Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TRIENTINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for trientine hydrochloride

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004339 ↗ Study of Tetrathiomolybdate in Patients With Wilson Disease Completed University of Michigan Phase 3 1994-01-01 OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of ammonium tetrathiomolybdate alone and compared with trientine therapy as initial treatment in patients with Wilson disease presenting neurologically.
NCT00004339 ↗ Study of Tetrathiomolybdate in Patients With Wilson Disease Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Phase 3 1994-01-01 OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of ammonium tetrathiomolybdate alone and compared with trientine therapy as initial treatment in patients with Wilson disease presenting neurologically.
NCT00212355 ↗ Efficacy and Safety, Long-term Study of Zinc Acetate to Treat Wilson's Disease in Japan. Completed Nobelpharma Phase 3 2005-03-01 The purpose of this long-term study is to determine whether Zinc Acetate is effective and safe in the treatment of Wilson's disease among Japanese.
NCT01178112 ↗ Trientine and Carboplatin in Advanced Malignancies Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 1 2010-07-01 The goal of this clinical research study is to find the highest tolerable dose of the combination of trientine and carboplatin that can be given to patients with advanced cancer. The safety of this drug combination will also be studied.
NCT01213888 ↗ Trientine Hydrochloride for the Prevention of Macular Edema Associated With Pan-retinal Photocoagulation for Severe Non-proliferative and Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Terminated University of British Columbia N/A 2010-11-01 To evaluate the effects of Trientine Hydrochloride in prevention of post-laser (pan-retinal photocoagulation) macular edema in the eyes for subjects with diabetic retinopathy. Trientine hydrochloride can limit secondary inflammatory damage to retinal vessels following the administration of pan-retinal photocoagulation therapy for severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy or retinal neovascularization due to diabetic retinopathy, resulting in less macular edema and improved visual outcomes.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for trientine hydrochloride

Condition Name

Condition Name for trientine hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Wilson Disease 5
Wilson's Disease 4
Advanced Cancers 1
Diabetic Retinopathy 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for trientine hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Hepatolenticular Degeneration 9
Macular Edema 2
Melanoma 1
Edema 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for trientine hydrochloride

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for trientine hydrochloride
Location Trials
United States 9
United Kingdom 6
Germany 4
Denmark 2
Canada 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for trientine hydrochloride
Location Trials
Connecticut 3
Texas 2
Michigan 2
California 1
North Carolina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for trientine hydrochloride

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for trientine hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for trientine hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
RECRUITING 2
Active, not recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for trientine hydrochloride

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for trientine hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Univar BV 3
Orphalan 3
University of British Columbia 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for trientine hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Industry 12
Other 11
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trientine Hydrochloride: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis and 5-Year Projection

Last updated: April 29, 2026

What is trientine hydrochloride and where is it used clinically?

Trientine hydrochloride (historically marketed as trientine/triethylene tetramine analog therapy) is used in Wilson disease for the removal of copper from the body. The drug is also used in clinical practice for copper-chelation strategies where indicated by local standards of care.

Commercially, the market is driven by:

  • Prevalence of Wilson disease
  • Uptake of maintenance chelation regimens
  • Availability of oral chelators and formulary placement
  • Patient adherence and long-term safety/tolerability profiles

What do the latest clinical trials and pipeline signals show?

A complete, up-to-date clinical trials “update” requires trial-level retrieval across registries (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov and EU CTR) with study status, enrollment, endpoints, and sponsor-level details. With no trial registry identifiers, sponsor names, NCT/EudraCT numbers, or published protocol/publication dates in the input, a complete and accurate trial update cannot be produced.

Accordingly, this report provides a market and strategy view anchored to the established, on-label use in Wilson disease and the typical dynamics of this drug class, without claiming trial-status specifics.

How big is the trientine hydrochloride market today?

Trientine hydrochloride is a niche, indication-specific market tied to the Wilson disease population. The addressable market is constrained by:

  • Disease prevalence
  • Lifelong treatment patterns
  • Generic and authorized brand supply
  • Regional reimbursement and formulary access

Market sizing approach (framework used for projection below)

To forecast near-term demand for a niche chelator, the model uses:

  • Treated patient population (Wilson disease on chronic chelation)
  • Average annual therapy cost (AATC) by region and payer mix
  • Share of treated patients on trientine vs alternative chelators (e.g., D-penicillamine, zinc therapies) where applicable
  • Price erosion dynamics from generics
  • Uptake and persistence assumptions typical for lifelong maintenance drugs

Because no region-specific pricing, current sales, or treated-patient counts were provided in the input, numerical market size figures cannot be stated without risking inaccuracy.

What are the commercial drivers and risks?

Key demand drivers

  • Chronic use in Wilson disease: maintenance chelation drives steady baseline demand.
  • Oral administration fit: supports long-term adherence relative to some alternatives.
  • Clinical differentiation in tolerability: in real-world practice, some patients are switched to trientine due to tolerability issues on other chelators.

Key supply and pricing risks

  • Generic competition: sustained price compression is typical where patents are not enforced robustly.
  • Formulary restrictions: reimbursement decisions determine which chelator is preferred.
  • Manufacturing continuity: APIs and finished-dose supply sensitivity can affect continuity of therapy.

What is the competitive landscape?

Trientine is positioned within a small set of copper-chelation options, with competition centered on:

  • D-penicillamine (historically used; tolerability drives substitution)
  • Zinc salts (maintenance strategies in selected patients)
  • Other chelators depending on region and labeling

In practice, trientine’s share tends to reflect payer-driven preferred-status policies and clinician experience with switching due to adverse effects.

What regulatory and IP dynamics matter for market outlook?

For projection quality, companies typically map:

  • Patent expiry timelines (composition, use, and formulation where applicable)
  • Regulatory exclusivities (where any exist)
  • Generic entry timing and authorized distributor reach
  • Labeling constraints by region (Wilson disease staging, prior therapy rules)

The input contains no IP timeline or country list, so no expiration-driven claims are made here.

5-Year market projection for trientine hydrochloride

A numeric projection requires at least one of the following: current annual sales by region, patient counts, branded vs generic mix, or baseline market size. None is provided in the input. Under strict accuracy requirements, numerical forecasts cannot be generated.

What can be provided without fabricating figures is a directional projection with explicit assumptions that would be used by an investment-grade model:

Directional forecast (demand, pricing, and revenue components)

  • Unit demand: stable to mildly increasing, driven by treated prevalence and long-term therapy continuity.
  • Net pricing: declining due to generic competition and procurement pressure.
  • Revenue: likely flat-to-slightly down in absolute terms where price erosion outweighs unit gains; otherwise flat where competitive intensity is moderate.

Scenario map (qualitative)

Scenario Unit demand Net price Revenue trajectory (5 years)
Competitive pressure high Stable to slightly up Down Flat to down
Competitive pressure moderate Slight up Flat to down Flat
Competitive pressure low / contracting supply Up Flat Up

What should R&D and commercial teams do next?

For commercial strategy

  • Concentrate on payer-access and formulary positioning in Wilson disease centers, not broader oncology-style marketing.
  • Prioritize continuity-of-supply contracts with distributors to protect adherence-driven demand.
  • Optimize packaging and dosing convenience to reduce non-persistence.

For R&D strategy

  • Focus on studies that increase differentiation where clinicians already substitute based on tolerability.
  • If reformulation or fixed-dose adaptations are pursued, target pharmacokinetic consistency and adherence rather than broad mechanism claims.

Key Takeaways

  • Trientine hydrochloride is a niche, lifelong chelation therapy tied to Wilson disease; demand is dominated by treated prevalence and persistence.
  • A specific, registry-grade “clinical trials update” cannot be provided from the supplied input because no trial identifiers or study metadata were included.
  • A numeric market size and 5-year forecast cannot be stated without baseline sales, pricing, or treated-patient inputs; a directional outlook is that units are stable to slightly up while net price trends down under typical generic pressure.

FAQs

  1. Is trientine hydrochloride approved for Wilson disease maintenance therapy?
    Yes, it is used as copper chelation therapy in Wilson disease where indicated by local labeling and clinical standards.

  2. What is the biggest market risk for trientine hydrochloride?
    Generic and pricing pressure driven by formulary procurement policies.

  3. What drives trientine hydrochloride demand over time?
    Lifelong treatment patterns in diagnosed Wilson disease patients and adherence/persistence.

  4. How do competitors typically affect trientine hydrochloride revenue?
    By shifting preference toward alternate chelators or zinc-based strategies through reimbursement and clinician switching.

  5. What data would normally support an investment-grade 5-year revenue projection?
    Current sales (brand and generic), pricing by channel, treated patient counts, and country-by-country formulary share.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Trientine hydrochloride search results and study records. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[2] U.S. FDA. (n.d.). Drug labels and approvals for copper chelation therapies used in Wilson disease. https://www.fda.gov/drugs

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.