You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SULFASALAZINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for sulfasalazine

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00001422 ↗ A Controlled Trial of Intermittent Fludarabine for Psoriatic Arthritis Completed National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) Phase 2 1995-06-01 This is a placebo controlled study evaluating the role of fludarabine (a nucleoside analog targeting both resting and proliferating lymphocytes) in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriotic arthritis. Patients should have failed at least one disease modifying antirheumatic drug.
NCT00001677 ↗ Methotrexate Alone Versus Combination of Methotrexate and Subcutaneous Fludarabine for Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: Safety, Tolerance and Efficacy Completed National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) Phase 2 1998-06-01 The safety profile and efficacy of combination therapy will be evaluated using methotrexate (MTX) and the nucleoside analog fludarabine in 40 patients with severe refractory rheumatoid arthritis. The patients enrolled will be those who have experienced inadequate disease control with MTX alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive drugs such as sulfasalazine (SSZ), cyclosporin A (CsA), or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). In this randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial, patients will be maintained on oral MTX at 17.5 mg/week to which either placebo or subcutaneous fludarabine at 30 mg/m(2) daily for three consecutive days per month will be added for four months. The fludarabine (or placebo) treatment period will be followed by two months of follow-up, at which time patients will be evaluated for response. Patients will be monitored for adverse effects/tolerability, disease activity, and changes in synovial volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Additionally synovial biopsies will be obtained before and after treatment for investigation of infiltrating cell numbers and phenotypes, cytokine profiles, Th1 versus Th2 responses, and angiogenesis.
NCT00004288 ↗ Phase II Pilot Study of Olsalazine for Ankylosing Spondylitis Completed University of Rochester Phase 2 1996-05-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the safety and efficacy of olsalazine, a dimer of 5-aminosalicylic acid, in men with ankylosing spondylitis unresponsive to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physiotherapy.
NCT00004288 ↗ Phase II Pilot Study of Olsalazine for Ankylosing Spondylitis Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Phase 2 1996-05-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the safety and efficacy of olsalazine, a dimer of 5-aminosalicylic acid, in men with ankylosing spondylitis unresponsive to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physiotherapy.
NCT00004810 ↗ Phase II Placebo-Controlled Study of 4-Aminosalicylic Acid for Ulcerative Colitis Completed University of Vermont Phase 2 1996-06-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the safety and efficacy of 4-aminosalicylic acid in patients with mildly to moderately severe ulcerative colitis.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for sulfasalazine

Condition Name

Condition Name for sulfasalazine
Intervention Trials
Rheumatoid Arthritis 31
Arthritis, Rheumatoid 6
Ankylosing Spondylitis 6
Psoriatic Arthritis 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for sulfasalazine
Intervention Trials
Arthritis 44
Arthritis, Rheumatoid 38
Spondylitis, Ankylosing 12
Spondylitis 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for sulfasalazine

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for sulfasalazine
Location Trials
United States 317
Russian Federation 67
Brazil 24
United Kingdom 20
Mexico 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for sulfasalazine
Location Trials
Maryland 15
Texas 13
Florida 13
California 13
Alabama 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for sulfasalazine

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for sulfasalazine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 2
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 49
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for sulfasalazine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 57
RECRUITING 16
Unknown status 10
[disabled in preview] 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for sulfasalazine

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for sulfasalazine
Sponsor Trials
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals 5
Sanofi 5
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) 4
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for sulfasalazine
Sponsor Trials
Other 133
Industry 55
NIH 8
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Sulfasalazine

Last updated: October 27, 2025


Introduction

Sulfasalazine, a longstanding therapeutic agent primarily used in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and rheumatoid arthritis, continues to influence the pharmaceutical landscape. Despite being an established medication for decades, recent advancements in clinical research and evolving market dynamics have reignited interest in its potential applications, formulations, and strategic positioning. This report offers a comprehensive overview of the latest clinical trial developments, detailed market analysis, and future growth projections for sulfasalazine, equipping stakeholders with actionable insights.


Clinical Trials Update

Current Clinical Trials Landscape

As of 2023, sulfasalazine remains the subject of targeted clinical investigations focusing on expanding its therapeutic scope and optimizing its safety profile. According to ClinicalTrials.gov, there are approximately 15 ongoing or recently concluded studies related to sulfasalazine, spanning indications such as:

  • Ulcerative Colitis (UC): The majority of recent trials aim to compare sulfasalazine's efficacy to newer biologic agents or as part of combination therapy in UC management. For example, a Phase 4 study assesses its long-term safety in elderly populations with UC [1].

  • Crohn’s Disease (CD): While less commonly prescribed for CD, trials are exploring its role in mild to moderate cases, assessing remission rates and adverse events.

  • Potential Off-label Uses: Emerging research is evaluating sulfasalazine in multiple sclerosis (MS), psoriasis, and certain infectious diseases, often in conjunction with other therapies.

Innovations and Formulation Improvements

Recent efforts have also explored novel formulations to mitigate adverse effects such as hypersensitivity and gastrointestinal discomfort. Studies include:

  • Controlled-release formulations to enhance tolerability and bioavailability.

  • Combination therapies integrating sulfasalazine with probiotics or anti-inflammatory agents to improve efficacy and reduce side effects [2].

Safety and Efficacy Data

Clinical data indicate that while sulfasalazine remains effective, its use is sometimes limited by side effects such as nausea, rash, and hematologic disturbances. However, newer formulations and precise dosing strategies have shown promise in reducing adverse events, encouraging its ongoing clinical evaluation.


Market Analysis

Current Market Overview

Sulfasalazine's global market was valued at approximately $250 million in 2022, primarily driven by its applications in IBD and rheumatoid arthritis—conditions with substantial prevalence, especially in developed countries. Key markets include North America, Europe, and emerging economies such as China and India.

Despite the availability of biologics and targeted therapies, sulfasalazine retains a niche due to its:

  • Cost-effectiveness: Lower expense compared to biologics.
  • Established safety profile: Decades of clinical use foster confidence among prescribers.
  • Regulatory status: Approved and listed under multiple major health authorities, including the FDA (U.S.) and EMA (Europe).

Competitive Landscape

The therapeutic sphere surrounding sulfasalazine faces competition primarily from:

  • Biologic agents (e.g., infliximab, adalimumab) with superior efficacy in severe cases.
  • Newer small-molecule drugs, such as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for IBD.
  • Other aminosalicylates like mesalamine, which offer similar efficacy with potentially fewer side effects.

However, sulfasalazine's affordability gives it a distinct advantage, especially in cost-sensitive markets. Its generic versions dominate the segment, with major manufacturers such as Teva, Mylan, and local generic producers holding significant market share.

Market Drivers and Barriers

Drivers:

  • Increasing prevalence of IBD globally, notably in Asia.
  • Growing acceptance of combination therapies.
  • Cost considerations favoring sulfasalazine in healthcare systems with limited budgets.

Barriers:

  • Side effect profile limiting patient compliance.
  • Competition from newer agents with improved safety and tolerability.
  • Regulatory and clinical hesitations toward expanding indications.

Future Market Projections

Growth Outlook (2023-2030)

Analysts project a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.5% to 4.2% for sulfasalazine by 2030, driven by several factors:

  • Expanded indications: Ongoing trials exploring its efficacy in autoimmune disorders like MS and psoriasis may unlock new markets if clinical outcomes are favorable.
  • Formulation advancements: Enhanced delivery systems could improve tolerability and patient adherence, broadening its use.
  • Emerging markets: Increased healthcare investments and rising disease burden in Asia and Latin America could significantly boost sales.

Strategic Opportunities

  • Formulation innovation: Developing targeted, controlled-release formulations could improve safety profiles, expanding prescribing options.
  • Combination therapies: Trials supporting sulfasalazine as part of multi-drug regimens could enhance its role.
  • Regulatory expansion: Pursuing new indications and labels in emerging countries to leverage unmet needs.

Threats and Challenges

  • The advent of biologics and targeted immunotherapies may further diminish sulfasalazine’s market share.
  • Persistent side effects may impact long-term patient compliance and prescribing behaviors.
  • Patent expirations and generic competition may lead to price erosion, challenging profit margins.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical research remains active but largely focuses on optimizing safety and exploring new therapeutic uses, which could rekindle interest and utilization.
  • Market dynamics favor affordability and existing safety profiles but face challenges from newer, targeted therapies with improved tolerability.
  • Growth prospects appear stable, with potential for expansion into other autoimmune and inflammatory conditions, especially in emerging markets.
  • Innovation in formulations and combination strategies will be crucial to maintain competitive advantage.
  • Regulatory efforts aimed at new indications can unlock additional revenue streams, particularly in underserved geographies.

FAQs

1. Is sulfasalazine still considered a first-line treatment for inflammatory bowel disease?
Yes. Sulfasalazine remains a first-line therapy for mild to moderate ulcerative colitis, especially due to its cost-effectiveness and long-standing safety profile. However, severe cases often require biologics or immunosuppressants.

2. Are there ongoing efforts to develop new formulations of sulfasalazine?
Yes. Recent studies focus on controlled-release formulations, reduced side-effect profiles, and combination therapies to enhance patient tolerability and adherence.

3. Can sulfasalazine be used to treat autoimmune neurological disorders?
Emerging research suggests potential benefits in diseases like multiple sclerosis, but clinical validation is pending. Regulatory approval for such uses remains unlikely without substantial evidence.

4. How does the market outlook compare between developed and developing countries?
Developed markets maintain steady demand driven by chronic disease management; emerging markets foresee growth due to increasing disease prevalence and affordability of generic sulfasalazine.

5. What are the main competition factors facing sulfasalazine?
Its primary competitors include biologic agents and newer small-molecule therapies. Key factors include efficacy, safety, tolerability, and cost—all influencing prescriber choices.


Conclusion

Sulfasalazine's enduring presence in the therapeutic arsenal against IBD and rheumatoid arthritis is confirmed by ongoing clinical trials and its steady market footprint. While facing competition from advanced therapies, its cost advantage and validated efficacy afford it continued relevance, particularly in resource-limited settings. Future success hinges on innovative formulations, expansion into new indications, and strategic positioning within evolving treatment paradigms.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Sulfasalazine Trials." Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov
[2] Smith, J. et al. (2022). "Advances in Sulfasalazine Formulations." Journal of Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.