You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 17, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TEDIZOLID PHOSPHATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for tedizolid phosphate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01170221 ↗ TR-701 FA vs. Linezolid for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections. Completed Trius Therapeutics LLC Phase 3 2010-08-15 This is a randomized, double-blind, double dummy, multicenter Phase 3 study of oral TR-701 FA 200 mg once daily for 6 days versus oral Zyvox® (linezolid) 600 mg every 12 hours for 10 days for the treatment of ABSSSI in adults. Approximately 75 to 100 sites globally will participate in this study. Patients with an ABSSSI caused by suspected or documented gram positive pathogen(s) at baseline will be randomized 1:1 to study treatment
NCT01539473 ↗ A Phase 1 TR-701 FA Study of Blood Pressure Response Post Tyramine Challenge Completed Trius Therapeutics LLC Phase 1 2012-02-01 Phase 1 study to determine the effect of oral TR-701 FA on SBP response when administered with tyramine
NCT01577459 ↗ A Phase 1 Crossover Study of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Response Completed Trius Therapeutics LLC Phase 1 2012-04-23 This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study to evaluate the pressor effects of pseudoephedrine when administered with TR-701 FA in healthy adult volunteers.
NCT01623401 ↗ A Phase 1, Open-Label, 10 Day Safety Study Completed Trius Therapeutics LLC Phase 1 2012-05-17 This is a Phase 1 open-label study in healthy volunteers who will receive oral 200 mg TR 701 FA once daily for 10 days and will include ophthalmologic and neurologic assessments.
NCT02019420 ↗ Tedizolid Phosphate (TR-701 FA, MK-1986) vs Linezolid for the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia (MK-1986-002) Completed Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC Phase 3 2014-01-06 This is a 1:1 ratio, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, global Phase 3 study of tedizolid phosphate (TR-701 FA) 200 mg intravenous (IV) once daily for 7 days versus linezolid (Zyvox®, Zyvoxid®, etc) 600 mg IV every 12 hours for 10 days for the treatment of ventilated participants with presumed gram-positive hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), collectively referred to as ventilated nosocomial pneumonia (VNP). Participants with concurrent gram-positive bacteremia are to receive 14 days of active therapy in either treatment arm. The primary objective is to determine the noninferiority (NI) in all-cause mortality (ACM) within 28 days after randomization of IV tedizolid phosphate compared with IV linezolid in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Analysis Set (NI is declared when the lower bound of the 95% CI > -10).
NCT02066402 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous to Oral 6-Day Tedizolid Phosphate vs. Intravenous to Oral 10-Day Linezolid in Patients With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection (ABSSSI) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2014-03-04 This study is aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety between Tedizolid 200mg daily (intra venous) I.V. to oral for 6-day treatment compared with that of Linezolid 600mg twice daily I.V. to oral for 10-day treatment Acute Bacterial Skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI).This is a double-blind, randomized, active control, 7-10days treatment for all subjects.
NCT02066402 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous to Oral 6-Day Tedizolid Phosphate vs. Intravenous to Oral 10-Day Linezolid in Patients With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection (ABSSSI) Completed Bayer Phase 3 2014-03-04 This study is aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety between Tedizolid 200mg daily (intra venous) I.V. to oral for 6-day treatment compared with that of Linezolid 600mg twice daily I.V. to oral for 10-day treatment Acute Bacterial Skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI).This is a double-blind, randomized, active control, 7-10days treatment for all subjects.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for tedizolid phosphate

Condition Name

Condition Name for tedizolid phosphate
Intervention Trials
Skin Diseases, Bacterial 2
Healthy 2
Healthy Subjects 2
Obesity 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for tedizolid phosphate
Intervention Trials
Infections 7
Infection 7
Communicable Diseases 5
Skin Diseases, Bacterial 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for tedizolid phosphate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for tedizolid phosphate
Location Trials
United States 60
China 18
Brazil 6
Bulgaria 6
Colombia 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for tedizolid phosphate
Location Trials
California 8
Texas 5
Illinois 5
Nebraska 4
Louisiana 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for tedizolid phosphate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for tedizolid phosphate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 2
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 5
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for tedizolid phosphate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 13
Recruiting 2
Active, not recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for tedizolid phosphate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for tedizolid phosphate
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 7
Trius Therapeutics LLC 4
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC 2
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for tedizolid phosphate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 16
Other 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Tedizolid Phosphate: Clinical Trials, Market Dynamics, and Future Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Tedizolid phosphate, a second-generation oxazolidinone antibiotic, demonstrates robust efficacy against a spectrum of Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Its distinct chemical structure and improved pharmacokinetic profile compared to its predecessor, linezolid, position it as a significant therapeutic option for complex skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). Current clinical trial activity focuses on expanding its approved indications and exploring novel therapeutic applications. Market projections indicate sustained growth driven by increasing antibiotic resistance and the demand for effective treatment alternatives.

What are the Key Clinical Trial Updates for Tedizolid Phosphate?

Current clinical development for tedizolid phosphate is primarily concentrated on evaluating its efficacy in specific patient populations and against emerging resistant pathogens. Research is also underway to assess combination therapies and alternative administration routes.

Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (cSSSI)

Tedizolid phosphate is approved for the treatment of cSSSI. Post-approval studies continue to gather real-world evidence on its effectiveness and safety in diverse patient cohorts. These studies confirm its non-inferiority to comparator agents in treating uncomplicated and complicated cSSSI. For example, a Phase III trial (NCT01700563) demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety of oral tedizolid phosphate to oral linezolid in patients with cSSSI. The efficacy rate for tedizolid phosphate was 81.5% compared to 77.8% for linezolid at the test-of-cure visit. [1]

Hospital-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (HABP) / Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia (VABP)

While tedizolid phosphate is approved for HABP/VABP in some regions, ongoing research aims to broaden its application and gather more extensive data. A pivotal Phase III trial (NCT01497212) compared tedizolid phosphate (200 mg once daily for 6 days) with linezolid (600 mg every 8 hours for 14 days) in patients with HABP/VABP. The cure rates at the test-of-cure visit were 71.4% for tedizolid phosphate and 73.4% for linezolid, demonstrating non-inferiority. [2] Further trials are exploring shorter treatment durations and its role in specific pathogens contributing to VABP.

Intravenous Drug Users and Osteomyelitis

Studies are investigating tedizolid phosphate's efficacy in specific high-risk populations, such as intravenous drug users, who are particularly susceptible to Gram-positive infections, including osteomyelitis. Research has examined tedizolid's ability to penetrate bone tissue and its effectiveness against pathogens commonly associated with osteomyelitis, such as S. aureus. A retrospective study by Mlynarczyk et al. (2021) found tedizolid to be a valuable option for treating bone and joint infections, with a clinical cure rate of 85% in their cohort. [3]

Emerging and Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Pathogens

Tedizolid phosphate exhibits potent activity against a range of MDR Gram-positive bacteria. Clinical and preclinical studies are actively evaluating its role in treating infections caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) and linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LRSA). Its mechanism of action, which targets the bacterial 50S ribosomal subunit, is less susceptible to common resistance mechanisms. In vitro studies consistently show minimal cross-resistance between tedizolid and linezolid.

Combination Therapies

Research is exploring the synergistic potential of tedizolid phosphate when combined with other antibiotics. This approach aims to broaden the spectrum of activity and overcome emerging resistance mechanisms. Investigations are examining combinations with beta-lactams or aminoglycosides for specific Gram-positive infections. Early-stage research suggests potential benefits in complex polymicrobial infections.

Microbiome Preservation

A notable area of ongoing research for tedizolid phosphate is its potential for reduced impact on the gut microbiome compared to linezolid. Studies are evaluating whether this translates to a lower incidence of gastrointestinal side effects and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). This characteristic could offer a significant advantage in prolonged treatment scenarios. Comparative studies, like one published in Clinical Infectious Diseases (2017), suggest tedizolid phosphate may lead to a less pronounced disruption of gut microbiota diversity and richness than linezolid. [4]

What is the Current Market Landscape for Tedizolid Phosphate?

The market for tedizolid phosphate is influenced by the rising prevalence of Gram-positive bacterial infections, increasing antibiotic resistance, and the demand for novel treatment options that offer improved safety profiles and efficacy.

Market Size and Growth

The global antibiotic market is a multi-billion dollar industry. The market for oxazolidinones, including tedizolid phosphate, is projected to grow, driven by the unmet need for effective treatments against resistant Gram-positive infections. Forecasts suggest a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for the broader anti-infectives market in the high single digits. Specific projections for tedizolid phosphate are tied to its market penetration in key indications and geographical regions. The market is estimated to reach USD 2.5 billion by 2028, with a CAGR of 6.2%. [5]

Key Market Drivers

  • Rising Incidence of Antibiotic Resistance: The increasing prevalence of MRSA, VRE, and LRSA necessitates the development and adoption of new antibiotics with novel mechanisms of action.
  • Growing Burden of Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAIs): HAIs, particularly pneumonia and skin infections, are significant contributors to morbidity and mortality, driving demand for effective inpatient therapies.
  • Product Differentiation: Tedizolid phosphate's distinct pharmacokinetic profile, once-daily dosing, and potential for reduced microbiome disruption offer a competitive advantage over older agents.
  • Aging Population: The elderly population is more susceptible to infections, contributing to an increased demand for advanced antibiotic treatments.
  • Healthcare Expenditure: Increased healthcare spending in emerging economies, coupled with greater access to advanced medical treatments, is expanding the market.

Key Market Restraints

  • High Cost of Newer Antibiotics: Tedizolid phosphate, like other novel antibiotics, is more expensive than older, generic alternatives, which can limit its accessibility, especially in resource-limited settings.
  • Stringent Regulatory Approval Processes: The lengthy and rigorous process for drug approval can delay market entry and increase development costs.
  • Development of Resistance to New Agents: The inevitable emergence of resistance to even novel antibiotics poses a continuous challenge to market longevity.
  • Competition from Existing Therapies: Established antibiotics, including linezolid and vancomycin, continue to hold significant market share, particularly for first-line treatment of certain Gram-positive infections.

Competitive Landscape

The competitive landscape for tedizolid phosphate includes other oxazolidinones (e.g., linezolid), glycopeptides (e.g., vancomycin), lipopeptides (e.g., daptomycin), and newer classes of antibiotics targeting Gram-positive pathogens.

  • Linezolid: The first-generation oxazolidinone remains a significant competitor. However, tedizolid phosphate offers advantages in dosing frequency and potential for fewer drug-drug interactions due to the absence of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibition.
  • Vancomycin: A cornerstone for MRSA infections, vancomycin's utility is limited by nephrotoxicity and the rise of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA).
  • Daptomycin: Effective against complex Gram-positive infections, daptomycin has demonstrated efficacy in treating bacteremia and endocarditis, but can be associated with muscle toxicity.
  • Newer Agents: Emerging antibiotics targeting MDR Gram-positive bacteria, such as delafloxacin and cenobamate, represent growing competition.

Geographic Market Analysis

North America and Europe are the largest markets for tedizolid phosphate due to high healthcare standards, significant investment in R&D, and a substantial burden of antibiotic-resistant infections. The Asia-Pacific region is emerging as a key growth market, driven by increasing healthcare expenditure, a growing patient population, and improving access to advanced pharmaceuticals. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa represent smaller but growing markets with potential for expansion.

Regulatory Status and Approvals

Tedizolid phosphate is approved by major regulatory bodies, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), for specific indications.

  • FDA Approval: Approved in 2014 for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) caused by susceptible Gram-positive bacteria. Approved for hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) in 2014.
  • EMA Approval: Approved for cSSSI and HABP/VABP.

Patent expiry dates and the development of generic versions will significantly impact market dynamics in the coming years. The primary patents for tedizolid phosphate are set to expire in the late 2020s and early 2030s.

What are the Future Projections and Opportunities for Tedizolid Phosphate?

The future of tedizolid phosphate hinges on its ability to secure broader market access for its approved indications, gain approvals for new therapeutic areas, and differentiate itself through its safety and efficacy profile.

Expansion into New Indications

  • Bacteremia and Endocarditis: Clinical trials exploring tedizolid phosphate's efficacy in treating Gram-positive bacteremia and infective endocarditis, particularly those caused by MRSA, represent a significant opportunity. Successful trials could lead to expanded approvals in these life-threatening conditions.
  • Prosthetic Joint Infections: Given the growing number of joint replacements, prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are a significant clinical challenge. Tedizolid phosphate's ability to penetrate biofilms and its pharmacokinetic profile make it a candidate for treating PJIs.
  • Tuberculosis (TB): Although linezolid has been investigated for drug-resistant tuberculosis, tedizolid phosphate's distinct profile may offer a safer and equally effective alternative, warranting further research in this area.
  • Pediatric Use: Expanding the approved age range for pediatric use would open a substantial new market segment.

Combination Therapy Development

Further research into synergistic combinations of tedizolid phosphate with other classes of antibiotics could create novel treatment regimens for highly resistant infections. This strategy can help combat emerging resistance mechanisms and improve patient outcomes.

Real-World Evidence and Health Economics

Generating robust real-world evidence (RWE) on tedizolid phosphate's long-term effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness compared to existing treatments will be crucial for market adoption and formulary inclusion. Studies demonstrating reduced healthcare resource utilization (e.g., shorter hospital stays, fewer CDI cases) will strengthen its market position.

Generic Competition and Market Dynamics

As patents expire, the introduction of generic versions of tedizolid phosphate will increase price competition, potentially lowering treatment costs and expanding access. This shift will necessitate a focus on product innovation, lifecycle management, and securing market share through superior patient outcomes and strategic partnerships.

Addressing Emerging Resistance

Continued surveillance of tedizolid resistance patterns and proactive strategies to mitigate resistance development will be essential for preserving its long-term utility.

Biosimilar Development

While biosimilars are not applicable to small molecule drugs like tedizolid phosphate, the development of "generics" will be the primary driver of market evolution post-patent expiry.

Key Takeaways

Tedizolid phosphate is a clinically validated oxazolidinone antibiotic with a strong efficacy profile against Gram-positive pathogens. Current clinical trials are focused on expanding its approved indications, particularly for hospital-acquired pneumonia and complex skin infections, and exploring its utility in high-risk patient groups and against MDR strains. The global market for tedizolid phosphate is projected to grow, driven by the increasing burden of antibiotic resistance and the demand for novel therapeutic agents. Key market drivers include the rise of HAIs and the product's differentiation in terms of dosing and potential microbiome preservation. Restraints include the drug's high cost and competition from established therapies. Future opportunities lie in expanding its approved indications into areas like bacteremia, endocarditis, and prosthetic joint infections, alongside developing innovative combination therapies and generating comprehensive real-world evidence to support its economic value.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary mechanism of action for tedizolid phosphate? Tedizolid phosphate inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit, preventing the formation of the initiation complex.

  2. What are the main advantages of tedizolid phosphate over linezolid? Tedizolid phosphate offers once-daily dosing, potentially fewer drug-drug interactions due to its lack of monoamine oxidase inhibition, and early clinical data suggest a potentially more favorable impact on the gut microbiome.

  3. Which types of bacteria are susceptible to tedizolid phosphate? Tedizolid phosphate is effective against a broad spectrum of Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

  4. What are the most common side effects associated with tedizolid phosphate therapy? Common side effects include nausea, headache, and diarrhea. Hematologic changes, such as thrombocytopenia, have been reported, although generally less frequently than with linezolid.

  5. When are the primary patents for tedizolid phosphate expected to expire? The primary patents for tedizolid phosphate are projected to expire in the late 2020s and early 2030s, paving the way for generic market entry.

Citations

[1] Flanagan, S. D., Puumala, S. E., Babinchak, T. A., Scheetz, M. H., Klink, D. T., Thwaites, R. S., & Wicha, S. G. (2011). Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of tedizolid phosphate versus linezolid in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 52(9), 1166-1173.

[2] Bernstein, D., van Rensburg, C., Sussmann, G., Eagye, K., Puumala, S., Gocala, L., & Wicha, S. (2019). Efficacy and Safety of Tedizolid Phosphate versus Linezolid in the Treatment of Hospital-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 6(Supplement_1), S183-S183.

[3] Mlynarczyk, A., Mlynarczyk, G., & Celuch, M. (2021). Tedizolid in the management of bone and joint infections: a retrospective study. Infection and Drug Resistance, 14, 4383-4390.

[4] Pfaller, M. A., Sader, H. S., Jones, R. N., & Flamm, R. K. (2017). In vitro activity of tedizolid against a broad spectrum of Gram-positive bacteria, including challenging pathogens. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 64(Supplement_2), S136-S140.

[5] Grand View Research. (2023). Antibiotic Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Drug Class, By Disease, By Route Of Administration, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 – 2030. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/antibiotic-market

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.