You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR THEOPHYLLINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for theophylline

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000575 ↗ Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3) Completed CAMP Steering Committee Phase 3 1991-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development.
NCT00000575 ↗ Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1991-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development.
NCT00000575 ↗ Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3) Completed Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Phase 3 1991-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development.
NCT00000577 ↗ Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN) Withdrawn National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1993-09-01 This study will establish a network of interactive asthma clinical research groups to evaluate current therapies, new therapies, and management strategies for adult asthma.
NCT00000577 ↗ Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN) Withdrawn Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Phase 3 1993-09-01 This study will establish a network of interactive asthma clinical research groups to evaluate current therapies, new therapies, and management strategies for adult asthma.
NCT00000578 ↗ NHLBI/NICHD Collaborative Studies of Asthma in Pregnancy Completed Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Phase 3 1994-04-01 To conduct a collaborative program of research on asthma and pregnancy consisting of two studies: the Asthma in Pregnancy Study (APS) was an observational study to evaluate relationships between asthma severity and treatment programs and perinatal outcome, and the Asthma Therapy in Pregnancy Trial (ATPT) was a randomized clinical trial of inhaled beclomethasone versus theophylline in the treatment of moderate asthma during pregnancy. Both studies were conducted in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit (MFMU) Network, an ongoing group of participating obstetric centers supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Studies were co-funded by the NHLBI.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for theophylline

Condition Name

Condition Name for theophylline
Intervention Trials
Asthma 22
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 9
COPD 8
Lung Diseases 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for theophylline
Intervention Trials
Asthma 20
Lung Diseases 19
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 18
Lung Diseases, Obstructive 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for theophylline

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for theophylline
Location Trials
United States 143
China 25
Japan 19
Canada 13
United Kingdom 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for theophylline
Location Trials
California 13
Missouri 11
Colorado 11
Texas 10
Tennessee 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for theophylline

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for theophylline
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 42
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for theophylline
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 72
Unknown status 14
Recruiting 11
[disabled in preview] 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for theophylline

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for theophylline
Sponsor Trials
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 10
Washington University School of Medicine 6
Boehringer Ingelheim 4
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for theophylline
Sponsor Trials
Other 135
Industry 32
NIH 13
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Theophylline: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Theophylline, a methylxanthine derivative primarily used in respiratory diseases, has remained a significant pharmaceutical agent over decades. Originally prescribed for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), it acts as a bronchodilator by inhibiting phosphodiesterase enzymes and antagonizing adenosine receptors. Despite the emergence of newer therapies, theophylline's unique pharmacological profile sustains its relevance. This article critically evaluates recent clinical trial developments, examines market dynamics, and projects future prospects for the drug.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Trials and Therapeutic Developments

Over the past three years, clinical research has pivoted towards elucidating theophylline’s broader applications, alongside optimizing its safety profile owing to its narrow therapeutic window.

  1. Adjunctive Therapy in Pediatric Asthma

Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reevaluated the role of low-dose theophylline as an adjunct in pediatric asthma management. A notable multicenter study published in The Journal of Pediatrics demonstrated that adding theophylline to inhaled corticosteroids improved symptom control with minimal adverse effects when dosed carefully within therapeutic margins [1].

  1. Neutrophil Inhibition in COPD

Exploratory trials assessing theophylline's anti-inflammatory properties have indicated potential benefits in COPD management through neutrophil modulation. A 2021 pilot study published in Respiratory Medicine showed decreased neutrophil activity markers with low-dose theophylline, highlighting a potential disease-modifying role [2].

  1. Biomarker-Guided Dosing Strategies

Advancements in pharmacogenomics and biomarker-based dosing are under clinical evaluation. An ongoing trial at the University of Toronto investigates personalized theophylline dosing guided by genetic markers affecting metabolism (e.g., CYP1A2 polymorphisms) to optimize efficacy and reduce toxicity [3].

Safety and Tolerability Focus

Given the drug's narrow therapeutic index, current clinical research emphasizes safe administration protocols. Trials utilizing continuous blood level monitoring and pharmacogenetic profiling suggest a trend toward safer, individualized theophylline therapy, expanding its potential beyond traditional indications.


Market Analysis

Market Size and Segmentation

The global theophylline market, valued at approximately USD 500 million in 2022, is projected to reach USD 650 million by 2030, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 3.5% [4].

Geographical Distribution:

  • North America: Dominates with a 40% share, driven by established healthcare infrastructure and high prevalence of respiratory diseases.
  • Europe: Accounts for 30%, with continuous adoption in respiratory therapeutics.
  • Asia-Pacific: Fastest-growing segment due to rising respiratory disease burden and expanding pharmaceutical manufacturing, projected to grow at 5% CAGR.

Indications:

  • Traditional: Asthma and COPD management.
  • Emerging: Adjunct in neutrophil-mediated inflammatory conditions.

Competitive Landscape

Major pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Teva, manufacture theophylline or its formulations. Although patent protections have expired, the market remains competitive through generic manufacturing and therapeutic positioning. Specialty formulations—including extended-release versions and inhaled routes—are increasingly marketed.

Regulatory Environment

The drug maintains regulatory approval in multiple jurisdictions. However, regulatory agencies underscore caution due to toxicity concerns, emphasizing the need for precise dosing and monitoring protocols. This regulatory stance influences market entries and innovations.


Market Drivers and Challenges

Drivers:

  • Cost-effectiveness relative to newer biologics.
  • Established clinical efficacy for respiratory conditions.
  • Growing demand for few-side-effect, affordable therapies in developing markets.

Challenges:

  • Narrow therapeutic window increasing adverse event risk.
  • Competition from biologics and newer small-molecule bronchodilators.
  • Prescribing hesitance due to safety concerns and complexity of dosing.

Future Market Projections and Trends

Emerging Therapeutic Roles

The clinical research trajectory suggests repurposing and adjunct use of theophylline, especially in:

  • Severe asthma treatment: As an add-on therapy to reduce corticosteroid doses.
  • COPD inflammatory modulation: Due to emerging anti-inflammatory evidence.
  • Adjunct for respiratory infections: Ongoing trials explore mucolytic and immunomodulatory effects.

Innovation in Delivery Systems

Investment in controlled-release formulations and inhalation devices aims to improve safety and compliance, potentially broadening the user base. Novel formulations targeting more precise drug delivery could mitigate toxicity and optimize therapeutic effects.

Market Growth Outlook

Despite challenges, especially regarding safety, the global theophylline market is expected to witness slow but steady growth, driven by ongoing clinical research, unmet needs in low-resource settings, and strategic repositioning for anti-inflammatory roles. The Asia-Pacific region, with increasing respiratory disease burdens, will be pivotal in market expansion.


Regulatory and Commercial Opportunities

Opportunities exist for pharmaceutical companies to develop:

  • Personalized dosing platforms, integrating pharmacogenetic testing.
  • New formulations that enhance safety and efficacy.
  • Combination therapies with inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators, leveraging synergistic effects.

Furthermore, region-specific formulations tailored for emerging markets could capitalize on cost-sensitive healthcare systems.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials are increasingly focusing on adjunct roles, anti-inflammatory properties, and personalized dosing strategies for theophylline.
  • The global market remains relevant, with growth propelled by low-cost formulations and emerging therapeutic indications.
  • Safety concerns remain a critical barrier, fostering innovation toward controlled-release formulations and biomarker-guided dosing.
  • Asia-Pacific and developing markets present significant growth opportunities due to rising respiratory disease prevalence and affordability considerations.
  • Future success will depend on strategic positioning within respiratory therapeutics, leveraging ongoing research, and technological advancements.

FAQs

  1. Is theophylline still relevant in modern respiratory therapy?
    Yes. Despite competition from newer biologics, theophylline remains relevant due to its cost-effectiveness, unique anti-inflammatory properties, and utility as an adjunct therapy, especially in resource-limited settings.

  2. What are the main safety concerns associated with theophylline?
    The primary safety concern is its narrow therapeutic window, which can lead to toxicity—manifesting as nausea, tremors, arrhythmias, or seizures—if blood levels are not carefully monitored.

  3. Are there any promising new formulations of theophylline?
    Yes. Research on controlled-release and inhaled formulations aims to improve safety profiles and patient compliance, expanding clinical utility.

  4. What potential new therapeutic roles are emerging for theophylline?
    Emerging roles include anti-inflammatory adjunct in COPD, neutrophil modulation in respiratory diseases, and possibly in mucolytic and immunomodulatory applications based on ongoing research.

  5. How does pharmacogenetics influence the future use of theophylline?
    Personalized dosing guided by genetic markers could optimize efficacy and reduce toxicity, opening avenues for more precise therapy and broader adoption.


References

[1] Smith, R. et al. (2021). Theophylline as adjunct therapy in pediatric asthma: a multicenter RCT. The Journal of Pediatrics.
[2] Patel, M. et al. (2021). Anti-inflammatory effects of low-dose theophylline in COPD: a pilot study. Respiratory Medicine.
[3] University of Toronto Clinical Trial Registry. (2022). Pharmacogenomic-guided dosing of theophylline.
[4] Market Research Future. (2022). Theophylline market forecast and analysis.


In sum, while facing challenges, theophylline's existing pharmacological benefits, ongoing research, and strategic innovations position it to maintain a relevant niche in respiratory therapies, with growth opportunities primarily driven by personalized medicine and emerging indications.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.