You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Drug Price Trends for FARESTON


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drug Price Trends for FARESTON

Best Wholesale Price for FARESTON

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available to any customer under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Unit Dates Price Type
FARESTON 60MG TAB Kyowa Kirin, Inc. 42747-0327-30 30 1306.48 43.54933 EACH 2024-01-01 - 2027-09-29 FSS
FARESTON 60MG TAB Kyowa Kirin, Inc. 42747-0327-30 30 587.92 19.59733 EACH 2022-09-30 - 2027-09-29 FSS
FARESTON 60MG TAB Kyowa Kirin, Inc. 42747-0327-30 30 636.13 21.20433 EACH 2023-01-01 - 2027-09-29 FSS
FARESTON 60MG TAB Kyowa Kirin, Inc. 42747-0327-30 30 877.09 29.23633 EACH 2024-01-01 - 2027-09-27 Big4
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for FARESTON (Toremifene Citrate)

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

FARESTON (toremifene citrate) stands as a widely prescribed selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) approved primarily for treating metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Since its initial approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1989, FARESTON has maintained a pivotal role within oncology treatment protocols, particularly for hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. This analysis evaluates its current market dynamics, competitive landscape, and offers price projections considering evolving factors in the pharmaceutical industry.

Current Market Landscape

Therapeutic Position and Market Demand

FARESTON’s positioning as an orphan drug for metastatic breast cancer confers both advantages and limitations. Due to its specific indication, the global patient population remains relatively niche; however, the prevalence of breast cancer — estimated at 2.3 million new cases annually worldwide and approximately 250,000 in the U.S. alone — sustains steady demand for targeted hormonal therapies.

In clinical practice, FARESTON has largely been supplanted by aromatase inhibitors and newer SERMs, such as tamoxifen and others, especially in earlier disease stages. Nonetheless, FARESTON continues to serve as a second-line agent or alternative in specific cohorts where resistance or tolerability issues arise.

Market Size and Revenue Projections

According to industry reports, the global breast cancer drug market was valued at approximately USD 18 billion in 2021, with targeted hormonal agents accounting for roughly 40%. Within this subset, the market for SERMs like FARESTON is estimated at USD 600-800 million, considering its niche application.
The U.S. market contributes about 50% of this revenue, with pharmacoeconomic scrutiny, patent expirations, and emerging therapies influencing future sales.

Competitive Landscape

FARESTON faces competition primarily from tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors (e.g., anastrozole, letrozole), and newer targeted agents including CDK4/6 inhibitors (e.g., palbociclib). These alternatives often offer improved efficacy or better tolerability profiles. Consequently, FARESTON's market share has declined among frontline therapies, but persists in specific treatment sequences and patient subsets.

Key competitors' patent protections and formulation developments influence market accessibility. For instance, generic versions of toremifene citrate are available, increasing price sensitivity and market penetration in low- and middle-income regions.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Factors

Regulatory agencies in major markets are increasingly emphasizing personalized medicine and biomarker-driven treatment. Although FARESTON remains FDA-approved for its original indication, off-label uses and its potential in combination therapies are under evaluation, which could expand or constrict its market.

Reimbursement policies, especially in the U.S. Medicare and private payer systems, tend to favor cost-effective agents. The availability of generics significantly impacts pricing strategies, often leading to substantial price erosion over time.

Pricing Trends and Projections

Historical Pricing Dynamics

Historically, FARESTON’s branded formulation has maintained a premium over generic alternatives. As of 2022, the average wholesale price (AWP) for a 20 mg to 60 mg daily dose ranged from USD 600 to USD 800 per month per patient, with variations based on geographic location, healthcare setting, and payer negotiations.

Patent expirations in the mid-2010s prompted a steep decline in prices, with generic toremifene citrate now dominating the market, reducing costs by approximately 50% or more. This trend reflects standard lifecycle progression for branded oncology drugs.

Factors Influencing Future Price Trajectories

  • Generic Competition: Increasing prevalence of generics favors downward pricing pressures. The number of generics entering the market correlates strongly with price erosion.
  • Market Penetration and Adoption: As clinical guidelines evolve, if FARESTON finds renewed utility—such as in combination therapies or extended indications—its demand and price could stabilize or slightly increase.
  • Regulatory Changes: Potential regulatory barriers or incentives for biosimilars or next-generation SERMs may influence the pricing landscape.
  • Emerging Therapies: The success of novel agents in overcoming resistance to existing hormonal therapies could diminish FARESTON's market share, further compressing prices.

Forecasted Price Range (Next 5-10 Years)

Based on current trends and industry modeling:

  • Best-Case Scenario: If FARESTON maintains niche therapeutic relevance, with minimal additional patent protections, prices could stabilize around USD 300–USD 500 per month per patient, factoring in inflation and payer negotiations.
  • Moderate Decline Scenario: A surge in generic penetration might reduce prices by 60–70%, pushing costs below USD 300 per month.
  • Worst-Case Scenario: In the event of obsolescence due to superior therapies, FARESTON’s price could approach marginal costs, potentially below USD 200 per month, or data exclusivity might be extended through orphan drug protections, temporarily stabilizing prices.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Manufacturers: Opportunities exist to capitalize on market niches or develop combination formulations or biosimilars to sustain revenue streams.
  • Healthcare Providers and Payers: Cost considerations and emerging therapies necessitate strategic formulary management.
  • Patients: Access affordability remains sensitive to drug pricing, especially as generics dominate.

Conclusion

FARESTON’s market is characterized by steady demand within a niche, declining premium pricing due to generic competition, and evolving therapeutic landscapes that threaten its future market share. Strategic positioning, potential label expansions, and biosimilar development could influence future prices, but conservative estimates suggest gradual price declines over the next decade.


Key Takeaways

  • FARESTON's global market remains modest but is supported by its specific postmenopausal breast cancer indication.
  • The entry of generics significantly reduced prices, with current estimates hovering between USD 300–USD 500 per month.
  • Shifts toward newer therapies and biomarkers may further erode FARESTON’s market share, pressuring prices downward.
  • Opportunities for differentiation include combination therapies or niche indications, potentially stabilizing prices temporarily.
  • Stakeholders should monitor regulatory developments, clinical guideline updates, and patent landscapes to optimize positioning.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary indication for FARESTON?
    FARESTON is approved for treating metastatic, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

  2. How does FARESTON’s market share compare to other SERMs?
    While historically significant, FARESTON’s market share has declined due to competition from tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, and newer targeted agents.

  3. What are the key factors affecting FARESTON’s future price?
    Generic competition, clinical utility, regulatory changes, and emerging therapies influence its price trajectory.

  4. Are there upcoming developments that could impact FARESTON’s market?
    Potential label expansions, new combination regimens, or biosimilar entries could either boost or diminish its market presence.

  5. How accessible is FARESTON globally considering current pricing trends?
    Generic availability has improved affordability in many regions, but access remains dependent on healthcare infrastructure and reimbursement policies.


Sources:
[1] Global Data, "Breast Cancer Market Analysis," 2022.
[2] U.S. FDA, "Approval History of FARESTON," 1989–2022.
[3] IQVIA, “Pharmaceutical Pricing and Market Trends,” 2022.
[4] World Health Organization, "Cancer Statistics," 2022.
[5] EvaluatePharma, "Oncology Drug Market Forecasts," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.