You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TEDIZOLID PHOSPHATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for tedizolid phosphate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01170221 ↗ TR-701 FA vs. Linezolid for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections. Completed Trius Therapeutics LLC Phase 3 2010-08-15 This is a randomized, double-blind, double dummy, multicenter Phase 3 study of oral TR-701 FA 200 mg once daily for 6 days versus oral Zyvox® (linezolid) 600 mg every 12 hours for 10 days for the treatment of ABSSSI in adults. Approximately 75 to 100 sites globally will participate in this study. Patients with an ABSSSI caused by suspected or documented gram positive pathogen(s) at baseline will be randomized 1:1 to study treatment
NCT01539473 ↗ A Phase 1 TR-701 FA Study of Blood Pressure Response Post Tyramine Challenge Completed Trius Therapeutics LLC Phase 1 2012-02-01 Phase 1 study to determine the effect of oral TR-701 FA on SBP response when administered with tyramine
NCT01577459 ↗ A Phase 1 Crossover Study of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Response Completed Trius Therapeutics LLC Phase 1 2012-04-23 This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study to evaluate the pressor effects of pseudoephedrine when administered with TR-701 FA in healthy adult volunteers.
NCT01623401 ↗ A Phase 1, Open-Label, 10 Day Safety Study Completed Trius Therapeutics LLC Phase 1 2012-05-17 This is a Phase 1 open-label study in healthy volunteers who will receive oral 200 mg TR 701 FA once daily for 10 days and will include ophthalmologic and neurologic assessments.
NCT02019420 ↗ Tedizolid Phosphate (TR-701 FA, MK-1986) vs Linezolid for the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia (MK-1986-002) Completed Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC Phase 3 2014-01-06 This is a 1:1 ratio, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, global Phase 3 study of tedizolid phosphate (TR-701 FA) 200 mg intravenous (IV) once daily for 7 days versus linezolid (Zyvox®, Zyvoxid®, etc) 600 mg IV every 12 hours for 10 days for the treatment of ventilated participants with presumed gram-positive hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), collectively referred to as ventilated nosocomial pneumonia (VNP). Participants with concurrent gram-positive bacteremia are to receive 14 days of active therapy in either treatment arm. The primary objective is to determine the noninferiority (NI) in all-cause mortality (ACM) within 28 days after randomization of IV tedizolid phosphate compared with IV linezolid in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Analysis Set (NI is declared when the lower bound of the 95% CI > -10).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for tedizolid phosphate

Condition Name

Condition Name for tedizolid phosphate
Intervention Trials
Healthy 2
Healthy Subjects 2
Skin Diseases, Bacterial 2
Bone and Joint Infection 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for tedizolid phosphate
Intervention Trials
Infections 7
Infection 7
Communicable Diseases 5
Skin Diseases, Bacterial 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for tedizolid phosphate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for tedizolid phosphate
Location Trials
United States 60
China 18
Bulgaria 6
Brazil 6
Georgia 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for tedizolid phosphate
Location Trials
California 8
Texas 5
Illinois 5
Nebraska 4
Missouri 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for tedizolid phosphate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for tedizolid phosphate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 2
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 5
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for tedizolid phosphate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 13
Recruiting 2
Active, not recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for tedizolid phosphate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for tedizolid phosphate
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 7
Trius Therapeutics LLC 4
Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for tedizolid phosphate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 16
Other 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Tedizolid Phosphate

Last updated: November 3, 2025

Introduction

Tedizolid phosphate, marketed under the brand name Sivextro, is an oxazolidinone-class antibiotic indicated primarily for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2014, its role in combating resistant gram-positive bacteria, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), has positioned it as a significant player in infectious disease therapeutics. This report offers an in-depth analysis of recent clinical trial developments, current market dynamics, and future projections for Tedizolid Phosphate.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trials and Outcomes

Since its approval, Tedizolid Phosphate has undergone several clinical trials to expand its indications and optimize dosing strategies.

  1. Phase IV Post-Marketing Studies

    Post-approval, the focus has shifted toward real-world effectiveness and safety assessments. Notably, a large-scale retrospective study in 2022 evaluated the incidence of adverse effects in long-term use, reaffirming its favorable safety profile with minimal hematological toxicity. This aligns with earlier phase studies demonstrating low rates of thrombocytopenia compared to linezolid (another oxazolidinone).

  2. Expanded Indications

    Trials are ongoing to explore Tedizolid’s efficacy in other infections, including Nocardia infections and pneumonia. In 2021, a Phase II study investigating Tedizolid in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) showed promising microbiological eradication rates comparable to standard-of-care therapies.

  3. Combination Therapy Trials

    Recent studies, such as the ACTIV-2 trial, are evaluating Tedizolid in combination with other agents, aiming to counteract multidrug resistance. Early data suggest synergistic activity with certain beta-lactams.

Upcoming Trials and Potential Indications

Several trials are registered to examine Tedizolid’s use in conditions such as prosthetic joint infections and diabetic foot infections. These could broaden its application beyond skin infections if results are favorable. The anticipated completion of these studies is projected for 2024–2025.

Regulatory and Safety Highlights

Throughout clinical development, Tedizolid Phosphate has demonstrated a consistent safety profile, with minor adverse events including nausea, headache, and infusion site reactions. Its once-daily dosing contrasts favorably with linezolid’s twice-daily regimen, potentially improving compliance.


Market Analysis

Market Overview

The global antibiotic market, especially in resistant gram-positive infections, is poised for expansion, driven by rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR), aging populations, and increasing hospitalizations due to resistant infections [1]. Tedizolid, positioned as a potent alternative to linezolid, captures a growing share of this niche.

Current Market Size

In 2022, the global antibacterial market was valued at approximately USD 55.2 billion, with the oxazolidinone class accounting for an estimated USD 2.5 billion—Tedizolid’s contribution, while lower in comparison, is significant due to its indications and profile. Its penetration remains strongest in North America, followed by Europe and select Asian markets.

Competitive Landscape

Tedizolid’s primary competitors include:

  • Linezolid (Zyvox): The first oral and IV oxazolidinone, with broader indications but higher toxicity profiles.
  • Delafloxacin (Baxdela): Approved for ABSSSI and bacterial pneumonia.
  • Dalbavancin and Oritavancin: Long-acting lipoglycopeptides for skin infections.

Tedizolid’s advantages lie in once-daily dosing, fewer drug interactions, and a potentially lower risk of hematological adverse effects.

Market Drivers and Barriers

Drivers:

  • Rising antimicrobial resistance, especially MRSA.
  • Increasing prevalence of complicated skin infections.
  • Patient compliance needs favoring once-daily dosing.

Barriers:

  • High cost of Tedizolid compared to generic linezolid.
  • Limited awareness among clinicians.
  • Pending expansion of indications with further clinical validation.

Pricing and Reimbursement

In the U.S., the average wholesale price (AWP) for Tedizolid is approximately USD 100 per 200 mg vial. Insurance reimbursement policies influence market access; however, reimbursement challenges persist due to the specialty nature and high cost. Cost-effectiveness analyses favor Tedizolid when considering reduced hospital stays and lower adverse event management costs.


Market Projections

Short-term Outlook (2023–2025)

Market penetration is anticipated to grow steadily, primarily driven by new clinical data supporting expanded indications and continued antimicrobial resistance concern. Sales in North America are expected to reach USD 500–700 million by 2025, contingent upon favorable clinical trial outcomes and broadening of clinical guidelines.

Long-term Outlook (2026 and beyond)

By 2030, the global Tedizolid market could surpass USD 1 billion, especially if new indications, such as pneumonia and device-associated infections, are approved. Innovations in formulations, including sustained-release options, could further expand its footprint.

Potential Challenges

  • Emergence of resistance to Tedizolid.
  • Market access hurdles due to pricing.
  • Competition from newer antimicrobials and generic alternatives.

Growth Opportunities

  • Strategic partnerships for combination therapies.
  • Launching in emerging markets with high antimicrobial resistance.
  • Development of oral formulations for outpatient management.

Conclusion

Tedizolid Phosphate remains a vital contender in antimicrobial therapy against resistant gram-positive infections. Continuous clinical trial advancements are critical for expanding indications, which will in turn boost its market share. While barriers such as high costs and competitive dynamics prevail, rising global resistance and evolving clinical confidence are expected to drive sustained growth over the next decade.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical momentum: Ongoing trials focus on expanding Tedizolid’s indications, with promising results in pneumonia and device-associated infections.
  • Market positioning: Its advantages over linezolid—once-daily dosing, better safety profile—favor broader adoption.
  • Growth prospects: Projected to exceed USD 1 billion in global sales by 2030, contingent on successful indication expansion and policy support.
  • Strategic focus: Manufacturers should prioritize clinical validation, pricing strategies, and market access to capitalize on rising resistance trends.
  • Innovation opportunities: Developing combination therapies and long-acting formulations can augment market presence.

FAQs

1. What are the main clinical advantages of Tedizolid over linezolid?
Tedizolid offers once-daily dosing, a lower risk of hematological toxicity, and fewer drug interactions, improving patient compliance and safety profiles compared to linezolid.

2. How is resistance impacting Tedizolid’s market viability?
While current resistance is limited, emerging resistance to oxazolidinones could challenge future efficacy. Continuous surveillance and combination therapies are strategies to sustain its utility.

3. Are there ongoing trials for indications beyond skin infections?
Yes, trials investigating Tedizolid in pneumonia, prosthetic joint infections, and other serious bacterial infections are underway, which could diversify its applications.

4. What are the main barriers to market expansion?
High drug costs, limited clinician awareness, evolving resistance, and regulatory hurdles in some regions restrict rapid market expansion.

5. How does the pricing of Tedizolid influence market adoption?
Its higher price point compared to generic antibiotics limits accessibility, necessitating cost-benefit analyses and insurance reimbursement strategies to facilitate broader use.


References

[1] Global Antibiotic Market Size & Trends – Industry Insights, 2022.
[2] FDA Approval Announcement for Sivextro (Tedizolid), 2014.
[3] Market Research Future, "Antibacterial Market Analysis," 2022.
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov Database – Tedizolid-related trials, 2023.
[5] World Health Organization, "Antimicrobial Resistance," 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.