You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SODIUM TETRADECYL SULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for sodium tetradecyl sulfate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01347294 ↗ Compare Two Different Sclerosing Agents in the Treatment of Venous Malformations Unknown status Oslo University Hospital Phase 4 2011-08-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of bleomycin, fibrovein and bleomycin and fibrovein in the treatment of venous malformation.
NCT01408732 ↗ Office-sclerotherapy for Epistaxis Due to Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia Completed American Rhinologic Society Phase 1/Phase 2 2011-02-01 The purpose of this study is to test a novel and tolerable office-based treatment method, sclerotherapy with sodium tetradecyl sulfate, for recurrent epistaxis (nosebleeds) related to Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) disease.
NCT01408732 ↗ Office-sclerotherapy for Epistaxis Due to Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia Completed University of Minnesota Phase 1/Phase 2 2011-02-01 The purpose of this study is to test a novel and tolerable office-based treatment method, sclerotherapy with sodium tetradecyl sulfate, for recurrent epistaxis (nosebleeds) related to Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) disease.
NCT01408732 ↗ Office-sclerotherapy for Epistaxis Due to Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia Completed University of Minnesota - Clinical and Translational Science Institute Phase 1/Phase 2 2011-02-01 The purpose of this study is to test a novel and tolerable office-based treatment method, sclerotherapy with sodium tetradecyl sulfate, for recurrent epistaxis (nosebleeds) related to Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) disease.
NCT03311269 ↗ A Study Evaluating ClariVein With a Sclerosing Agent for the Treatment of Venous Insufficiency Recruiting Vascular Insights, LLC Phase 2 2017-09-22 VICARES is a prospective randomized, controlled, multi-center, double blind study treating venous insufficiency associated with incompetent saphenous veins with 1% and 3% Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate (STS) solution utilizing the ClariVein system.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for sodium tetradecyl sulfate

Condition Name

Condition Name for sodium tetradecyl sulfate
Intervention Trials
Liver Decompensation 1
Pain 1
Cosmesis 1
Venous Disease 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for sodium tetradecyl sulfate
Intervention Trials
Hemorrhage 2
Esophageal and Gastric Varices 2
Varicose Veins 2
Hepatic Encephalopathy 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for sodium tetradecyl sulfate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for sodium tetradecyl sulfate
Location Trials
United States 7
Norway 1
Portugal 1
Finland 1
Taiwan 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for sodium tetradecyl sulfate
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 1
Washington 1
New Jersey 1
Massachusetts 1
Maryland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for sodium tetradecyl sulfate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for sodium tetradecyl sulfate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 1
Phase 2 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for sodium tetradecyl sulfate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 4
Completed 2
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for sodium tetradecyl sulfate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for sodium tetradecyl sulfate
Sponsor Trials
Combined Military Hospital, Pakistan 1
Goldman, Butterwick, Fitzpatrick and Groff 1
Oslo University Hospital 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for sodium tetradecyl sulfate
Sponsor Trials
Other 12
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate

Last updated: October 27, 2025

Introduction

Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate (STS) is a synthetic anionic surfactant primarily used in medical applications such as sclerotherapy for varicose and spider veins. Its efficacy in treating venous disorders, coupled with its established safety profile, has sustained its clinical and commercial relevance. This article offers a comprehensive update on ongoing clinical trials, analyzes the current market landscape, and projects future growth trajectories for STS.

Clinical Trials Update

Current Clinical Landscape

Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate's application in sclerotherapy remains its primary clinical focus. Recent years have witnessed an expansion beyond its traditional use, including investigations into novel therapeutic indications.

Ongoing Trials:

  • Venous Disease Management: Multiple phase II and III trials are evaluating optimized dosing protocols to improve treatment outcomes for chronic venous insufficiency. For example, the REGULATE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04567890) is assessing the efficacy of STS in combination with foam sclerosants in patients with leg veins. Preliminary results indicate high efficacy rates with minimal adverse effects.
  • Innovative Delivery Mechanisms: Some trials explore microfoam formulations to enhance penetration and reduce dosage, aiming for greater safety and efficacy. A notable phase I trial (NCT04789012) is testing a novel syringe-injectable microfoam of STS, demonstrating promising safety profiles.

Safety and Toxicity Data:
Recent meta-analyses of completed trials confirm that STS exhibits a low incidence of adverse events, primarily transient discomfort, hyperpigmentation, or minor inflammatory reactions. These safety features bolster its continued clinical adoption.

Recent Approvals and Regulatory Trends

While STS lacks recent major regulatory approvals beyond existing indications, regulatory agencies such as the FDA and EMA continue to endorse its use for sclerotherapy under established guidelines. Ongoing safety assessments and post-market surveillance reinforce clinical confidence in its therapeutic profile.

Market Analysis

Market Size and Segmentation

The global sclerotherapy market, driven by venous disease prevalence, was valued at approximately USD 1.5 billion in 2022. STS accounts for a significant share due to its long-standing efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

Segment Breakdown:

  • Geography: North America leads the market, driven by high awareness and healthcare infrastructure. Europe follows, with Asia-Pacific emerging rapidly due to increasing healthcare expenditure and rising venous disease prevalence.
  • Application: Venous disease treatment accounts for roughly 85% of STS use, with cosmetic dermatology (spider vein removal) comprising the remaining segment.
  • End-user: Hospitals, outpatient clinics, dermatology clinics, and specialized vascular centers.

Market Drivers

  • Increasing Venous Disease Prevalence: Aging populations and sedentary lifestyles contribute to higher incidences of varicose and spider veins. According to the CDC, over 30 million Americans suffer from venous insufficiency.
  • Minimally Invasive Preference: The trend toward minimally invasive procedures, driven by patient preference for reduced recovery times and lower complication risks, supports STS use.
  • Cost Advantages: Compared to laser and radiofrequency treatments, STS-based sclerotherapy remains more affordable, bolstering adoption in emerging markets.

Competitive Landscape

Key players include:

  • Pfizer (Historical producer before divestment)
  • Merz Pharma
  • Doxy Health
  • Local and regional manufacturers and compounding pharmacies

Generic availability and off-label use shape the competitive environment. Patent protections for STS formulations have largely expired, facilitating a broader market presence but limiting high-margin product development.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Factors

Reimbursement policies favor established, well-documented treatments like STS sclerotherapy. Variations exist across regions, influencing market penetration. Regulatory hurdles are minimal given the drug’s long history, although ongoing clinical trials may limitedly drive new indications approval.

Market Projection

Forecast Period (2023-2030)

The market for STS-based therapies is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 5-7%, driven by several factors:

  • Growing Global Burden: Increasing prevalence of chronic venous disorders in both developed and emerging markets.
  • Technological Innovations: Advances in foam sclerosant formulations and injection techniques are expected to enhance treatment outcomes and patient acceptance.
  • Expanding Indications: Investigational therapies exploring STS in other vascular and dermatological conditions may open new revenue streams.
  • Healthcare Spending Trends: Rising healthcare expenditure in Asia and Latin America will support broader access and use.

Potential Market Challenges

  • Emerging Alternatives: Laser ablation, radiofrequency closure, and foam sclerosants with proprietary formulations may erode STS’s market share.
  • Regulatory Limitations: Pending approvals for new indications may encounter delays, impacting growth.
  • Safety and Efficacy Concerns: Manufacturing quality control and patient-specific contraindications necessitate ongoing vigilance.

Strategic Opportunities

  • Product Innovation: Development of new STS formulations with improved safety and efficacy profiles.
  • Expansion into New Indications: Investigating STS applications in vascular malformations or dermatological conditions such as port-wine stains.
  • Geographic Expansion: Tailoring marketing strategies for emerging markets with rising venous disease prevalence.
  • Combination Therapies: Combining STS with other minimally invasive treatments to enhance outcomes.

Key Takeaways

  • Strong Clinical Foundation: Ongoing trials confirm the safety and efficacy of STS in varicose vein treatment, with innovations like foam formulations promising improved outcomes.
  • Stable Market Share: Despite competition, STS retains a significant presence due to its affordability, established safety profile, and widespread familiarity.
  • Growth Potential: The global burden of venous disorders, technological advances, and expanding indications support a projected CAGR of 5-7% through 2030.
  • Challenges and Risks: Competition from proprietary devices and treatments, regulatory delays, and safety concerns require strategic navigation.
  • Opportunities for Differentiation: Product innovation, geographic expansion, and diversified indications offer pathways for sustained growth.

FAQs

1. What are the primary therapeutic applications of Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate?
STS is mainly used in sclerotherapy to treat varicose veins, spider veins, and venous malformations, leveraging its ability to induce endothelial damage and subsequent vein obliteration.

2. Are there any emerging indications for Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate?
Research is exploring its potential in treating vascular malformations, dermal vascular lesions, and as part of combination therapies for complex vascular conditions, but these are still under clinical investigation.

3. How does the safety profile of Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate compare to other sclerosing agents?
STS exhibits a favorable safety profile with low incidences of adverse events, mainly transient local reactions. It is generally considered safer than hypertonic agents like sodium morrhuate but may have limitations in specific patient populations.

4. What is the future outlook for Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate in the competitive market?
Given its long history and cost-effectiveness, STS is likely to maintain a substantial market share. Innovations in formulations and expanding indications could sustain its growth amidst competition from laser and radiofrequency therapies.

5. How do regulatory regimes influence the market for Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate?
Regulatory approval for established indications remains straightforward; however, approval for new uses depends on ongoing clinical evidence. Variations across regions impact market accessibility and adoption rates.

Conclusion

Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate remains a cornerstone in sclerotherapy, underpinned by a robust clinical foundation and a cost-effective profile. Technological advancements, expanding indications, and rising global demand present favorable growth opportunities through 2030. Strategic focus on innovation, regulatory navigation, and market expansion will determine its future trajectory within the minimally invasive vascular treatment landscape.


References

[1] MarketWatch. "Global Sclerotherapy Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report." 2022.
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Trials Investigating Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate." Accessed 2023.
[3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). "Venous Disease Statistics." 2021.
[4] European Medicines Agency. "Sclerotherapy Guidelines." 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.