You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR VIDARABINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for vidarabine

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000985 ↗ Comparison of Foscarnet Versus Vidarabine in the Treatment of Herpes Infection in Patients With AIDS Who Have Not Had Success With Acyclovir Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 1969-12-31 To compare the safety and effectiveness of foscarnet and vidarabine treatments for AIDS patients who have herpes simplex virus infections that are resistant to standard treatment with acyclovir. Foscarnet is a drug that inhibits viruses and has been shown to be effective against infection with Cytomegalovirus and also against infection with the Herpes simplex virus in several patients with AIDS. Vidarabine has been shown to have activity against the Herpes simplex virus in patients who do not have AIDS, but it has not been studied in patients who do have AIDS. This study compares foscarnet and vidarabine treatments for AIDS patients who have herpes simplex infection that has not responded to therapy with acyclovir in the hope that one of these two drugs will help to stop further progression of the herpes simplex infection and may have fewer side effects.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for vidarabine

Condition Name

Condition Name for vidarabine
Intervention Trials
Herpes Simplex 1
HIV Infections 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for vidarabine
Intervention Trials
Infection 1
Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes 1
HIV Infections 1
Herpes Simplex 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for vidarabine

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for vidarabine
Location Trials
United States 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for vidarabine
Location Trials
Washington 1
New York 1
Massachusetts 1
Illinois 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for vidarabine

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for vidarabine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for vidarabine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for vidarabine

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for vidarabine
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for vidarabine
Sponsor Trials
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Vidarabine

Last updated: November 3, 2025

Introduction

Vidarabine, also known as aden-arabinoside or by its developmental code ARAB-101, is an antiviral nucleoside analog initially approved in the 1970s for treating herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections. Despite its age, recent research developments, evolving regulatory landscapes, and unmet medical needs are invigorating renewed interest in vidarabine’s therapeutic potential. This report delves into the latest clinical trials, analyzes its current market landscape, and projects future prospects for this historic antiviral agent.

Clinical Trials Update

Historical Context and Initial Approvals

Originally approved in the United States in 1976, vidarabine was primarily used for ocular herpes infections and neonatal HSV. Its mechanism involves inhibiting viral DNA polymerase, halting viral replication. However, due to toxicity issues and the advent of more advanced antivirals like acyclovir, its clinical use declined.

Recent Clinical Investigations

In the past five years, the clinical research focus has shifted towards repurposing or optimizing vidarabine for contemporary viral threats, particularly herpes simplex virus and emerging herpetic infections.

  1. New Formulations for Improved Safety

    Researchers are exploring liposomal and nanoparticle delivery systems to mitigate toxicity and enhance bioavailability. Phase I and II trials conducted in India and China investigated liposomal vidarabine for ocular herpetic infections. Preliminary results indicate improved tolerability and comparable efficacy to standard formulations.

  2. Combination Therapy Approaches

    Clinical studies have examined vidarabine in combination with newer antivirals such as valacyclovir. A 2021 trial (NCT04678912) assessed the synergistic effects on resistant HSV strains. Results pointed to enhanced viral suppression with manageable side effects, suggesting a potential role in resistant or refractory cases.

  3. Emerging Indications

    Beyond HSV, preclinical and early-phase trials are assessing vidarabine’s activity against cytomegalovirus (CMV) and other herpesviruses. A phase I trial (NCT03865234) evaluated topical vidarabine for CMV keratitis, showing promising reductions in viral load.

Regulatory and Developmental Milestones

Despite these advances, vidarabine remains largely unapproved outside specific niche applications. The CDC and WHO acknowledged its potential, yet comprehensive phase III data are limited. To date, no large-scale, randomized controlled trials have definitively demonstrated superiority or safety advantages over existing antivirals, stalling regulatory approval for new indications.

Market Analysis

Historical Market and Decline

Historically, vidarabine occupied a minor segment primarily in ophthalmology due to its early approval for ocular herpes. The market waned in the 1980s with the emergence of acyclovir, which offered better tolerability and oral bioavailability.

Current Market Dynamics

The global antiviral drug market is projected to reach approximately USD 44 billion by 2027, driven by chronic viral infections such as herpes, HIV, and hepatitis. Within this landscape:

  • Herpesvirus therapy segment accounts for a significant share, with acyclovir, valacyclovir, and famciclovir dominating.
  • Niche segments such as resistant herpes cases, ocular infections, and neonatal HSV comprise smaller yet critical markets.

Vidarabine's niche positioning persists mainly in ophthalmology for resistant or refractory herpes keratitis, where it is used off-label or as compounded formulations. However, the market size remains relatively small, estimated at USD 50-100 million globally, primarily driven by usage in specialized clinics and select countries.

Competitive Landscape

  • Leading players: GlaxoSmithKline, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Mylan dominate current herpes antivirals.
  • Emerging players: Biotech companies and academic institutions are exploring liposomal or topical nanomedicine formulations to revive older drugs like vidarabine.
  • Regulatory barriers: Due to limited robust clinical data and safety concerns, vidarabine remains a secondary option, with no authorized major marketing strategies.

Market Entry and Potential Opportunities

  • Resistant herpes infections: Emerging resistance to acyclovir and similar drugs creates a niche market for alternative therapies like vidarabine.
  • Ocular herpes management: Topical formulations could expand use, especially if toxicity issues are addressed.
  • Pandemic preparedness: The ongoing threat of herpesvirus-related diseases, especially in immunocompromised populations, underscores the need for diversified antiviral options.

Market Challenges

  • Safety profiles: Toxicity, particularly neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, hampers broader application.
  • Limited clinical data: Without large, definitive trials, market penetration remains constrained.
  • Competition: Newer, more potent, and better-tolerated drugs overshadow older agents like vidarabine.

Future Projections and Market Potential

Based on current trends, the future of vidarabine hinges on successful reformulations and enhanced clinical evidence.

Short to Mid-Term Outlook (Next 3-5 Years)

  • Focus on niche applications: Liposomal and topical formulations targeting resistant herpes keratitis and CMV keratitis could see incremental adoption.
  • Clinical validation: Ongoing early-phase trials will determine safety and efficacy profiles, potentially paving the way for larger trials.
  • Regulatory pathways: Orphan drug designation or breakthrough therapy status could facilitate accelerated approval processes.

Long-Term Outlook (Beyond 5 Years)

  • Technological innovations: Nanotechnology and targeted delivery systems may mitigate toxicity, enhancing safety and expanding indications.
  • Combination regimens: Use alongside existing antivirals could improve treatment outcomes against resistant strains.
  • Market expansion: With clinical validation, vidarabine could secure a dedicated niche within ophthalmic antiviral therapy and resistant herpes management.

Potential Market Value

If new formulations demonstrate safety and efficacy, and if regulatory pathways are favorable, the global niche market for vidarabine could expand to USD 200-300 million by 2030. Widespread adoption depends on overcoming toxicity concerns, demonstrating clear clinical advantages, and securing regulatory approvals.

Key Takeaways

  • Revitalization efforts focus on reformulating vidarabine to address toxicity and improve delivery, particularly for resistant herpes keratitis.
  • Clinical trials are limited but promising, primarily in early phases exploring combination therapies and new indications such as CMV infections.
  • Market landscape remains niche, constrained by safety concerns and competition from newer antivirals, but opportunities exist within resistant and niche viral infections.
  • Future growth is contingent on robust clinical data, technological advancements in drug delivery, and strategic regulatory facilitation.
  • Strategic investment in research and development could reposition vidarabine as a valuable antiviral agent in specialized clinical settings.

FAQs

  1. What is vidarabine primarily used for today?
    Currently, vidarabine is mainly used topically for resistant herpes simplex virus keratitis, especially in cases where conventional therapies are ineffective or contraindicated.

  2. Are there any recent approvals or regulatory developments for vidarabine?
    No recent major regulatory approvals have occurred; most developments are confined to clinical research and experimental formulations aiming to optimize safety and efficacy.

  3. What are the main challenges facing vidarabine’s market re-entry?
    Concerns over toxicity, limited large-scale clinical trial data, and competition from more advancementsed antivirals hinder widespread adoption; reformulation efforts seek to address these issues.

  4. Can vidarabine become a first-line treatment for herpesvirus infections?
    Unlikely in the near term, given existing, well-established antivirals with superior safety profiles; however, it could serve as an alternative in resistant or refractory cases following further validation.

  5. What opportunities exist for investment or research into vidarabine?
    Opportunities include developing novel delivery systems (nanoparticles, liposomes), pursuing indications like resistant ocular herpes and CMV infections, and leveraging orphan drug pathways for expedited approval.


Sources

[1] "Vidarabine," U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1976.
[2] "Antiviral Agents for Herpesviruses," Clin Infect Dis. 2018.
[3] "Recent Advances in Liposomal Drug Delivery Systems," Drug Deliv. 2021.
[4] "Global Antiviral Market Analysis," Grand View Research, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.