Last Updated: April 30, 2026

Drug Price Trends for VENOFER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drug Price Trends for VENOFER

Average Pharmacy Cost for VENOFER

These are average pharmacy acquisition costs (net of discounts) from a US national survey
Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
VENOFER 100 MG/5 ML VIAL 00517-2340-10 12.20667 ML 2025-08-01
VENOFER 100 MG/5 ML VIAL 00517-2340-99 12.20667 ML 2025-08-01
VENOFER 100 MG/5 ML VIAL 49230-0534-10 12.20667 ML 2025-08-01
VENOFER 200 MG/10 ML VIAL 00517-2310-05 12.53048 ML 2025-08-01
VENOFER 100 MG/5 ML VIAL 00517-2340-10 11.85148 ML 2025-07-23
VENOFER 100 MG/5 ML VIAL 00517-2340-99 11.85148 ML 2025-07-23
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for VENOFER

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available to any customer under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Unit Dates Price Type
VENOFER 20MG/ML INJECTION 10ML SDV American Regent, Inc. 00517-2310-05 5X10ML 251.26 2023-09-29 - 2028-09-28 FSS
VENOFER 100MG/5ML INJECTION American Regent, Inc. 00517-2340-25 10X25ML 662.08 2024-01-01 - 2028-09-28 FSS
VENOFER 20MG/ML INJECTION 10ML SDV American Regent, Inc. 00517-2310-05 5X10ML 273.20 2024-01-01 - 2028-09-28 FSS
VENOFER 50MG INJ American Regent, Inc. 00517-2325-10 10X2.5ML 137.01 2023-09-29 - 2028-09-28 FSS
VENOFER 50MG INJ American Regent, Inc. 00517-2325-10 10X2.5ML 159.80 2024-01-01 - 2028-09-28 FSS
VENOFER 20MG/ML INJECTION 5ML SDV American Regent, Inc. 00517-2340-10 10X5ML 251.26 2023-09-29 - 2028-09-28 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for VENOFER

Last updated: February 13, 2026

Overview

VENOFER (iron sucrose injection) is an intravenous iron replacement therapy used to treat iron deficiency anemia in dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Since its approval, it has established a significant footprint in nephrology care, competing primarily with ferrous salts and other IV iron formulations.

Market Size and Growth

The global IV iron therapy market was valued at approximately USD 3.2 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.5% through 2030, reaching USD 6.4 billion. VENOFER accounts for roughly 15-20% of this market, with sales concentrated in the U.S., Europe, and Asia-Pacific regions.

Factors driving growth include increasing CKD prevalence, advancements in IV iron formulations, and expanding approval for non-dialysis patients. The U.S. market represents the largest segment, driven by ESRD patient numbers and Medicare coverage policies.

Competitive Landscape

VENOFER’s primary competitors include:

  • Ferrlecit (sodium ferric gluconate)
  • Injectafer (ferric carboxymaltose)
  • Feraheme (ferumoxytol)

Market share dynamics depend on efficacy, safety profile, dosing convenience, and pricing strategies.

Pricing Analysis

  1. Current Price Points

    • VENOFER: Average wholesale price (AWP) per 100 mg vial ranges from USD 25 to USD 35 in the U.S.

    • Comparison:

      • Ferrlecit: USD 20–25 per 100 mg
      • Injectafer: USD 70–80 per 200 mg dose
      • Feraheme: USD 150–180 per 510 mg vial
  2. Pricing Trends

    • VENOFER historically priced lower than newer formulations like Injectafer due to older approval status and generic competition. However, recent price pressures from biosimilars and increased competition have narrowed margins.

    • Reimbursement policies influence net prices, with private insurers often reimbursing at higher rates than Medicaid or Medicare.

  3. Cost-Effectiveness Considerations

    • VENOFER’s dosing schedule typically involves multiple infusions (up to 10 doses for full correction), impacting clinic costs.

    • Newer formulations with higher single-dose capacities (e.g., Injectafer, Feraheme) may command premium pricing but reduce administration costs.

Price Projections

  1. Short-term (Next 2 years)

    • Prices are expected to stabilize amid increased competitive pressure.

    • A slight decline of 2–5% in wholesale prices is probable due to biosimilar entry and generic options.

    • Reimbursement levels are likely to remain constant, with payers favoring cost-effective options.

  2. Long-term (Next 5 years)

    • Price erosion may accelerate as biosimilars and generics increase market penetration.

    • Innovator brands could reduce prices by 10–15% to maintain market share.

    • Conversely, formulations offering improved convenience or safety could sustain premium pricing, keeping VENOFER at approximately USD 25–30 per 100 mg vial.

  3. Market Entry of Biosimilars

    • Biosimilar versions of IV iron products are anticipated in the coming years, which could further pressure prices across the market.

    • Price reductions for biosimilars range from 20–30% upon entry.

Regulatory and Policy Impact

  • Reimbursement adjustments from CMS and private payers influence net prices.

  • Increasing emphasis on value-based care may favor formulations that demonstrate superior safety and dosing efficiency, potentially reducing demand for older, less convenient options like VENOFER.

Summary

  • Price per 100 mg vial: USD 25–35 (current)
  • Market share: 15–20% within IV iron segment
  • Growth prospects driven by CKD prevalence and expanding indications
  • Short-term prices likely stable with slight declines, long-term downward pressure expected due to biosimilars and generics

Key Takeaways

  • VENOFER remains a key player in IV iron therapy with stable pricing, though competitive pressures are increasing.
  • The overall market is set for moderate growth, supported by rising CKD cases globally.
  • Price erosion is anticipated over the next five years, accelerated by biosimilar entry and value-based reimbursement models.

FAQs

1. How does VENOFER’s efficacy compare to newer IV iron formulations?
VENOFER effectively treats iron deficiency anemia in CKD patients; however, newer formulations can deliver higher doses per infusion, reducing treatment time and potentially improving patient compliance.

2. What influences VENOFER’s market share in the IV iron segment?
Pricing, safety profile, dosing convenience, and formulary decisions mainly impact its market share relative to competitors.

3. Are biosimilars expected to significantly affect VENOFER pricing?
Yes. Biosimilar versions of IV iron products could reduce prices by 20–30%, increasing competition and pressuring VENOFER’s pricing structure.

4. How do reimbursement policies impact VENOFER’s net pricing?
Reimbursements from Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers directly influence net prices; policies favoring cost-effective treatments can reduce margins.

5. What geographic regions offer the highest growth potential for VENOFER?
Emerging markets in Asia-Pacific and Latin America present significant growth opportunities, driven by increasing CKD prevalence and expanding healthcare infrastructure.


Citations

  1. Grand View Research. "Intravenous Iron Therapy Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis." 2022.
  2. IQVIA. "Pharmaceutical Market Data & Insights," 2022.
  3. CMS. "Medicare Physician Fee Schedule," 2023.
  4. Evaluate Pharma. "Forecast for IV Iron Market," 2023.
  5. US Food and Drug Administration. "VENOFER Approval," 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.