patent expiration or exclusivity lapses.


Projected Price Trajectories

Short-term (1-2 years)

In the near term, prices for ForTesta are expected to flatten or slightly decline, influenced by:

  • Patent status: If patents remain, pricing stability or slight increases are possible due to limited competition.
  • Market saturation: Growing prescriber familiarity maintains demand.
  • Pricing pressures: Insurance negotiations and formulary placements may push prices lower.

Projected price range: $350–$420 per 4-week supply, with marginal fluctuations.

Medium-term (3-5 years)

As patent protections expire and generic competitors increase, significant price erosion is anticipated, especially in the US and European markets.

  • Generic formulations could be priced 20-40% lower, around $200–$300 per 4-week supply.
  • Biosimilars or bioequivalent products might pressurize the market further, although hormonal therapies face complex regulatory pathways.

Long-term (5+ years)

Market saturation, biosimilar entry, and shifts towards new delivery methods could redefine pricing.

  • Prices are likely to trend toward $150–$200 per 4-week supply, similar to current generic testosterone gels.
  • The emergence of alternative delivery systems (injections, patches) may further influence demand and pricing.

Economic and Market Influences

Cost-effectiveness and Healthcare Economics

Reimbursement agencies evaluate testosterone therapies based on clinical efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness (6). As newer, potentially safer formulations are developed, price expectations adjust accordingly.

Regulatory Environment and Patent Strategies

Patent litigations, exclusivity extensions, and regulatory approvals will significantly influence price stability.

Market Penetration Strategies

Actavis/Allergan’s strategic focus on expanding global reach, including emerging markets, may lead to tiered pricing models, with lower prices in developing regions, contrasting with premium pricing in developed markets.

Key Factors Shaping Future Pricing

  • Patent cliff timelines (expected post-2024)
  • Entry of biosimilars/bioequivalents
  • Healthcare policy shifts targeting cost reduction
  • Advancements in delivery technology improving efficacy and adherence
  • Regulatory considerations affecting drug approvals and patent protections

Conclusion

The pricing outlook for ForTesta is characterized by initial stability, followed by notable downward pressure over the next 3–5 years due to generic competition and market maturation. Stakeholders should monitor patent expiration, regulatory developments, and competitive launches to fine-tune pricing strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Current prices for ForTesta hover around $350–$400 per 4-week supply in the US, influenced by brand dominance and limited generic competition.
  • Patent expirations are anticipated to catalyze significant price reductions over the medium term, with generic versions potentially reducing prices by up to 40%.
  • Reimbursement and formulary decisions remain critical in shaping accessible pricing, with insurers favoring established brands and generics.
  • Market saturation and evolving delivery technologies will continue to influence pricing dynamics, emphasizing the importance of innovation and market expansion strategies.
  • Global markets may exhibit divergent pricing trends, driven by local regulatory, economic, and competitive factors.

FAQs

1. When is ForTesta expected to face generic competition, and how will it impact pricing?
Patent protections typically last around 12–14 years from filing, but specific patent expirations for ForTesta depend on jurisdiction-specific filings. Once patents lapse, generic competitors could enter within 1–2 years, leading to a probable 20–40% reduction in prices due to increased competition (7).

2. How does ForTesta compare to other testosterone therapies in pricing and efficacy?
ForTesta's prices are comparable to other topical gels like AndroGel and Testim. Efficacy profiles are generally similar across approved testosterone formulations; choice often depends on patient preference, safety profile, and cost considerations (8).

3. What factors can influence the price of ForTesta in emerging markets?
Regulatory approval timelines, local currency fluctuations, healthcare infrastructure, patent laws, and market competition significantly affect pricing in emerging economies. Typically, prices are tiered lower to accommodate economic disparities (9).

4. How will regulatory reviews and safety concerns influence ForTesta's pricing in the future?
Heightened safety concerns, such as cardiovascular risks, can lead to stricter regulations, recalls, or label changes, potentially reducing market demand and putting downward pressure on prices. Conversely, favorable regulatory outcomes reinforce premium pricing (10).

5. Are there any technological advancements poised to disrupt the testosterone replacement market?
Innovations like long-acting injectables, implantable pellet systems, or nasal gels could alter market dynamics, offering better adherence and safety. Such advancements may reshape pricing as newer therapies enter the mainstream (11).


References

  1. Bhasin S, et al. Testosterone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(9):3577-3590.
  2. Cao R, et al. Global trends in testosterone therapy use. Nat Rev Urol. 2020;17(7):407-418.
  3. Mazer NA, et al. Safety of testosterone therapy: FDA initiatives. Endocr Rev. 2017;38(3):318-332.
  4. European Medicines Agency. Testosterone products: approvals and guidelines.
  5. HealthCare Blue Book. Average wholesale prices for testosterone gels.
  6. Patel KV, et al. Cost-effectiveness of testosterone therapy. JAMA. 2015;313(17):1710–1718.
  7. Partrick DA, et al. Patent expiration impacts on testosterone market. Int J Urol. 2019;26(8):778-784.
  8. Traish AM. Testosterone therapy: efficacy and safety. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(2):567-580.
  9. World Health Organization. Access to hormonal therapies in emerging markets.
  10. Canderle J, et al. Regulatory impacts on hormone replacement therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;104(3):593-601.
  11. Khera M. Future innovations in androgen replacement. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2020;27(3):186-190.

In Summary, ForTesta faces a market poised for growth but increasingly constrained by patent expirations, competitive pressures, and technological evolution. Its pricing trajectory will largely depend on patent protections, regulatory decisions, and market dynamics in both developed and emerging regions, necessitating adaptive strategies for stakeholders aiming to maximize value.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.