Last Updated: September 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR THIAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for thiamine hydrochloride

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00031057 ↗ Vitamin B Therapy for Hyperlactatemia Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to see if vitamin B can treat mild hyperlactatemia (a higher than normal level of lactate in the blood) in patients who take nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Hyperlactatemia is a potentially life-threatening condition that can be associated with NRTI therapy. A lack of vitamin B may be related to the development of hyperlactatemia. However, no studies have been done to evaluate this. This study proposes that high doses of vitamin B may bring elevated lactate levels back to normal among patients taking NRTIs.
NCT00143702 ↗ D4T or Abacavir Plus Vitamin Enhancement in HIV-Infected Patients (DAVE) Completed CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network Phase 2/Phase 3 2001-08-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the best way to treat people on d4T (stavudine) with high levels of lactic acid. Switching from d4T to abacavir will be assessed. Adding riboflavin and thiamine will also be assessed. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: - Group 1 participants will continue to take d4T as part of their antiretroviral (ARV) regimen, and will be given the vitamin supplements - Group 2 will continue to take d4T without vitamin supplements - Group 3 will switch from d4T to abacavir and receive the vitamins - Group 4 will switch from d4T to abacavir without vitamin supplements. The study plans to involve eighty participants from Canada and Argentina for a treatment period of 16 weeks and a follow-up visit at week 24.
NCT00143702 ↗ D4T or Abacavir Plus Vitamin Enhancement in HIV-Infected Patients (DAVE) Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 2/Phase 3 2001-08-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the best way to treat people on d4T (stavudine) with high levels of lactic acid. Switching from d4T to abacavir will be assessed. Adding riboflavin and thiamine will also be assessed. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: - Group 1 participants will continue to take d4T as part of their antiretroviral (ARV) regimen, and will be given the vitamin supplements - Group 2 will continue to take d4T without vitamin supplements - Group 3 will switch from d4T to abacavir and receive the vitamins - Group 4 will switch from d4T to abacavir without vitamin supplements. The study plans to involve eighty participants from Canada and Argentina for a treatment period of 16 weeks and a follow-up visit at week 24.
NCT00143702 ↗ D4T or Abacavir Plus Vitamin Enhancement in HIV-Infected Patients (DAVE) Completed University of British Columbia Phase 2/Phase 3 2001-08-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the best way to treat people on d4T (stavudine) with high levels of lactic acid. Switching from d4T to abacavir will be assessed. Adding riboflavin and thiamine will also be assessed. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: - Group 1 participants will continue to take d4T as part of their antiretroviral (ARV) regimen, and will be given the vitamin supplements - Group 2 will continue to take d4T without vitamin supplements - Group 3 will switch from d4T to abacavir and receive the vitamins - Group 4 will switch from d4T to abacavir without vitamin supplements. The study plans to involve eighty participants from Canada and Argentina for a treatment period of 16 weeks and a follow-up visit at week 24.
NCT00202228 ↗ Lactate Metabolism Study in HIV Infected Persons Completed Ontario HIV Treatment Network Phase 4 2002-07-01 Lactic acidosis is a potentially life-threatening disease associated with the treatment of chronic HIV infection. Although acidosis is rare, hyperlactatemia is common and may have long term consequences yet to be recognized. Lactic acidosis is a manifestation of mitochondrial toxicity; consequences which have yet to be fully recognized and understood. In this study, we propose to look at lactate clearance and production by two methods, in four treatment groups, including HIV positive subjects on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) treatment regimes and without HAART regimes, with liver steatosis and without, and compared with HIV negative controls. Supplementation with cofactors thiamine, niacin and L-carnitine, which may have a positive effect on lactate metabolism by facilitating mitochondrial function, will be studied as well.
NCT00202228 ↗ Lactate Metabolism Study in HIV Infected Persons Completed Queen's University Phase 4 2002-07-01 Lactic acidosis is a potentially life-threatening disease associated with the treatment of chronic HIV infection. Although acidosis is rare, hyperlactatemia is common and may have long term consequences yet to be recognized. Lactic acidosis is a manifestation of mitochondrial toxicity; consequences which have yet to be fully recognized and understood. In this study, we propose to look at lactate clearance and production by two methods, in four treatment groups, including HIV positive subjects on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) treatment regimes and without HAART regimes, with liver steatosis and without, and compared with HIV negative controls. Supplementation with cofactors thiamine, niacin and L-carnitine, which may have a positive effect on lactate metabolism by facilitating mitochondrial function, will be studied as well.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for thiamine hydrochloride

Condition Name

Condition Name for thiamine hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Sepsis 19
Septic Shock 18
Thiamine Deficiency 9
Lactic Acidosis 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for thiamine hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Shock, Septic 22
Sepsis 17
Shock 15
Toxemia 12
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for thiamine hydrochloride

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for thiamine hydrochloride
Location Trials
United States 60
Brazil 8
Canada 4
China 4
Indonesia 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for thiamine hydrochloride
Location Trials
Massachusetts 12
New York 6
California 4
Arizona 3
Ohio 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for thiamine hydrochloride

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for thiamine hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 18
[disabled in preview] 42
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for thiamine hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 44
Recruiting 21
Unknown status 9
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for thiamine hydrochloride

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for thiamine hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center 9
National Institute on Aging (NIA) 2
University of Aarhus 2
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for thiamine hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Other 156
NIH 9
U.S. Fed 4
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 28, 2026

Thiamine Hydrochloride Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis & Future Projections (2026–2035)

Thiamine hydrochloride (vitamin B1) is widely marketed as a nutritional supplement and as a therapeutic agent in defined deficiency and neurologic indications. Public clinical-trials activity is sparse because most thiamine use is established and formulary-driven. Market growth is mainly tied to parenteral nutrition (TPN) and enteral deficiency management, plus expansion of fortified foods and chronic-disease related risk pools. Revenue opportunity concentrates in injectable and oral products in regulated markets, with competitive dynamics led by large generics and ingredient-supply players.

Is there a current clinical trials update for thiamine hydrochloride in 2025–2026?

Clinical-trials visibility for thiamine hydrochloride is limited. The molecule is old, and many studies use “thiamine” broadly rather than “thiamine hydrochloride” as the named investigational product. As a result, trial-by-trial confirmability for the exact salt form is inconsistent across public registries and publications.

What the observable trial landscape typically includes (by design):

  • Deficiency and malabsorption cohorts (dietary deficiency, alcoholism-linked risk, bariatric-surgery outcomes).
  • Neurologic and critical-care contexts where thiamine status is assessed and corrected.
  • Wernicke’s encephalopathy prevention or treatment protocols (often time-to-dose studies).
  • Combination regimens with other micronutrients (commonly magnesium, glucose, or multi-vitamin formulations).

Active design patterns that matter commercially:

  • Protocol-driven endpoints (time to symptom improvement, thiamine level normalization, or neurologic scores).
  • Pharmacokinetic and bioavailability comparisons among oral vs injectable delivery forms.
  • Safety and dosing frequency comparisons rather than new mechanism-of-action claims.

Which trial types dominate thiamine hydrochloride research?

  • Observational and pragmatic interventional studies: often embedded in emergency medicine, psychiatry, and nutrition support workflows.
  • PK/bioavailability studies: compare oral salts, salts with absorption enhancers, and intramuscular/intravenous regimens.
  • Combination-intervention trials: thiamine with other cofactors because routine deficiency workups are comorbidity-driven.

How to interpret “thiamine” versus “thiamine hydrochloride” in clinical records

For regulatory and commercial diligence, the key is whether the study explicitly specifies thiamine hydrochloride as the active ingredient and salt form, or whether it uses “thiamine” generically. Many submissions and compendial products are interchangeable at the API level, but label claims and manufacturing specifications can differ across jurisdictions.

What indications are driving use of thiamine hydrochloride: deficiency, Wernicke’s, or critical care?

Thiamine hydrochloride’s commercial relevance is mostly clinical-management of deficiency states rather than novel therapeutics. The indication set is stable across years and regions, with variation driven by guideline adoption and payer coverage.

Primary indication buckets that support demand:

  1. Thiamine deficiency and malnutrition

    • Dietary insufficiency
    • Malabsorption syndromes
    • High-risk populations under medical care
  2. Alcohol-related risk and encephalopathy protocols

    • Prevention and treatment pathways where thiamine is administered early
  3. Nutrition support

    • Parenteral nutrition and enteral supplementation where routine inclusion is standard practice
  4. Neurologic sequelae linked to low thiamine

    • Commonly managed with vitamin repletion

Does thiamine hydrochloride have biologic-like competition threats?

No. The molecule is an API with large numbers of supply-side equivalents. Threat is generic and process-based, not biologics-like.

What is the market size for thiamine hydrochloride and how is it growing?

A comprehensive market sizing for thiamine hydrochloride must be separated into:

  • API/ingredient market (bulk thiamine HCl supply)
  • Finished pharmaceutical products (oral tablets/capsules, injection vials)
  • Nutritional and fortified consumer products (where thiamine HCl is one input)

Public market datasets often bundle thiamine across salts (hydrochloride, mononitrate) and across application categories. For actionable projections, the most revenue-sensitive slice is pharmaceutical-grade injectable and oral dosage forms used in deficiency correction and clinical protocols.

Growth drivers that typically support expansion:

  • Higher throughput in hospitals using standardized nutrition support bundles.
  • Increased screening and early-treatment protocols for deficiency in high-risk settings.
  • Demand from bariatric and GI disorder care pathways.
  • Fortification and chronic disease management increasing micronutrient utilization.

Constraints that cap pricing and margin:

  • Generic competition across oral and injectable.
  • Globalized ingredient sourcing and price pressure in commodities.
  • Regulatory focus on quality and GMP compliance rather than differentiation.

What is the market forecast for thiamine hydrochloride through 2035?

Base-case forecast structure used by market participants:

  • Low single-digit real growth in developed markets.
  • Mid single-digit growth in emerging markets driven by healthcare access expansion, hospital pharmacy utilization, and nutrition supplementation programs.
  • Flatter growth for commoditized oral tablets where dosing and labeling are standardized.

Scenario logic (commercially relevant):

  • If hospital protocols for early repletion expand, injectable consumption increases.
  • If outpatient oral prophylaxis dominates, oral products gain share but with lower unit pricing.
  • If supply disruptions occur in ingredient production, near-term revenue can rise while long-term share normalizes.

What dosage forms likely capture the most incremental revenue?

  • Injectables: more protocol-driven and higher unit value, with tender-driven procurement.
  • Oral repletion products: high volume but typically lower pricing and margin.
  • Multi-vitamin combinations containing thiamine: share growth driven by adherence and label positioning, not salt-specific IP.

Which companies dominate the supply chain for thiamine hydrochloride (API and finished products)?

Competitive leadership is typically split between:

  • Ingredient producers supplying thiamine HCl into the global generic pharmaceutical ecosystem.
  • Finished-dose manufacturers supplying tablets, capsules, and sterile injectables into hospitals and wholesalers.

Commercial reality: in many markets, buyers qualify multiple suppliers quickly; switching costs are driven by documentation, sterility assurance, and tender terms rather than patent exclusivity.

What patents protect thiamine hydrochloride and how strong is the patent estate?

Thiamine hydrochloride itself has no meaningful modern patent moat. The active ingredient is widely used and not patentable as a new chemical entity in most jurisdictions. The remaining protectable space is generally:

  • Process patents for manufacturing the salt at specific purity/yield targets.
  • Formulation patents (delayed release, improved stability, specific excipient systems).
  • Method-of-use patents for narrow protocols or combination regimens.

For commercial diligence, the key question is not “is thiamine HCl patented,” but “are any specific finished product claims or sterile manufacturing processes protected in the target jurisdiction.”

Do any Orange Book listed thiamine hydrochloride products exist with active exclusivity?

There can be Orange Book entries for specific thiamine hydrochloride formulations if the product has method or formulation exclusivity tied to an approved NDA. However, exclusivity is typically older for vitamins unless tied to a specific Rx product with a defined clinical protocol. Practical competitive risk usually comes from generics rather than brand exclusivity.

When does thiamine hydrochloride lose exclusivity, and is exclusivity relevant for this drug?

For thiamine hydrochloride, exclusivity is often not a meaningful strategic constraint. Any remaining exclusivity is typically tied to a particular formulation, use, or approval date for an Rx product, not the active ingredient.

Actionable interpretation for planning:

  • Treat thiamine HCl as process- and product-specific in any exclusivity analysis.
  • Expect quick generic entry once a supplier is qualified unless a specific product has unique sterility/formulation IP.

What generic entry risks exist for thiamine hydrochloride?

Generic entry risks are mostly operational:

  • Sterile manufacturing capacity and process validation.
  • Stability and reconstitution performance for injectable dosing.
  • Regulatory and quality system readiness (batch release, impurity profile control, sterility assurance).

Legal/IP risk is generally lower unless a specific formulation or method-of-use is still protected in a relevant jurisdiction.

What patent litigation affects thiamine hydrochloride?

Patent litigation affecting thiamine hydrochloride is uncommon because the active ingredient is not typically the subject of active exclusivity fights. Litigation, if any, is more likely to involve:

  • Process patents for particular manufacturing steps.
  • Narrow formulation claims.
  • Sterile product platform IP for a specific NDA/ANDA lineage.

What is the FDA regulatory status of thiamine hydrochloride?

Thiamine hydrochloride is regulated as:

  • Dietary supplement ingredient in OTC contexts, and
  • Pharmaceutical active ingredient in Rx products used for deficiency and clinical protocols where approved.

For market execution, regulatory diligence focuses on whether a target product is:

  • An Rx injectable (sterile requirements, NDA/ANDA framework),
  • An oral Rx product,
  • Or a supplement without drug-claim exposure.

How does thiamine hydrochloride compare with other thiamine salts (e.g., thiamine mononitrate) for market positioning?

Commercial comparison axes:

  • Bioavailability and stability in finished products
  • Manufacturing cost and supply reliability
  • Formulary preference in hospital nutrition protocols
  • Labeling and reimbursement differences driven by product designation (Rx vs supplement)

In practice, many procurement decisions treat thiamine salts as interchangeable at the dosing level unless product performance data favors one salt.

What formulation and delivery technologies matter for thiamine hydrochloride?

Key formulation issues typically determine competitive differentiation more than patents:

  • Oral stability and taste masking (where applicable)
  • Injectable stability and reconstitution time
  • Particle size and dissolution for oral bioavailability
  • Excipient systems improving shelf-life and reducing degradation products

Key product roadmap scenarios: where could incremental demand come from?

  • Hospital protocol expansion for early empiric thiamine use in at-risk patients increases injectable usage.
  • Nutritional support standardization in ICU and perioperative settings increases consistent uptake.
  • Outpatient chronic management increases oral supplement sales but with commoditized pricing.
  • Developing market penetration expands baseline demand through wider hospital formularies.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical-trial activity for thiamine hydrochloride is limited and often captured under broader “thiamine” interventions; commercial insight depends on dosing protocols and delivery-form performance, not new molecular claims.
  • Market growth is steady and driven by deficiency management, nutrition support, and hospital protocol adherence rather than novel product differentiation.
  • Patent and exclusivity constraints are typically product- and process-specific, with the active ingredient having minimal modern exclusivity.
  • Incremental revenue upside clusters in injectables and higher-value Rx placements, while oral products remain volume-led and price-competitive.

FAQs

  1. Are there any ongoing FDA registrational trials for thiamine hydrochloride in deficiency indications?
  2. Does thiamine hydrochloride have clinically meaningful advantages versus thiamine mononitrate in oral dosing?
  3. What injectable dosing forms and stability profiles influence hospital procurement of thiamine hydrochloride?
  4. How do hospital formularies and nutrition protocols affect volume demand for thiamine hydrochloride?
  5. What IP risks should investors screen for beyond active-ingredient patents (process, sterility, formulation)?

References

  1. No sources cited.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.