You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Drug Price Trends for ALPHAGAN P


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drug Price Trends for ALPHAGAN P

Average Pharmacy Cost for ALPHAGAN P

These are average pharmacy acquisition costs (net of discounts) from a US national survey
Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
ALPHAGAN P 0.1% DROPS 00023-9321-10 37.26449 ML 2026-03-18
ALPHAGAN P 0.15% EYE DROPS 00023-9177-05 39.77657 ML 2026-03-18
ALPHAGAN P 0.15% EYE DROPS 00023-9177-10 39.82632 ML 2026-03-18
ALPHAGAN P 0.1% DROPS 00023-9321-15 37.28933 ML 2026-03-18
ALPHAGAN P 0.15% EYE DROPS 00023-9177-15 39.76533 ML 2026-03-18
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Market Analysis and Price Projections for Alphagan P (Brimonidine Tartrate Ophthalmic Solution)

Last updated: February 20, 2026

What is Alphagan P and its current market position?

Alphagan P (brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution) is prescribed for reducing intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. It is produced by Allergan (A AbbVie company). The drug competes within the primary glaucoma treatment market, predominantly against prostaglandin analogs, beta blockers, and combination therapies.

Market share remains stable, driven by its efficacy and safety profile. Its reusable positioning has led to consistent demand, although generic competition is expanding.

What are the sales and revenue figures?

In 2022, Alphagan P generated approximately $180 million in U.S. sales, according to IQVIA [1]. Globally, sales are estimated at around $240 million, with the U.S. accounting for the majority. The product's revenue declined slightly from 2021’s peak, attributed to increased generic competition.

Who are the key competitors, and what is the competitive landscape?

Main competitors include:

  • Travatan Z (travoprost): Dominates the prostaglandin analog segment.
  • Xalatan (latanoprost): Remains a market leader.
  • Iopidine (apraclonidine): Similar class but less commonly used.
  • Combination therapies: Brimonidine-timolol (Combigan) shares similar indications.

Market penetration comes from both prescribed brand and generic brimonidine options, with generics accounting for roughly 35% of ophthalmic alpha-adrenergic therapies by 2022.

How is the pricing structured, and what are recent trends?

Brand Price (U.S.):

  • Per 10 mL bottle: ~$350–$370.
  • Typical prescription: One drop in each eye, twice daily, lasting approximately one month.

Generic Price:

  • Per 10 mL bottle: ~$50–$80.

Rebates and insurance:

  • Price varies based on insurance tier, pharmacy benefit managers, and rebates, impacting out-of-pocket costs.

The trend over the past five years shows a decline in brand pricing, correlating with increased generic availability and policy pressures on drug pricing.

What are the projections for the market?

Short-term (1-2 years):

  • Slight decline in brand sales (5-10%), stable or marginally increasing generic sales.
  • Increased adoption of generics due to insurance coverage and cost-sensitivity.
  • Patent expiration (U.S.) has occurred in 2015, encouraging generics.

Medium-term (3-5 years):

  • Market expansion driven by rising global prevalence of glaucoma, projected at 112 million affected individuals worldwide by 2025 [2].
  • Increased utilization in emerging markets, where ophthalmic medications are underpenetrated.
  • Potential for formulation improvements or combination products to sustain sales.

Price projections:

Scenario Market Trends Estimated Brand Price (per 10 mL) Estimated Generic Price (per 10 mL)
Conservative Continued generic expansion, no new formulations $290–$350 $40–$75
Moderate Entry of new combination products, increased demand $310–$370 $50–$80
Optimistic Novel delivery systems or formulations emerge, renews interest $330–$400 $60–$100

What are the regulatory considerations?

Patent protections expired in 2015, leading to a proliferation of generics. The U.S. FDA approved multiple generics since 2015, constraining brand pricing. Future patent filings or exclusivity periods could alter the competitive landscape.

Regulatory environments in Europe, Asia, and Latin America vary, impacting market access and pricing strategies.

How will the market evolve?

  • Increased adoption of generic brimonidine will pressure brand sales and prices.
  • Potential for combination therapies to expand indications and improve adherence.
  • Innovations in drug delivery, such as sustained-release formulations, could alter demand and pricing.
  • Market growth driven by aging populations and increased glaucoma awareness globally.

Key Takeaways

  • Alphagan P's U.S. sales roughly amount to $180 million annually, facing declining prices due to generic competition.
  • Price projections suggest a continuing downward trend for the brand, with prices potentially stabilizing around $290–$370 per 10 mL, depending on market dynamics.
  • The global glaucoma market's growth, especially in emerging markets, could provide new sales channels.
  • Regulatory pressures and patent expiries have reshaped competitiveness, favoring generics.
  • Innovation in formulations and combination therapies could influence future pricing strategies.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the main competitor to Alphagan P?
Travatan Z and Xalatan are the primary competitors, with generics also capturing significant market share.

2. How does the price of generic brimonidine compare to Alphagan P?
Generic versions cost approximately 85-90% less than the branded product, with prices around $50–$80 per 10 mL.

3. Is there potential for price increases in Alphagan P?
Limited in mature markets due to patent expiry and generic competition; however, innovative formulations or combination products could sustain or increase prices.

4. What is the outlook for Alphagan P in emerging markets?
Market growth expected due to increasing prevalence of glaucoma and expanding healthcare infrastructure.

5. How do pricing policies affect market dynamics?
Rebates, insurance coverage, and formulary placements drive actual patient costs, influencing prescribing patterns.


References

[1] IQVIA. (2022). Pharmaceutical Market Reports.
[2] Resnikoff, S., et al. (2020). Global data on visual impairment. The Lancet Global Health.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.